ホストクラブ無許可営業疑いで逮捕 「東海最大」グループの役員ら3人
（）
西日本新聞の有料会員限定記事です。
「東海最大」とされるホストクラブグループの役員ら3人が、無許可営業の疑いで逮捕されました。詳細な情報は有料会員のみに提供されています。
クリップ機能の利用も有料会員限定となっております。今なら7日間無料トライアルを実施しており、1日あたりわずか37円で読み放題となっています。年払いならさらにお得です。
ホストクラブ無許可営業疑い逮捕 「東海最大」グループ役員ら3人
Reply
Category Archives: law
薄毛治療、62億円申告漏れ 「麻生美容クリニック」
2025年10月10日 9:53（2025年10月10日 9:54 更新）
—
[有料会員限定記事]
—
薄毛治療の「AGAスキンクリニック」や美容医療の「東京美容外科」などを全国で展開している「麻生美容クリニックグループ」が、大阪国税局の税務調査を受け、2023年までの約5年間で計約62億円の申告漏れを指摘されました。
この記事は有料会員限定です。
残り203文字を読むには、7日間無料トライアル、または1日37円で読み放題の有料会員登録が必要です。
年払いプランならさらにお得にご利用いただけます。
—
【西日本新聞meとは？】
クリップ機能は有料会員の方のみご利用いただけます。
—
＜SNSでシェアする＞
[threadsでシェアする] [Facebookでシェアする] [Twitterでシェアする]
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1409712/
大津いじめ中2死亡から14年 対策法関与の馳氏が訴え
2025年10月10日 3:23 （2025年10月10日 3:25 更新）
[有料会員限定記事]
—
インタビューに応じる石川県の馳浩知事
2011年に大津市立中学2年生の男子生徒（当時13歳）がいじめを苦に自殺してから、10月11日で14年を迎えます。2013年9月には、いじめ防止対策推進法が施行されました。この法施行に尽力したのが、石川県知事の馳浩氏です。
今回、馳浩知事がインタビューに応じ、「見て見ぬふりをやめ、困難に立ち向かうことの重要性」を語りました。
—
※この記事は有料会員限定です。残り544文字をお読みいただけます。
7日間無料トライアルを利用すれば、1日37円で読み放題。年払いプランならさらにお得です。
—
＜クリップ機能は有料会員の方のみご利用いただけます＞
西日本新聞meについて詳しくはこちら。
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1409650/
山口・岩国基地を敷地外から撮影の男性 米軍が写真削除求め顔写真も撮影 弁護士は違法性指摘
社会記事｜山口・岩国基地を敷地外から撮影の男性、米軍が写真削除求め顔写真も撮影 弁護士は違法性指摘
2025年10月9日 21:52（同日更新）
—
関西地方の20代男性が、9月に観光で訪れた山口県岩国市で、米軍岩国基地を敷地外から撮影しました。撮影直後、米兵に基地内に呼ばれ、写真の削除を求められたうえに、男性自身の顔写真も撮影されたと訴えています。
日本の法律では基地の撮影は禁止されていませんが、日米地位協定については議論がある状況です。男性が体験した行為の違法性については、弁護士からも指摘が出ています。
（写真：観光客が写真を撮影していた米軍岩国基地の正門＝山口県岩国市、2020年11月撮影・竹中謙輔）
—
【関連動画】
「眠れない」「頭痛が」昼夜響く爆音、住民悲鳴
米軍岩国基地の艦載機訓練、苦情1000件超
2025年9月28日 06:00
—
（この記事は有料会員限定です。7日間無料トライアルあり。月額37円で読み放題。年払いプランもあります。）
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1409541/
玉木氏「首相指名後回しも」 早期国会召集要求
—
title: 玉木氏「首相指名後回しも」早期国会召集要求
date: 2025-10-09 20:33
categories: 政治
—
国民民主党の玉木雄一郎代表は9日、自民、公明両党の連立協議がまとまらず、臨時国会召集に遅れが生じている状況に関しコメントしました。
玉木氏は「協議が長引くのであれば、首相指名選挙を後にしてでも国会を開き、法案や予算案を処理すべきだ」と述べ、早期の国会召集を強く求めています。
現在、連立協議の遅延が国会運営に影響を及ぼしている中でのこの発言は、政治の停滞解消に向けた重要なメッセージといえるでしょう。
（※この記事は有料会員限定記事のため、一部内容は省略されています。）
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1409504/
What Is this? You Can’t Discuss The Paper? Delhi HC Raises Questions Over SSC’s Social Media Gag On Exam
Delhi High Court Raises Concern Over SSC Directive Restricting Discussion of Exam Question Papers
The Delhi High Court has expressed serious concern over a recent directive issued by the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) that prohibits candidates from discussing, analysing, or sharing question papers of conducted exams on social media. The Court termed such restrictions as potential “gag orders.”
