‘No Kings’ protests against Trump

WASHINGTON — Large crowds of protesters marched and rallied in cities across the U.S. Saturday for “No Kings” demonstrations, decrying what participants see as the government’s swift drift into authoritarianism under President Donald Trump.

People carrying signs with slogans such as “Nothing is more patriotic than protesting” or “Resist Fascism” packed into New York City’s Times Square and rallied by the thousands in parks in Boston, Atlanta, and Chicago. Demonstrators marched through Washington and downtown Los Angeles and picketed outside capitols in several Republican-led states, a courthouse in Billings, Montana, and at hundreds of smaller public spaces.

Trump’s Republican Party disparaged the demonstrations as “Hate America” rallies, but in many places the events looked more like a street party. There were marching bands, huge banners with the U.S. Constitution’s “We The People” preamble that people could sign, and demonstrators wearing inflatable costumes, particularly frogs, which have emerged as a sign of resistance in Portland, Oregon.

It was the third mass mobilization since Trump’s return to the White House and came against the backdrop of a government shutdown that not only has closed federal programs and services but is testing the core balance of power, as an aggressive executive confronts Congress and the courts in ways that protest organizers warn are a slide toward authoritarianism.

In Washington, Iraq War Marine veteran Shawn Howard said he had never participated in a protest before but was motivated to show up because of what he sees as the Trump administration’s “disregard for the law.” He said immigration detentions without due process and deployments of troops in U.S. cities are “un-American” and alarming signs of eroding democracy.

“I fought for freedom and against this kind of extremism abroad,” said Howard, who added that he also worked at the CIA for 20 years on counter-extremism operations. “And now I see a moment in America where we have extremists everywhere who are, in my opinion, pushing us to some kind of civil conflict.”

Trump, meanwhile, was spending the weekend at his Mar-a-Lago home in Florida. “They say they’re referring to me as a king. I’m not a king,” the president said in a Fox News interview that aired early Friday, before he departed for a $1 million-per-plate MAGA Inc. fundraiser at his club. A Trump campaign social media account mocked the protests by posting a computer-generated video of the president clothed like a monarch, wearing a crown and waving from a balcony.

**Nationwide demonstrations**

In San Francisco, hundreds of people spelled out “No King!” and other phrases with their bodies on Ocean Beach. Hayley Wingard, who was dressed as the Statue of Liberty, said she too had never been to a protest before. Only recently she began to view Trump as a “dictator.”

“I was actually OK with everything until I found that the military invasion in Los Angeles and Chicago and Portland — Portland bothered me the most, because I’m from Portland, and I don’t want the military in my cities. That’s scary,” Wingard said.

Tens of thousands of people gathered in Portland for a peaceful demonstration downtown. Later in the day, tensions grew as a few hundred protesters and counterprotesters showed up at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building, with federal agents at times firing tear gas to disperse the crowd and city police threatening to make arrests if demonstrators blocked streets.

The building has been the site of mostly small nightly protests since June — the reason the Trump administration has cited for trying to deploy National Guard troops in Portland, which a federal judge has at least temporarily blocked.

About 3,500 people gathered in Salt Lake City outside the Utah State Capitol to share messages of hope and healing after a protester was fatally shot during the city’s first “No Kings” march in June. More than 1,500 people gathered in Birmingham, Alabama, evoking the city’s history of protests and the critical role it played in the Civil Rights Movement two generations ago.

“It just feels like we’re living in an America that I don’t recognize,” said Jessica Yother, a mother of four. She and other protesters said they felt camaraderie by gathering in a state where Trump won nearly 65% of the vote last November. “It was so encouraging,” Yother said. “I walked in and thought, ‘Here are my people.’”

**Organizers hope to build opposition movement**

“Big rallies like this give confidence to people who have been sitting on the sidelines but are ready to speak up,” Democratic U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy said in an interview with The Associated Press.

While protests earlier this year — against Elon Musk’s cuts and Trump’s military parade — drew crowds, organizers say this one is uniting the opposition. Top Democrats such as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders are joining what organizers view as an antidote to Trump’s actions, from the administration’s clampdown on free speech to its military-style immigration raids.

More than 2,600 rallies were planned Saturday, organizers said. The national march against Trump and Musk this spring had 1,300 registered locations, while the first “No Kings” day in June registered 2,100.

