Gov. JB Pritzker and GOP House leader bickered in texts after conservative influencer filmed Pritzker’s home

When a right-wing provocateur last month posted a video outside Gov. JB Pritzker’s Chicago home encouraging viewers to “take action” after conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination, the governor reached out to both Republican leaders of the Illinois legislature.

“I’m dealing with vastly increased threats on my family and myself in the wake of this week and this Republican Trumper went to my house, suggested that I’m taking God out of public life and encouraged people to ‘take action,’” the governor texted separately to Illinois Senate Leader John Curran and House Leader Tony McCombie. “I’d like to see condemnation of this from GOP leaders today.”

What followed was not exactly what Pritzker sought. Instead, he and McCombie, who are typically cordial in texts to each other, exchanged heated messages as McCombie rebuffed the governor’s request and called out Pritzker for some of his previous comments about Republicans. The governor shot back, sometimes in all capital letters, that her response was “absurd” and that she was playing politics.

“So you won’t condemn this guy coming to MY HOME (where my wife and children live) and calling me evil while encouraging people to ‘take action?’ GOT IT,” Pritzker wrote to McCombie.

While Senate GOP Leader Curran later issued a joint statement with Democratic Senate President Don Harmon condemning political violence more broadly, the testy back-and-forth between Pritzker and McCombie occurred just two days after Kirk’s death. Republicans and Democrats across the nation debated, discussed, and denounced political violence, while at the same time accusing the other side of perpetuating it.

President Donald Trump himself escalated the situation in the hours and days after Kirk’s death, saying publicly that rhetoric from “the radical left” was “directly responsible for the terrorism that we’re seeing in our country today.”

It also came at an especially tense time in Chicago between Pritzker and the Trump administration, as the president was just days into his sometimes-violent crackdown on illegal immigration in and around the city.

In Illinois, the debate about political violence among top leaders was more behind the scenes, according to text messages the Tribune received through the Freedom of Information Act. While the governor and state Republican leaders, such as McCombie, often engage in public sparring, their one-on-one texts—which the Tribune regularly obtains—are typically breezy and brief. But the tone was different on Sept. 12 when Pritzker texted both Curran, of Downers Grove, and McCombie, of Savanna.

The governor sent each a link to a social media video from right-wing influencer Ben Bergquam, in which Bergquam criticized Pritzker for blaming Trump for fomenting political violence. As Bergquam spoke, the influencer pointed behind him at the governor’s home in Chicago’s Gold Coast neighborhood, including the house address number.

“If you love America and the assassination of Charlie Kirk doesn’t inspire you to take action, I don’t know what will!” the video caption said.

After decrying legal protections for transgender people, abortion rights, and immigrants in the U.S. without legal permission, Bergquam, who hosts the show “Law & Border” and had been accompanying U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents around Chicago, said, “Godless leftist policies are the problem, evil is the problem and it’s politicians like Gov. Pritzker.”

When Pritzker sent the link of Bergquam’s post and requested that Illinois GOP leaders condemn it, McCombie sent a three-paragraph response. She said she prayed for the safety of Pritzker and his family daily and has condemned political violence against Democrats before, including the shootings of Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota.

But she then turned the issue back on the governor, asking him to apologize for his own past statements. These included likening the actions of Trump’s administration in the early days of his second term to the rise of Nazism in Germany in the 1930s and saying Republicans should never “know a moment of peace.” Pritzker has repeatedly said he was talking about the public expressing their opposition to the GOP through protests, not violence.

“I would like for you to publicly apologize for your rhetoric,” she said after citing the examples.

That’s when Pritzker responded with “GOT IT” before adding: “I think you know how absurd your response is. But I suppose you have a primary to run.”

Pritzker brought up the texts publicly weeks later, at an Oct. 7 appearance in Minneapolis.

“Neither one of them—I asked them to simply post something publicly or put a statement out, anything. It seems like just common decency to just say, ‘This is wrong,’ and they wouldn’t do it,” Pritzker said onstage at a summit hosted by the Minnesota Star Tribune.

