パパ活か、大阪府警警視 不同意わいせつ罪在宅起訴

“`markdown
# 社会 パパ活か、大阪府警警視 不同意わいせつ罪在宅起訴

2025年10月10日 18:38(2025年10月10日 18:40 更新)
※この記事は有料会員限定です。

大阪府警の警視がパパ活に関連した不同意わいせつ罪で在宅起訴されました。詳細は西日本新聞meの有料会員向け記事でご覧いただけます。

### 西日本新聞meとは?

西日本新聞meは、有料会員限定の記事を配信するサービスです。
クリップ機能やその他便利な機能も有料会員向けに提供しています。

【ご案内】
この記事は残り248文字分、7日間無料トライアル期間中は1日わずか37円で読み放題です。
年払いプランをご利用いただくと、さらにお得にお読みいただけます。
“`
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1409965/

公明党が自民党との連立離脱 公明幹部が明らかに

公明党が自民党との連立離脱を表明 公明幹部が明らかに

2025年10月10日 15:40(15:43更新)

2025年10月10日午後、国会にて自民党の高市総裁(右)と公明党の斉藤代表が会談に臨みました。

この会談の中で、公明党の幹部が自民党との連立離脱を明らかにしました。

※この記事は有料会員限定記事です。残り35文字まで閲覧可能。

7日間の無料トライアルあり。1日37円で読み放題、年払いならさらにお得です。

https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1409842/

ホストクラブ無許可営業疑い逮捕 「東海最大」グループ役員ら3人

ホストクラブ無許可営業疑いで逮捕 「東海最大」グループの役員ら3人

西日本新聞の有料会員限定記事です。

「東海最大」とされるホストクラブグループの役員ら3人が、無許可営業の疑いで逮捕されました。詳細な情報は有料会員のみに提供されています。

クリップ機能の利用も有料会員限定となっております。今なら7日間無料トライアルを実施しており、1日あたりわずか37円で読み放題となっています。年払いならさらにお得です。

西日本新聞meについて詳しくはこちら

https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1409799/

Israel optimistic about prospects of reaching a Gaza deal, sources tell ‘Post’

Israel Optimistic About Prospects of Reaching a Gaza Deal, Sources Tell ‘Post’

By AMICHAI STEIN, Jerusalem Post Staff

Israel remains optimistic about the prospects of reaching a deal concerning Gaza, sources have indicated to the Jerusalem Post.

An additional source clarified that, as the deal currently stands, Marwan Barghouti and Ahmad Saadat will not be released.

Meanwhile, families of Israelis held hostage by Hamas terrorists in Gaza have shown their solidarity and hope by building a sukkah outside the Prime Minister’s residence in Jerusalem. The sukkah, constructed on October 5, 2025, features photographs of the hostages, symbolizing their ongoing presence in the hearts and minds of their loved ones.

(Photo credit: Chaim Goldbeg/FLASH90)
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-869809

The Us@250 Experience

**Pride. Reckoning. Aspiration.**

As an American, you can experience all of these feelings at the same time: hold pride in our progress, reckon with our problematic past, and aspire for a better future.

That is at the heart of New America’s *Us@250* initiative—an effort to deepen our understanding of our national identity by expanding the American narrative to include the rich, complex histories of all of us.

Ahead of the nation’s 250th anniversary in 2026, join New America this fall for robust conversations on these themes with policymakers, visual artists, community organizers, and more.

Together, we’ll explore the truths and contradictions about ourselves and our country through poetry, film, comedy, story, and music.

We’ll also ask big questions: Given the nation’s history, who might we become if we truly live up to its founding ideals? Who belongs here, and who will be welcome? And how can we make the promise of America available to all?
https://www.newamerica.org/new-america/events/the-us250-experience/

Apocalypse behind a paywall

When a society collapses, where do the billionaires go? In *Billionaires Bunker*, the new Spanish thriller series from *Money Heist* creators Alex Pina and Esther Martinez Lobato, the answer is: down. Deep underground into a luxury shelter built to preserve wealth, power, and the illusion of control in a world on fire.

But what happens when you seal off the rich and powerful together with their secrets, grudges, and paranoia? Netflix’s eight-part series attempts to find out.

Set in the opulent, high-tech confines of the Kimera Underground Park, the show introduces us to two billionaire families who take refuge there as the threat of nuclear war looms. From the first episode, *Billionaires Bunker* establishes a stylish yet tense atmosphere—part psychological thriller, part social commentary, and part mystery box. It is *Succession* meets *Lost*, with a dash of *Severance* in its tone and sense of isolation.

