Bombay HC Seeks Maharashtra Police Response In YouTuber-Journalist Sneha Barve Assault Case

**Bombay High Court Seeks Response from Maharashtra Police in Assault Case of YouTuber-Journalist**

*Mumbai:* The Bombay High Court on Wednesday sought a response from the Maharashtra police while hearing a petition filed by a YouTuber-journalist who was allegedly assaulted in July this year and has since been receiving threats.

The court noted the rising incidents of harassment against journalists in recent times. A bench comprising Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam Ankhad remarked, “This is happening. We have this understanding that they are doing it with the journalists. Whoever reports something against them, they try to harass.”

**Details of Assault and Petition**

The petition was filed by Sneha Barve, who alleged that she was assaulted with an iron rod on July 4, 2025, while reporting on an alleged illegal construction in Pune. She had initially sought police protection but, after not receiving any response, approached the High Court.

During the hearing on Tuesday, the court asked Barve’s counsel, Mihir Desai, whether she was willing to pay for police protection. On Wednesday, Desai informed the bench that she was ready to bear the charges as per the state government’s policy.

He further explained that Barve sustained serious injuries in the July attack and has been receiving threats since. Despite writing three letters to the Superintendent of Police seeking protection, no decision has been taken, Desai added.

**Evidence and Court Observations**

When questioned by the court, Desai emphasized that there is video evidence showing Barve being assaulted with an iron rod during her investigation of the illegal construction site.

However, the court observed that the petition was not drafted properly and lacked submitted evidence. It noted that affidavits from witnesses to the threats should have been attached to the petition.

The court has asked the state to file its response to the petition and adjourned the hearing to September 29.

*Also Watch:* For exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai and surrounding areas, visit [Budget Properties](https://budgetproperties.in/).
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/bombay-hc-seeks-maharashtra-police-response-in-youtuber-journalist-sneha-barve-assault-case

Man trying to serve Taylor Swift deposition papers gets himself arrested

**Man Trying to Serve Taylor Swift Deposition Papers Ends Up Arrested**

*By Shreya Mukherjee | September 24, 2025, 1:18 PM*

**What Happened?**

A man was arrested for trespassing at NFL player Travis Kelce’s Kansas residence on September 15, according to local reports. The suspect, identified as Justin Lee Fisher, allegedly attempted to serve deposition papers to Kelce’s fiancée, pop star Taylor Swift. The papers were related to the ongoing legal battle between actor-director Justin Baldoni and his *It Ends With Us* co-star Blake Lively.

The incident took place around 2:00 AM local time after police received reports of a trespasser near Kelce’s gated home in Leawood, Kansas.

**Legal Implications**

Justin Lee Fisher, a former police officer turned private investigator, was charged with misdemeanor criminal trespassing. He reportedly jumped the fence into Kelce’s gated estate to deliver the deposition papers on behalf of Baldoni’s legal team.

However, details of the incident remain limited. The official one-page police report noted in bold letters, “This information is restricted as to use and dissemination,” providing scant additional information.

**Case Background**

Earlier this month, Judge Lewis Liman denied Baldoni’s request to depose Taylor Swift. On September 12, Liman ruled that Baldoni’s team had waited too long to serve the deposition and had failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for extending the original September 30 deadline.

“Having failed to demonstrate appropriate diligence, the requested extension is denied,” Judge Liman wrote.

**Legal Responses**

Baldoni claimed Swift would testify, but her lawyer Douglas Baldridge denied this assertion. Baldridge emphasized that Swift “has no material role in this action” and “did not agree to a deposition.”

Baldoni’s legal team reportedly sought to obtain information regarding conversations between Swift and Lively about working conditions on the set of *It Ends With Us*.

**Ongoing Legal Battle**

The dispute began in December when Blake Lively filed a lawsuit against Justin Baldoni, his Wayfarer Studios colleagues, publicist, and crisis PR firm. Lively alleged sexual harassment and a retaliatory smear campaign after raising concerns about workplace misconduct.

The conflict escalated when Baldoni responded with a $400 million countersuit against Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, accusing them of defamation and extortion. However, Judge Liman dismissed Baldoni’s countersuit in June, leaving the original allegations under scrutiny.

This latest incident adds an unusual twist to an already high-profile legal battle involving several celebrities and underscores the complexities surrounding legal procedures and high-stakes disputes in the entertainment industry.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/man-arrested-for-trespassing-2/story

Court hears arguments on behalf of Samir Modi, police oppose bail plea

At the outset, Senior Advocate Tanveer Ahmed Mir requested the court to hear arguments on camera. Subsequently, the hearing was conducted in camera (closed room hearing). The court has listed the bail plea for hearing on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) extended the judicial custody of Samir Modi till October 6. He was produced before the court after the expiry of one day’s judicial custody.

On Saturday, the Delhi Police filed a reply opposing the bail plea of businessman Samir Modi. Senior Advocates Ramesh Gupta, along with Advocates Punit Mittal, Shailendra Singh, Ishaan Jain, and Surya Pratap Singh, appeared for Samir Modi. On the other hand, Senior Advocate Tanveer Ahmed Mir, accompanied by Shubham Mahajan and Ravish Thakur, appeared for the complainant.