HC Bench Critiques SSC Directive
A bench comprising Chief Justice DK Upadhyay and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela raised the issue while hearing a petition filed by Vikas Kumar Mishra, which challenged the SSC’s notification dated September 8, 2025. The court observed, “After coming out of the exam hall, the first thing that we used to do was… what is this? How is this being prohibited in the notification? You can’t put such gag orders…you can’t discuss the paper?”, as reported by Law Trend.
The bench has issued notices to the Centre and SSC, directing them to submit their responses ahead of the next hearing scheduled for December 17, 2025.
Petition Challenges SSC’s Action
According to a report by Hindustan Times, the plea argues that the SSC directive is “illegal, arbitrary, and perverse.” It claims that the notification violates candidates’ and the public’s right to freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.
The petition further states that the notification imposes “unreasonable restrictions” on post-exam discussions and therefore should be quashed.
SSC’s Stand: Protecting Exam Integrity
Last month, the SSC cautioned candidates against sharing or posting question papers on social media under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 (PEA Act, 2024). The commission highlighted cases where candidates and content creators shared examination material, which they assert constitutes “unfair means.”
Key Provisions Under the PEA Act, 2024
- Section 3: Prohibits leakage, access, possession, or sharing of exam papers without proper authority.
- Section 9: Declares all offences cognisable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable.
- Section 10: Prescribes strict punishments including:
– Individuals: 3 to 5 years imprisonment plus a fine of ₹10 lakh.
– Institutions/Service Providers: Fine up to ₹1 crore plus disqualification from exams.
– Organised crime: 5 to 10 years imprisonment plus fine equal to or exceeding ₹1 crore.
The SSC stressed that any transgression will attract immediate legal action. It urged candidates, content creators, and social media platforms to refrain from posting or analysing question papers to maintain the integrity of examinations.
Student Reaction and Controversy
The SSC directive has drawn criticism from aspirants on social media. Many argue that these restrictions limit discussion of exam strategies, peer learning, and transparency in the examination process.
Some candidates have expressed concerns that banning post-exam discussions may affect their ability to learn from shared experiences, which are crucial for preparation and improvement.
As the Delhi High Court seeks responses from the Centre and SSC, the coming hearings are being closely watched by students, educators, and legal experts alike.
NASCAR and teams to meet in court to try to resolve yearlong feud over charter system
Un proyecto de ley que ya cuenta con dictamen de dos comisiones y podría llegar al recinto de Diputados en breve tiene en vilo al sector TIC argentino, ya que implicaría el regreso recargado de un tributo que había sido eliminado.
Se trata del impuesto Enard a las telecomunicaciones, un gravamen del 1% que se aplicó a la telefonía celular hasta 2017 y que se destinaba al Ente Nacional de Alto Rendimiento Deportivo. La versión actual también implicaría financiar al nuevo Consejo Federal para el Alto Rendimiento Deportivo (Cofard) con un 1% de la facturación de las compañías, pero no solo de telefonía móvil, sino también de internet y TV paga que tengan más de 10.000 clientes, lo que encarecería el servicio para los consumidores.
Este impuesto ya existió en su momento, pero solo para las compañías de telefonía móvil. Ahora se extiende a todo el resto de los servicios TIC.
“Estamos dando un paso hacia atrás”, afirmó Federico Fornelli, presidente de la Asociación Argentina de Televisión por Cable (ATVC).
