9/30: CBS Evening News Plus

What the FBI’s Mass Exodus Means for the Bureau’s Future

The recent wave of departures within the FBI has raised significant questions about the future of the bureau. This mass exodus reflects deeper issues related to leadership, workplace culture, and evolving challenges in law enforcement. As seasoned agents leave, concerns grow over the bureau’s ability to maintain institutional knowledge and effectively tackle emerging threats.

Experts suggest that retaining talent and fostering a resilient organizational culture are essential for the FBI to navigate these turbulent times. Reforms aimed at improving morale, providing better support, and encouraging diversity are critical steps toward ensuring the bureau’s strength and relevance in the years ahead.

Reporter’s Notebook: The “Journal Girl” Who Raced to Circle the Globe in 1936

In 1936, a remarkable journey captured the imagination of the public—a female reporter, famously dubbed the “Journal Girl,” embarked on an ambitious race to circle the globe. Her adventure was not only a testament to journalistic dedication but also a celebration of courage and determination during an era when female reporters were a rarity.

Documenting her travels and challenges, she offered readers a unique glimpse into distant cultures and events, broadening perspectives and inspiring many. Her story remains a fascinating chapter in the history of journalism and a reminder of the trailblazing women who helped shape the profession.

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/930-cbs-evening-news-plus/

EXCLUSIVE: Meghan Markle ‘Still Feeling the Sting’ Of Martha Stewart’s Brutal Takedown of Wannabe Lifestyle Guru Duchess

**Meghan Markle Hurt and Frustrated by Martha Stewart’s Remarks Questioning Her Credibility as a Lifestyle Figure**

*Published Sept. 30, 2025, 5:32 p.m. ET*

Meghan Markle is still hurting and frustrated by recent remarks from Martha Stewart that questioned her credibility as a lifestyle figure. Insiders have told RadarOnline.com that Stewart’s comments landed an extra punch since they came just as the duchess was working hard to build her new brand and expand her presence on Netflix.

The 44-year-old Duchess of Sussex has been steadily repositioning herself—from former royal to Montecito tastemaker.

### Stewart’s Comments Hit Hard

After years of mixed public reception, Meghan has earned praise from fans but also faced waves of criticism surrounding her Netflix cooking and home series *With Love, Meghan*. The show recently returned for a second season, coinciding with the rebranding of her lifestyle label, As Ever.

However, Stewart’s high-profile dismissal of Meghan’s “authenticity” has clearly struck a nerve.

A Hollywood source shared, “Meghan came across Martha’s remarks online like everybody else, and they really hit a nerve. Martha heaped praise on Gwyneth Paltrow, then turned around and admitted she didn’t know Meghan before casting doubt on her credibility. To Meghan, it felt calculated, and she hasn’t been able to shake it since.”

During an interview, Stewart called Goop founder Gwyneth Paltrow “pretty powerful” and praised her Oscar win and lifestyle empire. She then added, “Meghan, I don’t really know very well, and I hope she knows what she’s talking about. Authenticity, to me, is everything.”

### Career Stakes on the Line

Another insider noted, “Martha isn’t careless—she understands the weight her words carry with TV bosses and lifestyle gatekeepers, and Meghan knows it too. The timing couldn’t be more damaging, coming just as Meghan is trying to secure a new solo Netflix deal with her Sussex contract about to expire. Having Martha publicly question her authenticity risks sowing doubts in exactly the rooms where Meghan needs backing.”

Markle, who previously ran the lifestyle blog *The Tig* before meeting Prince Harry, 41, has spent the past year crafting her post-royal identity. She soft-launched her brand by sending strawberry jam to friends before unveiling As Ever with more ambitious plans.

Her Netflix series, filmed on a Montecito set designed to mirror her family home, has been praised for its accessible recipes and relaxed hosting style.

### A Crowded Lifestyle Market

Critics argue the duchess is stepping into crowded territory.

