Ex-NASA scientist poached by France urges European flexibility on appointments

As Europe considers how best to attract US-based scientists impacted by funding cuts and political hostility from the administration of Donald Trump, one space scientist heading for Marseille has a message for funders: allow Americans to retain some of their old ties.

Kartik Sheth, who lost his position as associate chief scientist at NASA in April due to a mass layoff affecting thousands of employees, is preparing to start a new chapter in France. Sheth will soon join Aix-Marseille University as part of its Safe Place for Science programme, an initiative designed to offer a haven for US-based academics affected by recent cuts in the United States.

“The French have been extremely wonderful and generous in offering a pretty sizable start-up package,” said Sheth, who earlier this year met French President Emmanuel Macron to discuss the scheme.

As European institutions work to welcome displaced talent, the Safe Place for Science programme stands as an example of how global cooperation can support researchers during challenging times.
https://sciencebusiness.net/news/r-d-funding/aerospace/ex-nasa-scientist-poached-france-urges-european-flexibility-appointments

Disease-Ridden Homosexuals Stage Border ‘Kiss-In’ To Protest Trump Immigration Policies

A group of HIV-positive men gathered at the U.S.-Mexico border on Sunday and staged a coordinated “kiss-in,” aiming to confront what they described as discrimination and hostile immigration policies under President Donald Trump.

The demonstration took place at Friendship Park/Parque de la Amistad, located between California and Mexico, as activists marked the run-up to World AIDS Day, according to The Advocate. MPact Global Action for Gay Men’s Health and Rights officials organized the event.

The group said they intend to normalize public displays of affection by people living with HIV, push back against stigmas surrounding sex and dating, and highlight concerns that queer migrants face under Trump-era border enforcement.

Andrew Spieldenner, MPact’s executive director, told The Advocate that the group deliberately sought a high-visibility protest at the border.

“As one of the only openly HIV-positive Executive Directors of a global organization, I am inspired and heartened by this highly visible action for the rights of all people living with HIV, especially queer migrants, when there’s so much fear and disinformation out there,” Spieldenner said. “Our communities are powerful when we come together.”

Research from the Williams Institute estimates that roughly 640,000 non-U.S. citizens identify as LGBTQ+ in the United States, including as many as 288,000 undocumented immigrants. Activists claim these migrants face heightened vulnerability under Trump’s immigration policies.

Advocacy groups have accused U.S. detention centers of denying lifesaving HIV medications and tolerating violence against LGBTQ+ detainees. Alex Garner, MPact’s senior director of strategic initiatives, said the border demonstration sought to challenge those conditions.

“MPact works in collaboration with local communities to create the International HIV Kiss-in because it’s a bold, provocative, and revolutionary act to publicly demonstrate the sexuality of people living with HIV and declare the human rights of queer migrants,” Garner explained. “We’ve transcended borders of sexuality and of gender, and borders cannot restrict our fight for queer migrants and people living with HIV as we utilize the power of a kiss.”

Migrants moving through Mexico toward the United States have shown documented HIV prevalence ranging from roughly 0.6% to 2% in studies conducted since 2020. A large analysis of 9,108 Central American migrants found a 0.71% overall rate and significantly higher levels among transgender migrants.

Additional research in the Tijuana-San Diego border region reported a 0.63% HIV prevalence among migrants in 2021, showing a consistent pattern of sub-1% infection rates across major transit points.

A separate surveillance effort by the International Organization for Migration (IOM) found about 2% HIV prevalence among migrants tested at Mexico’s southern border during 2022-2023.

