A new study from Northwestern Medicine has brought exciting progress in predicting heart rhythm problems before they even happen. These problems, called arrhythmias, occur when the heart beats too fast, too slow, or irregularly. Some types, like atrial fibrillation (AFib), can increase the risk of stroke, while others can lead to sudden death. Now, researchers have developed a new genetic risk score that makes it easier to identify who might be at higher risk. Published in the journal Cell Reports Medicine, the study involved over 1, 100 people. The team wanted to see if combining different kinds of genetic data could give doctors a more accurate picture of a person’s risk. Traditionally, genetic testing has been done in three separate ways. One looks for rare changes in a single gene (like a typo in a word). Another looks at many small changes across different genes (like analyzing the tone of a whole chapter). And the third approach reads the person’s entire genetic code (like reading an entire book). But in this study, researchers combined all three methods to create a more complete picture. They used this combined genetic score to study people with arrhythmias and compare them to healthy people. The result was a much better understanding of who is most at risk and why. They believe this approach can help doctors identify patients in danger long before symptoms start. The study was led by Dr. Elizabeth McNally, a genetic testing expert at Northwestern University. She explained that this method is not just helpful for heart problems, but may also be used for other conditions like cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and autism. By building a “genetic roadmap,” researchers hope to guide future treatment and testing for many different diseases. The study included 523 people with arrhythmias, and many of them also had heart failure. The researchers looked at each patient’s medical history in detail, including data from heart-monitoring devices. Then, they sequenced the patients’ genomes and used both rare and common genetic changes to calculate risk scores. These were compared to 596 healthy people from a biobank who had no known heart disease. The results were impressive. People with higher combined risk scores were more likely to have dangerous arrhythmias. This shows that the genetic method could help doctors catch problems earlier, possibly saving lives. McNally said that in her own practice, she uses genetic tests to help decide which patients might need extra care, like an implanted defibrillator. But there’s still a problem: not enough people get genetic testing. Even though the benefits are clear, only about 1-5% of people who should get tested actually do. Even in cancer care, where genetics are well known to play a role, only 10-20% of eligible patients get tested. McNally says the biggest reason is that many doctors aren’t trained in how to use genetic results. She hopes that as tests like polygenic risk scores become more common, more patients will benefit. Overall, this study shows how powerful it can be to look at the full picture of a person’s genes. By combining different types of genetic data, researchers can now better predict who might develop dangerous heart rhythms. It’s not a cure, but it’s a big step toward personalized care-where treatments are based on a person’s unique genetic makeup. This could lead to earlier warnings, better treatment plans, and a better chance to protect people from life-threatening heart issues. If you care about health, please read studies about the benefits of low-dose lithium supplements, and what we know about egg intake and heart disease. For more health information, please see recent studies about potatoes and high blood pressure, and results showing 6 best breads for people with heart disease.
https://knowridge.com/2025/11/new-dna-test-could-predict-dangerous-heart-rhythms-before-they-start/
Tag Archives: traditionally
In his words: Trump’s rhetoric about Zelenskyy and Putin has evolved
President Donald Trump repeatedly said during his White House campaign that if he won the 2024 election, he would be able to end the war between Russia and Ukraine “in 24 hours.” But in the 10 months since he took office, the road to a peace deal has been fraught with changing dynamics involving the American leader, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump’s rhetoric toward both men has evolved. It continues to do so. At the outset of his second term in January, Trump was conciliatory toward Putin, for whom he long has shown admiration. Over time, Trump expressed increasing exasperation with Putin, while seemingly softening criticism of Zelenskyy after their February blowout in the Oval Office. Trump’s administration imposed sanctions on