City Council amends bill to allow expansion of bike lanes in Philly

Efforts to expand bike lane access in Center City took a major step forward Thursday as the City Council unanimously passed an amendment to a bill changing parking rules and loading zones for a significant portion of Philadelphia streets between the rivers.

The bill proposes allowing all loading zones from Spring Garden to Bainbridge streets east of Broad Street, and from Bainbridge to the northern border of the 2nd Councilmanic District west of Broad. The amendment introduced Thursday expands the targeted areas beyond just Spruce and Pine streets between the Delaware and Schuylkill rivers.

If passed, the bill would open specialized lanes for bikes and other non-car traffic, benefiting thousands of residents in and around Center City. Cyclists testified about the dangers they face and injuries they have suffered while biking alongside cars in the city. Some spoke in honor of Dr. Barbara Friedes, a child oncology resident at CHOP who was tragically killed by a drunken driver in July 2024 at the corner of 18th and Spruce streets.

“I looked at the map of the area and just made sure as we move forward, we’re not just protecting bicyclists but also keeping the lines of communication open in partnership with the residents when they have issues and concerns,” Council President Kenyatta Johnson said after the session. The bill was introduced on his behalf, as per Council rules.

“This is making sure that we deal with the issue comprehensively, and that’s why I decided, working in partnership with my colleague Mark Squilla, to expand the scope of it,” Johnson added.

West of Broad Street, the loading zones would expand to Market Street between the Schuylkill River and 22nd Street; Chestnut Street between 22nd and 20th streets and between 17th and Broad streets; and Locust Street between 20th and 17th streets around Rittenhouse Square.

Meanwhile, efforts to expand bike lanes in the southernmost region of the 5th District have stalled in the Streets Committee. Biking advocates blame committee chair Jeffery Young Jr., who represents the 5th District including the streets around City Hall.

“There’s nothing more left to learn about it,” said Jon Geeting, policy and advocacy director for Build Philly Now, in a post on X on Oct. 5, one day after the committee hearing failed to advance the legislation. “(Young) just thinks he’s smarter than OTIS (the Office of Transportation and Infrastructure Systems) and PennDOT and doesn’t believe them that it won’t cause problems.”

In other Council business, Young also introduced a bill to end late fees charged to residential Philadelphia Water Department customers starting July 1, 2026. Council members have been introducing legislation to combat rising utility costs.

“In order to allow our residents to just be able to live a little more free in this city, this bill will enable residential customers to avoid paying late fees and penalties on your water,” Young said in a floor speech.

“We have to make sure this city is affordable for the people who live in the city. That doesn’t mean you don’t have to pay your water bill, all right. But we want to make sure that we are providing a level of service so that city residents can really appreciate it, and we want to again keep their costs down as much as possible, as other costs continue to rise up in the city,” he added.

Stay informed and connected — subscribe to The Philadelphia Tribune NOW! [Click Here]

**Community Guidelines**

– Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist, or sexually oriented language.
– PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
– Don’t Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
– Be Truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
– Be Nice. No racism, sexism, or any form of -ism that is degrading to others.
– Be Proactive. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to alert us to abusive posts.
– Share with Us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts and the history behind an article.
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/local_news/city-council-amends-bill-to-allow-expansion-of-bike-lanes-in-philly/article_72b1530f-83fb-446e-936b-a758d1f11163.html

Government shutdown to stretch into next week after GOP funding bill fails for 10th time

The Senate failed on Thursday for the 10th time to advance a Republican-led bill intended to end the government shutdown.

CBS News congressional correspondent Caitlin Huey-Burns reports on the ongoing legislative stalemate and its implications.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/government-shutdown-stretch-next-week-gop-funding-bill-fails-10th-time/

“They’ll call you a terrorist and ruin your life”: Dems sound alarm over Trump’s IRS weaponization