(RELATED: Trump Plans To Build 10 Miles Of New Border Wall Near San Diego Ports Of Entry)

*All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.*
https://dailycaller.com/2025/12/01/hiv-positive-mexico-border-kiss-in-protest-trump-policy/

EU plans €51M Choose Europe call for research careers in 2027

The European Commission plans to launch a €51. 25 million call in 2027 as part of the Choose Europe initiative, which is intended to make the continent a more attractive place to pursue a career in research. The Commission launched a €22. 5 million pilot call in October, which will close on December 3, but a draft 2026-27 work programme for the Marie Skłodowska Curie Actions (MSCA), Horizon Europe’s researcher training scheme, has revealed plans to extend the support. The Choose Europe initiative, announced with great pomp earlier this year, aims to tackle brain drain and the precarity of research careers by co-funding the recruitment of postdoctoral researchers for up to five years. EU funding will cover the positions for two to three years, while the host institutions must provide funding for an additional two years. Each programme that receives funding must recruit a minimum of three researchers. While the research community welcomed the initial pilot, there have been concerns that national cuts to research budgets in several EU countries could make it difficult for research organisations to cough up their share of the money. The draft call offers universities more flexibility by allowing the EU funding to cover either the first or second phase of the programme, although the basic issue remains. Attracting foreign talent A key priority is to attract international talent to Europe, particularly as researchers from around the world find fewer opportunities than before in the US. Recruited researchers can be of any nationality and must not have resided or carried out their main work or studies in the country of the recruiting institution for more than 12 months in the previous three years. The draft work programme gives researchers the possibility of implementing their MSCA-backed project on a part-time basis, for personal, family or professional reasons, which could benefit international scientists who still have family ties in their home country. Maria Leptin, president of the European Research Council, recently suggested that Europe should offer scientists a “haven,” in a “non-selfish manner,” allowing them to spend only half their time in Europe if needed. Related articles US researchers: Choose Europe, but part-time ERC to introduce seven-year €7 million ‘super grants’ in 2026 Choose Europe talent pilot receives lukewarm welcome A related goal is to improve working conditions and long-term prospects for researchers in Europe. Institutions applying for support will be evaluated partly on the competitiveness of the salaries and career development opportunities offered as part of their programme, as well as the quality of long-term career prospects beyond the duration of the fellowship. Supported programmes can be in any research discipline, despite indications from Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, at a Choose Europe launch event in May, that support beyond the pilot phase would privilege “frontier fields like artificial intelligence.” The MSCA calls are part of a broader €500 million package to make Europe “a magnet for researchers,” including seven-year “super grants” worth up to €7 million under the European Research Council.
https://sciencebusiness.net/news/international-news/eu-plans-eu51m-choose-europe-call-research-careers-2027

Congress Moves Quickly to Bring Epstein Files Closer to Sunlight – Liberty Nation News