In a statement after those remarks, McCombie said she condemned violence and added of Pritzker: “If he is serious about lowering the temperature, he should stop pointing fingers and take responsibility for his own words.”

Curran did issue a statement on Sept. 12 condemning political violence, a joint release with Harmon, of Oak Park. The statement did not mention the video at Pritzker’s house or any other specific incident. When Curran responded to Pritzker’s request with a text mentioning the joint statement, the governor didn’t respond, records show.

Neither Curran’s office nor Pritzker’s office provided a comment Wednesday on the text message exchanges.

After the June shooting of the Minnesota lawmakers, Robert Pape, a University of Chicago expert on political violence, wrote in an op-ed for The New York Times that joint statements—such as the one from Harmon and Curran—are an effective tool for tamping down political violence.

“My research suggests that to de-escalate the political environment and reduce the risk of violence, America’s political leaders need to cross their political divides and make joint statements (and ideally joint appearances) that denounce all political violence, welcome all peaceful protest and call for respecting the rules, process and results of free and fair elections in the country,” Pape wrote.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/23/jb-pritzker-texts-gop-house-leader-influencer/

President Trump Hosts a Rose Garden Lunch with Senate Republicans – 12:00pm ET Livestream

Today, President Donald Trump will host a Rose Garden Club lunch with Senate Republicans at the White House in Washington, D.C.

The event is scheduled to begin at 12:00 PM ET.

Livestream links are provided below for those who wish to watch the event live.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/10/21/president-trump-hosts-a-rose-garden-lunch-with-senate-republicans-1200pm-et-livestream/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=president-trump-hosts-a-rose-garden-lunch-with-senate-republicans-1200pm-et-livestream

Cierre de gobierno llega a su día 21, el segundo más largo de la historia de EE.UU.

Sin un acuerdo a la vista, ha llegado el día 21 del cierre federal del gobierno y el Congreso sigue en un punto muerto. El Partido Republicano y el Partido Demócrata no han logrado un consenso sobre los subsidios a la atención médica, y la votación sobre la legislación de financiación de los republicanos fracasó de nuevo la noche del lunes.

Las consecuencias del impasse continúan sintiéndose en toda la fuerza laboral federal. Los republicanos dijeron anoche que no habrá cambios de estrategia y se comprometieron a bloquear los esfuerzos demócratas para pagarles a todos los empleados suspendidos. Asimismo, los demócratas del Senado bloquearon otra vez la propuesta de financiación republicana para reabrir el gobierno, con una votación de 50 a 43; esta fue la undécima vez que el plan fracasa.

Chip Roy, republicano de la Cámara de Representantes, cree que su partido debería considerar eliminar el umbral de 60 votos en el Senado. Los senadores republicanos dejaron claro que creen que la responsabilidad de detener el estancamiento y reabrir el gobierno recae en sus opositores, incluso cuando los dos partidos enfrentan presión porque los trabajadores federales no han cobrado sus cheques de pago.

John Thune, líder de la mayoría republicana, quiere que el Senado vote sobre un proyecto de ley para pagar a los empleados federales que siguen laborando durante el cierre. Por su lado, Hakeem Jeffries, líder de la minoría de la Cámara de Representantes, indicó que no apoya la legislación porque “parece más bien una estratagema política”.

**Impactos del cierre de gobierno**

Roger Wicker, presidente de la Comisión de las Fuerzas Armadas del Senado, criticó la decisión de suspender temporalmente a gran parte del personal de la Administración Nacional de Seguridad Nuclear (NSA), que supervisa el arsenal nuclear de EE. UU. La mencionada agencia aseguró que mantendrá a los contratistas empleados hasta finales de octubre.

El lunes, se informó a los empleados del Senado que ya no recibirán su pago durante el resto del cierre. Por su parte, la Oficina de Administración y Presupuesto defendió la decisión de congelar más de $11 mil millones en proyectos con el Cuerpo de Ingenieros del Ejército, alegando que el gobierno busca “reorientar” los fondos federales.