### A Timely and Potent Premise

The show’s central premise is both timely and potent: in an age of climate catastrophe, pandemics, and geopolitical instability, the notion of the ultra-wealthy buying their way out feels uncomfortably real. From doomsday preppers to tech moguls investing in bunkers, this isn’t just speculative fiction—it’s a dramatised distillate of fears rooted in reality.

*Billionaires Bunker* leverages anxiety and tension effectively, using an enclosed setting to explore themes of privilege, guilt, denial, and moral decay.

### Characters and Dynamics

The ensemble cast is led by Max, recently released from prison and reluctantly returning to his powerful family as they descend into the shelter. His outsider status offers viewers a grounded perspective on the moral rot of those around him.

Opposite him is Minerva, the enigmatic administrator of Kimera, whose icy professionalism and ambiguous motives give the show its cool, unsettling edge. The two families, each with their own skeletons, rivalries, and traumas, become the battleground for personal and philosophical clashes.

### Intrigue and Atmosphere

The series excels in its early episodes, establishing intrigue through cryptic rules, questionable leadership, and vague inconsistencies in the world outside. Viewers, like the characters, start asking: Is the threat real? Are they safer underground? Or is this a prison for the wealthy?

These questions make the first half of the show, driven by a strong sense of paranoia and claustrophobia, compelling.

Visually, *Billionaires Bunker* is sleek and effective. The production design of the bunker itself is stunning—clean lines, cold lighting, and a sense of curated perfection that slowly becomes oppressive. The contrast between the supposed comfort and mounting psychological tension is smartly used. Cinematographer Migue Amoedo, also of *Money Heist* fame, gives the series a polished, cinematic look that supports the suspense without becoming sterile.

### Flaws in Writing and Plot Development

The show’s biggest flaw emerges as it progresses: for all its atmosphere and thematic weight, the writing falters. Characters begin as archetypes—the guilt-ridden son, the ruthless matriarch, the manipulative administrator—but not all evolve beyond those roles. Dialogue, especially during emotional confrontations, sometimes slips into melodrama or cliché, undermining the complex moral terrain the show attempts to explore.

The mystery element, compelling at the beginning, becomes increasingly convoluted. Instead of deepening organically, twists are introduced rapidly and with uneven payoff. What begins as a taut, intelligent drama veers into more sensational territory in the latter half. Some plot developments feel more like narrative gimmicks than earned revelations.

### Strong Performances and Notable Characters

That said, performances are strong across the board. The cast, though mostly unfamiliar to international audiences, brings intensity and nuance to roles that sometimes lack depth on paper. Max’s internal conflict and Minerva’s controlled detachment are particularly watchable.

A few secondary characters, especially Asia—a teenage girl whose disillusionment mirrors the audience’s—bring fresh energy and perspective as the series unfolds.

### Themes and Philosophical Undercurrents

The show’s moral and philosophical undercurrents are its most compelling elements. *Billionaires Bunker* asks questions worth sitting with: What does safety mean when it is bought? Is survival ethical when it is exclusive? And at what point does the illusion of control become another trap?

These are rich themes, and while the show does not always answer them with subtlety, it raises them in ways that resonate long after the credits roll.

### A Study of Privilege, Psychology, and Social Issues

*Billionaires Bunker* dramatises how psychology and social issues intertwine when privilege collides with crisis. The series highlights the psychological defenses of the ultra-rich—denial, paranoia, and entitlement—as they retreat underground to preserve their survival while the rest of the world supposedly collapses.

Within the bunker, social issues like class inequality, exploitation, and mistrust become magnified, showing how wealth cannot shield people from power struggles, anxiety, and moral corruption. The illusion of safety exposes how privilege fosters a distorted reality, where billionaires cling to control through fear and manipulation.

From a psychological perspective, the confined space acts as a pressure cooker, revealing how group dynamics, ego, and survival instincts can fracture even the most luxurious of sanctuaries. This makes the show both a critique of social inequality and a study of human behavior under an imagined apocalypse.

### Final Verdict

*Billionaires Bunker* is a series that nearly matches its ambition. It is a bold attempt to blend psychological drama with social critique, packaged in a gripping, high-stakes thriller format.

It doesn’t always land cleanly—occasionally, the writing slips and the plot twists strain belief—but it remains a visually engaging, thematically provocative ride. While not as tight or emotionally precise as *Money Heist*, *Billionaires Bunker* is a worthy entry in the growing genre of dystopia for the rich.

