Witkoff To Moscow. Zelenskyy Is Wary. A Phone Call Leaks. A Peace Plan Coalesces. What Exactly Is Going On With Ukraine?

The White House’s lead envoy is heading to Russia for a sixth time. Ukraine fears a peace that heavily favors Moscow. A leaked phone call shows the US envoy advising a Kremlin official on how to sweet talk the White House. And Russia’s invasion — now in its 46th month — has pushed Ukraine’s beleaguered armed forces closer to the breaking point. There’s a lot that happened in the six days since a US-drafted peace proposal first leaked not to mention the circumstances under which it was drafted. The 28-point plan jolted what until recently had been sputtering efforts to halt the Russian war, something that Trump had pledged to do within 24 hours of taking office in January. Here’s what you need to know as of November 26, as diplomats and negotiators from Washington, Moscow, Kyiv, and many other European capitals wrangle over details over a concrete, and controversial plan. The Main Sticking Points? After the US plan leaked, and then was given to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the Ukrainian leader sent his chief of staff and other officials to Geneva for urgent talks with US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Zelenskyy reportedly was blindsided by the plan, which echoed most of the hard-line positions that Russia has held before the invasion. The Geneva talks, however, produced an “updated and refined” framework a reworked 19-point plan — that would deliver a “sustainable and just peace,” both the White House and Zelenskyy’s office said. But Zelenskyy’s comments suggested the thorniest issues might still be on the table. That includes the fate of a chunk of the Donetsk region that the Kremlin has been hellbent on seizing. Moscow has repeatedly said it must control all of Donetsk, one of five Ukrainian regions Putin baselessly claims are Russian. Ceding land that Ukraine’s forces have kept out of Russia’s clutches, at great cost, would be a massive concession by Kyiv and could have political repercussions for Zelenskyy. Other pitfalls include the Kremlin’s insistence that Ukraine be forever barred from joining NATO and a potential cap on the size of Kyiv’s military. The US draft would require Ukraine to “enshrine in its constitution that it will not join NATO” and the alliance to formalize a pledge that Ukraine will never be admitted. That approach may be unpalatable for Ukraine, which wants freedom to choose its geopolitical partners and currently has its NATO aspirations codified in its constitution. Ukraine also wants to be able to defend itself from any potential future Russian attack. In previous negotiations, Russia called for Ukraine’s military to be under 100, 000 personnel. The initial US draft would cap it at 600, 000. A European counterproposal would raise that to 800, 000 “in peacetime.” Several top Republican senators have criticized the initial US plan, including former Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. “A deal that rewards aggression wouldn’t be worth the paper it’s written on. America isn’t a neutral arbiter, and we shouldn’t act like one,” he said in a post to X. Sixth Time’s A Charm? A real estate developer with no diplomatic background, Steve Witkoff is the man tapped by Trump to lead efforts to find an end to Russia’s war. He’s met with Putin five times already, traveling to Moscow on his private jet. Some of Witkoff’s prior actions have raised alarm bells to outside observers, who fear he is being manipulated or that he misunderstands the war’s deeply intractable historical contours. Witkoff has relied on translators provided by the Kremlin for his conversations with Putin and other officials, rather than using translators authorized by the US Embassy. After Witkoff’s last meeting with Putin in August, US and European officials said the envoy misunderstood the geography of Ukrainian territory Putin was claiming. Representative Don Bacon, a Republican who has criticized the Trump administration’s engagement with Russia, called for Witkoff to be fired. Sending Witkoff back to Moscow, a visit Kremlin foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov confirmed would happen next week, is a sign that the White House is eager to cement some or all of the points that were set in Geneva and Abu Dhabi. Another wild-card: Trump mentioned his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, might accompany Witkoff, something neither Ushakov nor Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov commented on. Kushner was reportedly present for previously undisclosed US meeting involving Witkoff and Russian who is also not a diplomat but who has played a starring, unconventional role in negotiations with the Americans: Kirill Dmitriev. Wait, A Leaked Phone Call? In late October, Dmitriev, a sharp-tongued, Harvard-trained businessman who heads Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, traveled to Miami, Florida. He met with Republican Representative Anna Luna, giving her what he said were undisclosed Russian files on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. He also gave her a box of chocolates and a book of Putin quotes. Dmitriev had been blacklisted in 2022, along with other Russian officials, in punishment for the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Trump’s Treasury secretary has called him a “Kremlin propagandist.” It later emerged that Dmitriev, who was given an exemption by US authorities to travel, had secret meetings with Witkoff and Kushner while in Miami- reportedly leaving some White House and State Department officials in the dark. After news of the US proposal emerged last week, several US senators said that Rubio told them the draft was Russian in nature, influenced by a Russian, though Dmitriev was not named. Rubio, who was in Geneva, insisted it was a US draft. On November 25, not long before Trump announced Witkoff would travel to Moscow, Bloomberg News published a transcript of what it said was telephone call between Witkoff and Ushakov, held about two weeks before Witkoff met Dmitriev in Miami. According to the transcript, Witkoff advised Ushakov on how to charm Trump on a possible peace deal. “I would make the call and just reiterate that you congratulate the president on this achievement, that you supported it, you supported it, that you respect that he is a man of peace and you’re just, you’re really glad to have seen it happen. So I would say that,” Witkoff was quoted as saying. “I know what it’s going to take to get a peace deal done: Donetsk and maybe a land swap somewhere,” Witkoff reportedly said. Bloomberg did not say how it obtained the recording, which was likely made by US intelligence agencies who routinely monitor and eavesdrop on foreign officials’ conversations. RFE/RL could not independent verify the transcript. Trump partially confirmed the fact of the call, though not its content, saying “He’s got to sell this to Ukraine. He’s going to sell Ukraine to Russia. That’s what a dealmaker does.” Ushakov also appeared to confirm the fact of the call, telling a Russian state TV reporter that the call was leaked to undermine the backchannel negotiations. “It is unlikely that such a leak could have come from the participants in the conversation,” he was quoted as saying. RFE/RL Russia/Ukraine editor Steven Gutterman contributed to this report.
https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-ukraine-witkoff-dmitriev-peace-ushakov/33606177.html