En este sentido, la escasez de personal de la Administración de Seguridad en el Transporte (TSA) causó el lunes retrasos más largos de lo habitual en el Aeropuerto Internacional Hartsfield-Jackson de Atlanta. Además, se anunció la escasez de personal en al menos ocho instalaciones de control de tráfico aéreo, que se ha extendido hasta las primeras horas de la mañana del martes, ya que los controladores laboran sin goce de sueldo en medio del cierre de gobierno.

Desde el comienzo del cierre federal, se han reportado 188 faltas de personal, en comparación con las 45 reportadas en las mismas fechas del año pasado, según un análisis sobre planes operativos previos.
https://eldiariony.com/2025/10/21/cierre-de-gobierno-llega-a-su-dia-21-el-segundo-mas-largo-de-la-historia-de-ee-uu/

Jon Stewart Gives Basic Economics Lesson To Socialist Bernie Sanders

Comedy Central host Jon Stewart explained the impact subsidies have on prices to independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont during a Monday appearance on “The Daily Show” while discussing the government shutdown.

The federal government entered a partial shutdown at 12:01 a.m. EDT on Oct. 1 after the Senate failed to pass a continuing resolution, falling short of the 60 votes needed to overcome a Democratic filibuster. This came after the House of Representatives passed the short-term funding bill on Sept. 19.

During the discussion, Stewart talked about Democrats’ demands for over $1 trillion in funding for various priorities, including continuing enhanced payouts for Obamacare, with Sanders. He explained how subsidies can increase prices for consumers.

“What happens is, when the government promises endless funds to insurance companies or private universities without any cost controls — and Trump seems to understand this — prices rise far beyond the rate of inflation. We have seen this in tuition, pharmaceuticals, and health care. So my question is, will Democrats recognize the poison pill that they have often placed into well-intentioned policy?” Stewart asked Sanders.

Sanders responded, “Right, right. What they end up doing is coming up with very complicated proposals. You make $48,964, you will get this thing, make a dollar more, blah, blah, blah.”

He continued, “Listen, we have to make it simple. In the wealthiest country in the history of the world, should health care be a human right? Yes, it should be. Should we have the best quality education in the world, from childcare to graduate school? Yes, we should.”

A 2017 study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that for every dollar of financial aid provided through federal programs, college tuitions increased by 60 cents. Former Sallie Mae CEO Al Lord admitted in a 2021 Wall Street Journal interview that student-loan programs enabled the steep increases in college tuition since the 1980s.

In a related development, the University of Santa Clara announced it would increase financial aid after the One Big Beautiful Bill Act limited loans for professional education like law and medical school to $50,000. The university plans to provide each new student a $16,000 scholarship, effectively reducing tuition from $63,280 to $47,280, according to Reuters.

After pausing due to audience applause, Sanders launched into a critique targeting so-called “oligarchs.”

“You know, what we need is a very simple, straightforward agenda, which says, by the way, this is really the sticking point: you’ve got to finally say to the oligarchs, who have never ever had it so good — they are making hand over fist — all right, you got to say to them, ‘Sorry, guys, a billion dollars is enough. You ain’t going to have $200 billion or $300 billion. Try to survive on a mere billion. You will start paying your fair share of taxes!’” Sanders said as the audience applauded and cheered.

According to the Tax Foundation, the top 1% of income earners in the United States — those making $682,577 a year or more in 2024 — accounted for 26.3% of adjusted gross income and paid 45.8% of all federal income taxes.

*All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.*
https://dailycaller.com/2025/10/21/jon-stewart-basic-economics-lesson-bernie-sanders/

‘No Kings’ protests against Trump

WASHINGTON — Large crowds of protesters marched and rallied in cities across the U.S. Saturday for “No Kings” demonstrations, decrying what participants see as the government’s swift drift into authoritarianism under President Donald Trump.