La autoría del proyecto, que modifica la ley 26.573, corresponde a Rogelio Iparraguirre y Victoria Tolosa Paz, del bloque Unión por la Patria, y ya cuenta con dictamen de las comisiones de Deportes y Comunicación de Diputados.
Según ATVC, si algunos legisladores cercanos al oficialismo, algunos de los cuales votaron a favor en comisión, acompañan la iniciativa, esta podría avanzar. Según la redacción del texto, el 1% se agregaría al precio del servicio, pero el cliente no lo distinguiría en la factura.
“Estamos hablando de un nuevo impuesto que explícitamente mete mano en el bolsillo de toda la población y castiga a todos los usuarios por igual”, agregó.
Según datos del Ente Nacional de Comunicaciones (Enacom), el 82% de los hogares del país tiene acceso a internet, la penetración de líneas móviles asciende al 135% y el 57% de los hogares cuenta con TV por suscripción. Más allá de esto, debido al deterioro histórico del poder de compra, especialmente entre los usuarios de menores ingresos, Argentina presenta aún un déficit en el uso de estos servicios.
En 2023 se avanzó en mejorar las condiciones de acceso a dispositivos, gracias al plan de reducción gradual de impuestos. “Gravar los servicios TIC va en contra de esta tendencia”, continuó el ejecutivo.
Según un relevamiento de la Cámara Argentina de Internet (Cabase), el sector está sujeto a más de 20 tributos y tasas nacionales, provinciales y municipales, con una presión tributaria promedio del 41,5%.
La industria TIC, además, aporta el 1% de los ingresos totales devengados para constituir el Fondo de Servicio Universal, destinado a financiar proyectos de conectividad y acelerar la digitalización. Solo en 2024, el aporte total del sector por este concepto fue de $58.800 millones.
“¿Queremos una industria habilitadora, que fomente el empleo y la educación? En vez de ayudar, nos ponen otra barrera. Y además, no tiene mucho que ver con su función. ¿Qué tienen que ver las telecomunicaciones con el deporte? ¿Por qué no le ponen un impuesto al tabaco? A cualquier industria que se lo pusieran, igual estaría mal. El presupuesto del Enard debería establecerse con base en los ingresos, y luego, en función de eso, ver los gastos. No se puede castigar a una industria con el potencial de la nuestra para financiar el deporte”, cerró Fornelli.
https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/sports/autoracing/2025/10/08/nascar-and-teams-to-meet-in-court-to-try-to-resolve-yearlong-feud-over-charter-system
Israel optimistic about prospects of reaching a Gaza deal, sources tell ‘Post’
Israel Optimistic About Prospects of Reaching a Gaza Deal, Sources Tell ‘Post’
By AMICHAI STEIN, Jerusalem Post Staff
Israel remains optimistic about the prospects of reaching a deal concerning Gaza, sources have indicated to the Jerusalem Post.
An additional source clarified that, as the deal currently stands, Marwan Barghouti and Ahmad Saadat will not be released.
Meanwhile, families of Israelis held hostage by Hamas terrorists in Gaza have shown their solidarity and hope by building a sukkah outside the Prime Minister’s residence in Jerusalem. The sukkah, constructed on October 5, 2025, features photographs of the hostages, symbolizing their ongoing presence in the hearts and minds of their loved ones.
(Photo credit: Chaim Goldbeg/FLASH90)
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-869809
PIL filed in Supreme Court seeks inquiry into toxic cough syrup deaths of 14
A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking an inquiry and systemic reforms in drug safety mechanisms. This comes in the wake of the deaths of 14 children in Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, allegedly due to the consumption of toxic cough syrups.
The PIL, filed by advocate Vishal Tiwari, requests a court-monitored probe into the incidents. It also urges the constitution of a National Judicial Commission or an Expert Committee headed by a retired Supreme Court judge to oversee the matter.
Additionally, the plea seeks the transfer of all pending FIRs and investigations related to the deaths of children across various states to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
The plea further urges the court to direct the Central government to constitute a national-level judicial or expert body to identify regulatory failures that allowed the distribution of substandard medicines. It also calls for mandatory toxicological testing of all suspected products before they are allowed for further sale.