In his words: Trump’s rhetoric about Zelenskyy and Putin has evolved

President Donald Trump repeatedly said during his White House campaign that if he won the 2024 election, he would be able to end the war between Russia and Ukraine “in 24 hours.” But in the 10 months since he took office, the road to a peace deal has been fraught with changing dynamics involving the American leader, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump’s rhetoric toward both men has evolved. It continues to do so. At the outset of his second term in January, Trump was conciliatory toward Putin, for whom he long has shown admiration. Over time, Trump expressed increasing exasperation with Putin, while seemingly softening criticism of Zelenskyy after their February blowout in the Oval Office. Trump’s administration imposed sanctions on Russia and he was suggesting by the fall that Ukraine could win back all territory lost to Russia. That was a dramatic shift from his repeated calls for Kyiv to make concessions to end the war that began with Russia’s invasion in February 2022. By late November, Trump had endorsed a peace plan favorable to Russia. Some Democratic senators suggested the proposal was a “wish list” that originated with Moscow and they had heard just that from Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The State Department disputed it and Rubio insisted the plan was written by the United States. American allies in Europe nonetheless worried it was too conciliatory to Russia. Trump had returned to slamming Zelenskyy in ways that recalled how Trump and Vice President JD Vance had hounded the Ukrainian leader out of the Oval Office months earlier. Trump was now suggesting Zelenskyy was not appearing grateful enough for years of U. S. military support. The Republican president also chided European countries for not doing more to put economic pressure on Russa. Here is a look at what Trump has said this year and how his tone has changed: Jan. 31 “We want to end that war. That war would have not started if I was president.” Trump said his new administration had already had “very serious” discussions with Russia and that he and Putin could soon take “significant” action toward ending the conflict. Feb. 19 “A Dictator without Elections, Zelenskyy better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left.” Trump’s harsh words for Zelenskyy on his Truth Social platform drew criticism from Democrats and even some Republicans in Congress, where defending Ukraine from Russian aggression has traditionally had bipartisan support. Zelenskyy said Trump was falling into a Russian disinformation trap. He was quickly admonished by Vance about the perils of publicly criticizing the new U. S. president. Feb. 28 “You’re gambling with World War III. And what you’re doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that’s backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have.” Trump and Vance berated Zelenskyy over the war, accusing him of not showing gratitude after he challenged Vance on the question of diplomacy with Putin. The argument in the Oval Office was broadcast globally. It led to the rest of Zelenskyy’s White House visit being canceled and called into question the U. S. support of Ukraine. A few days after the blowup, Trump temporarily paused military aid to Ukraine to pressure Zelenskyy to seek peace. March 30 “I don’t think he’s going to go back on his word. You’re talking about Putin. I don’t think he’s going to go back on his word. I’ve known him for a long time. We’ve always gotten along well.” Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said he trusted Putin to hold up his end of a potential peace deal. April 24 “I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Lets get the Peace Deal DONE!” In a Truth Social post, Trump reacted to Russia attacking Kyiv with an hourslong barrage of missiles and drones. It was the first of his rare criticism of Putin as Russia stepped up its attacks on Ukraine. April 29 “A lot of his people are dying. They’re being killed, and I feel very badly about it.” Trump addressed the toll It was the first time the two leaders had met since the Oval Office spat and it signaled a shift in Trump’s attitude toward the Ukrainian president. May 25 “I’ve always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY!” Trump’s Truth Social post made it clear he was losing patience with Putin as Moscow pounded Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities with drones and missiles. June 25 “He was very nice actually. We had a little rough times, sometimes. He was . Couldn’t have been nicer. I think he’d like to see an end to this, I do.” Trump had a closed-door meeting with Zelenskyy during a NATO summit in The Hague. Trump’s comments to reporters later also opened the possibility of sending Patriot air defense missiles to Ukraine. July 8 “We get a lot of bull–t thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.” Trump also said he was “not happy” with Putin and that the war was “killing a lot of people” on both sides. Trump’s comments during a Cabinet meeting came a day after he said the United States would send more weapons to Ukraine. It was a dramatic reversal after earlier announcing a pause in