People carrying signs with slogans such as “Nothing is more patriotic than protesting” or “Resist Fascism” packed into New York City’s Times Square and rallied by the thousands in parks in Boston, Atlanta, and Chicago. Demonstrators marched through Washington and downtown Los Angeles and picketed outside capitols in several Republican-led states, a courthouse in Billings, Montana, and at hundreds of smaller public spaces.

Trump’s Republican Party disparaged the demonstrations as “Hate America” rallies, but in many places the events looked more like a street party. There were marching bands, huge banners with the U.S. Constitution’s “We The People” preamble that people could sign, and demonstrators wearing inflatable costumes, particularly frogs, which have emerged as a sign of resistance in Portland, Oregon.

It was the third mass mobilization since Trump’s return to the White House and came against the backdrop of a government shutdown that not only has closed federal programs and services but is testing the core balance of power, as an aggressive executive confronts Congress and the courts in ways that protest organizers warn are a slide toward authoritarianism.

In Washington, Iraq War Marine veteran Shawn Howard said he had never participated in a protest before but was motivated to show up because of what he sees as the Trump administration’s “disregard for the law.” He said immigration detentions without due process and deployments of troops in U.S. cities are “un-American” and alarming signs of eroding democracy.

“I fought for freedom and against this kind of extremism abroad,” said Howard, who added that he also worked at the CIA for 20 years on counter-extremism operations. “And now I see a moment in America where we have extremists everywhere who are, in my opinion, pushing us to some kind of civil conflict.”

Trump, meanwhile, was spending the weekend at his Mar-a-Lago home in Florida. “They say they’re referring to me as a king. I’m not a king,” the president said in a Fox News interview that aired early Friday, before he departed for a $1 million-per-plate MAGA Inc. fundraiser at his club. A Trump campaign social media account mocked the protests by posting a computer-generated video of the president clothed like a monarch, wearing a crown and waving from a balcony.

**Nationwide demonstrations**

In San Francisco, hundreds of people spelled out “No King!” and other phrases with their bodies on Ocean Beach. Hayley Wingard, who was dressed as the Statue of Liberty, said she too had never been to a protest before. Only recently she began to view Trump as a “dictator.”

“I was actually OK with everything until I found that the military invasion in Los Angeles and Chicago and Portland — Portland bothered me the most, because I’m from Portland, and I don’t want the military in my cities. That’s scary,” Wingard said.

Tens of thousands of people gathered in Portland for a peaceful demonstration downtown. Later in the day, tensions grew as a few hundred protesters and counterprotesters showed up at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building, with federal agents at times firing tear gas to disperse the crowd and city police threatening to make arrests if demonstrators blocked streets.

The building has been the site of mostly small nightly protests since June — the reason the Trump administration has cited for trying to deploy National Guard troops in Portland, which a federal judge has at least temporarily blocked.

About 3,500 people gathered in Salt Lake City outside the Utah State Capitol to share messages of hope and healing after a protester was fatally shot during the city’s first “No Kings” march in June. More than 1,500 people gathered in Birmingham, Alabama, evoking the city’s history of protests and the critical role it played in the Civil Rights Movement two generations ago.

“It just feels like we’re living in an America that I don’t recognize,” said Jessica Yother, a mother of four. She and other protesters said they felt camaraderie by gathering in a state where Trump won nearly 65% of the vote last November. “It was so encouraging,” Yother said. “I walked in and thought, ‘Here are my people.’”

**Organizers hope to build opposition movement**

“Big rallies like this give confidence to people who have been sitting on the sidelines but are ready to speak up,” Democratic U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy said in an interview with The Associated Press.

While protests earlier this year — against Elon Musk’s cuts and Trump’s military parade — drew crowds, organizers say this one is uniting the opposition. Top Democrats such as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders are joining what organizers view as an antidote to Trump’s actions, from the administration’s clampdown on free speech to its military-style immigration raids.

More than 2,600 rallies were planned Saturday, organizers said. The national march against Trump and Musk this spring had 1,300 registered locations, while the first “No Kings” day in June registered 2,100.