*Disclaimer: This story has been sourced from a third-party syndicated feed/agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for the dependability, trustworthiness, reliability, or accuracy of the content. Mid-day management and mid-day.com reserve the sole right to alter, delete, or remove content (without notice) at their absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.*
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/pil-filed-in-supreme-court-seeks-inquiry-into-toxic-cough-syrup-deaths-of-14-children-23597687
‘Fake’ Madeleine McCann Sobs as Court Confirms She’s Not Missing Toddler… After She ‘Stalked’ Family and Claimed to Be Young Girl
**Court Confirms: Julia Wandelt Is Not Madeleine McCann**
*Published Oct. 7, 2025, 2:40 p.m. ET*
A disturbing individual who had been falsely claiming to be missing toddler Madeleine McCann was finally confronted by a judge, who confirmed she is, in fact, not the child, RadarOnline.com can reveal.
Julia Wandelt, 24, broke down in tears in court after hearing the news that she has no familial link to the McCann family.
### What Did The Court Have To Say?
Wandelt is currently on trial, accused of stalking Madeleine’s parents, Gerry and Kate McCann. Prosecutors explained that Wandelt “pursued that myth” by sending emails, making phone calls, and turning up uninvited at their home on multiple occasions.
During the proceedings, jurors were presented with “unequivocal scientific evidence” proving Wandelt is not related to the McCanns — despite her repeated claims of having memories of Madeleine’s childhood and disappearance.
Prosecutor Michael Duck stated, “Can we at this very early stage in the trial make this position clear – that Julia Wandelt is not Madeleine McCann.” This declaration caused Wandelt to break down in tears.
### Co-Defendant Also Accused of Stalking
Wandelt is not the only defendant facing the court. Co-defendant Karen Spragg, 61, is also accused of stalking and causing serious distress to Kate and Gerry, with alleged incidents spanning from June 2022 to February 2025.
### “She Pursued That Myth”
Prosecutor Duck further outlined Wandelt’s obsession:
“Her contention over the two and a half years that followed was that she must have been abducted and taken to Poland, where she lived with people who she was erroneously told were her parents.
You will hear instances where she claims evolving memories of what happened in May 2007. She pursued claims that she was Madeleine McCann and relentlessly contacted Madeleine’s parents over an extended period. She pursued that myth.”
Duck revealed that Wandelt obtained Kate McCann’s phone number in April 2024 and continued to push her false narrative. At one point, Wandelt even sent photos to Madeleine’s younger sister in an attempt to “persuade” her they were somehow related.
“There could never have been a legitimate belief by Julia Wandelt that she was Madeleine McCann,” Duck emphasized.
“At the time of Madeleine’s disappearance, Julia Wandelt was not the same age. She gathered numerous images of Madeleine McCann and other McCann family photos and tried to compare them with images of herself.”
### Arrest and Confrontation
Earlier this year, Wandelt confronted Kate McCann at her UK home, months before Wandelt was arrested at an airport on suspicion of harassment.
According to an insider, Wandelt flew to the UK in December accompanied by Spragg to plead her case and convince Kate that she was her daughter. The exchange was recorded on a phone Wandelt had in her pocket.
During the encounter, Kate is heard saying, “This is private property.” Wandelt pleaded, “Please, please! Only two minutes! I understand you!” but Kate insisted they leave. Spragg then asked, “I thought you wanted to find your daughter?” to which Kate replied, “I do, but I don’t need this,” before threatening to call the police.
Wandelt had multiple encounters with the McCanns, including one instance in which she claimed to have “results” from a new DNA test analyzed by “highly respected and recognized world expert, Dr. Monte Miller.”
On February 19, Wandelt was arrested at Bristol Airport on suspicion of stalking and harassing Gerry and Kate McCann.
### Background: Madeleine McCann’s Disappearance
Madeleine McCann vanished from a Portuguese hotel in 2007 and has not been seen since. Christian Brueckner is currently considered the prime suspect in her disappearance.
—
*Stay tuned to RadarOnline.com for further updates on this ongoing trial.*
https://radaronline.com/p/fake-madeleine-mccann-julia-wandelt-sobs-in-court-not-missing-toddler/