During the proceedings on Saturday, Senior Advocate Ramesh Gupta contended that a Lookout Circular (LOC) can be issued within five days of an FIR being registered. It was submitted that the FIR in this case was registered on September 10, and the LOC was issued within four days. He stated that Samir Modi had traveled to London on a return ticket, returned from London, and was detained at the airport before being handed over to the police on September 18.

The counsel requested that the court inquire with the police about how an LOC could be opened within four days. He also submitted that the police be asked to investigate a complaint filed by the accused alleging extortion by the complainant. Additional Sessions Judge Vipin Kharb remarked that he, too, wanted to know how an LOC could be opened in four days.

On September 19, the Saket court granted two more days’ remand of Samir Modi to the Delhi Police. He was subsequently sent to judicial custody on Sunday. The court had also directed the police to inquire into the complaint filed by Samir Modi.

The Friday hearing was conducted in camera, with the court asking the media and others to leave. Senior Advocate Ramesh Gupta pointed out that bail plea hearings are typically never conducted in camera.

*This story has been sourced from a third-party syndicated feed and agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for the dependability, trustworthiness, reliability, or accuracy of the information presented. Mid-day management reserves the sole right to alter, delete, or remove (without notice) any content at its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.*
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/police-opposes-bail-plea-of-samir-modi-court-lists-matter-to-hear-arguments-23595275

NEET PG 2025: Supreme Court Hearing Today On Answer Key Dispute; Counselling Schedule Awaited

**NEET PG 2025 Counselling: Supreme Court to Hear Petitions on Answer Key Transparency**

The Supreme Court is set to hear petitions related to the NEET PG 2025 counselling today, September 19. Originally slated for September 12, the hearing will now be conducted by a bench comprising Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice KV Viswanathan, according to media reports.

### Petitioners Raise Concerns Over Transparency

The petitions have been filed by NEET PG aspirants along with the United Doctors Front (UDF), who are strongly opposing the answer key released by the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS). This is the first time NBEMS has published an answer key following a directive from the Supreme Court.

However, candidates argue that the answer key format is not transparent. The key includes only question IDs and answer key IDs, without the actual questions. Students claim this restricts their ability to verify their answers effectively, defeating the purpose of publishing the answer key in the first place.

The petitioners are urging the Supreme Court to direct NBEMS to publish the complete set of question papers along with detailed answer explanations. They believe this will ensure a fair and equitable verification process.

### NEET PG 2025 Counselling Schedule Awaited

While the Supreme Court examines the matter, thousands of aspirants eagerly await the release of the NEET PG 2025 counselling schedule, which will be announced shortly by the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC).

The schedule will outline important details including registration procedures, choice filling, and dates for seat allotment results. Shortlisted candidates will need to register on the MCC website, submit their applications, and select their preferred courses and institutions.

Seat allocation will be carried out based on merit, candidate preferences, and seat availability across medical colleges.

### Potential Impact of the Supreme Court Verdict

The Supreme Court’s decision on the transparency of the NEET PG answer key could have significant implications for future medical entrance examinations. It may set new standards for accountability and fairness in postgraduate medical admission processes, enhancing trust in the system for aspirants nationwide.
https://www.freepressjournal.in/education/neet-pg-2025-supreme-court-hearing-today-on-answer-key-dispute-counselling-schedule-awaited

Brigitte Macron to provide ‘scientific’ gender evidence in US lawsuit

Photos of Brigitte Macron, wife of the French president, could be presented in court as part of the defamation case brought by the Macrons against US right-wing influencer Candace Owens.

The couple has filed a 22-count lawsuit in the US state of Delaware, accusing Owens of knowingly spreading false claims, including the assertion that Brigitte Macron was born a man.

“We’re going to have the two testimonies of the two plaintiffs. There will be expert testimony that will come out that will be scientific in nature and will also demonstrate the falsity of the statements,” Macrons’ lawyer Tom Clare told the BBC on Thursday.

The lawsuit describes the Macrons as victims of a global humiliation campaign that is invasive, dehumanising, and deeply unjust.

However, Owens has stood by her remarks even after the lawsuit was filed.
https://www.scmp.com/news/world/europe/article/3326055/french-first-lady-brigitte-macron-provide-scientific-gender-evidence-us-lawsuit?utm_source=rss_feed

Man accused of killing Bilal Hamze was ‘best friends’ with alleged Alameddine member on Snapchat

A man accused of killing a senior member of a Sydney crime gang was Snapchat friends with a rival gang member, a court has been told.

The revelation came during recent proceedings, highlighting the complex relationships between members of competing gangs. This unusual connection has raised questions about the dynamics within the criminal underworld of Sydney.

Further details emerged as the trial progressed, shedding light on the interactions between the accused and his alleged rivals. The court continues to examine the evidence surrounding the case.
https://thewest.com.au/news/man-accused-of-killing-bilal-hamze-was-best-friends-with-alleged-alameddine-member-on-snapchat-c-20060068