“We’re here because we love America,” Sanders said, addressing the crowd from a stage in Washington. He said the American experiment is “in danger” under Trump but insisted, “We the people will rule.”

**Republican critics denounce the demonstrations**

Republicans sought to portray protesters as far outside the mainstream and a prime reason for the government shutdown, now in its 18th day. From the White House to Capitol Hill, GOP leaders called them “communists” and “Marxists.” They said Democratic leaders, including Schumer, are beholden to the far-left flank and willing to keep the government shut to appease those liberal forces.

“I encourage you to watch — we call it the Hate America rally — that will happen Saturday,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana. “Let’s see who shows up for that,” Johnson said, listing groups including “antifa types,” people who “hate capitalism,” and “Marxists in full display.”

Many demonstrators, in response, said they were meeting such hyperbole with humor, noting that Trump often leans heavily on theatrics such as claiming that cities he sends troops to are war zones.

“So much of what we’ve seen from this administration has been so unserious and silly that we have to respond with the same energy,” said Glen Kalbaugh, a Washington protester who wore a wizard hat and held a sign with a frog on it.

New York police reported no arrests during the protests.

**Democrats try to regain their footing amid shutdown**

Democrats have refused to vote on legislation that would reopen the government as they demand funding for health care. Republicans say they are willing to discuss the issue later, only after the government reopens.

The situation is a potential turnaround from just six months ago, when Democrats and their allies were divided and despondent. Schumer in particular was berated by his party for allowing an earlier government funding bill to sail through the Senate without using it to challenge Trump.

“What we are seeing from the Democrats is some spine,” said Ezra Levin, a co-founder of Indivisible, a key organizing group. “The worst thing the Democrats could do right now is surrender.”

Associated Press journalists Lisa Mascaro and Kevin Freking in Washington, Jill Colvin and Joseph Frederick in New York, Jeffrey Collins in Columbia, South Carolina, Hannah Schoenbaum in Salt Lake City, Terry Chea in San Francisco, Chris Megerian in West Palm Beach, Florida, and Bill Barrow in Birmingham, Alabama, contributed.
https://www.phillytrib.com/no-kings-protests-against-trump/article_0e012434-cac9-47ad-bf8c-9a2f7ab226eb.html

Advocates behind Denver billboard campaign push for community safety funding in 2026 budget

You may have noticed new bus shelter ads popping up around Denver. These ads are part of an expanding campaign called “Get Real Denver.”

The campaign aims to encourage city leaders to prioritize funding for community-led solutions in the 2026 budget. By supporting initiatives driven by local communities, the effort seeks to create meaningful and lasting change throughout the city.

Keep an eye out for these ads and learn more about how you can join the movement to make Denver a better place for everyone.
https://kdvr.com/news/politics/advocates-behind-denver-billboard-campaign-push-for-community-safety-funding-in-2026-budget/

Comey hired possible witness as his lawyer to block testimony, DOJ says

The government has asked the court to approve a “filter protocol” to allow a neutral team to review seized communications between James Comey and several lawyers, including Michael Fitzgerald, to determine whether the material is privileged or evidence of misconduct.

“Based on publicly disclosed information, the defendant used current lead defense counsel to improperly disclose classified information,” prosecutors wrote.

### A Case Rooted in 2017 Memo Leaks

Comey, 64, was indicted on September 25 for allegedly making false statements and obstructing a congressional proceeding related to his 2020 Senate testimony about the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation. He pleaded not guilty earlier this month, insisting he never authorized leaks to the press and accusing the Justice Department of mounting a vindictive prosecution encouraged by former President Trump.

According to a Department of Justice Office of Inspector General (OIG) report from August 2019, Comey leaked copies of his personal memos—documenting conversations he had with Trump—to at least three attorneys: David Kelley, Michael Fitzgerald, and Daniel Richman. He later tapped all three as his personal lawyers. These memos contained detailed accounts of Oval Office meetings and one-on-one calls in which Trump allegedly urged leniency for then-national security adviser Michael Flynn.

Prosecutors now argue that Comey is repeating the pattern that started with that arrangement. Because Fitzgerald is now representing Comey in the criminal case stemming in part from those very disclosures, the government says Fitzgerald’s presence on the defense team “raises a question of conflict and disqualification.”

### Classified Information and the Breach

The FBI later concluded that some of the memos shared with the trio contained information classified at the “confidential” level and moved to delete them from the attorneys’ computers in early 2018, underscoring the seriousness of the breach.