“We’re here because we love America,” Sanders said, addressing the crowd from a stage in Washington. He said the American experiment is “in danger” under Trump but insisted, “We the people will rule.”

**Republican critics denounce the demonstrations**

Republicans sought to portray protesters as far outside the mainstream and a prime reason for the government shutdown, now in its 18th day. From the White House to Capitol Hill, GOP leaders called them “communists” and “Marxists.” They said Democratic leaders, including Schumer, are beholden to the far-left flank and willing to keep the government shut to appease those liberal forces.

“I encourage you to watch — we call it the Hate America rally — that will happen Saturday,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana. “Let’s see who shows up for that,” Johnson said, listing groups including “antifa types,” people who “hate capitalism,” and “Marxists in full display.”

Many demonstrators, in response, said they were meeting such hyperbole with humor, noting that Trump often leans heavily on theatrics such as claiming that cities he sends troops to are war zones.

“So much of what we’ve seen from this administration has been so unserious and silly that we have to respond with the same energy,” said Glen Kalbaugh, a Washington protester who wore a wizard hat and held a sign with a frog on it.

New York police reported no arrests during the protests.

**Democrats try to regain their footing amid shutdown**

Democrats have refused to vote on legislation that would reopen the government as they demand funding for health care. Republicans say they are willing to discuss the issue later, only after the government reopens.

The situation is a potential turnaround from just six months ago, when Democrats and their allies were divided and despondent. Schumer in particular was berated by his party for allowing an earlier government funding bill to sail through the Senate without using it to challenge Trump.

“What we are seeing from the Democrats is some spine,” said Ezra Levin, a co-founder of Indivisible, a key organizing group. “The worst thing the Democrats could do right now is surrender.”

Associated Press journalists Lisa Mascaro and Kevin Freking in Washington, Jill Colvin and Joseph Frederick in New York, Jeffrey Collins in Columbia, South Carolina, Hannah Schoenbaum in Salt Lake City, Terry Chea in San Francisco, Chris Megerian in West Palm Beach, Florida, and Bill Barrow in Birmingham, Alabama, contributed.
https://www.phillytrib.com/no-kings-protests-against-trump/article_0e012434-cac9-47ad-bf8c-9a2f7ab226eb.html

City Council amends bill to allow expansion of bike lanes in Philly

Efforts to expand bike lane access in Center City took a major step forward Thursday as the City Council unanimously passed an amendment to a bill changing parking rules and loading zones for a significant portion of Philadelphia streets between the rivers.

The bill proposes allowing all loading zones from Spring Garden to Bainbridge streets east of Broad Street, and from Bainbridge to the northern border of the 2nd Councilmanic District west of Broad. The amendment introduced Thursday expands the targeted areas beyond just Spruce and Pine streets between the Delaware and Schuylkill rivers.

If passed, the bill would open specialized lanes for bikes and other non-car traffic, benefiting thousands of residents in and around Center City. Cyclists testified about the dangers they face and injuries they have suffered while biking alongside cars in the city. Some spoke in honor of Dr. Barbara Friedes, a child oncology resident at CHOP who was tragically killed by a drunken driver in July 2024 at the corner of 18th and Spruce streets.

“I looked at the map of the area and just made sure as we move forward, we’re not just protecting bicyclists but also keeping the lines of communication open in partnership with the residents when they have issues and concerns,” Council President Kenyatta Johnson said after the session. The bill was introduced on his behalf, as per Council rules.

“This is making sure that we deal with the issue comprehensively, and that’s why I decided, working in partnership with my colleague Mark Squilla, to expand the scope of it,” Johnson added.

West of Broad Street, the loading zones would expand to Market Street between the Schuylkill River and 22nd Street; Chestnut Street between 22nd and 20th streets and between 17th and Broad streets; and Locust Street between 20th and 17th streets around Rittenhouse Square.

Meanwhile, efforts to expand bike lanes in the southernmost region of the 5th District have stalled in the Streets Committee. Biking advocates blame committee chair Jeffery Young Jr., who represents the 5th District including the streets around City Hall.