Democrats in Congress are blasting the recent revelation that President Donald Trump will push the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to investigate left-leaning groups and political opponents, calling it a blatant weaponization of a government agency. “Donald Trump believes he’s a king, and he’s determined to wield every agency under his control as a weapon to crush political opposition and silence free speech,” Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said in a statement shared with Salon on Thursday. “The Trump administration will try to legitimize this abuse with legal opinions and procedural lingo, but the implicit threat is that if you give to a progressive cause, they’ll deem you a terrorist and ruin your life.” According to a report from the Wall Street Journal, the Trump administration is preparing to overhaul the way the IRS investigates crimes, paving the way for more probes into groups and individuals who do not align politically with the president. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent‘s adviser, Gary Shapley, would reportedly become the director of the IRS’s criminal investigative division. Bessent, as acting IRS commissioner, has already been directed by Trump to compile financial records for left-leaning political organizations. Start your day with essential news from Salon. Sign up for our free morning newsletter, Crash Course. Vice Chairman of the Senate Intel Committee, Mark Warner, D-Va., called the development “absurd and dangerous” in a post on X. “As if Trump’s weaponization of the justice system hadn’t gone far enough, now he’s weaponizing the IRS against his perceived enemies,” Warner said. “It’s a clear and authoritarian attempt to silence critics.” Rep. Jimmy Gomez, D-Calif., said the nation should be “concerned” about Trump’s use of the IRS in a social media post. “Trump is illegally going after his political enemies with the IRS, the very kind of abuse of power that destroys democracies from within,” Gomez said.
https://www.salon.com/2025/10/16/theyll-call-you-a-terrorist-and-ruin-your-life-dems-sound-alarm-over-trumps-irs-weaponization/

What is gerrymandering? Here’s a deeper look at the controversies of redistricting, voters’ impact

RALEIGH, N.C. (WTVD) — A significant political battle is shaping up in North Carolina, while a Supreme Court case in Washington, D.C., could have far-reaching effects on voters across the United States, including those in the Tar Heel State.

Texas and California have already attempted to influence the balance of power in Congress through redistricting efforts designed to favor Republicans or Democrats. Texas is widely recognized as a red state, and California is considered a blue state. North Carolina, however, is viewed as a deep shade of purple.

### Supreme Court Review of Voting Rights Act Challenge

The Supreme Court is currently reviewing a major Republican-led challenge to the Voting Rights Act in Louisiana. This case has the potential to undermine a critical provision of the landmark Civil Rights Movement legislation that prohibits racial discrimination in redistricting.

Enacted in 1965, the Voting Rights Act forbids gerrymandering based on race, ensuring that redistricting does not discriminate against voters of color.

David McClennan, a political scientist at Meredith University in Raleigh, explains,
*“This idea that, particularly in southern states like North Carolina, but other southern states as well, the basic principle of one person, one vote was being basically ignored. The Voting Rights Act was a way to guarantee that Black voters in particular couldn’t be marginalized.”*

### What Is Gerrymandering?

Gerrymandering refers to the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to favor a particular political party or group.

For example, consider a voting population with 20 purple voters and 30 orange voters. If the area is divided evenly, the result would be five majority orange districts and no purple districts. However, by redrawing the lines strategically, as illustrated in the diagram, purple voters could secure a majority in certain districts despite being outnumbered overall.

Gerrymandering is legal when based on political affiliation but illegal when based on race.

McClennan notes,
*“Gerrymandering is a powerful tool, and again in North Carolina, it gives much more power to the Republicans than they would otherwise have.”*

### North Carolina Redistricting Plans and Legal Challenges

Republican lawmakers in North Carolina plan to redraw the state’s congressional districts once again, which could potentially increase the number of Republican members of Congress.

In response, Democrats aim to prove that the redistricting is racially motivated and therefore violates the law. For courts to rule the redistricting illegal, they must find clear evidence that race was a significant factor in the redistricting process.

### New Congressional Maps Released

On Thursday, North Carolina House and Senate leaders released copies of the new proposed congressional map, marking the next step in a contentious political and legal battle over representation in the state.

As the situation develops, voters and officials alike are closely watching how redistricting efforts and the Supreme Court ruling will shape future elections in North Carolina and beyond.
https://abc11.com/post/gerrymandering-nc-other-states-redistrict-congressional-maps-help-republicans-scotus-weigh-voting-rights-act-decision/18016215/

Jim Jordan Embarrasses Democrat Ro Khanna During Heated Shutdown Debate [WATCH]

Rep. Jim Jordan is one of the Democrats who voted with Republicans, but they still need five more votes to pass the legislation. “You’ve got to understand basic civics, how Congress works,” Jordan emphasized during the exchange.