Russia and he was suggesting by the fall that Ukraine could win back all territory lost to Russia. That was a dramatic shift from his repeated calls for Kyiv to make concessions to end the war that began with Russia’s invasion in February 2022. By late November, Trump had endorsed a peace plan favorable to Russia. Some Democratic senators suggested the proposal was a “wish list” that originated with Moscow and they had heard just that from Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The State Department disputed it and Rubio insisted the plan was written by the United States. American allies in Europe nonetheless worried it was too conciliatory to Russia. Trump had returned to slamming Zelenskyy in ways that recalled how Trump and Vice President JD Vance had hounded the Ukrainian leader out of the Oval Office months earlier. Trump was now suggesting Zelenskyy was not appearing grateful enough for years of U. S. military support. The Republican president also chided European countries for not doing more to put economic pressure on Russa. Here is a look at what Trump has said this year and how his tone has changed: Jan. 31 “We want to end that war. That war would have not started if I was president.” Trump said his new administration had already had “very serious” discussions with Russia and that he and Putin could soon take “significant” action toward ending the conflict. Feb. 19 “A Dictator without Elections, Zelenskyy better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left.” Trump’s harsh words for Zelenskyy on his Truth Social platform drew criticism from Democrats and even some Republicans in Congress, where defending Ukraine from Russian aggression has traditionally had bipartisan support. Zelenskyy said Trump was falling into a Russian disinformation trap. He was quickly admonished by Vance about the perils of publicly criticizing the new U. S. president. Feb. 28 “You’re gambling with World War III. And what you’re doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that’s backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have.” Trump and Vance berated Zelenskyy over the war, accusing him of not showing gratitude after he challenged Vance on the question of diplomacy with Putin. The argument in the Oval Office was broadcast globally. It led to the rest of Zelenskyy’s White House visit being canceled and called into question the U. S. support of Ukraine. A few days after the blowup, Trump temporarily paused military aid to Ukraine to pressure Zelenskyy to seek peace. March 30 “I don’t think he’s going to go back on his word. You’re talking about Putin. I don’t think he’s going to go back on his word. I’ve known him for a long time. We’ve always gotten along well.” Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said he trusted Putin to hold up his end of a potential peace deal. April 24 “I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Lets get the Peace Deal DONE!” In a Truth Social post, Trump reacted to Russia attacking Kyiv with an hourslong barrage of missiles and drones. It was the first of his rare criticism of Putin as Russia stepped up its attacks on Ukraine. April 29 “A lot of his people are dying. They’re being killed, and I feel very badly about it.” Trump addressed the toll It was the first time the two leaders had met since the Oval Office spat and it signaled a shift in Trump’s attitude toward the Ukrainian president. May 25 “I’ve always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY!” Trump’s Truth Social post made it clear he was losing patience with Putin as Moscow pounded Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities with drones and missiles. June 25 “He was very nice actually. We had a little rough times, sometimes. He was . Couldn’t have been nicer. I think he’d like to see an end to this, I do.” Trump had a closed-door meeting with Zelenskyy during a NATO summit in The Hague. Trump’s comments to reporters later also opened the possibility of sending Patriot air defense missiles to Ukraine. July 8 “We get a lot of bull–t thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.” Trump also said he was “not happy” with Putin and that the war was “killing a lot of people” on both sides. Trump’s comments during a Cabinet meeting came a day after he said the United States would send more weapons to Ukraine. It was a dramatic reversal after earlier announcing a pause in the delivery of previously approved firepower to Kyiv, a decision that was made amid concerns that America’s military stockpiles had declined too much. July 13 “I am very disappointed with President Putin, I thought he was somebody that meant what he said. He’ll talk so beautifully and then he’ll bomb people at night. We don’t like that.” Trump’s remarks to reporters