With a single exception, the House of Representatives on Tuesday, Nov. 18, voted unanimously to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act and send it to the Senate. The act requires the Justice Department to make public all “unclassified records, documents, communications and investigative materials” related to the late convicted sex predator and accused sex trafficker within 30 days of the bill being signed into law. The Senate gave the American public whiplash when, just hours later, it too fired the bill off to the president’s desk by unanimous consent. Several GOP representatives expressed concern at some of the bill’s language, but it seems the public circus this whole affair has stirred up was too much for those who believe the legislation needed more work. The final vote in the House was 427-1. It is a historic and unprecedented move. These documents pertain to criminal investigations – something normally outside of its purview. That’s what troubles some Republicans. The lone “nay” vote belonged to Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), who explained in a post on X: “What was wrong with the bill three months ago is still wrong today. It abandons 250 years of criminal justice procedure in America. As written, this bill reveals and injures thousands of innocent people – witnesses, people who provided alibis, family members, etc. If enacted in its current form, this type of broad reveal of criminal investigative files, released to a rabid media, will absolutely result in innocent people being hurt. [emphasis Higgins’]” A Dangerous Political Exercise House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and other GOPers expressed similar concerns about the lack of proper protections for some of Epstein’s victims and for many others whose names appear in the Epstein files and, thus, may be assumed to have been involved in the disgraced financier’s crimes even though they were not. There’s also the possible chilling effect the passage of this bill could have on future criminal investigations. Speaking to reporters on Nov. 18, Johnson said, “Who’s going to want to come forward if they think Congress can take a political exercise and reveal their identities? Who’s going to come talk to prosecutors? It’s very dangerous. It would deter future whistleblowers and informants.” The Speaker said he would insist to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) that language is inserted into the bill that will ensure the privacy of individuals who, for various reasons, are named in the Epstein files but are not implicated in any wrongdoing. These may include witnesses, victims, family members, whistleblowers, and even law enforcement personnel who may have been working undercover during the Epstein investigation. As Higgins further pointed out in his X post: “The Oversight Committee is conducting a thorough investigation that has already released well over 60,000 pages of documents from the Epstein case. That effort will continue in a manner that provides all due protections for innocent Americans.” Higgins added that he would vote for the bill when it returned to the House “[i]f the Senate amends the bill to properly address privacy of victims and other Americans, who are named but not criminally implicated.” He will not get the chance, though. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) asked for unanimous consent and got it without objection. Previously, he had said in a statement, “Republicans have spent months trying to protect Donald Trump and hide what’s in the files. Americans are tired of waiting and are demanding to see the truth. If Leader Thune tries to bury the bill, I’ll stop him.” This has been the line from Democrats for months, even though the name Epstein barely crossed their lips for the four years during which the Biden administration sat on the Epstein files, making no move to release anything. For his part, Thune had reportedly indicated that, because the House so overwhelmingly approved the bill, the Senate is unlikely to alter it to any extent, and the upper chamber is likely to move swiftly. Unanimous consent means no debate, obviously, no changes to the bill, and therefore no need to return it to the House. The Epstein Files and Trump As so many have pointed out – including The Washington Post, a newspaper well-known for its heavy anti-Trump leanings – if the Epstein files implicated Trump in anything that appeared remotely illegal, immoral, or underhanded, that information would have been leaked to the media years ago. Undoubtedly, Trump’s political opponents would have ensured any such revelations were so widely known that almost certainly America’s 47th president would not have been named Trump. After blowing hot and cold on the issue, the president finally signaled his approval of the Epstein bill and asserted that he would sign it even without the kinds of additional protections many Republicans called for. He may believe that this will finally put the whole affair in the rearview mirror. He would be wrong about that. The Epstein files saga is not nearing its end. In fact, this is not even the beginning of the end – it may just be the end of the beginning. What follows, after the president signs the bill and the DOJ reluctantly complies, will be a months-long media feeding frenzy and probably a few lawsuits. Elected Democrats, after they have pored over every word in the documents and come up with nothing they can pin on Trump, will inevitably proclaim that the documents containing the damning evidence have been classified and redacted. Trump’s enemies could be about to fall into a trap of their own making – focusing so much on flogging this particular deceased Equus ferus caballus that even their most ardent anti-Trump cheerleaders get tired of it. But perhaps they believe this is their new secret midterm elections weapon. Spoiler alert: It almost certainly is not.
https://www.libertynation.com/congress-moves-quickly-to-bring-epstein-files-closer-to-sunlight/