This conversation took place as the government shutdown entered its second week following failed attempts to pass funding legislation. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer led Democrats in rejecting the GOP-backed “clean” bill, which focused on keeping essential services funded while addressing immigration and spending concerns.

The measure failed in a 55-45 vote, with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) joining Democrats in opposition. Meanwhile, the Democratic proposal—which included additional spending measures, tax increases, and funding expansions for programs tied to transgender medical services—also failed to reach the 60-vote threshold needed to break a filibuster.

Jordan’s comments served as a reminder that even with a Republican president and congressional majorities, Democrats can still block legislation in the Senate by using procedural rules they once sought to abolish. During the exchange, Rep. Ro Khanna, who has served in Congress since 2017, did not address the filibuster.

Jordan also noted that Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), who appeared earlier in the evening, supported keeping the government open and had voted with Republicans on one of the failed measures.

The debate underscored the legislative impasse that continues in Washington, with both parties trading blame for the shutdown. As of Wednesday night, no new vote had been scheduled to resolve the standoff.

This ongoing deadlock highlights the complex dynamics of Congress and the challenges in passing critical legislation amid partisan divisions.
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/10/jim-jordan-embarrasses-democrat-ro-khanna-during-heated-shutdown-debate-watch/

Kansas SNAP funding accusations examined

**Kansas SNAP Funding Controversy: Attorney General Kris Kobach’s Claims Debunked by Gov. Laura Kelly’s Administration**

Kansas SNAP funding was reportedly at risk of losing $10.4 million, according to claims made by Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach in a lawsuit filed against Governor Laura Kelly’s administration on September 8. However, these assertions were officially refuted by the Kelly administration on September 30 through a series of press releases, which addressed the most significant claim regarding the potential loss of funding for families depending on the SNAP program.

The Kelly administration stated, “After the USDA rejected the Kansas Department for Children and Families (DCF) Corrective Action Proposal, DCF filed an appeal with the USDA. The filing of that appeal immediately prevented the USDA from withholding the $10.4 million. The State of Kansas has not lost any SNAP administrative funding, and the program continues to operate as usual.”

Moreover, the administration revealed that Kobach made these allegations without conducting prior research or consulting with the Governor’s office. These unsubstantiated claims caused unwarranted panic among Kansas SNAP recipients and raised questions about the continued availability of their benefits. Gov. Kelly was quickly and repeatedly blamed despite no substantial evidence supporting Kobach’s accusations.

In response, Governor Kelly remarked, “Had the Attorney General met with my office prior to filing his lawsuit, as my office had requested, we could have explained the issue without having to go through the time and expense of the court.”

The Kelly administration also clarified that its decision to withhold certain SNAP recipients’ information went beyond Kobach’s claim that Gov. Kelly was “making a show of resistance to the Trump administration,” a statement never issued by anyone in Kelly’s office. Both DCF Secretary Laura Howard and Governor Kelly have expressed distrust of President Donald Trump’s executive order requiring states to share more detailed information about SNAP recipients to prevent fraud.

Secretary Howard explained in an interview with the *Kansas Reflector*, “The release of information isn’t about detecting fraud because those procedures are already in place.” Since effective fraud detection measures were established, Governor Kelly concluded that complying with the federal request to provide additional personal information could potentially violate recipients’ privacy.

Despite this, Kobach characterized the refusal as a “political demonstration,” without providing impartial evidence to support his claim.

Concerns about the Trump administration’s intentions were echoed by multiple parties. U.S. District Judge Maxine Chesney of California ruled against the federal agency’s effort to enforce this new policy after states raised worries that revealing such data could compromise sensitive applicant information—including income, family details, and immigration status—potentially facilitating mass deportations.

Although the Kelly administration did not participate in this lawsuit, its reasoning aligned with that of 21 states involved in the legal challenge.