the delivery of previously approved firepower to Kyiv, a decision that was made amid concerns that America’s military stockpiles had declined too much. July 13 “I am very disappointed with President Putin, I thought he was somebody that meant what he said. He’ll talk so beautifully and then he’ll bomb people at night. We don’t like that.” Trump’s remarks to reporters came as Russia has intensified its aerial attacks. July 14 “I don’t want to say he’s an assassin, but he’s a tough guy. It’s been proven over the years. He’s fooled a lot of people before.” Trump pushed harder against Putin during an Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. Trump said if there was no deal to end the war within 50 days, the U. S. would impose “secondary tariffs,” meaning taxes would target Russia’s trading partners in an effort to isolate Moscow. Trump and Rutte also discussed a rejuvenated pipeline for U. S. weapons. European allies planned to buy military equipment and then transfer it to Ukraine. Aug. 15 “There’s no deal until there’s a deal.” Trump failed to secure an agreement from Putin during a summit in Alaska even after rolling out the red carpet for the man who started the war. Trump had wanted to show off his deal-making skills. Instead, he handed Putin long-sought recognition on the international stage after years of Western efforts to make Putin a pariah over the war and his crackdown on dissent, and forestalled the threat of additional U. S. sanctions. Sept. 23 “Russia has been fighting aimlessly for three and a half years a War that should have taken a Real Military Power less than a week to win. This is not distinguishing Russia. In fact, it is very much making them look like ‘a paper tiger.’ ” Trump posted on social media soon after meeting with Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the U. N. General Assembly gathering of world leaders. He also said he believed Ukraine could win back all territory lost to Russia, a departure from Trump’s previous suggestions that Ukraine would never be able to reclaim all the territory that Russia has occupied since it seized the Crimean Peninsula in 2014. Oct. 17 “Stop the war immediately.” After again hosting Zelenskyy at the White House, Trump implied that Moscow should be allowed keep territory it has taken from Kyiv if doing so could help end the conflict more quickly. “You go by the battle line wherever it is otherwise it’s too complicated,” Trump said. “You stop at the battle line and both sides should go home, go to their families, stop the killing, and that should be it.” Trump had a lengthy phone call with Putin the day before Zelenskyy arrived and announced he soon planned to meet with Putin in Hungary. That meeting never materialized, in part because of a lack of progress on ending the war. Trump also signaled to Zelenskyy that the U. S. would not be selling Ukraine long-range Tomahawk missiles, which the Ukrainians believed could be a game changer in helping prod Putin to the negotiating table. Oct. 22 “Hopefully he’ll become reasonable.” Trump made the comment suggesting Putin could be more favorable to a peace agreement after the Treasury Department announced sanctions against Russia’s two biggest oil companies and their subsidiaries. But Trump added, “And, hopefully Zelenskyy will be reasonable, too. You know, it takes two to tango, as they say.” Nov. 21 “He’s going to have to approve it.” Trump suggested that Zelenskyy would have to accept the U. S. peace plan. Trump pressed Zelenskyy to agree to concessions of land to Moscow, a massive reduction in the size of Ukraine’s army and agreement from Europe to assert that Ukraine would never be admitted into the NATO military alliance. Trump set a Nov. 27 deadline Thanksgiving Day in the U. S. for Zelenskyy to respond to the plan. Trump also said more time could be allotted to Ukraine as long as progress was made to a lasting peace. Nov. 22 “I would like to get to peace.” Asked if the peace plan was his final offer, Trump said it was not. He did not elaborate. But his comment suggested he would be willing to negotiate past the Nov. 27 deadline and alter the peace plan in ways that Ukraine wants. “We’re trying to get it ended. One way or the other, we have to get it ended,” Trump said of the war. Senators from both parties who have been critical of Trump’s approach to ending the war said they spoke with Rubio, who told them that the plan Trump was pushing Kyiv to accept was actually a “wish list” of the Russians. The State Department called that account “false” and Rubio later took the extraordinary step of insisting that the plan was U. S.-authored. But the incident raised still more questions about its ultimate fate. Nov. 23 “UKRAINE ‘LEADERSHIP’ HAS EXPRESSED ZERO GRATITUDE FOR OUR EFFORTS, AND EUROPE CONTINUES TO BUY OIL FROM RUSSIA.” In a post on his social media site, Trump went after Zelenskyy and the Europeans once more: “With strong and proper U. S. and Ukrainian LEADERSHIP” Russia’s invasion of Ukraine “would have NEVER HAPPENED,” Trump said, again blaming his predecessor, Democrat Joe Biden, for allowing the conflict in Ukraine.
https://ktar.com/national-news/in-his-words-trumps-rhetoric-about-zelenskyy-and-putin-has-evolved-3/5781614/

