Court hears arguments on behalf of Samir Modi, police oppose bail plea

At the outset, Senior Advocate Tanveer Ahmed Mir requested the court to hear arguments on camera. Subsequently, the hearing was conducted in camera (closed room hearing). The court has listed the bail plea for hearing on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) extended the judicial custody of Samir Modi till October 6. He was produced before the court after the expiry of one day’s judicial custody.

On Saturday, the Delhi Police filed a reply opposing the bail plea of businessman Samir Modi. Senior Advocates Ramesh Gupta, along with Advocates Punit Mittal, Shailendra Singh, Ishaan Jain, and Surya Pratap Singh, appeared for Samir Modi. On the other hand, Senior Advocate Tanveer Ahmed Mir, accompanied by Shubham Mahajan and Ravish Thakur, appeared for the complainant.

During the proceedings on Saturday, Senior Advocate Ramesh Gupta contended that a Lookout Circular (LOC) can be issued within five days of an FIR being registered. It was submitted that the FIR in this case was registered on September 10, and the LOC was issued within four days. He stated that Samir Modi had traveled to London on a return ticket, returned from London, and was detained at the airport before being handed over to the police on September 18.

The counsel requested that the court inquire with the police about how an LOC could be opened within four days. He also submitted that the police be asked to investigate a complaint filed by the accused alleging extortion by the complainant. Additional Sessions Judge Vipin Kharb remarked that he, too, wanted to know how an LOC could be opened in four days.

On September 19, the Saket court granted two more days’ remand of Samir Modi to the Delhi Police. He was subsequently sent to judicial custody on Sunday. The court had also directed the police to inquire into the complaint filed by Samir Modi.

The Friday hearing was conducted in camera, with the court asking the media and others to leave. Senior Advocate Ramesh Gupta pointed out that bail plea hearings are typically never conducted in camera.

*This story has been sourced from a third-party syndicated feed and agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for the dependability, trustworthiness, reliability, or accuracy of the information presented. Mid-day management reserves the sole right to alter, delete, or remove (without notice) any content at its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.*
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/police-opposes-bail-plea-of-samir-modi-court-lists-matter-to-hear-arguments-23595275

NEET PG 2025: Supreme Court Hearing Today On Answer Key Dispute; Counselling Schedule Awaited

**NEET PG 2025 Counselling: Supreme Court to Hear Petitions on Answer Key Transparency**

The Supreme Court is set to hear petitions related to the NEET PG 2025 counselling today, September 19. Originally slated for September 12, the hearing will now be conducted by a bench comprising Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice KV Viswanathan, according to media reports.

### Petitioners Raise Concerns Over Transparency

The petitions have been filed by NEET PG aspirants along with the United Doctors Front (UDF), who are strongly opposing the answer key released by the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS). This is the first time NBEMS has published an answer key following a directive from the Supreme Court.

However, candidates argue that the answer key format is not transparent. The key includes only question IDs and answer key IDs, without the actual questions. Students claim this restricts their ability to verify their answers effectively, defeating the purpose of publishing the answer key in the first place.

The petitioners are urging the Supreme Court to direct NBEMS to publish the complete set of question papers along with detailed answer explanations. They believe this will ensure a fair and equitable verification process.

### NEET PG 2025 Counselling Schedule Awaited

While the Supreme Court examines the matter, thousands of aspirants eagerly await the release of the NEET PG 2025 counselling schedule, which will be announced shortly by the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC).

The schedule will outline important details including registration procedures, choice filling, and dates for seat allotment results. Shortlisted candidates will need to register on the MCC website, submit their applications, and select their preferred courses and institutions.

Seat allocation will be carried out based on merit, candidate preferences, and seat availability across medical colleges.

### Potential Impact of the Supreme Court Verdict

The Supreme Court’s decision on the transparency of the NEET PG answer key could have significant implications for future medical entrance examinations. It may set new standards for accountability and fairness in postgraduate medical admission processes, enhancing trust in the system for aspirants nationwide.
https://www.freepressjournal.in/education/neet-pg-2025-supreme-court-hearing-today-on-answer-key-dispute-counselling-schedule-awaited

Brigitte Macron to provide ‘scientific’ gender evidence in US lawsuit

Photos of Brigitte Macron, wife of the French president, could be presented in court as part of the defamation case brought by the Macrons against US right-wing influencer Candace Owens.

The couple has filed a 22-count lawsuit in the US state of Delaware, accusing Owens of knowingly spreading false claims, including the assertion that Brigitte Macron was born a man.

“We’re going to have the two testimonies of the two plaintiffs. There will be expert testimony that will come out that will be scientific in nature and will also demonstrate the falsity of the statements,” Macrons’ lawyer Tom Clare told the BBC on Thursday.

The lawsuit describes the Macrons as victims of a global humiliation campaign that is invasive, dehumanising, and deeply unjust.

However, Owens has stood by her remarks even after the lawsuit was filed.
https://www.scmp.com/news/world/europe/article/3326055/french-first-lady-brigitte-macron-provide-scientific-gender-evidence-us-lawsuit?utm_source=rss_feed

Man accused of killing Bilal Hamze was ‘best friends’ with alleged Alameddine member on Snapchat

A man accused of killing a senior member of a Sydney crime gang was Snapchat friends with a rival gang member, a court has been told.

The revelation came during recent proceedings, highlighting the complex relationships between members of competing gangs. This unusual connection has raised questions about the dynamics within the criminal underworld of Sydney.

Further details emerged as the trial progressed, shedding light on the interactions between the accused and his alleged rivals. The court continues to examine the evidence surrounding the case.
https://thewest.com.au/news/man-accused-of-killing-bilal-hamze-was-best-friends-with-alleged-alameddine-member-on-snapchat-c-20060068