Governor Kelly addressed the situation on social media, criticizing the “attacks” against her as “childish” and “idiotic.” She stated on X:

> “As public officials, we should be bigger than that and better than that. Kansans face serious challenges; many are just trying to make ends meet, and they expect us to be focused on their problems, not wasting time on idiotic memes. I’d like to invite the Republican officials who I know also disdain these types of silly attacks to join me in trying to restore a basic sense of civility to our politics.”

At the time of publication, Governor Laura Kelly could not be reached for further comment.
https://kstatecollegian.com/2025/10/16/kansas-snap-funding-accusations-examined/

自民と立民、物価高対策で協力 党首会談、暫定税率廃止も

政治|自民と立民、物価高対策で協力 党首会談で暫定税率廃止も合意

2025年10月15日 20:53(20:55更新)
※この記事は有料会員限定です。

自民党の高市早苗総裁と立憲民主党の野田佳彦代表は15日、国会内で会談を行いました。両党は物価高対策の実施に向けて協力することで一致し、特にガソリン税の暫定税率廃止に取り組む意向を示しました。

また、立憲民主党が求めている「給付付き税額控除」の制度設計に関しても、今後協議を継続していくことを確認しています。

※この記事の続きは有料会員限定での配信となります。
7日間の無料トライアルも実施中。1日あたり37円で読み放題、年払いならさらにお得です。
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1411706/

৪৮তম বিসিএস: নির্বাচিতদের স্বাস্থ্যপরীক্ষার সূচি প্রকাশের নির্দেশ

৪৮তম বিসিএসে সহকারী সার্জন ও সহকারী ডেন্টাল সার্জন পদে নিয়োগের জন্য সাময়িকভাবে মনোনীত দুই হাজার ৮৬৯ জন প্রার্থীর স্বাস্থ্য পরীক্ষার ব্যবস্থা করার নির্দেশ দেওয়া হয়েছে।

সোমবার (১৩ অক্টোবর) স্বাস্থ্য অধিদপ্তরের পরিচালক (হাসপাতাল ও ক্লিনিক সমূহ) ডা. আবু হোসেন মো. মঈনুল আহসান স্বাক্ষরিত নোটিসে এ নির্দেশনা প্রদান করা হয়।

https://medivoicebd.com/article/33542/৪৮তম-বিসিএস-নির্বাচিতদের-স্বাস্থ্যপরীক্ষার-সূচি-প্রকাশের-নির্দেশ

首相指名、駆け引き激化 立維国協議、一本化視野


title: 政治・社会|首相指名、駆け引き激化 立維国協議、一本化視野
date: 2025-10-14 17:37
updated: 2025-10-14 17:39
category: 政治・社会
tags: [首相指名, 立憲民主党, 日本維新の会, 国民民主党, 駆け引き]

【有料会員限定記事】

14日午後、国会内で立憲民主党、日本維新の会、国民民主党の3党幹事長が会談を行いました。写真は左から国民民主党の榛葉幹事長、立憲民主党の安住幹事長、日本維新の会の中司幹事長の様子です。

今回の会談では、石破茂首相の後任を決める首相指名選挙に関し、立憲民主党が国民民主党の玉木雄一郎代表への一本化も視野に入れた連携を呼びかける見込みであることが明らかになりました。

玉木氏は特に安全保障分野での取り組みを重視しており、各党間での合意形成に向けた調整が進んでいます。今後の動向が注目されるところです。

※この記事は有料会員限定です。残り578文字は会員登録後にご覧いただけます。
7日間の無料トライアル期間や、1日37円で読み放題のプラン、さらに年払いプランもご用意しております。

詳細は当サイトの会員ページをご確認ください。
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1411138/

高校授業料無償化へ「進展期待」 文科相、公明連立離脱の影響否定


title: 高校授業料無償化へ「進展期待」 文科相、公明連立離脱の影響否定
date: 2025-10-14 12:14

阿部俊子文部科学相は14日の閣議後記者会見で、公明党の連立離脱による高校授業料無償化への影響について言及しました。

阿部文科相は「協議が進まなくなるという話では必ずしもないのではないか」と述べ、受験生や高校生が不利益を被らないよう引き続き取り組む考えを示しました。

【写真】記者会見する阿部文科相=14日午前、文科省

(※本記事は有料会員限定です)
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1411013/