Federal judges block Texas from using its new US House map in the 2026 midterms

A federal court on Tuesday blocked Texas from using a redrawn U.S. House map that touched off a nationwide redistricting battle and is a major piece of President Donald Trump’s efforts to preserve a slim Republican majority ahead of the 2026 elections. Texas this summer was the first state to meet Trump’s demands in what has become an expanding national battle over redistricting. Republicans drew the state’s new map to give the GOP five additional seats, and Missouri and North Carolina followed with new maps adding an additional Republican seat each. To counter those moves, California voters approved a ballot initiative to give Democrats an additional five seats there. “The public perception of this case is that it’s about politics. To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 Map. But it was much more than just politics. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 Map,” the ruling states. The 2-1 decision followed a nearly two-week trial in El Paso, Texas. Texas’ expected appeal would be directly to the U.S. Supreme Court, under a federal law dealing with redistricting lawsuits. A coalition of civil rights groups representing Black and Hispanic voters argued the map reduced the influence of minority voters, making it a racial gerrymander that violates the federal Voting Rights Act and the U.S. Constitution. They sought an order blocking Texas from using the map while their case proceeded, which would force the state to use the map drawn by the GOP-controlled Legislature in 2021 for next year’s elections. The panel of judges granted the critics’ request, signaling that they think those critics have a substantial chance of winning their case at trial. Judges appointed by Trump and Democratic President Barack Obama formed the majority. An appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan dissented. “Without an injunction, the racial minorities the Plaintiff Groups represent will be forced to be represented in Congress based on likely unconstitutional racial classifications for at least two years,” the ruling said. Republicans in Texas said repeatedly during the Legislature’s debates this summer, and after, that they were redrawing districts solely to help Republicans win more seats. The U.S. Supreme Court gave states the go-ahead to pursue partisan gerrymandering by ruling in 2019 that it’s a political issue beyond the reach of the federal courts. But the two appeals judges concluded that a major reason that GOP Gov. Greg Abbott and Republican lawmakers moved was a letter from the head of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division in July, directing Texas to redraw four districts that it said violated the Voting Rights Act. Harmeet Dhillon, the assistant U.S. attorney general overseeing the division, cited a ruling last year by the conservative federal appeals court for Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 does not allow separate minority groups to “aggregate their populations” to argue that a map illegally dilutes minority voters’ ability to elect the candidate of their choice. The court said each group’s situation must be analyzed separately. Dhillon argued that so-called “coalition” districts, where no group has a majority but minority voters together outnumber non-Hispanic white voters, must be dismantled as “vestiges of an unconstitutional racially based gerrymandering past.” “The Legislature adopted those racial objectives,” the majority said. “The redistricting bill’s sponsors made numerous statements suggesting that they had intentionally manipulated the districts’ lines to create more majority-Hispanic and majority-Black districts.” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment about the ruling. Republicans hold 25 of Texas’ 38 congressional seats, with Democrats holding two of their 13 seats in districts that Trump carried in 2024. Had the new map been in place last year, Trump would have carried 30 congressional districts by 10 percentage points or more, making it likely that the GOP would have won that many seats as well. Democrats across the U.S. have described the redistricting in Texas and other states as a power grab by Trump designed to prevent a congressional check on him, regardless of voter anger. Republicans are keen to avoid a repeat of the 2018 midterms, when they lost the majority and the Democratic-controlled House twice impeached Trump. The new map decreased from 16 to 14 the number of congressional districts where minorities comprise a majority of voting-age citizens. In doing so, they eliminated what had been five of nine coalition districts. Five of six Democratic lawmakers drawn into districts with other incumbents are Black or Hispanic. Yet Republicans argued that the map is better for minority voters. While five “coalition” districts are eliminated, there’s a new, eighth Hispanic-majority district, and two new Black-majority districts. Critics consider each of those new districts a sham, arguing that the majority is so slim that white voters, who tend to turn out in larger numbers, will control election results. Stay informed and connected — subscribe to The Philadelphia Tribune NOW! Click Here Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Don’t Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. Be Truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything. Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person. Be Proactive. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts. Share with Us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/federal-judges-block-texas-from-using-its-new-us-house-map-in-the-2026-midterms/article_c4887c98-6b09-445a-989d-ced904e7d6fc.html

Makers of 120 Bahadur launch customised ‘My Stamp’ honouring Rezang La War memorial; unveiled by Rajnath Singh ahead of battle’s 63rd anniversary

In a heartfelt tribute to the courage and sacrifice of Indian soldiers, the makers of the upcoming war epic **120 Bahadur** have launched a special customised ‘My Stamp’ dedicated to the Rezang La War Memorial. The stamp, unveiled by Hon’ble Raksha Mantri Shri Rajnath Singh Ji in New Delhi, commemorates the valour of the 13th Battalion, Kumaon Regiment of the Indian Army—the heroes of the historic Battle of Rezang La.

### Customised ‘My Stamp’ Honours Rezang La War Memorial

The unveiling ceremony was attended by Shri Jitendra Gupta, Director General Postal Services, along with the film’s team—director Razneesh ‘Razy’ Ghai, producers Farhan Akhtar, Ritesh Sidhwani, Amit Chandrra, and actor Arhan Bagati. Together, they released the customised My Stamp issued by the Department of Posts, marking a symbolic gesture of remembrance ahead of the 63rd anniversary of the 1962 battle.