It is best enjoyed not for airtight plotting, but for the questions it asks about wealth, survival, and the walls we build—literal and metaphorical—to keep the world at bay.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/tns/detail/1348573-apocalypse-behind-a-paywall

Mumbai Shocker! 18-Year-Old Found Eight Months Pregnant, Investigation Reveals Minor Boyfriend Involved; Booked Under Relevant Sections

**Mumbai Teen’s Fake Assault Claim Unravels, Revealing Pregnancy by Boyfriend**

In a shocking case from Mumbai, an 18-year-old girl, found to be eight months pregnant during a medical examination at Cama Hospital, initially gave a false statement to the police to protect her boyfriend. The matter came to light after doctors, suspecting she was underage, informed the authorities, prompting a police investigation.

**The Initial Misleading Claim**

According to the initial report, the victim claimed that while on a trip to Matheran with friends, she was sexually assaulted by an unknown man. She alleged that the man, despite knowing she was underage, forced himself on her at a lodge. Acting on this account, the Matheran Police began investigating the case.

**The Truth Unfolds**

The investigation took a turn when police interrogated the victim’s close friend. The friend confirmed that she and another companion had gone to Matheran in July, but the victim had not accompanied them. This directly contradicted the victim’s earlier story.

Confronted with this evidence, the victim admitted in a supplementary statement recorded on September 25 that her initial account was fabricated.

**The Actual Sequence of Events**

The victim revealed that her 17-year-old boyfriend was responsible for her pregnancy. She stated that he repeatedly engaged in sexual relations with her when she was still a minor, around January or February 2024, at his maternal uncle’s residence.

**Case Transfer and Charges**

Based on the revised statements and corroboration from her friends, investigators established that the offence occurred within the jurisdiction of the Wadala TT Police Station. Consequently, the Matheran Police have officially transferred the case to Wadala TT Police for further investigation.

The 17-year-old boyfriend has been booked under relevant sections of the law, and further inquiries are underway.
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/mumbai-shocker-18-year-old-found-eight-months-pregnant-investigation-reveals-minor-boyfriend-involved-booked-under-relevant-sections

McDowell says he didn’t nominate Steen because ‘her election would be step backwards’

Senator Michael McDowell has stated that he did not nominate Maria Steen for the presidency because, “as a liberal, I felt her election would have been a step backwards for the Ireland I believe in.”

Maria Steen is a conservative campaigner who advocated for a ‘no’ vote in both the abortion and same-sex marriage referendums. She received 18 of the 20 required Oireachtas nominations but criticized Mr. McDowell following her failed bid.

Ms. Steen claimed she had been waiting to see if Mr. McDowell would run for president herself. She also said she had expected his support, as they campaigned on the same side during the family and care referenda — proposals that were overwhelmingly rejected by the public.

In a written statement, Mr. McDowell explained his position in detail:

“In early 2025, I considered suggestions that I should seek nomination for the presidential election and decided against doing so. My decision was made public on May 23rd in this newspaper.

In July, my office was informed of plans by pro-life members of the Oireachtas, including Aontú, to establish a process in which members of the Oireachtas would interview aspiring candidates chosen by them. These aspirants included Declan Ganley and Maria Steen, both known pro-life activists. I indicated then that I was not interested in becoming involved with such a caucus.”

Mr. McDowell also revealed that he was approached by Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín on a second occasion but again declined to participate in the process.

He further discussed correspondence he received from Ms. Steen regarding her nomination:

“A number of people sounded me out as to whether I would support their candidacies. On September 1st, Steen contacted me by text saying: ‘you may have seen I am looking for a nomination would you have time to take a quick call today.’

I replied as follows: ‘Maria, thanks for your message. My position is that as I have already informed two hopefuls, I will make no decision or commitments on nominations until the likely set of nominees becomes clearer including the possibility of Local Authority nominations and whether Sinn Féin are running an SF candidate.'”

Mr. McDowell concluded:

“I did not consider that a face-to-face meeting with Steen would serve any useful purpose, as her Seanad supporters well knew my position.

Suggestions that I was motivated by envy, jealousy, misogyny or other base reasons are simply untrue. For the reasons stated above, I was opposed to her election, which might very well have happened, in my view. It would have been divisive and a step backwards for the kind of Ireland I believe in.”
https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/mcdowell-says-he-didnt-nominate-steen-because-her-election-would-be-step-backwards-1813744.html

Why Spike Lee’s dialogue still shapes Hollywood today

By Vinita Jain | Oct 01, 2025, 09:24 AM

**What’s the story?**

Spike Lee is a name that needs no introduction in Hollywood. The director, producer, writer, and actor has been redefining the way dialogues are written in films for decades. His unique style and storytelling techniques have inspired a generation of filmmakers.