“There’s nothing more left to learn about it,” said Jon Geeting, policy and advocacy director for Build Philly Now, in a post on X on Oct. 5, one day after the committee hearing failed to advance the legislation. “(Young) just thinks he’s smarter than OTIS (the Office of Transportation and Infrastructure Systems) and PennDOT and doesn’t believe them that it won’t cause problems.”

In other Council business, Young also introduced a bill to end late fees charged to residential Philadelphia Water Department customers starting July 1, 2026. Council members have been introducing legislation to combat rising utility costs.

“In order to allow our residents to just be able to live a little more free in this city, this bill will enable residential customers to avoid paying late fees and penalties on your water,” Young said in a floor speech.

“We have to make sure this city is affordable for the people who live in the city. That doesn’t mean you don’t have to pay your water bill, all right. But we want to make sure that we are providing a level of service so that city residents can really appreciate it, and we want to again keep their costs down as much as possible, as other costs continue to rise up in the city,” he added.

Stay informed and connected — subscribe to The Philadelphia Tribune NOW! [Click Here]

**Community Guidelines**

– Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist, or sexually oriented language.
– PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
– Don’t Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
– Be Truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
– Be Nice. No racism, sexism, or any form of -ism that is degrading to others.
– Be Proactive. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to alert us to abusive posts.
– Share with Us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts and the history behind an article.
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/local_news/city-council-amends-bill-to-allow-expansion-of-bike-lanes-in-philly/article_72b1530f-83fb-446e-936b-a758d1f11163.html

Government shutdown to stretch into next week after GOP funding bill fails for 10th time

The Senate failed on Thursday for the 10th time to advance a Republican-led bill intended to end the government shutdown.

CBS News congressional correspondent Caitlin Huey-Burns reports on the ongoing legislative stalemate and its implications.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/government-shutdown-stretch-next-week-gop-funding-bill-fails-10th-time/

“They’ll call you a terrorist and ruin your life”: Dems sound alarm over Trump’s IRS weaponization

Democrats in Congress are blasting the recent revelation that President Donald Trump will push the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to investigate left-leaning groups and political opponents, calling it a blatant weaponization of a government agency. “Donald Trump believes he’s a king, and he’s determined to wield every agency under his control as a weapon to crush political opposition and silence free speech,” Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said in a statement shared with Salon on Thursday. “The Trump administration will try to legitimize this abuse with legal opinions and procedural lingo, but the implicit threat is that if you give to a progressive cause, they’ll deem you a terrorist and ruin your life.” According to a report from the Wall Street Journal, the Trump administration is preparing to overhaul the way the IRS investigates crimes, paving the way for more probes into groups and individuals who do not align politically with the president. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent‘s adviser, Gary Shapley, would reportedly become the director of the IRS’s criminal investigative division. Bessent, as acting IRS commissioner, has already been directed by Trump to compile financial records for left-leaning political organizations. Start your day with essential news from Salon. Sign up for our free morning newsletter, Crash Course. Vice Chairman of the Senate Intel Committee, Mark Warner, D-Va., called the development “absurd and dangerous” in a post on X. “As if Trump’s weaponization of the justice system hadn’t gone far enough, now he’s weaponizing the IRS against his perceived enemies,” Warner said. “It’s a clear and authoritarian attempt to silence critics.” Rep. Jimmy Gomez, D-Calif., said the nation should be “concerned” about Trump’s use of the IRS in a social media post. “Trump is illegally going after his political enemies with the IRS, the very kind of abuse of power that destroys democracies from within,” Gomez said.
https://www.salon.com/2025/10/16/theyll-call-you-a-terrorist-and-ruin-your-life-dems-sound-alarm-over-trumps-irs-weaponization/

What is gerrymandering? Here’s a deeper look at the controversies of redistricting, voters’ impact

RALEIGH, N.C. (WTVD) — A significant political battle is shaping up in North Carolina, while a Supreme Court case in Washington, D.C., could have far-reaching effects on voters across the United States, including those in the Tar Heel State.