Situated in Chushul, Ladakh, the Rezang La War Memorial stands as a solemn tribute to the indomitable spirit of the soldiers who made the ultimate sacrifice in the 1962 India-China war. The newly unveiled stamp captures this legacy, celebrating their unmatched courage and ensuring their heroic deeds continue to inspire generations.

### 120 Bahadur: Celebrating Extraordinary Bravery

**120 Bahadur** brings to life the extraordinary story of Major Shaitan Singh Bhati, Param Vir Chakra awardee, portrayed by Farhan Akhtar. The film chronicles his leadership and the steadfast bravery of his men as they stood their ground in one of India’s most defining military moments.

Directed by Razneesh ‘Razy’ Ghai and produced by Ritesh Sidhwani, Farhan Akhtar (Excel Entertainment), and Amit Chandrra (Trigger Happy Studios), **120 Bahadur** is slated to release in cinemas on **November 21, 2025**. The film’s stirring tagline—“Hum Peechhe Nahin Hatenge”—echoes the immortal spirit of those who defended the nation with unwavering resolve.

**Also Read:** Rajasthan MLA Seeks Tax-Free Status for 120 Bahadur, Pens Letter to CM Bhajan Lal Sharma
**More Pages:** 120 Bahadur Box Office Collection

**Stay tuned for more updates on Bollywood News.**
https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/makers-120-bahadur-launch-customised-stamp-honouring-rezang-la-war-memorial-unveiled-rajnath-singh-ahead-battles-63rd-anniversary/

Adams administration throws support behind 16-year-old Bronx student detained by ICE

Mayor Eric Adams is standing behind a 16-year-old Bronx high schooler, Joel Camas, who was recently detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The city has formally filed legal papers supporting Camas’s lawsuit aimed at halting his deportation.

Camas was arrested during a routine immigration check on October 23 and now faces deportation to Ecuador. He originally fled Ecuador in 2022 to escape threats from violent gangs, according to documents submitted in Manhattan federal court.

The Adams administration argues that Camas, as a teenage public school student, should have the right to “access city schools and services while their immigration issues are being resolved.” This stance was detailed in a brief filed Monday in support of the teen.

In a statement, Mayor Adams described Camas as “a hard-working student, dedicated to his school work and future, who followed the proper immigration process.” He added, “We are proud to support his petition for justice, just like we have done with the many other New York City Public School students who have been detained during routine immigration proceedings.”

Since his arrest, Camas has been held at an Office of Refugee Resettlement youth shelter in The Bronx, according to news outlet THE CITY.

The city further argues that Camas poses no flight or safety risk, making detention unnecessary. Muriel Goode-Trufant, the city’s top attorney, stated, “The Trump administration has not met the very high bar for detaining this minor student who is better served remaining in the community with his family.”

However, federal authorities remain determined to deport Camas. The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District, Jay Clayton, also requested the judge to keep Camas detained pending his trial, emphasizing the government’s intention to reunite him with his mother in Ecuador.

Camas arrived from Ecuador in December 2022 with his mother, who self-deported earlier this year. She entrusted Joel to relatives in hopes he could build a better life. According to Camas’s lawsuit, both have had orders of removal against them since losing their asylum case in 2024—an appearance they made without legal representation.

Currently a junior at Gotham Collaborative High School in The Bronx, Camas maintains a perfect attendance record, as noted in the city’s supportive amicus brief. His teachers have described him as a “committed” student who is so motivated to learn English that “he refuses materials in his native language,” the filing states.

The city’s backing of Joel Camas highlights ongoing concerns about the treatment of immigrant students and the importance of access to education and services during immigration proceedings. Mayor Adams’s administration continues to champion these causes as part of its broader commitment to supporting New York City’s immigrant communities.
https://nypost.com/2025/11/11/us-news/city-throws-support-behind-bronx-student-detained-by-ice/

Editorial: Philly voters joined national rejection of Trump’s GOP

Democrats swept major races in Philadelphia, the suburbs, statewide judicial contests, and in New Jersey in the first general election since President Donald Trump returned to the White House.

