‘Centre has failed Kerala people’: HC on Wayanad loan relief

**‘Centre has failed Kerala people’: Kerala High Court on Wayanad Loan Relief**

*By Snehil Singh | Oct 08, 2025 04:44 pm*

The Kerala High Court has strongly criticized the central government for its refusal to waive loans of those affected by the devastating Wayanad landslides. The court declared that the Union government had “failed the people of Kerala,” emphasizing that the state “does not need the Centre’s charity.”

### Strong Judicial Critique of the Centre’s Stance

A Division Bench comprising Justice AK Jayasankaran Nambiar and Justice Jobin Sebastian expressed sharp disapproval of the Centre’s affidavit, which claimed that there was no legal provision to waive loans for disaster-affected individuals.

“Please tell the Union Government it has failed the people of Kerala,” the court remarked sternly to government counsel, dismissing the Centre’s position as mere “bureaucratic babble.” The judges stressed, “It is not about whether the Union can act, but whether they are willing to act.”

### Highlighting Funding Disparities

The court further pointed out that while the Centre had sanctioned relief funds for Assam and Gujarat floods — even though those floods were not classified as severe — financial assistance for Wayanad’s victims was withheld.

While expressing respect for the Constitution and the principle of separation of powers, the judges made it clear they would no longer issue directions to the Union government. Justice Nambiar remarked, “We don’t need the Union’s charity,” and ordered banks to immediately halt loan recovery from the affected persons.

### Next Steps in Legal Proceedings

The bench also announced that banks would be formally impleaded in the case and asked to clarify whether they intended to waive the loans fully or partially. “Provide the names of the banks. We will issue notice to them and implead them. Until they respond, we will direct a stay on recovery actions,” the court declared.

The matter is set to be heard again in two weeks.

### Background

The High Court’s suo motu case was initiated following catastrophic landslides that struck Wayanad district on July 30, 2024. The disaster claimed dozens of lives and displaced hundreds of residents, leaving many struggling to recover financially and emotionally.

*This judgment highlights ongoing tensions between the state and central governments over disaster relief and loan waiver policies, reflecting broader challenges in addressing the needs of vulnerable communities in India.*
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/india/we-don-t-need-your-charity-kerala-hc-to-centre/story

‘Centre has failed Kerala people’: HC on Wayanad loan relief

**‘Centre has failed Kerala people’: High Court on Wayanad Loan Relief**

*By Snehil Singh | October 8, 2025, 4:44 PM*

The Kerala High Court has strongly criticized the central government for its refusal to waive loans of those affected by the devastating landslides in Wayanad. The Division Bench, comprising Justice AK Jayasankaran Nambiar and Justice Jobin Sebastian, stated that the Union government had “failed the people of Kerala” and emphasized that the state “does not need the Centre’s charity.”

### Court’s Legal Critique: ‘Bureaucratic Babble’

The court was highly critical of the Centre’s affidavit, which argued that there was no legal provision allowing the waiver of loans for disaster-affected individuals. Addressing government counsel, the judges remarked, “Please tell the Union Government it has failed the people of Kerala,” dismissing the Centre’s stance as mere “bureaucratic babble.”

They clarified, “It is not about whether the Union can act, but whether they are willing to act.”

### Funding Disparity Highlighted

Highlighting a funding disparity, the court noted that the Centre had sanctioned relief funds for Assam and Gujarat floods, although these were not classified as severe disasters. While expressing respect for the Constitution and the separation of powers, the judges clearly stated they would no longer issue directions to the Union government.

“We don’t need the Union’s charity,” Justice Nambiar asserted, while simultaneously ordering banks to immediately stop all loan recovery proceedings against the affected persons.

### Legal Proceedings and Bank Involvement

The bench announced that banks would be impleaded in the case and directed them to clarify whether they planned to waive loans, either fully or partially. “Provide the names of the banks. We will issue notices and implead them. Until we receive their responses, we direct a stay on all recovery actions,” the court said.

The matter is scheduled to be heard again in two weeks.

### Background

This suo motu case was initiated by the Kerala High Court after massive landslides struck Wayanad on July 30, 2024, resulting in dozens of deaths and displacing hundreds of residents.

*Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.*
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/india/we-don-t-need-your-charity-kerala-hc-to-centre/story

Why J&J has been fined $966M in the US

**Why J&J Has Been Fined $966M in the US**
*By Dwaipayan Roy | Oct 08, 2025, 05:15 PM*

Johnson & Johnson (J&J) has been ordered by a Los Angeles jury to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died from mesothelioma, a rare form of cancer. This ruling follows the jury’s finding that the company’s talc products were linked to cancer.

### Background of the Case
The lawsuit was filed by the family of Mae Moore, an 88-year-old California resident who passed away in 2021. The family initiated the case against J&J in the same year, alleging that the company’s talc products contributed to her illness.

### Verdict Details
The jury awarded $16 million in compensatory damages and an astounding $950 million in punitive damages against J&J. In response, Erik Haas, J&J’s global vice president of litigation, announced the company’s intention to appeal the decision. He described the verdict as “egregious and unconstitutional” and criticized the plaintiff lawyers for relying on what he called “junk science” that should not have been admitted in court.

### Product Safety and Company Response
Despite the verdict, J&J maintains that its talc-based products are safe, contain no asbestos, and do not cause cancer. The company discontinued sales of talc-based baby powder in the United States in 2020, transitioning to a cornstarch-based alternative. It is important to note that mesothelioma has been medically linked to asbestos exposure.

Trey Branham, attorney for Moore’s family, expressed hope that this ruling will finally hold Johnson & Johnson accountable for what he termed “senseless deaths.”

### Ongoing Litigation
Johnson & Johnson currently faces over 67,000 lawsuits alleging cancer caused by its baby powder and other talc products. While the majority of these claims relate to ovarian cancer, mesothelioma cases form a smaller portion of the litigation.

The company has attempted to resolve the mass litigation by filing for bankruptcy protection, but three such proposals have been rejected by federal courts.

### Settlement and Trial Landscape
Though J&J has settled some mesothelioma claims, it has yet to achieve a nationwide settlement agreement. Consequently, many mesothelioma lawsuits have proceeded to trial in various state courts over recent months.

In the past year alone, J&J has faced several significant verdicts related to mesothelioma, with Monday’s ruling representing one of the largest monetary penalties to date. The company has, however, successfully reduced some awards on appeal, including a $260 million verdict overturned by a state judge in Oregon.

This recent verdict underscores the ongoing legal challenges Johnson & Johnson faces concerning its talc products and the serious claims raised by affected consumers and their families. The company’s appeal process will be closely watched as these cases continue to unfold.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/business/j-j-hit-with-966m-verdict-in-talc-cancer-trial/story

Madhur Bhandarkar objects to Chandni Bar Returns; producers claim legal rights secured

**Filmmaker Madhur Bhandarkar Raises Objections to Title ‘Chandni Bar Returns’; Producers Claim Legal Rights Secured**

Filmmaker Madhur Bhandarkar has raised objections to the use of the title *Chandni Bar Returns* by producer Sandeep Singh and director Ajay Bahl. Bhandarkar, who directed the original *Chandni Bar* (2001) starring Tabu, has filed a complaint with the Indian Motion Picture Producers’ Association (IMPPA), alleging that the makers of the sequel are using his registered title without consent.

The 2001 drama, which won multiple National Awards and firmly established Bhandarkar’s place in Indian cinema, remains one of his most acclaimed works. In his complaint, he claimed that the title *Chandni Bar* belongs to him and accused Singh and Bahl of proceeding without proper authorization.

Following his grievance, IMPPA has reportedly instructed the makers to halt using the title until the matter is resolved.

### Producers Respond With Legal Clarification

In response, Sandeep Singh’s Legend Studios issued an official statement countering Bhandarkar’s claims, asserting that they hold all necessary rights to proceed with the project. The studio clarified that it acquired the option rights to the title from the original producers of *Chandni Bar*, represented by the late R. Mohan’s wife, Lata Mohan Iyer, who is listed as the proprietor in the Government of India’s Trademark Registry.

Co-producer Vishal Gurnani stated:

> “Sandeep Singh’s Legend Studios has acquired the Option Rights of the said title from the Original Producers, who are also the owners of the Registered Trademark and IP owner of the original cult classic *Chandni Bar* (2001). We want to state that no other banner can legally make the said film. Our IP lawyers are replying to the concerned trade associations and are taking all necessary steps to validate and protect our legal rights.”