U.S. seizes additional crypto linked to North Korea’s illegal network

**U.S. Department of Justice Convicts Several in Scheme Aiding North Korea’s Fraudulent Digital Asset Gains**

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced on Friday the conviction of several criminals involved in schemes that helped the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) illicitly obtain large amounts of digital assets. The DOJ also successfully recovered approximately $15 million in proceeds tied to remote information technology (IT) work and a cryptocurrency heist.

According to the DOJ, North Korea uses such fraudulent schemes to finance its weapons programs and other priorities, in direct violation of international sanctions. Investigations revealed that facilitators based in the U.S. and Ukraine assisted North Korean actors in securing remote IT employment with U.S. companies, furthering these illicit gains.

### U.S. Nationals Plead Guilty to Wire Fraud Conspiracy

Court documents linked to five guilty pleas show that the hackers’ schemes affected over 136 U.S. victim companies, generating more than $2.2 million in revenue for the DPRK regime. The fraudulent activities also compromised the identities of more than 18 U.S. citizens.

The DOJ further disclosed that a North Korean hacking group known as Advanced Persistent Threat 38 (APT38) executed a multimillion-dollar cryptocurrency heist across four overseas digital asset platforms in 2023. The U.S. government is now seeking to return the seized virtual currency—valued at over $15 million—to the rightful owners.

