Jimmy Kimmel’s Show Set To Return On Air, But Still May Face Partial Boycott

Despite ABC revoking Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension, Nexstar and Sinclair have refused to air his show over “insensitivity” following his remarks about the MAGA movement.

The day after ABC lifted the suspension on Jimmy Kimmel’s show, local TV stations operated by Nexstar and Sinclair, which collectively run dozens of stations affiliated with ABC, announced they would continue to replace the show with regular programming on Tuesday.

“Mr. Kimmel’s remarks were inappropriate and deeply insensitive at a critical moment for our country,” said Sinclair’s vice-chairman, Jason Smith.

Kimmel’s late-night talk show was abruptly pulled last week after Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr and affiliate networks threatened ABC over comments Kimmel made in a monologue about the MAGA movement’s response to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. This incident sparked a heated debate between supporters of former President Donald Trump’s administration and Kimmel regarding government interference and freedom of speech.

On Monday, over 400 artists, including Tom Hanks, Meryl Streep, and Jennifer Aniston, signed an open letter organized by the ACLU in support of Kimmel, CNN reported.

Later, a spokesperson for the Walt Disney Company, which owns ABC, told CNN, “We have spent the last days having thoughtful conversations with Jimmy, and after those conversations, we reached the decision to return the show on Tuesday.”
https://www.news18.com/world/tv-stations-refuse-to-air-insensitive-kimmels-show-despite-abc-lifting-suspension-ws-l-9592556.html

‘Consumers Who Have Not Received GST Rate Cut Benefits Can Register Complaints On Toll-Free Number’: CBIC

New Delhi: The government on Tuesday announced that consumers who have not received the benefits of the GST rate cut can register their complaints through multiple channels.

According to a FAQ released by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), aggrieved customers can contact the National Consumer Helpline (NCH) via the toll-free number 1915 or through WhatsApp at 8800001915. Additionally, complaints and queries can be registered on the Integrated Grievance Redressal Mechanism (INGRAM) portal.

Effective September 22, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) structure was simplified into a two-tier system of 5% and 18%. The previous rates of 5%, 12%, 18%, and 28% have been merged into these two slabs, leading to reduced prices for 99% of daily use items.

While the anti-profiteering mechanism has not yet been activated for complaints related to profiteering, the government has been closely monitoring pricing trends. Several companies have voluntarily confirmed that they are passing on the benefits of the tax cut by lowering prices.

However, complaints have started emerging on social media alleging that some businesses are not passing on the GST rate cut benefits to consumers.

*Disclaimer: This story is from a syndicated feed. No changes have been made except to the headline.*
https://www.freepressjournal.in/business/consumers-who-have-not-received-gst-rate-cut-benefits-can-register-complaints-on-toll-free-number-cbic

Trump’s $100,000 H-1B Gamble: An Erratic Tax On Talent That Will Hollow Out Indo-US Trust

When policy looks like a tantrum, economies pay the price. Last week’s proclamation from the White House slapped a staggering $100,000 charge on H-1B sponsorships — a move rolled out with breathtaking haste and defended as a revenue-and-protection measure by the administration.

Whatever its stated objectives, the practical arithmetic and geopolitical fallout are stark: this is not a narrow reform but a blunt instrument aimed squarely at the talent bridge between India and America.

### The Numbers Speak First

The H-1B system is not small. USCIS approved roughly 399,395 H-1B petitions in FY-2024, of which about 141,205 were approvals for initial employment (new entrants rather than renewals). The statutory annual cap remains 85,000 (65,000 regular slots plus 20,000 for advanced degrees).

Depending on how the new charge is applied, the headline revenue to U.S. coffers could range widely — and not all of it would be net gain once economic second-order effects are accounted for.

– If the $100,000 were charged only to the statutory cap (85,000 new visas), the gross take is $8.5 billion.
– If it were to fall against all initial petitions approved in a year (~141,205), that figure jumps to roughly $14.1 billion.
– If the levy extended to every approved petition in FY-2024 (a broader and legally doubtful reading), the sum would be nearly $40 billion.

(Using today’s rupee-dollar rates, $100,000 is roughly ₹8.8 lakh — small variations in exchange rates explain why some reports quote ₹83 lakh or ₹88 lakh.)

### Beyond Raw Revenue

Raw revenue is not the whole ledger. Indian technocrats are woven through American tech, finance, healthcare, and academia — they are founding entrepreneurs, senior engineers, hospital specialists, and university researchers. Indian nationals accounted for roughly three-quarters of H-1B approvals in recent years, a concentration that means any blunt restriction falls disproportionately on India.