The studio also shared the official trademark certificate (Application Number 1662053, Class 41), listing Lata Mohan Iyer as the proprietor, thereby substantiating its claim to the title.

### The Road Ahead for *Chandni Bar Returns*

Despite Bhandarkar’s objection, Legend Studios has confirmed that the sequel is moving forward. The film, directed by Ajay Bahl, is slated for a worldwide release on December 3, 2026.

The makers describe the project as a reimagined sequel that will retain the essence of the original while presenting a modern, gritty narrative for contemporary audiences. Legend Studios maintains that it is committed to honoring the legacy of the 2001 classic while ensuring that the production of *Chandni Bar Returns* remains legally compliant and respectful of its predecessor’s cultural impact.

**Also Read:** [Ankita Lokhande Turns Producer with *Chandni Bar* Sequel; Says She Wants to Pave the Way for Newcomers]

*More Pages:*
– *Chandni Bar Box Office Collection*
– *Bollywood News Live Updates*
https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/madhur-bhandarkar-objects-chandni-bar-returns-producers-claim-legal-rights-secured/

‘Deposit ₹60 crore’: Bombay High Court tells Shilpa Shetty, Raj Kundra amid plea seeking permission to travel abroad

**Bombay High Court Demands ₹60 Crore Deposit to Consider Shilpa Shetty and Raj Kundra’s Plea to Travel Abroad**

The Bombay High Court on Wednesday demanded a ₹60 crore deposit to consider the plea filed by actress Shilpa Shetty and her husband Raj Kundra seeking permission to travel abroad, according to reports by news agencies.

This order comes after the couple approached the High Court to quash a Look Out Circular (LOC) issued against them in connection with an FIR relating to an alleged ₹60 crore fraud case.

**Details of the Fraud Case Against Raj Kundra and Shilpa Shetty**

The case originates from a complaint filed by businessman Deepak Kothari, who accused Shilpa Shetty and Raj Kundra of inducing him to invest ₹60 crore in their now-defunct venture, Best Deal TV Pvt Ltd, between 2015 and 2023. Kothari alleged that the funds were later diverted for personal use.

Raj Kundra has already been questioned by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the Mumbai Police. The LOC against the couple was issued at the request of the EOW.

On Tuesday, Shilpa Shetty was questioned by EOW officials for approximately four and a half hours in connection with the ₹60 crore fraud case.

**What Was the Couple’s Plea?**

In their petition, Shilpa Shetty and Raj Kundra claimed that Shilpa resigned from the company in 2016. They emphasized the need to travel abroad for professional commitments and argued that denying them this opportunity would amount to a violation of their fundamental rights.

The Bombay High Court’s demand for a ₹60 crore deposit highlights the seriousness of the case as it continues to unfold.
https://www.livemint.com/news/india/deposit-rs-60-crore-bombay-high-court-tells-shilpa-shetty-raj-kundra-amid-plea-seeking-permission-to-travel-abroad-11759913314874.html

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ lawyers plan to appeal as convicted hip-hop star faces more years behind bars

**Sean “Diddy” Combs Sentenced to Over Four Years in Prison for Transporting People Across State Lines for Sexual Encounters**

Attorneys for Sean “Diddy” Combs are planning to appeal after the Grammy-winning artist and music executive was sentenced Friday to more than four years in prison for transporting people across state lines for sexual encounters.

The case shattered Combs’ carefully cultivated reputation as an affable celebrity entrepreneur, A-list party host, and reality TV star. It marked a public reckoning for the 55-year-old hip-hop mogul, who made a plea for leniency and wept as his lawyers played a video portraying his family life, career, and philanthropy.

U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian also fined Combs $500,000, the maximum allowed by law. Combs was convicted in July of flying his girlfriends and male sex workers around the country to engage in drug-fueled sexual encounters over many years and in multiple places.

The sordid, nearly two-month federal trial in Manhattan featured harrowing testimony from women who said Combs beat, threatened, sexually assaulted, and blackmailed them. However, he was acquitted of sex trafficking and racketeering charges that could have put him behind bars for life.

### How Much Time Will Combs Serve?

Combs was sentenced to four years and two months in prison. Having already served a year in jail, he could be released in about three years. Prosecutors had sought a sentence of more than 11 years.