came as Russia has intensified its aerial attacks. July 14 “I don’t want to say he’s an assassin, but he’s a tough guy. It’s been proven over the years. He’s fooled a lot of people before.” Trump pushed harder against Putin during an Oval Office meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. Trump said if there was no deal to end the war within 50 days, the U. S. would impose “secondary tariffs,” meaning taxes would target Russia’s trading partners in an effort to isolate Moscow. Trump and Rutte also discussed a rejuvenated pipeline for U. S. weapons. European allies planned to buy military equipment and then transfer it to Ukraine. Aug. 15 “There’s no deal until there’s a deal.” Trump failed to secure an agreement from Putin during a summit in Alaska even after rolling out the red carpet for the man who started the war. Trump had wanted to show off his deal-making skills. Instead, he handed Putin long-sought recognition on the international stage after years of Western efforts to make Putin a pariah over the war and his crackdown on dissent, and forestalled the threat of additional U. S. sanctions. Sept. 23 “Russia has been fighting aimlessly for three and a half years a War that should have taken a Real Military Power less than a week to win. This is not distinguishing Russia. In fact, it is very much making them look like ‘a paper tiger.’ ” Trump posted on social media soon after meeting with Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the U. N. General Assembly gathering of world leaders. He also said he believed Ukraine could win back all territory lost to Russia, a departure from Trump’s previous suggestions that Ukraine would never be able to reclaim all the territory that Russia has occupied since it seized the Crimean Peninsula in 2014. Oct. 17 “Stop the war immediately.” After again hosting Zelenskyy at the White House, Trump implied that Moscow should be allowed keep territory it has taken from Kyiv if doing so could help end the conflict more quickly. “You go by the battle line wherever it is otherwise it’s too complicated,” Trump said. “You stop at the battle line and both sides should go home, go to their families, stop the killing, and that should be it.” Trump had a lengthy phone call with Putin the day before Zelenskyy arrived and announced he soon planned to meet with Putin in Hungary. That meeting never materialized, in part because of a lack of progress on ending the war. Trump also signaled to Zelenskyy that the U. S. would not be selling Ukraine long-range Tomahawk missiles, which the Ukrainians believed could be a game changer in helping prod Putin to the negotiating table. Oct. 22 “Hopefully he’ll become reasonable.” Trump made the comment suggesting Putin could be more favorable to a peace agreement after the Treasury Department announced sanctions against Russia’s two biggest oil companies and their subsidiaries. But Trump added, “And, hopefully Zelenskyy will be reasonable, too. You know, it takes two to tango, as they say.” Nov. 21 “He’s going to have to approve it.” Trump suggested that Zelenskyy would have to accept the U. S. peace plan. Trump pressed Zelenskyy to agree to concessions of land to Moscow, a massive reduction in the size of Ukraine’s army and agreement from Europe to assert that Ukraine would never be admitted into the NATO military alliance. Trump set a Nov. 27 deadline Thanksgiving Day in the U. S. for Zelenskyy to respond to the plan. Trump also said more time could be allotted to Ukraine as long as progress was made to a lasting peace. Nov. 22 “I would like to get to peace.” Asked if the peace plan was his final offer, Trump said it was not. He did not elaborate. But his comment suggested he would be willing to negotiate past the Nov. 27 deadline and alter the peace plan in ways that Ukraine wants. “We’re trying to get it ended. One way or the other, we have to get it ended,” Trump said of the war. Senators from both parties who have been critical of Trump’s approach to ending the war said they spoke with Rubio, who told them that the plan Trump was pushing Kyiv to accept was actually a “wish list” of the Russians. The State Department called that account “false” and Rubio later took the extraordinary step of insisting that the plan was U. S.-authored. But the incident raised still more questions about its ultimate fate. Nov. 23 “UKRAINE ‘LEADERSHIP’ HAS EXPRESSED ZERO GRATITUDE FOR OUR EFFORTS, AND EUROPE CONTINUES TO BUY OIL FROM RUSSIA.” In a post on his social media site, Trump went after Zelenskyy and the Europeans once more: “With strong and proper U. S. and Ukrainian LEADERSHIP” Russia’s invasion of Ukraine “would have NEVER HAPPENED,” Trump said, again blaming his predecessor, Democrat Joe Biden, for allowing the conflict in Ukraine.