Much of the economic value these professionals create — patents, start-ups, payroll taxes, consumption, and managerial leadership — is not captured by a one-off visa levy. Indiaspora and industry studies show the Indian diaspora’s economic footprint in the U.S. runs into the tens or hundreds of billions when multiplicative effects are counted; students alone contribute over $8 billion a year in tuition and living expenses.

Strip mobility, and the innovation pipeline is damaged in ways a fee cannot repair.

### Who Gets Hit?

In one sense, every company that depends on specialized, mobile labor — from Amazon and Microsoft to giant Indian services exporters such as TCS and Infosys — faces sharply higher costs. Federal filings show Amazon, Cognizant, Ernst & Young, TCS, and others among the biggest sponsors; Amazon alone accounted for thousands of H-1B beneficiaries in 2024.

For Indian services firms that staff client sites across the U.S., the hit is not merely additional fees but the prospect of re-pricing contracts, canceling placements, or shifting delivery back offshore — with attendant margin and reputational damage. Smaller U.S. start-ups, which rely on H-1B hires to scale, would be squeezed even harder.

How many Indian lives and careers are immediately endangered is a question of definitions: reports quote a range from roughly 300,000 to 700,000 Indians affected, depending on whether one counts active H-1Bs, beneficiaries plus dependents, or cumulative approvals.

That variance matters politically: a conservative figure of ~300,000 still represents whole communities clustered in specific Indian ecosystems — Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Pune, Mumbai, and the Delhi-NCR corridor — and flows of talent that feed the wider economy through remittances, entrepreneurship, and investments.

States that account for the lion’s share of India’s software exports — Karnataka, Maharashtra, Telangana, and Tamil Nadu — will feel the blow most directly, since they host the headquarters and campus pipelines that feed U.S. placements.

### Americans Will Also Be Hit

So what does the U.S. “gain”? The immediate fiscal headline looks seductive: billions in receipts (depending on the base) and, the administration argues, pressure on employers to hire domestically.

But the counterfactual is costly. Reduced mobility will depress U.S. innovation output, delay product roadmaps, shrink start-up formation by immigrant founders, and raise costs for firms that cannot easily replace experience embodied in transferred teams.

In short, short-term revenue risks becoming a longer-term tax on competitiveness.

### What Should Be India’s Future Strategy?

There is no single lever; this moment calls for a layered response:

**1. Diplomatic Containment and Negotiation**
New Delhi must mount a calibrated diplomatic offensive — not tit-for-tat, but targeted advocacy for carve-outs (healthcare, critical R&D, academic exchanges) and grandfathering of current holders. India should channel industry pressure through U.S. corporate stakeholders who will lose talent and lobby Congress.

**2. Legal and Multilateral Pressure**
The legality of an executive fee of this magnitude will be challenged in U.S. courts; India and affected firms should coordinate legal and administrative reviews while using WTO and international forums to underscore the externalities of unilateral, extra-legislative measures.

**3. Offshore Resilience and Near-Shoring**
Indian firms must accelerate higher-value onshore-offshore models: repatriate roles to Indian delivery centers, deepen centers in neighboring time zones (ASEAN, Middle East), and pivot clients to outcome-based contracts rather than body-shopping models.

**4. Domestic Absorption and Talent Policy**
Invest the shortfall into skilling, start-up financing, and R&D incentives so returning talent seeds domestic product companies rather than becoming unemployed. States such as Karnataka and Telangana must be offered fiscal support to expand global capability centers.

**5. Strategic Economic Diplomacy**
Broaden mobility pipelines with Europe, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and Canada while pressing for reciprocal mobility and technical collaboration.

### Final Thoughts

The administration’s spectacle — a policy unleashed with headline theatrics and inconsistent clarifications about renewals and scope — has already frayed trust.

If the objective was to protect American workers, the tools chosen are blunt and economically perverse: levy first, measure consequences later.

For India, the need is to turn diplomatic shock into strategic opportunity: convert disruption into accelerated domestic capability, diversify partner markets, and make the case — to U.S. firms and to Washington — that talent mobility is not a subsidy but the oxygen of 21st-century innovation.

If New Delhi and Mumbai react only with anger, they will cede the strategic initiative. If they act with speed, foresight, and the hard policy instruments of investment, skills, and international coalition-building, the loss of a visa corridor can become impetus for a stronger, less dependent India.