Combs’ lawyers argued for immediate release, stating the time behind bars has already forced his remorse and sobriety. On the eve of his sentencing, Combs wrote the judge proclaiming himself a changed man after realizing he was “broken to my core.” His legal team has confirmed they will appeal the decision.

There is no possibility of parole in the federal system. Prosecutor Christy Slavik stated that sparing Combs serious prison time would excuse years of violence. Key witnesses against Combs urged the judge to reject leniency, expressing fears for their safety if he were freed.

### Where Is Combs Serving His Sentence?

Combs was sent to a Brooklyn federal lockup a year ago after his lawyers unsuccessfully fought to keep him out of jail following his arrest. This facility is primarily used for post-arrest detention for individuals awaiting trial in federal courts in Manhattan or Brooklyn, as well as for those serving short sentences.

The lockup has been plagued by problems since its opening in the 1990s, and its conditions have been so poor in recent years that some judges have refused to send people there. Combs’ lawyers were denied his request to await trial under house arrest at his Miami Beach mansion on an island.

It is currently unclear where Combs will serve the remainder of his sentence. Near his home, there is a low-security federal correctional institution in Miami with an adjacent minimum-security satellite camp. The facility houses approximately 1,000 inmates in total.

### Testimony at Trial

During trial testimony, former girlfriend and R&B singer Casandra “Cassie” Ventura recounted to jurors that Combs ordered her to have “disgusting” sexual encounters with strangers hundreds of times during their decade-long relationship. Jurors viewed video footage showing Combs dragging and beating her in a Los Angeles hotel hallway after one such multiday event referred to as a “freak-off.”

Another woman, identified as “Jane,” testified that she was pressured into sex with male workers during drug-fueled “hotel nights” while Combs watched and sometimes filmed the encounters.

The Associated Press does not typically name alleged victims of sexual abuse unless they have come forward publicly. Combs’ lawyers argued at trial that the government was trying to criminalize consensual, albeit unconventional, sexual preferences.

### Federal Law Violated: The Mann Act

Combs was sentenced for violating the federal Mann Act, a century-old anti-prostitution law. The Mann Act prohibits transporting someone across state lines for the purpose of prostitution or other illegal sexual acts.

Amended primarily in the 1980s, the law today is chiefly used to prosecute interstate prostitution crimes or the transportation of underage children across state lines for sexual purposes. Defense attorney Jason Driscoll argued that the law was misapplied in Combs’ case.

### Combs’ Reputational Decline

Combs’ fall from grace began when Ventura, a key witness in the trial, sued him in 2023, alleging years of sexual and physical abuse. The lawsuit was settled within hours for $20 million, an amount Ventura publicly disclosed for the first time during the trial.

Since then, dozens of others have made similar legal claims against Combs. The federal sex trafficking investigation was publicly revealed on the day of a bicoastal raid on Combs’ properties, elevating the seriousness and public awareness of the allegations.

### How the Case Played in Popular Culture

The seizure of 1,000 bottles of baby oil and other lubricants by federal agents during the raid quickly became a cultural talking point. The case transformed Combs into a punchline in addition to a villain.

Talk shows, “Saturday Night Live,” and social media users have joked about the so-called “freak-offs” and the vast quantities of baby oil allegedly used during Combs’ sex marathons. Fellow celebrities with past associations to Combs were called out, though none have been implicated in the criminal allegations.

Stay informed with the latest updates on this and other stories. Subscribe to The Philadelphia Tribune TODAY!

*Please note: We encourage all readers to engage respectfully. Avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist, or sexually-oriented language. Threats or falsehoods will not be tolerated. Use the “Report” link to flag any abusive posts. We welcome eyewitness accounts and additional insights related to our articles.*
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/sean-diddy-combs-lawyers-plan-to-appeal-as-convicted-hip-hop-star-faces-more-years/article_4c992b72-bce3-4aa1-941e-691650e9324a.html

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ lawyers plan to appeal as convicted hip-hop star faces more years behind bars

**Sean “Diddy” Combs Sentenced to Over Four Years in Prison for Transporting People Across State Lines for Sexual Encounters**

Attorneys for Sean “Diddy” Combs are planning to appeal following the Grammy-winning artist and music executive’s sentencing on Friday to more than four years in prison. Combs was convicted of transporting people across state lines for sexual encounters, a case that has shattered his carefully cultivated reputation as an affable celebrity entrepreneur, A-list party host, and reality TV star.