https://ktar.com/national-news/in-his-words-trumps-rhetoric-about-zelenskyy-and-putin-has-evolved-3/5781614/
Jeff Bezos Warns of a Market Crash in the Coming Months, Advises People Against Big-Ticket Purchases
Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has issued a stark warning about the fragile state of the global economy. In an interview with CNN, Bezos advised consumers and small businesses to hold off on significant purchases and capital expenditures as fears of a recession intensify. He also emphasized the importance of cautious financial planning during these uncertain times. Optimism for the Future While emphasising caution in the near term, Bezos maintained an optimistic outlook for the long-term prospects of the economy. He expressed confidence that the American Dream remains achievable and hinted that space travel could become more accessible to the public within his lifetime. Bezos’ recent comments align with his social media post on X last month, where he urged industries to ‘batten down the hatches’ amid turbulent times ahead for both consumers and businesses. Many experts agree that adapting to these changes will be crucial for economic stability. US Economy on the Brink of Recession Moody’s chief economist, Mark Zandi, echoed Bezos’ concerns, warning that the US could be on the cusp of a recession. In a social media post, Zandi highlighted that nearly a third of US states-accounting for a significant portion of the country’s GDP-are either already in or at high risk of recession. ‘States making up nearly a third of US GDP are either in or at high risk of recession,’ Zandi stated. ‘Another third are just holding steady, and the remaining third are growing.’ The data presents a mixed picture, with some traditionally strong Southern states experiencing a slowdown. States such as Wyoming, Montana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Kansas, and Massachusetts have been identified as exhibiting high recession risks. Meanwhile, economic challenges in the Washington, DC area-partly due to recent government job cuts-are also a concern. Additionally, inflationary pressures are expected to persist into the coming years, further complicating economic recovery efforts. Inflation and Economic Outlook Zandi predicts that inflation could rise to 4% by 2026, exacerbating the ongoing cost-of-living crisis. This projection raises alarms about household budgets and purchasing power amid economic uncertainty. Reassessing Immigration Policies The US government’s restrictive immigration policies could also negatively impact the tech sector, according to Zandi. He urged lawmakers to safeguard access to global talent, especially in AI, software engineering, and data science. ‘If it feels like we’re coming to the end of the tariff increases, or like we’re going to get a more rational immigration policy, I think that would be a signal that the coast may be clear,’ he told Business Insider. He primarily blamed economic struggles on rising US tariffs and immigration policies. ‘Tariffs are cutting increasingly deeply into the profits of American companies and the purchasing power of American households. Fewer immigrant workers means a smaller economy,’ Zandi concluded. While there are cautious signs and serious concerns about the near-term economic outlook, many experts remain hopeful that thoughtful policy adjustments and innovation can help steer the economy toward a more stable future. Disclaimer: Our digital media content is for informational purposes only and not investment advice. Please conduct your own analysis or seek professional advice before investing. Remember, investments are subject to market risks and past performance doesn’t indicate future returns.
https://www.ibtimes.com/jeff-bezos-warns-market-crash-coming-months-advises-people-against-big-ticket-purchases-3790947
Iowa football vs. USC expert predictions nationally
Last weekend was heartbreaking for Iowa players, coaches, and fans. The Hawkeyes battled for 60 minutes but came up just short in an 18-16 loss to Oregon. With the loss, Iowa saw its College Football Playoff hopes end and extended its losing streak against ranked opponents to 12 games.
While the playoff seems to be off the table, Iowa has a chance to end that ranked opponent losing streak this Saturday. The Hawkeyes will make the cross-country trip to Los Angeles for a matchup with the 17th-ranked USC Trojans.
Iowa has traditionally struggled playing on the West Coast, and they’ll need to overcome those demons if they want to win this game and break the streak against ranked teams. The 7-2 Trojans are playing some really good football at the moment and will present a huge test for the Hawkeyes.
### Expert Predictions: Iowa vs. USC
**College Football News: USC 27, Iowa 20**
College Football News is backing the home team to win this game. Here’s more from Pete Fiutak:
“Oregon ran for 261 yards and averaged over seven yards per carry last week against the Hawkeyes. The Iowa style sort of travels, but wins over Wisconsin and Rutgers are nothing compared to going to USC and dealing with this high-powered attack. The Trojans will bring out the Hawkeye offensive pop — Mark Gronowski will throw a bit more, but the pace will get too fast. USC will pass a key test before the showdown at Oregon.”