*— The writer is a strategic affairs columnist and senior political analyst based in Shimla.*
https://www.freepressjournal.in/analysis/trumps-100000-h-1b-gamble-an-erratic-tax-on-talent-that-will-hollow-out-indo-us-trust

Jimmy Kimmel’s Show Set To Return On Air, But Still May Face Partial Boycott

Despite ABC revoking Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension, Nexstar and Sinclair refused to air his show over “insensitivity” following his MAGA remarks.

A day after the suspension order on Jimmy Kimmel’s show was revoked, local TV stations owned by Nexstar and Sinclair announced they would continue to refuse to air the program, citing concerns over its “insensitivity.” BBC quoted Nexstar and Sinclair, which together operate dozens of ABC-affiliated stations, stating that they would replace the show with regular programming on Tuesday.

“Mr. Kimmel’s remarks were inappropriate and deeply insensitive at a critical moment for our country,” said Sinclair’s vice-chairman, Jason Smith.

The late-night talk show was abruptly pulled off the air last week after Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr, along with networks of affiliate stations, threatened ABC over Kimmel’s comments made during a monologue about the MAGA movement’s response to Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

This controversy sparked a debate between supporters of President Donald Trump’s administration and Kimmel regarding government interference and freedom of speech.

On Monday, over 400 artists, including Tom Hanks, Meryl Streep, and Jennifer Aniston, signed an open letter organized by the ACLU in support of Kimmel, CNN reported.

Later, a spokesperson for the Walt Disney Company, which owns ABC, told CNN: “We have spent the last days having thoughtful conversations with Jimmy, and after those conversations, we reached the decision to return the show on Tuesday.”
https://www.news18.com/world/tv-stations-refuse-to-air-insensitive-kimmels-show-despite-abc-lifting-suspension-ws-l-9592556.html

They said it: Leaders at the UN, in their own words

**Voices from the 2025 U.N. General Assembly: Insights Beyond the Headlines**

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Each year, the U.N. General Assembly serves as a platform where many leaders discuss a wide range of topics important to their nations, regions, and the world. While certain speeches often dominate headlines and airtime, some voices offer equally compelling perspectives that deserve attention.

Here, The Associated Press highlights notable remarks from leaders who may not have captured the spotlight on the first day of the 2025 General Debate.

**Jennifer Geerlings-Simons, President of Suriname**
*“The United Nations must be a genuine unity of nations. We are all really better together.”*

**Gitanas Nauseda, President of Lithuania**
*“Our international order is being slowly eroded by the irresponsible actions of those who should know better. The world is turning into a much more dangerous place. We have seen this before.”*

**Abdullah II, King of Jordan, on the Mideast situation**
*“Not for the first time, developments on the ground have made me question the worth and utility of words in capturing the magnitude of the crisis. Yet, not speaking about it would signal acceptance of the situation and abandonment of our humanity—and that, I will not do.”*

**Lee Jae Myung, President of South Korea**
*“K culture is connecting people all over the world. The success and spread of K culture prove that universal empathy is possible.”*

**Cyril Ramaphosa, President of South Africa**
*“We are fighting wars that cause death and destruction when we should be fighting poverty.”*

These insightful reflections remind us of the diverse challenges and hopes shared by leaders around the globe as they convene to shape our collective future.
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/said-leaders-un-own-words-025711663.html

Bus passengers cheer after driver avoids head-on crash in Vietnam

On September 21, 2025, in Tuyen Quang Province, Vietnam, a tourist bus narrowly avoided a head-on collision with a swerving lorry on a blind curve.

The sudden maneuver turned passengers’ panic into relief as the bus driver skillfully averted what could have been a serious accident. This close call highlights the importance of cautious driving, especially on challenging road sections like blind curves.

Fortunately, no injuries were reported, and both vehicles continued safely on their journeys. Passengers expressed gratitude for the driver’s quick reflexes and professional handling of the situation.
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/bus-passengers-cheer-driver-avoids-030048350.html

Indian Diaspora Must Speak On Trump’s Policy Changes, Visiting US Congressmen Tell Parliament Panel

A Visiting US Democratic Delegation Voices Concerns Over President Trump’s Policies During Meeting with Indian MPs

A delegation of five US Democratic lawmakers recently engaged with Indian Members of Parliament (MPs) from across party lines in the Standing Committee on External Affairs, chaired by Dr. Shashi Tharoor. The meeting provided an opportunity for frank discussions on several pressing issues pertaining to US-India relations.