The sentencing culminated a public reckoning for the 55-year-old hip-hop icon, who made a plea for leniency and wept as his lawyers played a video highlighting his family life, career, and philanthropy. U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian also imposed a $500,000 fine, the maximum allowed under the law.

### Conviction and Sentencing Details

Combs was convicted in July of flying girlfriends and male sex workers around the country to engage in drug-fueled sexual encounters over many years and multiple locations. The nearly two-month federal trial in Manhattan featured harrowing testimony from women who accused Combs of beating, threatening, sexually assaulting, and blackmailing them. However, Combs was acquitted of sex trafficking and racketeering charges, which could have resulted in a life sentence.

He was sentenced to four years and two months in prison. Having already served one year in jail, he could be released in about three years. Prosecutors had sought a sentence exceeding 11 years, while Combs’ lawyers argued for immediate release, stating that the time served has already led to his remorse and commitment to sobriety.

On the eve of his sentencing, Combs wrote the judge, describing himself as a “new man” after realizing he was “broken to my core.” His legal team has announced plans to appeal the sentence.

There is no possibility of parole in the federal system.

### Prosecutors and Key Witnesses Oppose Leniency

Prosecutor Christy Slavik emphasized that sparing Combs serious prison time would effectively excuse years of violence. Key witnesses also urged the judge to reject leniency, expressing fears for their safety should Combs be freed.

### Where Is Combs Serving His Sentence?

Since his arrest a year ago, Combs has been held in a federal lockup in Brooklyn. His lawyers’ requests to keep him under house arrest at his Miami Beach mansion were denied. The Brooklyn facility, primarily used for post-arrest detention and short sentences, has faced criticism for poor conditions.

It remains unclear where Combs will serve the remainder of his sentence, but there is a low-security federal correctional institution near his Miami home, including an adjacent minimum security satellite camp. According to its website, the facility houses about 1,000 inmates.

### Key Trial Testimonies

During the trial, former girlfriend and R&B singer Casandra “Cassie” Ventura testified that Combs compelled her to have “disgusting” sex with strangers hundreds of times during their decade-long relationship. Jurors viewed video footage of Combs dragging and beating her in a Los Angeles hotel hallway after one such multi-day encounter.

Another woman, identified as “Jane,” testified that Combs pressured her into sex with male workers during drug-fueled “hotel nights,” which he sometimes filmed. The Associated Press does not typically name sexual abuse victims unless they come forward publicly.

Combs’ lawyers argued that the government was attempting to criminalize consensual—but unconventional—sexual preferences.

### The Federal Law Involved: The Mann Act

Combs was sentenced for violating the federal Mann Act, an anti-prostitution law with a century-old history. The Mann Act prohibits the transportation of individuals across state lines for prostitution or other illegal sexual acts. While amended in the 1980s, it is primarily used to prosecute interstate prostitution crimes or cases involving the transportation of minors for sexual purposes.

Defense attorney Jason Driscoll contended that the law was misapplied in Combs’ case.

### Diddy’s Reputational Downfall

Combs’ public downfall began in 2023 when Ventura, a key trial witness, sued him, alleging years of sexual and physical abuse. The two settled within hours for $20 million—a sum Ventura revealed publicly for the first time during the trial. Since then, dozens of others have come forward with similar allegations.

The federal sex trafficking investigation was publicly revealed during a coordinated raid on Combs’ homes across the country, escalating the case to intense public scrutiny.

### Cultural Impact of the Case

The raid’s seizure of 1,000 bottles of baby oil and other lubricants quickly became a cultural talking point, turning Combs into both a villain and a punchline. Talk shows, “Saturday Night Live,” and social media widely joked about the “freak-offs” and the vast quantities of baby oil allegedly used during the sex marathons.

While fellow celebrities associated with Combs faced public scrutiny, no others have been implicated in the criminal allegations.