“In Hollywood circles, it’s no secret that Martha has been dismissive of Meghan’s attempt to brand herself as the next domestic goddess,” another source revealed. “With her influence, she could easily create obstacles for Meghan. The real concern is that other high-profile figures might echo Martha’s stance and feed the narrative that Meghan isn’t the real deal.”

The backdrop is challenging. Sympathy for the Sussexes has waned since their high-profile royal exit in 2020, and the couple’s $100 million Spotify partnership collapsed last year.

While Harry pursued legal battles over his U.K. security arrangements, Markle focused on investing her energy in brand-building—making Stewart’s comments all the more damaging.

### Meghan’s Response

A source added, “Meghan’s fed up with having to bite her tongue. A big part of her would love to call Martha out for being so dismissive, but she realizes the wiser move is to stay focused and let her work speak for itself.

“Even so, it hurt—she feels like whenever she makes headway, someone influential takes a swing at her simply because it’s become trendy to knock her and Harry.”

For now, Markle is said to be channeling her frustration into further cementing As Ever and *With Love, Meghan*. But with Stewart’s remarks lingering in Hollywood circles, the duchess faces an uphill battle to prove she belongs in the lifestyle elite.
https://radaronline.com/p/meghan-markle-stung-martha-stewart-lifestyle-takedown/

Crime that unsettles

Netflix has released the second chapter of its *Monsters* anthology, **The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story**, a dramatization that revisits a case embedded in American popular culture for more than three decades. The series focuses on the 1989 murders of Jose and Kitty Menendez by their two sons, Lyle and Erik, and the subsequent trials that became a national spectacle.

The production raises uncomfortable questions about privilege, secrecy, and abuse, concentrating both on the violence itself and the social environment that shaped the brothers. Across nine episodes, the story unfolds in a strictly chronological order but employs alternating perspectives, shifting between the courtroom, the family home, and the media frenzy that surrounded the brothers.

This narrative approach keeps the tension alive while reflecting how the public encountered the case in fragments during the early 1990s. Viewers are constantly reminded that the truth is layered and contested, heightening the unease that defines the series from start to finish.

At the heart of the production are the performances of Nicholas Alexander Chavez as Lyle Menendez and Cooper Koch as Erik Menendez. Chavez captures the intensity and defiance of the elder brother, while Koch conveys the fragility and self-doubt of the younger sibling. Together, they paint a portrait of two young men deeply connected yet burdened with conflicting emotions about their parents and themselves. The bond between the brothers, carrying both tenderness and despair, feels authentic, adding a profoundly human dimension to the story.

What sets this production apart from other true crime dramatizations is its refusal to offer clear answers. The series does not suggest whether the brothers should be viewed as cold-blooded killers or victims of long-term abuse. It presents evidence, perspectives, and memories, leaving viewers to wrestle with the contradictions on their own.

Javier Bardem delivers a commanding performance as Jose Menendez, portraying a man driven by ambition and a will to control. His presence dominates the household scenes, embodying both the promise of success and the fear it instilled in his children. Chloe Sevigny plays Kitty Menendez with a mixture of vulnerability and volatility, suggesting a woman caught between dependence and resentment. Their portrayals ensure the parents are seen not merely as victims but as complex individuals with their own flaws and contradictions. This choice prevents the narrative from descending into moral simplicity.

The dialogue throughout the series is precise. Courtroom exchanges are brisk yet intense, while domestic scenes often rely on silences and hesitations that carry as much weight as spoken words. This balance allows viewers to experience both the noise of public spectacle and the quiet pain of private life. Rather than leaning heavily on drama, the series builds tension through subtlety, making the story even more unsettling.

One of the most challenging aspects of the show is its depiction of abuse. The production does not sensationalize these elements, nor does it obscure them. By presenting detail candidly, the series forces viewers to confront the disturbing claims that shaped the brothers’ defense. Whether or not particular accounts are accurate becomes less important than their emotional impact on the audience. The series powerfully conveys how trauma can remain hidden within families that outwardly appear secure and successful. This thematic choice makes the series difficult to watch but leaves a lasting impression.