“Hostile nation-states raising funds for illicit programs by stealing from digital asset exchanges threatens both national security and economic stability,” said Mathew Galeotti, Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “The Criminal Division is steadfast in its determination to forfeit ill-gotten gains from bad actors and return funds to victims.”

### Details of the Fraudulent Scheme

Court filings from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia revealed that U.S. nationals Audricus Phagnasay, Jason Salazar, and Alexander Paul Travis pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud conspiracy.

Authorities found that Phagnasay and Travis knowingly provided their U.S. identities to remote IT workers located outside the country, enabling those workers to fraudulently apply for and obtain employment with U.S. companies.

Additionally, the trio hosted laptops provided by the victim companies at their residences and installed unauthorized remote access software. This setup created the false impression that the remote IT workers were legitimately working from the defendants’ homes.

The defendants also facilitated completion of employer vetting procedures on behalf of the remote workers. Notably, both Travis and Salazar appeared for drug testing intended for the remote employees.

### Court-Imposed Fines

The court fined Alexander Paul Travis at least $51,397 for his role in the scheme. Audricus Phagnasay and Jason Salazar were fined approximately $3,450 and $4,500, respectively.

U.S. Attorney Margaret Heap for the Southern District of Georgia praised the cooperation among U.S. law enforcement agencies in uncovering, investigating, and prosecuting those involved in the fraudulent activities.

### Additional Guilty Pleas and Charges

Ukrainian national Oleksandr Didenko also pleaded guilty earlier this week to one count each of wire fraud conspiracy and aggravated identity theft. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia revealed that Didenko’s IT worker clients were paid hundreds of thousands of dollars by U.S. companies for their work.

Didenko agreed to forfeit more than $1.4 million, including about $570,000 in both fiat currency and digital assets seized from him and his co-conspirators.

Furthermore, U.S. national Erick Ntekereze Prince pleaded guilty on November 6 to one count of wire fraud conspiracy. The Southern District of Florida court uncovered that Prince’s company, Taggcar Inc., supplied purportedly certified IT workers to U.S. companies between June 2020 and August 2024. Prince knowingly hosted U.S. company-provided laptops used by IT workers employing stolen or false identities to secure employment.

In January 2025, Prince, U.S. national Emanuel Ashtor, and Mexican national Pedro Ernesto Alonso de los Reyes were charged for their participation in the scheme. The fraudulent IT worker operation generated over $943,000 in salary payments from U.S. companies.

Currently, Pedro Ernesto Alonso de los Reyes is awaiting extradition from the Netherlands, while Emanuel Ashtor’s trial is pending.

*Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community limited to 1,000 members.*
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/crypto/u-s-seizes-additional-crypto-linked-to-north-koreas-illegal-network/

Pentagon move to pull troops from Romania ‘directly at odds’ with Trump strategy: GOP lawmakers

WASHINGTON — The Republican chairmen of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees criticized the Pentagon’s Wednesday decision to remove hundreds of U.S. troops from Romania, a country that shares a border with Ukraine. They argued that the move contradicts the White House’s ongoing pressure campaign on Russia.

“This decision sends the wrong signal to Russia at the very moment President Trump is applying pressure to force Vladimir Putin to come to the table to achieve a lasting peace in Ukraine,” said Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) in a joint statement.

“The President has it exactly right: now is the time for America to demonstrate our resolve against Russian aggression. Unfortunately, the Pentagon’s decision appears uncoordinated and directly at odds with the President’s strategy,” they added.

This troop pullout would not be the first time the Pentagon has taken unilateral action that contradicts Trump’s approach to ending the war in Ukraine. U.S. defense officials have previously attempted to halt weapons shipments to Ukraine, only to be reversed once the president became aware of these moves.

The Republican rebuke followed the Department of Defense’s announcement that it would not replace the 2nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team of the 101st Airborne Division when the unit rotates back to their Kentucky home base as scheduled. While the Pentagon has not specified how many troops will be affected, the Romanian Defense Ministry stated that Bucharest expects between 700 and 800 U.S. forces to leave the country, with approximately 900 to 1,000 remaining.