**Stay Informed and Connected**

Subscribe to The Philadelphia Tribune for the latest updates.
[Click Here to Subscribe]

*Please note: We encourage respectful and truthful discussion. Avoid obscene, vulgar, or discriminatory language. Threats or harassment will not be tolerated. Use the ‘Report’ link to notify us of any abusive posts. We welcome eyewitness accounts and information related to our articles.*
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/sean-diddy-combs-lawyers-plan-to-appeal-as-convicted-hip-hop-star-faces-more-years/article_4c992b72-bce3-4aa1-941e-691650e9324a.html

Mumbai Shocker! 18-Year-Old Found Eight Months Pregnant, Investigation Reveals Minor Boyfriend Involved; Booked Under Relevant Sections

**Mumbai Teen’s Fake Assault Claim Unravels, Revealing Pregnancy by Boyfriend**

In a shocking case from Mumbai, an 18-year-old girl, found to be eight months pregnant during a medical examination at Cama Hospital, initially gave a false statement to the police to protect her boyfriend. The matter came to light after doctors, suspecting she was underage, informed the authorities, prompting a police investigation.

**The Initial Misleading Claim**

According to the initial report, the victim claimed that while on a trip to Matheran with friends, she was sexually assaulted by an unknown man. She alleged that the man, despite knowing she was underage, forced himself on her at a lodge. Acting on this account, the Matheran Police began investigating the case.

**The Truth Unfolds**

The investigation took a turn when police interrogated the victim’s close friend. The friend confirmed that she and another companion had gone to Matheran in July, but the victim had not accompanied them. This directly contradicted the victim’s earlier story.

Confronted with this evidence, the victim admitted in a supplementary statement recorded on September 25 that her initial account was fabricated.

**The Actual Sequence of Events**

The victim revealed that her 17-year-old boyfriend was responsible for her pregnancy. She stated that he repeatedly engaged in sexual relations with her when she was still a minor, around January or February 2024, at his maternal uncle’s residence.

**Case Transfer and Charges**

Based on the revised statements and corroboration from her friends, investigators established that the offence occurred within the jurisdiction of the Wadala TT Police Station. Consequently, the Matheran Police have officially transferred the case to Wadala TT Police for further investigation.

The 17-year-old boyfriend has been booked under relevant sections of the law, and further inquiries are underway.
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/mumbai-shocker-18-year-old-found-eight-months-pregnant-investigation-reveals-minor-boyfriend-involved-booked-under-relevant-sections

Diddy Speaks: Sean Combs Breaks Silence on ‘Disgusting and Sick’ Behavior as He Addresses Court for First Time and Pleads for Mercy in Final Bid for Freedom

**Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Breaks Silence, Pleads for Mercy at Sentencing Hearing**

*Published Oct. 3, 2025, 4:27 p.m. ET*

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs has broken his silence and begged for mercy in a final bid for his freedom at his sentencing hearing, RadarOnline.com can reveal.

While Combs, 55, was acquitted of his most serious charges—sex trafficking and racketeering—in July, he still faces up to 20 years behind bars after being found guilty on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. Prosecutors are seeking a minimum of 11 years imprisonment, while Combs’ defense team argued a 14-month sentence is fair and could guarantee the disgraced music mogul’s release within weeks due to time served.

**Combs Apologizes to Ex Cassie Ventura**

When the moment came for Combs to address Judge Arun Subramanian, the rapper took accountability for his actions and issued an apology to his ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura.

He said,
“One of the hardest things I’ve had to handle was having to be quiet and not being able to express how sorry I am for my actions.
I want to personally apologize to Cassie Ventura for any harm I have caused her emotionally or physically. I don’t take that lightly.
I would also like to apologize to her family. I am so sorry. I would like to apologize to Jane. I’m sorry. I brought you into my mess.”

**Combs Blames ‘Disgusting, Shameful and Sick’ Actions on Drugs**

Combs then blamed his behavior on himself and drug use, describing his actions as “disgusting, shameful, and sick.”

He told the court,
“My actions were disgusting, shameful, and sick. I was sick, sick from the drugs. I was out of control, I needed help, and I didn’t get the help. I cannot make any excuses because my mother taught me better.”

The music mogul added,
“I got lost in my dream of life. I am not this larger-than-life person. I am just a human being. I was trying my best, but I got lost in my excess.”

**Emotional Plea While Apologizing to Family**

The father of seven broke down in tears as he admitted he’s been “stripped down to nothing.” Turning to face his family — which included his six adult children who had addressed the judge earlier, calling their dad a “changed man” — Combs said,
“You taught me better. You raised me better.”