The supporting cast enriches the production further. Ari Graynor as defense attorney Leslie Abramson demonstrates both empathy and strategic determination, while Nathan Lane as journalist Dominick Dunne highlights the media’s role in shaping public perception of the case. Their performances add essential layers, reminding viewers that the Menendez story extends beyond the family to engage broader conversations about wealth, justice, and the spectacle of televised trials.

As a viewing experience, *The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story* is demanding. It is not casual entertainment; it requires attention, patience, and a willingness to endure disturbing material. Those who invest this effort are rewarded with a portrayal that is both emotionally powerful and intellectually engaging.

Combining strong performances with thoughtful storytelling, the series unsettles rather than comforts and questions rather than simplifies. It succeeds precisely because it avoids sensational shortcuts, presenting a disturbing family tragedy with honesty and care. This approach creates a portrayal marked by complexity rather than caricature.

For viewers prepared to sit with discomfort, the series offers an absorbing examination of one of the most notorious cases in American criminal history—a poignant reminder that beneath public spectacle often lies private pain.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/tns/detail/1346827-crime-that-unsettles-in-1989-two-brothers

A ‘masterclass’ from Devon Dampier and more: How social media reacted to Utah’s win over West Virginia

Maybe the frustration directed at Devon Dampier online last week and the angst aimed at the Utah football team was a bit much. During Utah’s 34-10 loss to Texas Tech, many fans and analysts were critical of the Utes’ starting quarterback and the overall offensive effort.

There was a noticeable change in that tune on Saturday, when Utah went on the road and defeated a woebegone West Virginia team 48-14. You can even forgive Utah punter Orion Phillips for giving Utah fans a humorous shoutout to Dampier on social media after the quarterback threw a career-high four touchdowns. As a result of the strong offensive showing, Phillips didn’t even get into the game.

National media personality and former West Virginia punter Pat McAfee was convinced by Utah’s performance on Saturday. But what about others? Here’s a sampling of how social media reacted to the Utes’ impressive win over West Virginia.
https://www.deseret.com/sports/2025/09/27/how-social-media-reacted-to-utah-west-virginia-football-2025/

Stephen A. Smith torches Tua Tagovailoa for ‘asinine’ response to Cam Newton

Stephen A. Smith recently reacted to Tua Tagovailoa’s attempt to challenge Cam Newton, referencing a tactic reminiscent of Ryan Clark’s playbook—and he wasn’t having it.

Last week on *First Take*, Cam Newton pointed out that Tagovailoa is making more money than several notable quarterbacks, including Patrick Mahomes, Justin Herbert, Lamar Jackson, Jalen Hurts, Baker Mayfield, Matthew Stafford, and Jayden Daniels. Newton emphasized his point by saying, “more money, more expectations.”

Despite facing justified criticism for his subpar performance this season, Tagovailoa fired back at Newton during a recent press conference. He stated, “I want to see anybody on the streets come and play quarterback,” escalating the ongoing battle between the two players.

While many might have expected Newton to respond by boasting about his own accomplishments on the field, he instead chose a more relatable and compassionate approach—earning credit for keeping the discussion grounded and respectful.
https://awfulannouncing.com/nfl/stephen-a-smith-tua-tagovailoa-asinine-response-cam-newton.html

JD Vance Trolls Joy Reid’s DEI Rant with A Meme That Goes Mega Viral [WATCH]

Vice President JD Vance responded Wednesday to a viral segment featuring former MSNBC host Joy Reid by posting a lighthearted meme mocking her remarks about his background and education.

Reid, who was dismissed from MSNBC in February, made her comments during an interview with former CNN anchor Don Lemon. The conversation drew attention online as she linked Vance’s academic career to affirmative action policies and criticized his public stance on the issue.