Texas and California have already attempted to influence the balance of power in Congress through redistricting efforts designed to favor Republicans or Democrats. Texas is widely recognized as a red state, and California is considered a blue state. North Carolina, however, is viewed as a deep shade of purple.

### Supreme Court Review of Voting Rights Act Challenge

The Supreme Court is currently reviewing a major Republican-led challenge to the Voting Rights Act in Louisiana. This case has the potential to undermine a critical provision of the landmark Civil Rights Movement legislation that prohibits racial discrimination in redistricting.

Enacted in 1965, the Voting Rights Act forbids gerrymandering based on race, ensuring that redistricting does not discriminate against voters of color.

David McClennan, a political scientist at Meredith University in Raleigh, explains,
*“This idea that, particularly in southern states like North Carolina, but other southern states as well, the basic principle of one person, one vote was being basically ignored. The Voting Rights Act was a way to guarantee that Black voters in particular couldn’t be marginalized.”*

### What Is Gerrymandering?

Gerrymandering refers to the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to favor a particular political party or group.

For example, consider a voting population with 20 purple voters and 30 orange voters. If the area is divided evenly, the result would be five majority orange districts and no purple districts. However, by redrawing the lines strategically, as illustrated in the diagram, purple voters could secure a majority in certain districts despite being outnumbered overall.

Gerrymandering is legal when based on political affiliation but illegal when based on race.

McClennan notes,
*“Gerrymandering is a powerful tool, and again in North Carolina, it gives much more power to the Republicans than they would otherwise have.”*

### North Carolina Redistricting Plans and Legal Challenges

Republican lawmakers in North Carolina plan to redraw the state’s congressional districts once again, which could potentially increase the number of Republican members of Congress.

In response, Democrats aim to prove that the redistricting is racially motivated and therefore violates the law. For courts to rule the redistricting illegal, they must find clear evidence that race was a significant factor in the redistricting process.

### New Congressional Maps Released

On Thursday, North Carolina House and Senate leaders released copies of the new proposed congressional map, marking the next step in a contentious political and legal battle over representation in the state.

As the situation develops, voters and officials alike are closely watching how redistricting efforts and the Supreme Court ruling will shape future elections in North Carolina and beyond.
https://abc11.com/post/gerrymandering-nc-other-states-redistrict-congressional-maps-help-republicans-scotus-weigh-voting-rights-act-decision/18016215/

Jim Jordan Embarrasses Democrat Ro Khanna During Heated Shutdown Debate [WATCH]

Rep. Jim Jordan is one of the Democrats who voted with Republicans, but they still need five more votes to pass the legislation. “You’ve got to understand basic civics, how Congress works,” Jordan emphasized during the exchange.

This conversation took place as the government shutdown entered its second week following failed attempts to pass funding legislation. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer led Democrats in rejecting the GOP-backed “clean” bill, which focused on keeping essential services funded while addressing immigration and spending concerns.

The measure failed in a 55-45 vote, with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) joining Democrats in opposition. Meanwhile, the Democratic proposal—which included additional spending measures, tax increases, and funding expansions for programs tied to transgender medical services—also failed to reach the 60-vote threshold needed to break a filibuster.

Jordan’s comments served as a reminder that even with a Republican president and congressional majorities, Democrats can still block legislation in the Senate by using procedural rules they once sought to abolish. During the exchange, Rep. Ro Khanna, who has served in Congress since 2017, did not address the filibuster.

Jordan also noted that Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), who appeared earlier in the evening, supported keeping the government open and had voted with Republicans on one of the failed measures.

The debate underscored the legislative impasse that continues in Washington, with both parties trading blame for the shutdown. As of Wednesday night, no new vote had been scheduled to resolve the standoff.

This ongoing deadlock highlights the complex dynamics of Congress and the challenges in passing critical legislation amid partisan divisions.
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/10/jim-jordan-embarrasses-democrat-ro-khanna-during-heated-shutdown-debate-watch/