During the interaction, the Democratic delegation expressed strong concerns regarding policy changes implemented by US President Donald Trump. Sources reveal that questions were raised by Indian MPs about key issues such as modifications to the H-1B visa program, the 50% tariff imposed on Indian goods, and the persistent involvement of President Trump in matters affecting bilateral ties.

In response, the visiting Democrats urged Indian MPs to motivate the Indian diaspora in the United States to speak out against these policy shifts. They emphasized the importance of advocacy within the Indian-American community to influence US policy decisions favorably.

Following the meeting, committee chairman Dr. Shashi Tharoor addressed the media, stating, “I do want to stress that one of the points we raised is why the Indian-American diaspora has been so silent about all this. One of the Congressmen said not one phone call has come to her office from any Indian-American voter asking her to support a change of policy. This is something that is surprising.”

He further added, “We all need to reach out to the Indian-American population, saying if you care about your relationship with the motherland, then you also have to fight for it and speak for it, and make more of an effort to press your political representative to stand up for India.”

Dr. Tharoor underscored that the visiting US lawmakers are well-disposed towards India and are friends of the country, making their concerns and suggestions particularly noteworthy.

Besides visa and tariff-related issues, the committee also discussed the US sanctions waiver for Iran’s Chabahar Port—an important development project led by India.

The H-1B visa concerns were especially highlighted by opposition leaders from the Samajwadi Party, including Ballia MP Sanatan Pandey and Firozabad MP Akshay Yadav, both of whom noted how these policies affect numerous Indians.

Sanatan Pandey shared, “Sanatan Pandey and I met with the visiting delegation led by Amerish Bera. We told them that we are the third-largest party in India and our leader, along with Akshay Yadav from the Samajwadi Party, raised this matter.”

The delegation also included BJP MPs such as Sudhanshu Trivedi, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Aparajita Sarangi, and Bansuri Swaraj, among others.

The first half of the meeting featured a detailed briefing on India-Sri Lanka relations, with India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri providing insights to the committee members.

This interactive session marks an important step in fostering dialogue and cooperation between US lawmakers and Indian parliamentarians concerning bilateral matters, diaspora engagement, and regional strategic interests.
https://www.news18.com/world/indian-diaspora-must-speak-on-trumps-policy-changes-visiting-us-congressmen-tell-parliament-panel-9592589.html

Mumbai News: FIR Registered Against Industrialist Nusli Wadia, Family Members And Four Others Following Court Order

The Bangur Nagar police have registered an FIR against noted industrialist Nusli Wadia, 81, Maureen Wadia, 78, Ness Wadia, 54, and four others under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita.

The complainant, Manohar Dhanji Chande, 70, a resident of Versova and CEO of Ferani Hotels Pvt Ltd, stated that on March 15 he submitted a written complaint to the senior inspector of Bangur Nagar police station. Subsequently, on March 24, he also filed the complaint with the police commissioner regarding certain documents.

However, since there was no response from the authorities, Mr. Chande approached the court of the metropolitan magistrate, 68th court in Borivli. On September 20, the court directed the senior inspector of Bangur Nagar police to register the FIR.

The Free Press Journal (FPJ) made attempts to contact the Wadias for their response, but there was no reply.
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/mumbai-news-fir-registered-against-industrialist-nusli-wadia-family-members-and-four-others-following-court-order

Mumbai News: Activists Urge Artificial Ponds For Pinda Daan To Prevent Annual Fish Deaths At Banganga Tank

Activists Urge Civic Body to Prevent Fish Deaths in Historic Banganga Tank After Pitru Paksha Rituals

Activists have called on the civic body to take urgent measures to prevent the annual death of hundreds of fish in the historic Banganga tank in Walkeshwar, which occurs following the Pitru Paksha rituals. They have proposed banning the immersion of puja remains directly into the tank and suggested the creation of artificial ponds around the tank to accommodate these offerings during the ritual period.

Recurring Problem at Sacred Banganga Tank

On Monday morning, hundreds of dead fish were seen floating on the surface of the Banganga tank, a sacred water body surrounded by ancient temples in the Walkeshwar area of Malabar Hill. This occurrence is not new; fish deaths have been a recurring issue every year after the last day of Pitru Paksha, when Hindus perform rites to honour their departed ancestors.

Rituals and Their Aftermath

On Sunday, hundreds of devotees gathered at the holy site to perform shraddha and pinda daan rituals, believed to provide peace to the departed souls. As in previous years, the rituals were conducted at the tank, after which numerous fish were found dead.