The discussion began with Reid reflecting on the recent death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk before turning to criticism of Vance. She accused him of benefiting from affirmative action in the same way that she claimed women and minorities have historically relied on such programs. Reid singled out Vance’s admission to Yale Law School, suggesting it was not based solely on merit.

“Maybe the way that JD Vance got into Yale is because they were tired of just letting in White men from New York, from all the elite schools, and they wanted an Appalachian White. That’s how that man got into Yale, I promise you,” Reid said.

The former television host argued that affirmative action policies have empowered individuals from underrepresented backgrounds, including racial minorities, people with disabilities, military veterans, and those from rural regions. She claimed these programs helped place people in spaces they might not otherwise reach.

Reid also cited herself as a personal example, arguing that affirmative action contributed to her own visibility in media. “Right-wingers, you have the ability to know who I am when I don’t know who most of y’all are, but you know me because affirmative action brought me your way,” she said. “Tell the Lord, thank you. Be grateful for all that God has given you. God knows what God is doing. She’s a smart, smart lady.”

Reid has previously criticized prominent White public figures. In recent commentary, she described Elvis Presley as a mediocre White man, a remark that also drew widespread online debate.

In response to the interview clip circulating on X, Vance posted a meme of himself, appearing to downplay Reid’s criticisms. The image quickly spread across social media, with his supporters creating and sharing memes of their own in solidarity.

The exchange highlighted ongoing debates about affirmative action and its role in shaping opportunities for individuals across different backgrounds. Reid framed her comments as part of a broader argument that such policies have benefited people beyond traditional categories, while Vance and his allies brushed aside her attack with humor online.

Neither Lemon nor Reid issued additional public statements following the viral spread of the interview. The Vice President’s meme response, however, ensured that the back-and-forth remained a trending topic on social media throughout the day.
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/09/jd-vance-trolls-joy-reids-dei-rant-with-a-meme-that-goes-mega-viral-watch/

Bombay HC Seeks Maharashtra Police Response In YouTuber-Journalist Sneha Barve Assault Case

**Bombay High Court Seeks Response from Maharashtra Police in Assault Case of YouTuber-Journalist**

*Mumbai:* The Bombay High Court on Wednesday sought a response from the Maharashtra police while hearing a petition filed by a YouTuber-journalist who was allegedly assaulted in July this year and has since been receiving threats.

The court noted the rising incidents of harassment against journalists in recent times. A bench comprising Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam Ankhad remarked, “This is happening. We have this understanding that they are doing it with the journalists. Whoever reports something against them, they try to harass.”

**Details of Assault and Petition**

The petition was filed by Sneha Barve, who alleged that she was assaulted with an iron rod on July 4, 2025, while reporting on an alleged illegal construction in Pune. She had initially sought police protection but, after not receiving any response, approached the High Court.

During the hearing on Tuesday, the court asked Barve’s counsel, Mihir Desai, whether she was willing to pay for police protection. On Wednesday, Desai informed the bench that she was ready to bear the charges as per the state government’s policy.

He further explained that Barve sustained serious injuries in the July attack and has been receiving threats since. Despite writing three letters to the Superintendent of Police seeking protection, no decision has been taken, Desai added.

**Evidence and Court Observations**

When questioned by the court, Desai emphasized that there is video evidence showing Barve being assaulted with an iron rod during her investigation of the illegal construction site.

However, the court observed that the petition was not drafted properly and lacked submitted evidence. It noted that affidavits from witnesses to the threats should have been attached to the petition.

The court has asked the state to file its response to the petition and adjourned the hearing to September 29.

