MSNBC Panelists Rage At Democrats For Getting ‘Nothing In Return’ After Shutting Government Down

MSNBC panelists criticized Democrats on Sunday for appearing to cave to President Donald Trump as they prepared to reopen the government without securing extensions for Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies.

Eight Democratic senators broke ranks with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer by supporting the Republican-led continuing resolution (CR) in a procedural vote. This CR would reopen and fund the government until January 30.

On “The Weekend: Primetime,” panelists expressed frustration that Democrats, despite shutting down the government for the longest period in U.S. history, are not receiving Obamacare subsidy extensions in return.

“For 40 days, you shut the government down and now you’re going to open the government up and what did you get in return? Nothing? Nothing?” MSNBC columnist Dean Obeidallah said. “After the pain you inflicted — people were willing to take the pain. I talked to union workers from TSA who said, ‘I’ll take the pain, it’s going to help me get health insurance subsidies paid.’ So you’re getting nothing in return. I don’t know how, and you just won an election on Tuesday, and you lose numbers.”

The panelists also found it unclear why several Democrats flipped their position after maintaining a firm stance over healthcare demands during the shutdown.

Democratic Virginia Senator Tim Kaine voted in favor of reopening the government just five days after the party’s significant victory in Virginia’s gubernatorial race.

The bipartisan compromise would reverse layoffs affecting 4,000 federal workers and schedule a vote on ACA subsidy extensions in December.

Co-host Antonia Hylton suggested that Trump ultimately emerged victorious, rendering the 40-day shutdown meaningless.

“In a way, it seems like the president is kind of getting what he wanted 40 days ago when all this started,” Hylton said. “He was out there saying that, ‘oh, this is all about Democrats trying to give health care to illegal immigrants.’ He just said that to reporters moments ago, repeating that refrain that Democrats had actually very successfully pushed back against.”

“There’s all this energy in the wake of Tuesday’s election. The president made remarks basically acknowledging he was on his back foot, saying Republicans are being harmed by all of this. And now, here he is, winning again?” she added.

Trump and Republicans have argued that Democrats supported the shutdown because they wanted to provide government-run healthcare to illegal immigrants. Data shows Medicaid spending for illegal immigrants nearly tripled under the Biden administration, coinciding with record-high illegal border crossings surpassing 2 million and 3 million encounters in a single fiscal year.

Additionally, the cost of Medicaid for illegal immigrants’ emergency care rose 142% in fiscal year 2024.

Obeidallah expressed confusion over Democratic senators’ decisions to cave. “I don’t understand how a Democratic senator goes, ‘Wow, we won really big. Let me cave now.’ That makes no sense to me.”

Notably, none of the Democrats who voted to reopen the government—including Illinois Senator Dick Durbin and New Hampshire Senator Jeanne Shaheen—are facing reelection in the 2026 midterms.
https://dailycaller.com/2025/11/10/msnbc-panelists-democrats-govt-down-obamacare/

Government shutdown to stretch into next week after GOP funding bill fails for 10th time

The Senate failed on Thursday for the 10th time to advance a Republican-led bill intended to end the government shutdown.

CBS News congressional correspondent Caitlin Huey-Burns reports on the ongoing legislative stalemate and its implications.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/government-shutdown-stretch-next-week-gop-funding-bill-fails-10th-time/

What is gerrymandering? Here’s a deeper look at the controversies of redistricting, voters’ impact

RALEIGH, N.C. (WTVD) — A significant political battle is shaping up in North Carolina, while a Supreme Court case in Washington, D.C., could have far-reaching effects on voters across the United States, including those in the Tar Heel State.

Texas and California have already attempted to influence the balance of power in Congress through redistricting efforts designed to favor Republicans or Democrats. Texas is widely recognized as a red state, and California is considered a blue state. North Carolina, however, is viewed as a deep shade of purple.

### Supreme Court Review of Voting Rights Act Challenge

The Supreme Court is currently reviewing a major Republican-led challenge to the Voting Rights Act in Louisiana. This case has the potential to undermine a critical provision of the landmark Civil Rights Movement legislation that prohibits racial discrimination in redistricting.

Enacted in 1965, the Voting Rights Act forbids gerrymandering based on race, ensuring that redistricting does not discriminate against voters of color.

David McClennan, a political scientist at Meredith University in Raleigh, explains,
*“This idea that, particularly in southern states like North Carolina, but other southern states as well, the basic principle of one person, one vote was being basically ignored. The Voting Rights Act was a way to guarantee that Black voters in particular couldn’t be marginalized.”*

### What Is Gerrymandering?

Gerrymandering refers to the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to favor a particular political party or group.

For example, consider a voting population with 20 purple voters and 30 orange voters. If the area is divided evenly, the result would be five majority orange districts and no purple districts. However, by redrawing the lines strategically, as illustrated in the diagram, purple voters could secure a majority in certain districts despite being outnumbered overall.

Gerrymandering is legal when based on political affiliation but illegal when based on race.

McClennan notes,
*“Gerrymandering is a powerful tool, and again in North Carolina, it gives much more power to the Republicans than they would otherwise have.”*

### North Carolina Redistricting Plans and Legal Challenges

Republican lawmakers in North Carolina plan to redraw the state’s congressional districts once again, which could potentially increase the number of Republican members of Congress.

In response, Democrats aim to prove that the redistricting is racially motivated and therefore violates the law. For courts to rule the redistricting illegal, they must find clear evidence that race was a significant factor in the redistricting process.

### New Congressional Maps Released

On Thursday, North Carolina House and Senate leaders released copies of the new proposed congressional map, marking the next step in a contentious political and legal battle over representation in the state.

As the situation develops, voters and officials alike are closely watching how redistricting efforts and the Supreme Court ruling will shape future elections in North Carolina and beyond.
https://abc11.com/post/gerrymandering-nc-other-states-redistrict-congressional-maps-help-republicans-scotus-weigh-voting-rights-act-decision/18016215/