His 80-year-old mother, Janice, was also present in court.

**A Final Plea for Mercy**

After addressing his loved ones, Combs delivered a last-ditch plea to the court, promising the judge he would never be violent again.

He claimed that his arrest and sex trafficking trial had forever changed him, and insisted that if the judge showed him mercy in his sentencing, he would use the opportunity to get the help he “desperately needs.”

“I can’t change the past, but I can change the future,” Combs said.
“I ask Your Honor for mercy. I beg Your Honor for mercy — to be a father again, a son again, and a leader in my community again, and to get the help I desperately need.
They need me, they’re scared, and I’m scared. I have nobody to blame but myself. I will never put my hands on another person again. I have learned my lesson.”

**Sentencing**

Despite his desperate pleas, Judge Subramanian sentenced Combs to 50 months behind bars. Combs will receive credit for 12 months already served.
https://radaronline.com/p/sean-diddy-combs-breaks-silence-sentencing-apologizes-sick-behavior-court/

EXCLUSIVE: Radar’s Deep Dive into Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban’s Divorce Papers — Including Broken Couple’s Astonishing Child Custody Plans

**Nicole Kidman Gains Primary Custody of Daughters Following Split from Keith Urban**

*October 1, 2025 | Published 7:50 p.m. ET*

Nicole Kidman will take on primary custody of her teenage daughters, Sunday Rose and Faith Margaret, following her split from country singer Keith Urban, RadarOnline.com can reveal after reviewing the couple’s newly filed divorce papers.

### Custody Agreement Details

Court documents show that Kidman, 58, and Urban, 57, have reached a unique custody arrangement. The actress has been granted custody of the girls for 306 days a year, while the musician will have them for just 59 days.

Under the terms, Urban will have their daughters—Sunday, 17, and Faith, 14—from 10 a.m. on Saturdays until 6 p.m. on Sundays every other weekend. The documents also specify that major decisions regarding education and activities must be made jointly by both parents.

A source close to the case explained, “Nicole’s priority was making sure the children had consistency, and the agreement reflects that. Keith will spend less time with them but will remain involved in major decisions.”

### Holidays and Financial Arrangements

The divorce papers further outline how holidays will be shared between Kidman and Urban. Kidman will have custody on Mother’s Day and Easter, while Urban will spend Father’s Day and Thanksgiving with the girls.

Neither parent will pay child support, as Urban has already prepaid his obligations in full, according to the court. Both Kidman and Urban are required to complete a parenting seminar within 60 days.

The notarized custody plan was signed by Kidman on September 6, with Urban signing a week earlier. Importantly, the agreement stresses that both parties must refrain from disparaging each other in front of the children and encourage their daughters to maintain healthy relationships with both parents.

Court costs will be shared equally, and both child and spousal support have been waived.

### End of a 19-Year Marriage

Kidman filed for divorce after 19 years of marriage, citing “irreconcilable differences.” Once considered one of Australia’s most enduring celebrity couples, Kidman and Urban have been living largely separate lives due to demanding filming and touring schedules.

Sources close to Kidman say the speculation surrounding their relationship has been difficult for her. A friend shared, “The idea that Keith might already be moving on has been painful for Nicole. She has always placed a high value on loyalty.”

### Public Signs of Strain

The couple was last seen together publicly in June at a FIFA World Cup match in Nashville, Tennessee. Since then, Urban has been on his High and Alive world tour, currently performing in Pennsylvania, while Kidman remains at the couple’s $4 million Nashville home with their daughters.

Earlier this year, Urban hinted at marital tension when he abruptly ended a radio interview after being asked about Kidman’s intimate film scenes in *Babygirl* and *A Family Affair*. Meanwhile, Kidman suggested strains in their marriage during promotion for her Netflix series *The Perfect Couple* in September, stating, “There’s no perfect anything. Anything that’s presented as perfect… forget it.”

### Family Background

Kidman was previously married to actor Tom Cruise, 63, for 11 years. Together, they adopted two children, Isabella, 32, and Connor, 30.

Despite their separation, the court filing emphasizes that both Kidman and Urban are expected to provide a “loving, stable, consistent and nurturing relationship” for their daughters.

*Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.*
https://radaronline.com/p/nicole-kidman-keith-urban-divorce-papers-custody-plans/