In Philadelphia, District Attorney Larry Krasner defeated Republican challenger Pat Dugan by approximately 52 percentage points, easily securing a third term. Krasner captured 75.9% of the vote compared to Dugan’s 24%. For City Controller, Democratic incumbent Christy Brady defeated Republican challenger Ari Patrinos by more than 72 percentage points, winning 86.14% of the vote compared to Patrinos’ 13.79%.

Despite a well-funded campaign by conservative activists aligned with Trump to unseat three Democratic justices on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, all three justices up for retention were chosen to remain by voters.

In other judicial contests, Democrat Brandon Neuman won the Pennsylvania Superior Court race against Republican Maria Battista and Liberal Party candidate Daniel Wassmer. Alice DeBow retained her seat as well. For the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, Democrat Stella Tsai defeated Republican Matt Wolford, while Judge Michael Wojcik retained his seat.

Democrats also dominated in the suburbs. In Delaware County, Democrats maintained unanimous control of Delaware County Council. In Bucks County, Democrats swept all row offices, with Joe Khan elected as district attorney and Democrat Danny Ceisler ousting Republican Fred Harran in the sheriff’s race.

In New Jersey, Democrat Mikie Sherrill beat Republican Jack Ciattarelli in the governor’s race, a contest that drew national attention as a possible prelude to next year’s midterms.

Voter turnout was notably high in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. In Philadelphia, 34% of registered voters cast ballots — the highest turnout for an off-year election in at least a decade, according to unofficial results posted by the City Commissioners office.

Polling and exit surveys indicated that President Trump was a major motivating factor behind Democratic victories across the region, statewide, and nationally, including the gubernatorial race in Virginia and the mayoral race in New York.

In New York, Democrat Zohran Mamdani, a 34-year-old Democratic Socialist, defeated former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, who ran as an independent and was endorsed by Trump.

On Election Day, voters told the Tribune that dissatisfaction with the current state of government was a primary concern. As the Tribune reported, “While President Donald Trump was not on the ballot Tuesday, his policies and their effects were heavily on the minds of voters.”

Last Tuesday, Philadelphians joined voters nationwide in expressing opposition to Trump’s economic policies and the government shutdown, which polls indicate voters mainly blame on Trump and Republicans in Congress.
https://www.phillytrib.com/commentary/editorial-philly-voters-joined-national-rejection-of-trumps-gop/article_bda7e02d-fdaa-4e4f-9ebd-e67a67779936.html

Senate inches closer to vote on government shutdown deal

WASHINGTON — The Senate edged closer to a vote on legislation to end the government shutdown on Monday after a small group of Senate Democrats broke a 40-day stalemate late Sunday evening. These Democrats voted with Republicans to move forward with reopening the government.

It remains unclear when the Senate will hold final votes on the bill, but Senate Majority Leader John Thune expressed hope that passage would take “hours not days.” “The American people have suffered for long enough. Let’s not pointlessly drag this bill out,” Thune said as the Senate convened Monday morning.

The legislation still needs to clear the House before the government can officially reopen. Speaker Mike Johnson urged lawmakers to start returning to Washington “right now,” given travel delays, but said he would issue an official notice for the House’s return once the Senate passes the legislation.

“We have to do this as quickly as possible,” Johnson said at a news conference. He has kept the House out of session since mid-September, when the chamber passed a bill to continue government funding.

After weeks of negotiations, moderate Senate Democrats agreed to reopen the government without a guaranteed extension of health care subsidies. This decision angered many in their caucus, who have demanded Republicans negotiate on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits that expire January 1.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) promised a mid-December vote on the subsidies but made no guarantees about its outcome. The final procedural vote to advance the bill was 60-40.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York voted against moving ahead with the package, along with most of his Democratic colleagues. “We will not give up the fight,” Schumer said, adding that Democrats have now “sounded the alarm” on health care.

Still, an end to the shutdown could be delayed by days if any senators object and prolong the process. Thune is also addressing concerns within the Republican conference about individual provisions in the spending bills. For instance, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul threatened to object to a provision championed by his state colleague, former GOP leader Sen. Mitch McConnell, that prevents the sale of certain hemp-based products. Paul is seeking an amendment to remove this language before the final vote.

President Donald Trump expressed support for the agreement Monday, stating, “We’re going to be opening up our country very quickly.”