*Also Watch:* For exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai and surrounding areas, visit [Budget Properties](https://budgetproperties.in/).
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/bombay-hc-seeks-maharashtra-police-response-in-youtuber-journalist-sneha-barve-assault-case

Americans Reject Trump/Sinclair/Nextar’s Censorship

Censorship ought to be the most reviled form of control over self-expression in a country like the United States. The First Amendment guarantees the right to free expression and should not be subject to what a president or a media conglomerate deems acceptable speech. Such control is both vile and un-American.

Last night, a popular late-night show returned to the air—well, at least in many regions across the United States. However, ABC affiliate stations owned by Sinclair and Nexstar Media Group refused to air the show. Additionally, President Trump has publicly criticized the late-night comedian’s return.

Despite this opposition, ABC’s parent company, Disney—which faced considerable criticism last week for pulling Jimmy Kimmel from the air—has posted Kimmel’s returning opening monologue online for everyone to watch.

Here’s what you need to know and how you can watch Kimmel’s opening monologue in full.
https://crooksandliars.com/2025/09/americans-reject-trumpsinclairnextars

Jimmy Kimmel’s Show Set To Return On Air, But Still May Face Partial Boycott

Despite ABC revoking Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension, Nexstar and Sinclair have refused to air his show over “insensitivity” following his remarks about the MAGA movement.

The day after ABC lifted the suspension on Jimmy Kimmel’s show, local TV stations operated by Nexstar and Sinclair, which collectively run dozens of stations affiliated with ABC, announced they would continue to replace the show with regular programming on Tuesday.

“Mr. Kimmel’s remarks were inappropriate and deeply insensitive at a critical moment for our country,” said Sinclair’s vice-chairman, Jason Smith.

Kimmel’s late-night talk show was abruptly pulled last week after Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr and affiliate networks threatened ABC over comments Kimmel made in a monologue about the MAGA movement’s response to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. This incident sparked a heated debate between supporters of former President Donald Trump’s administration and Kimmel regarding government interference and freedom of speech.

On Monday, over 400 artists, including Tom Hanks, Meryl Streep, and Jennifer Aniston, signed an open letter organized by the ACLU in support of Kimmel, CNN reported.

Later, a spokesperson for the Walt Disney Company, which owns ABC, told CNN, “We have spent the last days having thoughtful conversations with Jimmy, and after those conversations, we reached the decision to return the show on Tuesday.”
https://www.news18.com/world/tv-stations-refuse-to-air-insensitive-kimmels-show-despite-abc-lifting-suspension-ws-l-9592556.html

Jimmy Kimmel’s Show Set To Return On Air, But Still May Face Partial Boycott

Despite ABC revoking Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension, Nexstar and Sinclair refused to air his show over “insensitivity” following his MAGA remarks.

A day after the suspension order on Jimmy Kimmel’s show was revoked, local TV stations owned by Nexstar and Sinclair announced they would continue to refuse to air the program, citing concerns over its “insensitivity.” BBC quoted Nexstar and Sinclair, which together operate dozens of ABC-affiliated stations, stating that they would replace the show with regular programming on Tuesday.

“Mr. Kimmel’s remarks were inappropriate and deeply insensitive at a critical moment for our country,” said Sinclair’s vice-chairman, Jason Smith.

The late-night talk show was abruptly pulled off the air last week after Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr, along with networks of affiliate stations, threatened ABC over Kimmel’s comments made during a monologue about the MAGA movement’s response to Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

This controversy sparked a debate between supporters of President Donald Trump’s administration and Kimmel regarding government interference and freedom of speech.

On Monday, over 400 artists, including Tom Hanks, Meryl Streep, and Jennifer Aniston, signed an open letter organized by the ACLU in support of Kimmel, CNN reported.

Later, a spokesperson for the Walt Disney Company, which owns ABC, told CNN: “We have spent the last days having thoughtful conversations with Jimmy, and after those conversations, we reached the decision to return the show on Tuesday.”
https://www.news18.com/world/tv-stations-refuse-to-air-insensitive-kimmels-show-despite-abc-lifting-suspension-ws-l-9592556.html