**CBS Sports**
CBS had nine experts make their picks for this game. Four of the experts picked Iowa to cover the -6.5 point spread, with three of those experts picking the Hawkeyes to win the game straight up.
**Athlon Sports**
Athlon Sports had three experts weigh in, and all three picked USC to take home the victory.
**Bleacher Report: USC 27, Iowa 16**
Bleacher Report is backing the Trojans at home. Here’s what David Keny had to say:
“After being so painfully close to upsetting Oregon, can Iowa shake the disappointment on the road? That seems like a tough ask, even as USC presents a ‘spoiler’ opportunity for the Hawkeyes once again. USC is perfect at home in 2025.”
**Sporting News**
Sporting News is taking USC to win and cover the spread. Bill Bender adds:
“Iowa is coming off a heartbreaking loss to Oregon. Can the Hawkeyes keep up on the road against USC’s high-powered offense that leads the Big Ten with 503.2 yards per game? USC is 4-1 ATS at home this season, and that time-zone difference will hit here.”
**The New York Times**
The Times is picking the Hawkeyes to pull the upset in overtime, though they did not provide a specific score prediction.
—
Will Iowa overcome its struggles on the West Coast and extend USC’s first home loss of the season? Fans will be watching closely as these two programs face off in a crucial late-season matchup.
*Contact: @zach_hiney*
https://sports.yahoo.com/article/iowa-football-vs-usc-expert-130911008.html
Wordle Hint October 25 2025 (10/25/25) – Puzzle 1589!
Wordle is still one of the most played games around the globe, which means many players are on the lookout for a bit of a boost when it comes to figuring out answers. If you don’t want to outright cheat, then we’ve got the Wordle hints that you need to find the solution.
You will find no spoilers in this post, but if you get stumped, we do feature an area where you can find the answer so you won’t lose that precious win streak! If you give up and just want the solution, check out our Today’s Wordle Answer post!
## Wordle Hint for October 25th, 2025
Here are multiple clues for today’s Wordle to help you complete it without losing your winning streak! These hints don’t reveal specific letters, so they’re perfect if you want to walk through the process without making it too simple. Keep reading for a list of 5-letter word lists we’ve compiled for additional help.
– Starts with a consonant, ends with a vowel
– Has a vowel in the middle
– There are three vowels in the puzzle (A, E, I, O, U)
– There **is** a repeat letter in the word
*Note:* For simplicity, we do not use “Y” as a vowel in our hints even when it is sometimes used as one.
## 5-Letter Word Lists for Wordle 1589
If you need more specific assistance, we have many posts that have proven helpful for those attempting to answer a Wordle. Depending on how much assistance you require, the more letters revealed and their positions exposed, the narrower the list of possible words!
– First Two Letters
– First Three Letters
– First Four Letters
– First and Last Letters
– Middle Letter
– Two Middle Letters
– Other Two Middle Letters
– Three Middle Letters
– Last Two Letters
– Last Three Letters
– Last Four Letters
You can get further hints and clues by heading to our Wordle Solver and inputting the letters you have currently uncovered in the puzzle.
## General Wordle Tips
If you’re hoping to get better at Wordle, we’ve got some tips that will hopefully help you solve puzzles more easily next time you play!
### Use a Good Starting Word
Try to figure out a few go-to words that you can start your puzzles with—words that feature multiple vowels and do not repeat ones you’ve already tried. These are traditionally things like *ADIEU*, *ACTOR*, *ARSON*, *EARNS*, *LEANT*, *OCEAN*, *RIOTS*, etc. We have a bunch of starter words listed on our [Best Wordle Starter Words](#) page.
### Watch Out for Duplicate Letters
It’s easy to forget that you might have repeat letters in your puzzle. For example, the word “buzzy” has a double “z” in it. This won’t always be obvious from the clues given by Wordle. Just because you see a letter is green in a particular spot doesn’t mean it wouldn’t also work in another!
—
Good luck with today’s Wordle! Remember, the goal is to have fun and keep your winning streak alive. If you get stuck, don’t hesitate to check out our full solutions and resources.
https://tryhardguides.com/wordle-hint-october-25-2025/