### Five Democrats Switch Votes

A group of three former governors—New Hampshire Sens. Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan, along with Independent Sen. Angus King of Maine—broke the six-week stalemate Sunday by agreeing to vote to advance three bipartisan annual spending bills and extend remaining government funding until late January.

The legislation includes a reversal of the mass firings of federal workers conducted by the Trump administration since the shutdown began on October 1. It also protects federal workers against further layoffs through January and guarantees they will be paid once the shutdown ends.

In addition to Shaheen, King, and Hassan, Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia—home to tens of thousands of federal workers—also voted in favor of moving forward. Other Democrats who voted yes include Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman, and Nevada Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen.

The moderates had expected a larger number of Democrats to join them, as 10–12 Democratic senators had been part of the negotiations. However, only five ultimately switched their votes—the exact number Republicans needed. Notably, King, Cortez Masto, and Fetterman had already been voting to open the government since October 1.

The agreement encompasses bipartisan bills crafted by the Senate Appropriations Committee to fund segments of the government, including food aid, veterans programs, and the legislative branch, among others.

### Democrats Call the Vote a “Mistake”

Schumer, who faced backlash from his party in March for voting to keep the government open, said he could not “in good faith” support the measure after a more than two-hour meeting with his caucus on Sunday.

Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who caucuses with the Democrats, decried giving up the fight as a “horrific mistake.” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) agreed, noting that voters who overwhelmingly supported Democrats in last week’s elections are urging them to “hold firm.”

House Democrats quickly criticized the Senate decision. Texas Rep. Greg Casar, chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, called a deal that doesn’t reduce health care costs a “betrayal” of millions of Americans relying on Democrats to fight for them.

Yet some gave Schumer a nod of support. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who had criticized Schumer in March after his vote to keep the government open, praised him on Monday and expressed confidence in his leadership throughout the shutdown.

“The American people know we are on the right side of this fight,” Jeffries said Monday, pointing to Tuesday’s election results.

### Health Care Debate Ahead

It remains uncertain whether the two parties will find common ground on health care subsidies ahead of the promised December vote in the Senate. House Speaker Mike Johnson has said he will not commit to bringing the issue up in his chamber.

On Monday, Johnson reiterated that House Republicans have always been open to voting to reform what he called the “unaffordable care act,” but again did not specify if they would vote on extending the subsidies.

Some Republicans have expressed openness to extending the COVID-19-era tax credits as premiums could dramatically increase for millions of Americans. However, they also seek new eligibility limits for these subsidies and insist that tax funding for the plans should be routed through individuals.

Other Republicans, including Trump, have used the debate to renew longstanding criticism of the ACA, calling for it to be scrapped or overhauled.
https://www.phillytrib.com/senate-inches-closer-to-vote-on-government-shutdown-deal/article_ab1e0940-4797-4551-bdb7-a2c09cef64a0.html

Mamdani Will Ravage the Entire State

**Zohran Mamdani’s Win Should Send Tremors Far Beyond New York City**
*By Betsy McCaughey*

Zohran Mamdani’s victory Tuesday should send shockwaves far beyond New York City. A Mamdani win will likely ignite wholesale legislative attacks on property owners, charter schools, law enforcement, and businesses across the entire state of New York. From Buffalo to Amagansett, no sector will be spared.

In New York, the critical decisions about criminal law, education, rent laws, and taxation are made at the state level—not locally. Mamdani and the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) will be calling the shots not only at City Hall but also in Albany. New Yorkers, brace yourselves for radical laws and huge tax hikes.

Mamdani, currently a member of the New York State Assembly from Queens until he is sworn in as mayor, already secured endorsements from the state’s top legislative leaders and sizable blocs within both the Assembly and Senate—27 Assembly members and 16 state senators—before his victory. His triumph elevates him to national prominence and positions him as the de facto head of the Democratic Party in New York State, wielding far more influence than Governor Kathy Hochul.