“Before litigating any issue of conflict or disqualification, the parties should have access to all relevant and non-privileged information,” prosecutors wrote in their Sunday night filing. “The sooner that the potentially protected information is reviewed and filtered, the sooner the parties can make any appropriate filings with the Court.”

### OIG Found Comey ‘Set a Dangerous Example’

Former DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s 2019 report described Comey’s actions as a serious breach of policy, saying he “set a dangerous example” for FBI employees by retaining and leaking government documents for “a personally desired outcome.” The watchdog said Comey kept four of seven memos in a personal safe at home after his firing and failed to notify the bureau he had done so.

Although the Horowitz report found no evidence that Comey or his lawyers shared classified information with the media, it concluded that his handling of official records violated FBI policy and DOJ regulations. Prosecutors at the time declined to bring charges, citing a lack of proof that Comey intentionally mishandled classified material.

One of the leaked memos described Comey’s February 2017 Oval Office meeting with Trump, in which the president allegedly said, “I hope you can see your way clear to letting Flynn go.” The contents of that memo, leaked through Richman to The New York Times, helped trigger the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller.

Prosecutors have since charged Comey with lying to Congress about leaking, although the details of the DOJ’s case remain unclear.

### How the Leaks Were Shared

The inspector general reported that Comey emailed four memos from a personal account to Fitzgerald within days of his May 2017 firing. Fitzgerald then forwarded the messages to Kelley and Richman, both of whom were advising Comey at the time. Separately, Comey sent Richman a photograph of the Flynn memo from his cellphone.

Copies of the memos later released to Congress showed that four were classified as either “secret” or “confidential” following an FBI review led by counterintelligence chief Bill Priestap. Comey disputed the secret designation for one of them, though investigators found he never sought classification guidance from the bureau before sharing the material.

In a 2019 FBI interview, Richman said Comey had not authorized him to discuss the bureau’s Hillary Clinton email investigation with reporters but acknowledged Comey knew he sometimes engaged with the press.

### First Pretrial Standoff Comes to the Forefront

Comey’s same 2017 relationships with close confidants are now at the heart of the government’s latest inquiry into whether Comey can keep his current lead counsel. Fitzgerald’s own involvement in transmitting Comey’s memos to other lawyers could make him a fact witness in the case, raising ethical questions about whether he can simultaneously defend his former client.

### Jack Smith’s Former Right-Hand Man Joins Comey’s Defense Team

The government’s disqualification effort comes on the heels of Comey’s move last Friday to hire an additional attorney, Mueller counselor Michael Dreeben, who also assisted former special counsel Jack Smith during his case against Trump last year over alleged election interference.

Dreeben’s involvement could present another unique conflict, though the government has yet to raise a specific issue with him being on the case.

Comey’s team has also accused the DOJ of mishandling privileged materials and is preparing to argue that the prosecution itself was politically motivated in additional filings expected Monday afternoon.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/3857132/comey-hired-possible-witness-as-lawyer-patrick-fitzgerald-doj-says/

These Skullcandy Earbuds Are Discounted Up to Nearly $50 Off

Scenes From Saturday’s Nationwide ‘No Kings’ Protests

Organizers say the “No Kings” protests drew more than 7 million people across 2,700 cities. The crowds included high-profile politicians, A-list celebrities, and more than a few creative inflatables.

How to Protect Yourself Against Getting Locked Out of Your Cloud Accounts

Cloud storage is speedy, convenient, and simple—until it stops working.

Gemini in Google Home Keeps Mistaking My Dog for a Cat

Google’s Gemini AI has offended my dog, but at least it can automatically turn the lights on for me.

The Zipper Is Getting Its First Major Upgrade in 100 Years

By stripping away the fabric tape that’s held zippers together for a hundred years, Japanese clothing giant YKK is designing the future of seamless clothing.

The New Power of Far-Right Influencers

In this episode of Uncanny Valley, we discuss the impacts of antifa’s designation as a domestic terrorist group as author Mark Bray faces new harassment from the far-right.

The 25 Best Movies on Amazon Prime Right Now

Nosferatu, Heads of State, and Knives Out are just a few of the movies you should be watching on Amazon Prime Video this week.

Swedish Death Cleaning, but for Your Digital Life

The art of ordering and culling your possessions before you die should extend to your documents, photos, and digital accounts.