The Pentagon denied that this decision would “change the security environment in Europe,” arguing that the troop reduction was appropriate because NATO allies could now take on the responsibilities previously held by U.S. troops. This, they said, was a direct result of “President Trump’s call for NATO members to take primary responsibility for the conventional defense of Europe.”

“This is not an American withdrawal from Europe or a signal of lessened commitment to NATO and Article 5,” stated U.S. Army Europe and Africa Command (USAREUR-AF) in a press release. “Rather, this is a positive sign of increased European capability and responsibility.”

While Rogers and Wicker acknowledged that “thanks to President Trump’s leadership, our European allies have agreed to shoulder historic levels of the burden of collective defense,” they cautioned that drawing down the U.S. presence too soon could reverse the president’s progress.

“European rearmament will take time,” they said. “Pulling back U.S. forces from NATO’s Eastern flank prematurely, and just weeks after Russian drones violated Romanian airspace, undermines deterrence and risks inviting further Russian aggression.”

Additionally, the Pentagon’s decision was made without prior consultation with Congress, which Rogers and Wicker called especially concerning. They highlighted “the clear bipartisan and bicameral support for a robust U.S. posture in Europe,” as expressed in both the House and Senate versions of the FY26 National Defense Authorization Act.

“The legislation also makes clear the Congressional intent that no modifications be made to the U.S. posture in Europe absent a thorough review process,” they emphasized.

The Department of Defense is currently conducting a force posture review, examining the U.S. military presence in Europe, estimated to range between 80,000 and 100,000 troops, as well as forces deployed around the globe. Although officials have indicated that reducing U.S. forces in Europe is under consideration, the findings of this review are not expected to be announced before early next year.
https://nypost.com/2025/10/29/world-news/pentagon-move-to-pull-troops-from-romania-directly-at-odds-with-trump-strategy-gop-lawmakers/

German economy minister arrives in Ukraine, pledges energy support

German Economy Minister Katherina Reiche arrived in Kiev on Friday with a business delegation, pledging support to help Ukraine get through the coming winter amid ongoing Russian attacks on its energy system.

“We will do everything we can to ensure Ukraine gets through this winter,” Reiche told reporters upon her arrival in the Ukrainian capital. She emphasized that the focus would be on supporting the reconstruction of destroyed energy infrastructure.

From the very beginning, Russia had deliberately targeted Ukraine’s energy supply in an attempt to wear down its people, Reiche explained. Highlighting the severity of the situation, she noted that between 55% and 60% of the country’s gas infrastructure has been damaged by Russian attacks.

Reiche also signaled increased financial support from Germany and stronger involvement of German energy equipment producers. Additionally, Germany will provide extra funds for the purchase of natural gas to help stabilize Ukraine’s energy needs.

Berlin has already contributed one third of the €390 million ($452 million) energy support fund for Ukraine, Reiche added, underscoring Germany’s commitment to the country’s recovery.

As part of the visit, German drone manufacturers are expected to sign cooperation agreements with Ukraine’s defense industry, further strengthening the collaboration between the two nations.

Ukraine has been defending itself against the invasion launched by Russia for more than three and a half years, relying on ongoing support from Western countries. This latest visit and pledge of support from Germany come at a critical time as Ukraine prepares to face the challenges of winter.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/german-economy-minister-arrives-ukraine-080720936.html

Air raid warnings across Ukraine, eastern Poland airspace closed due to unplanned military activity

Air Raid Warnings Across Ukraine as Eastern Poland Airspace Closed Due to Unplanned Military Activity

Ukraine is currently facing countrywide air raid alerts following overnight strikes by Russia. In response to the heightened military activity, Poland has closed its eastern airspace to ensure safety.

Residents across Ukraine have been urged to take immediate shelter as the attacks continue. In Kyiv, people sought refuge in metro stations during a recent Russian drone attack, highlighting the ongoing threat to civilian areas.

![People take shelter in a metro station during a Russian drone attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine September 28, 2025.](https://example.com/photo-reuters-thomas-peter.jpg)
*Photo credit: REUTERS/THOMAS PETER*

Stay tuned for updates as the situation develops.

— By REUTERS
https://www.jpost.com/international/internationalrussia-ukraine-war/article-868770