The civic body promptly responded by cleaning the tank and removing the dead fish. Mangal Prabhat Lodha, state minister and MLA from Malabar Hill, visited the site on Tuesday along with Manish Walunj, Deputy Assistant Commissioner of D ward, to engage with local residents and assess the situation.

Call for Preventive Measures

Activists have demanded concrete action from the civic authorities to stop the annual fish deaths. They recommended setting up artificial ponds around Banganga tank, similar to those used during Ganeshotsav visarjan, to prevent puja materials from polluting the water during Pitru Paksha.

Activists’ Perspectives

Sneha Visariya, founder trustee of Just Smile Charitable Trust, stated: “Puja materials should be banned from entering the water and instead immersed in artificial ponds, with only the water being released into the tank. This approach will allow devotees to fulfil their rituals without harming living beings. Killing aquatic life in the name of religion must stop.”

Visariya also recalled that after a similar incident in 2022, she had taken the dead fish to Parel Veterinary Hospital for a post-mortem. The hospital reportedly submitted a report to the police, identifying contaminated water as the cause of death.

Animal Welfare Concerns

Roshan Pathak, animal rights advisor at Pure Animal Lovers (PAL) Welfare Foundation, emphasized the necessity of regular tank maintenance. “If fish inhabit the tank, their well-being is the BMC’s responsibility. Devotees often throw various offerings into the tank assuming the fish will consume them, but fish have specific dietary needs. Unconsumed materials can turn into toxins, harming aquatic life.”

Local Residents’ Views

Locals revealed that such incidents have been occurring for decades, although the number of fish deaths this year was considerably lower. Notably, the BMC had banned the immersion of Ganpati idols in the tank before Ganesh Chaturthi this year.

Residents also complained about the foul stench caused by decaying fish, making the area unpleasant.

Chirag Dave, a local resident who facilitates rituals at the tank, shared: “I have witnessed fish dying after Pitru Paksha for over four decades. While we ensure that devotees do not immerse the pinda directly in the water, other ritual remains like oil, sesame seeds, and barley still flow into the tank, causing fish deaths. The area smells unpleasant every year after the incident, though the cleaning was quicker this time. While it is important to prevent fish deaths, devotees should not be stopped from performing their religious rituals.”

Looking Ahead

The situation at Banganga tank underscores the delicate balance between religious practices and environmental conservation. Implementing artificial ponds for puja immersions and regular cleaning could be effective steps toward preserving the sacred water body and its aquatic life, while respecting devotional sentiments.

https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/mumbai-news-activists-urge-artificial-ponds-for-pinda-daan-to-prevent-annual-fish-deaths-at-banganga-tank

‘Green scam’: At UN, watched by drowning nations’ leaders, Trump assails the ethos of climate change

NEW YORK (AP) — Some countries’ leaders are watching rising seas threaten to swallow their homes. Others are witnessing their citizens die in floods, hurricanes, and heat waves, all exacerbated by climate change.

But the world U.S. President Donald Trump described in his speech at the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday didn’t match the one many world leaders in the audience are contending with. Nor did it align with what scientists have long been observing.

“This ‘climate change,’ it’s the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world, in my opinion,” Trump said. “All of these predictions made by the United Nations and many others, often for bad reasons, were wrong. They were made by stupid people that have cost their countries fortunes and given those same countries no chance for success. If you don’t get away from this green scam, your country is going to fail.”

Trump has long been a critic of climate science and policies aimed at helping the world transition to green energies like wind and solar. His speech Tuesday, however, was one of his most expansive to date. It included false statements and made connections between things that are not connected.

Ilana Seid, an ambassador from the island nation of Palau and head of the organization of small island states, was in the audience. She said it’s what they’ve come to expect from Trump and the United States. She added that not acting on climate change will “be a betrayal of the most vulnerable,” a sentiment echoed by Evans Davie Njewa of Malawi, who said that “we are endangering the lives of innocent people in the world.”

For Adelle Thomas, a climate scientist who has published more than 40 studies and holds a doctorate, climate change disasters are personal, too. A vice chair of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world’s top body on climate science, Thomas is from the Bahamas and said she experienced firsthand “the devastation of the climate disaster” when Hurricane Sandy hit the Caribbean and New York City, the city Trump was speaking from, in 2012.

“Millions of people around the world can already testify to the devastation that climate change has brought to their lives,” she said. “The evidence is not abstract. It is lived, it is deadly, and it demands urgent action.”

### A Look at Some of Trump’s Statements, the Science Behind Them, and the Reaction

#### On Renewable Energy

**What He Said:**
Trump called renewable sources of energy like wind power a “joke” and “pathetic,” falsely claiming they don’t work, are too expensive, and too weak.