Hackers Dox ICE, DHS, DOJ, and FBI Officials

Plus: A secret FBI anti-ransomware task force gets exposed, the mystery of the CIA’s Kryptos sculpture is finally solved, North Koreans busted hiding malware in the Ethereum blockchain, and more.

Gear News of the Week: Honor Teases a Bizarre Robot Phone, and Kohler Debuts a Toilet Sensor

Plus: Coros has a new mountain watch, July unveils a trackable suitcase, Fujifilm has a new Instax, GrapheneOS will work on non-Pixel phones soon, and Roku leans into AI.

Need Something Repaired? Now There’s an App for That

The Repair App is a new platform that connects trusted repair service providers with people who need their stuff fixed. It couldn’t come at a better time for economically strapped consumers.

10% Off TurboTax Discount Codes for October 2025

Tax season doesn’t have to be stressful. Save $20 off Live Assisted, 10% off Full Service, and more with exclusive TurboTax coupons right here on WIRED.

https://www.wired.com/story/skullcandy-method-360-anc-deal-1025/

King Charles V Prince William! ‘Dying’ Monarch ‘Not Speaking’ to Son Over Shocking Revelations About His Childhood, Parents’ Divorce and Plans to Change the Monarchy

**A New Royal Family Feud Brewing Between King Charles and Prince William**

*Published Oct. 19, 2025, 5:45 p.m. ET*

Move over, Harry — RadarOnline.com has learned there’s a new royal family feud brewing between King Charles and his other son, Prince William. Reports suggest that the distance between the two is growing amid ongoing tension.

Sources reveal that the relationship between the 76-year-old king and his eldest son has devolved into what some describe as “total silence.” The rift reportedly began after William made recent remarks about his upbringing, his parents’ divorce, and his future role as royal successor — comments that reportedly upset King Charles.

In a candid interview, William shared his commitment to providing his children — son George, 12, daughter Charlotte, 10, and son Louis, 7 — with the calm family life he never quite enjoyed.

“I think it’s really important that the atmosphere is created at home,” William said. “You have to have that feeling of warmth, that feeling of safety, security, and love.”

Elaborating further, he remarked, “My parents got divorced… so that lasted a short period of time.”

### A Kingdom Under Attack

Royal correspondent Phil Dampier weighed in on William’s comments, telling *Women’s Day*: “Bringing up the failure of Charles and Diana’s marriage doesn’t achieve much and smacks of Harry’s complaining. The king and the prince need to be singing from the same song sheet.”

Dampier added, “As far as Prince Harry and Prince Andrew are concerned, they have their hands full without William rocking the boat.”

Despite this, William’s reflections on his family life reportedly hit a nerve with King Charles. William said, “I want to create a world in which my son is proud of what we do, and I hope we don’t go back to some of the practices in the past that Harry and I had to grow up with.”

A royal insider responded to William’s remarks: “That hurt, and although the king won’t say anything in return, he was deeply upset by some of what William said. Sometimes he feels he is being undermined on all sides.”

### Tense Family Reunion

William is also reportedly still reeling over Prince Harry’s recent rare meeting with their father. After months of talks about reconciliation, Charles agreed to a sit-down with his youngest son.

One source at the time said, “William is staggered that his father’s allowing Harry back into the fold like this prodigal son figure.”

Their nearly hour-long formal meeting took place on September 10 at Clarence House, coinciding with Harry’s visit to London. The last time Charles and Harry had a face-to-face reunion was in February 2024, following the king’s revelation of his cancer diagnosis.

### William’s Royal Duty

Insiders reveal that King Charles is currently busy downplaying Harry’s comments made in California. Now, he must also contend with William’s critical statements.

“All the time the king is battling his cancer and doing his best to be a unifying influence in an increasingly diverse time for society,” the source added. “Anything that questions him or how he is doing the job is not helpful.”

“It’s all about tradition and continuity, and William, who took an oath of allegiance at the coronation, needs to remember that.”

Stay tuned for updates on the evolving dynamics within the British royal family.
https://radaronline.com/p/king-charles-prince-william-monarch-not-speaking-son-parents-divorce/

Trump’s Economy – No Slouching. – C5 TV – Liberty Nation News

**Republish Policy**

LibertyNation.com welcomes the republication of our content in accordance with the following guidelines:

– We permit the republishing of up to 250 words from newly published Liberty Nation articles on the day of publication. This content must include a direct and obvious hot-link to our site.