Lee’s work often tackles social issues and cultural narratives, making his dialogue not only entertaining but also thought-provoking. Here’s how Lee’s approach to dialogue has changed Hollywood.

### 1. Authenticity in Dialogue

Lee’s dialogues are famous for their authenticity. He believes in writing conversations that feel real and relatable to the audience. By using natural language and expressions, Lee ensures that his characters are believable and their interactions genuine.

This authenticity makes the audience connect with the characters on a deeper level, making the storytelling more impactful.

### 2. Cultural Relevance

Another hallmark of Lee’s dialogues is their cultural relevance. He often weaves in elements from different cultures, which not only enriches the narrative but also makes it more relatable to a wider audience.

By doing so, he brings underrepresented voices to the forefront and sparks important conversations about cultural identity and diversity.

### 3. Social Commentary through Dialogue

Lee is a master at using dialogue as a tool for social commentary. His films often address pressing societal issues through sharp and incisive conversations between characters.

This technique not only raises awareness about these issues but also encourages viewers to reflect on them critically. By integrating social commentary into his scripts, Lee ensures that his films are not just entertaining but also enlightening.

### 4. Innovative Storytelling Techniques

Lee is known for his innovative storytelling techniques, particularly in how he uses dialogue to drive the plot forward. His scripts often feature non-linear narratives or unexpected twists that keep audiences engaged from start to finish.

These techniques highlight his creativity as a filmmaker and his ability to push the boundaries of traditional storytelling methods in Hollywood.

### 5. Empowering Marginalized Voices

Through his dialogues, Lee has always empowered marginalized voices in cinema. By focusing on stories that highlight underrepresented communities, he gives them a platform to be heard through powerful conversations on screen.

This not only enriches cinematic diversity but also paves the way for future filmmakers from different backgrounds to tell their stories too.

Spike Lee’s distinctive approach to dialogue continues to influence Hollywood, making films more authentic, culturally rich, socially aware, and creatively bold.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/how-spike-lee-revolutionized-hollywood-dialogue/story

Rowling hits back at Emma Watson’s comments, calls her ‘ignorant’

By Apoorva Rastogi | Sep 30, 2025, 11:17 AM

**JK Rowling Responds to Emma Watson’s Comments on Their Complicated Relationship**

Author J.K. Rowling has responded to recent comments made by Harry Potter star Emma Watson regarding their complicated relationship. In a lengthy and scathing post on X (formerly Twitter), Rowling criticized Watson for being “ignorant of how ignorant she is” and called out her privilege.

The ongoing feud between Rowling and several Harry Potter actors has been fueled by the author’s controversial anti-transgender comments and allegations of transphobia. In contrast, Watson and Daniel Radcliffe have publicly supported the transgender community.

### “Emma Has So Little Experience of Real Life”

Rowling began her post by stating,
> “I’m not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was 21 for what opinions I should hold these days.”

She added,
> “Like other people who’ve never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she’s ignorant of how ignorant she is.”

### Rowling’s Perspective on Watson and Radcliffe

Rowling further commented,
> “Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn’t want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death because of them.”

However, Rowling also wrote,
> “Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right, nay, obligation, to critique me and my views in public.”

### Addressing the 2022 BAFTA Moment

Rowling referenced a moment from Watson’s viral 2022 BAFTA speech, during which Watson said she was there for “all of the witches,” a statement widely perceived as showing support for the trans community.

Rowling revealed,
> “[After the event], Emma asked someone to pass a note, which [said] ‘I’m so sorry for what you’re going through.’ Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one-line expression of concern would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy.”

### Watson Speaks Out on Their Relationship

Rowling’s post followed Watson’s recent discussion of their relationship during an episode of Jay Shetty’s *On Purpose* podcast. Watson said,
> “I guess where I’ve landed it, it’s not so much what we say or what we believe, it’s how we say it. I just see this world right now where we seem to be giving permission to this throwing out of people, or that people are disposable. I will always think that’s wrong.”

### Watson and Radcliffe’s Support for the Transgender Community

Emma Watson has consistently shown her support for transgender rights. In 2020, she tweeted,
> “Trans people are who they say they are and deserve to live their lives without being constantly questioned or told they aren’t who they say they are.”

Similarly, Daniel Radcliffe has spoken out,
> “Transgender women are women. Any statement to the contrary erases the identity and dignity of transgender people and goes against all advice given by professional health care associations who have far more expertise on this subject matter than either Jo [Rowling] or I.”

The tension between Rowling and the Harry Potter cast highlights the ongoing cultural debate surrounding transgender rights and freedom of expression. As this story develops, both sides continue to receive strong support from their respective communities.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/jk-rowling-responds-to-emma-watson/story