**The Backstory:**
Solar and wind are now “almost always” the least expensive and the fastest options for new electricity generation, according to a July report from the United Nations. That report also said the world has passed a “positive tipping point” where those energy sources will only continue to become more widespread.

The three cheapest electricity sources globally last year were onshore wind, solar panels, and new hydropower, according to an energy cost report by the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA).

Subsidies endorsed by Trump and the Republican party are artificially keeping fossil fuels viable, said University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Michael Mann. “If one were truly in favor of the ‘free market’ to determine this, then fossil fuels would be disappearing even faster,” he wrote in an email.

Relatedly, Trump falsely claimed European electricity bills are now “two to three times higher than the United States, and our bills are coming way down.” In fact, retail electricity prices in the United States have increased faster than the rate of inflation since 2022, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, which expects prices to continue increasing through 2026.

#### On the International Politics of Climate, the UN, and the Paris Accord

**What He Said:**
Trump blasted the U.N.’s climate efforts, saying he withdrew America from the “fake” Paris climate accord because “America was paying so much more than every country, others weren’t paying.”

**The Backstory:**
The Paris Agreement, decided by international consensus in 2015, is a voluntary but binding document in which each country is asked to set its own national goal to curb planet-warming emissions and decide how much money it will contribute to countries hit hardest by climate change.

Because carbon dioxide stays in the atmosphere for more than a century, the United States has emitted more of the heat-trapping gas than any other nation, even though China is now the No. 1 carbon polluter.

Since 1850, the U.S. has contributed 24% of the human-caused carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, according to Global Carbon Project data. The entire continent of Africa, with four times the population of the U.S., is responsible for about 3%.

#### On Coal Being Referred to as Clean

**What He Said:**
“I have a little standing order in the White House. Never use the word ‘coal.’ Only use the words ‘clean, beautiful coal.’ Sounds much better, doesn’t it?”

**The Backstory:**
Coal kills millions of people a year. “The president can pretend coal is clean, but real people—mothers, fathers, sons, and daughters—will die for this lie,” said Stanford University climate scientist Rob Jackson.

Trump also called the carbon footprint “a hoax made up by people with evil intentions,” a contention that Texas A&M University climate scientist Andrew Dessler agreed with. Dessler said the term was coined by oil companies and may have been designed to shift the responsibility for combatting climate change away from corporations to individuals.

#### The Science of Climate Change

The science of climate change started 169 years ago when Eunice Foote conducted simple experiments with flasks and sunlight, showing that carbon dioxide trapped more heat than regular air. It is an experiment that can be repeated at home and has been replicated in laboratories and greenhouses worldwide every day. It is basic physics and chemistry with a long history.

“It is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean, and land,” reported the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, composed of hundreds of scientists with doctorates in the field.

In 2018, Trump’s own government stated: “The impacts of global climate change are already being felt in the United States and are projected to intensify in the future.”

#### On Cows and Methane

**What He Said:**
In “the United States, we have still radicalized environmentalists and they want the factories to stop. Everything should stop. No more cows. We don’t want cows anymore.”

**The Backstory:**
Cows belch methane, a powerful greenhouse gas. Around the world, cattle are often raised on lands where forests have been cut down. Since forests capture carbon dioxide, cutting them to raise cattle results in a double whammy.

Still, no one is suggesting that cows be eliminated, said Nusa Urbancic, CEO of the Changing Markets Foundation. “This polarizing and divisive language misrepresents the environmental message,” Urbancic wrote. “What is true, however, is that cutting methane emissions is a quick win to slow global heating and meet climate targets.”

Trump also blamed dirty air blowing in from afar, floating garbage in the ocean coming from other countries, and “radicalized environmentalists.” Although the United States does indeed now have cleaner air than it has had in decades, the pollution affecting communities is primarily caused by local dirty energy and industry projects, not by other countries.

Many experts have said the biggest blow to local air and water quality comes from the Trump administration’s wide-ranging rollbacks of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s power and other foundational environmental laws.

“It is sad to see marine debris, a globally important issue, being misrepresented so completely,” said Lucy Woodall, an associate professor of marine conservation and policy at the University of Exeter.

**Associated Press reporters Matthew Daly, Jennifer McDermott, and Annika Hammerschlag contributed to this report.**

The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters, and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
https://wgntv.com/politics-3/ap-politics/ap-green-scam-at-un-watched-by-drowning-nations-leaders-trump-assails-the-ethos-of-climate-change/