With Hochul’s approval ratings at a historic low, she is now desperately seeking Mamdani’s favor to curry goodwill with the Left. Mamdani’s clout at the Capitol means moderate Democrats are likely to fall in line “to enact a lot of his wish list,” reports Democratic Assemblyman Jake Blumencranz from Long Island. Blumencranz calls it “a perfect storm” set to impact the entire state.

### A Radical Criminal Justice Agenda

At the top of the DSA’s list—and Mamdani’s agenda—is aggressive decarceration that would put criminals back on the streets. Pro-criminal DSA legislators led efforts to pass the “Less is More” Act in 2021, a law that allows violent criminals who violate parole (for example, by using drugs) to remain free.

This law partly explains why Jamel McGriff, who was allegedly violating parole, was able to invade the home of an elderly Queens couple last September, torture them to death, and set their house on fire with them inside.

DSA legislators are also pushing bills to decriminalize prostitution under the state Senate bill titled “Cecilia’s Act for Rights in the Sex Trade” and to eliminate all criminal and civil penalties for possession of illegal drugs.

Mamdani ally and state Sen. Zellnor Myrie backs a bill, already passed in the Assembly, to extend youthful offender status to alleged criminals ages 19 to 25. This would spare them from a criminal conviction and seal their arrest record, magnifying the mistake made by the 2019 “Raise the Age” legislation—which shifted the criminal responsibility age from 16 to 18.

New York City Police Department Commissioner Jessica Tisch warns that “Raise the Age” has led to a quadrupling of homicides committed by juveniles and an 81% increase in juveniles being shot. Violent teens under 18 who commit heinous crimes receive merely a slap on the wrist in family court, and they soon return to offend again.

Mamdani’s allies in Albany are poised to worsen this situation by letting violent criminals in their 20s off the hook. It’s a dangerous and reckless approach.

### Hostility Toward Charter Schools

Mamdani and the DSA are fierce opponents of charter schools. They would rather see thousands of low-income and minority students languish in district schools assigned by geography—schools many consider “failure factories.”

Decisions about increasing charter schools are controlled in Albany by the State University of New York (SUNY) trustees, who generally support charters, and the SUNY Board of Regents, appointed by the legislature and heavily influenced by teachers unions aligned with the Democratic Party.

State Senate Bill 6800, sponsored by Mamdani ally Assemblywoman Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn of Brooklyn, would strip SUNY trustees of their charter powers, effectively leaving charter schools vulnerable to the hostile Board of Regents. The biggest losers in this battle will be the students.

### Targeting Property Owners and Renters

Property owners are squarely in the DSA’s crosshairs. The party aims to expand rent regulation—which many argue has caused severe housing shortages and dilapidated properties in New York City—to the entire state through state Senate Bill 4659. Furthermore, they seek to extend rent regulations to commercial properties such as stores via Senate Bill 8319.

### Ambitious Tax Hikes and Costly Freebies

As a candidate, Mamdani promised free bus rides, free child care, and other costly benefits—expenses he wants the entire state to fund. His campaign proposed hiking the state’s corporate tax rate by almost half, to 11.5%.

Mamdani ally state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal has already introduced a bill to increase corporate taxes, though by a somewhat lesser amount.

However, corporate taxes ultimately affect employees and customers—not just business owners—and tend to stifle economic growth. New York State already ranks dead last (50th out of 50) in economic outlook, largely due to its notoriously high tax burden.

How much worse can it get? Mamdani’s appetite for money as mayor threatens to drain the state’s resources further.

### Call to Action: Mobilize Now

Now is the time to mobilize a statewide counteroffensive to prevent a socialist takeover of state government. Do not wait for next year’s statewide elections.

Leaders in the nonprofit sector, including the Business Council, the Chamber of Commerce of Greater New York, and the New York State Bar Association, need to flood the state legislature with warnings and provide reinforcements to the vastly outnumbered Republicans and beleaguered moderate Democrats.

Mamdani may have won in New York City, but the real battle is moving to Albany.

*Betsy McCaughey is a former Lieutenant Governor of New York State and Chairman & Founder of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths.*
Follow her on Twitter: [@Betsy_McCaughey](https://twitter.com/Betsy_McCaughey)
https://www.independentsentinel.com/mamdani-will-ravage-the-entire-state/