– After 24 hours, Liberty Nation welcomes and permits sites to republish articles in full, provided the content includes a direct and obvious hot-link to the original article.

**Please Respect Our Original Content!**

LibertyNation.com and its parent company, One Generation Away, reserve the right to take action to ensure our copyrighted property is used in accordance with these terms.

Please note, we do not exercise editorial control over any site that republishes our work. Furthermore, permission to republish is not an endorsement or approval of any site or organization that republishes Liberty Nation’s content.
https://www.libertynation.com/trumps-economy-no-slouching-c5-tv/

Ukraine’s President Zelensky Comes to Washington Once Again – Liberty Nation News

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is back at the White House on Friday, October 17. This time, according to reports, he will request longer-range weapons so that Ukrainian forces can strike deeper into Russia – an idea for which President Trump has shown support. The US leader believes such a capability would give Ukraine leverage to pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin into agreeing to a ceasefire.

### Zelensky Will Have Much to Discuss

Volodymyr Zelensky has been a frequent visitor to the White House, sometimes seeking military support or coordinating strategy for some version of a ceasefire in Ukraine. This time, one of the key subjects will be persuading the US president to provide Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles with conventional warheads (TLAM-C) cruise missiles to Ukraine.

As it stands, providing these longer-range weapons may not require much persuasion. According to *Just the News*, “Trump warned Moscow on Sunday that he was considering providing Ukraine with the long-range missiles if the war was not settled soon.” These comments came after his call with Zelensky.

While awaiting Zelensky’s arrival, President Trump took a phone call from Vladimir Putin. As with past conversations, this talk was cordial, and there was a sense of progress toward stopping the war in Ukraine. However, given the history of such engagements, skepticism remains.

After the call, Trump posted on Truth Social:
“We also spent a great deal of time talking about trade between Russia and the United States when the war with Ukraine is over. At the conclusion of the call, we agreed that there will be a meeting of our High-Level Advisors next week. The United States’ initial meetings will be led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, together with various other people, to be designated. A meeting location is to be determined. President Putin and I will then meet in an agreed-upon location, Budapest, Hungary, to see if we can bring this ‘inglorious’ war between Russia and Ukraine to an end.”

Trump also explained that he would discuss the call with President Zelensky when they meet. Perhaps the prospect of key locations in Russia coming within range of TLAM-C missiles had a sobering impact on Putin. Nonetheless, it appears that Trump has grown impatient with Putin’s foot-dragging and is no longer inclined to defer to the Russian leader.

As *Politico* observed, “Trump has since abandoned his strategy of coddling Vladimir Putin to push Russia to the negotiating table.”

### Increasing Pressure on Russian Targets

One sure way of advancing negotiations is to put Russian infrastructure, airfields, and weapons plants at greater risk. Currently, Ukraine faces constant attacks from Russian ballistic and cruise missiles, long-range drones, and aerial bombardments from glide bombs targeting its territory — infrastructure, munitions plants, cities, and battlefield operations.

However, because of the limited range of its missiles, Ukraine must focus on targets only as far as its long-range drones can reach. Unfortunately, these drones are slow and easily intercepted by Russian air defenses.

So far, Ukraine has relied on the US-supplied Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), which has a range of about 180 miles. This pales in comparison to the TLAM-C, which can reach much farther. Current versions of the TLAM-C cruise missile have a range exceeding 1,500 miles and carry a 1,000-pound warhead.

As *Newsweek* explained, “While the missile wouldn’t be a gamechanger in itself, particularly not in the small numbers the White House would likely send if it greenlights the transfer, Tomahawks would still add significantly to how well Kyiv could hit vital Russian assets far over the border.”

### Critical Russian Targets Within TLAM-C Range

One crucial target inside Russia is the primary facility producing Iranian-designed Shahed-136 drones: the Yelabuga drone factory. Situated in the Alabuga Special Economic Zone near the city of Yelabuga, this site lies about 800 miles east of the Ukraine-Russia border — well within the range of Tomahawk cruise missiles.

The drone production facility reportedly had an output of 5,700 drones by late 2024. While there are other drone production sites, the Yelabuga facility plays a key role in assembling Shahed-136 drones.

Providing TLAM-C missiles to Ukraine would serve as a powerful incentive for Putin to seriously consider negotiating a ceasefire and a final peace agreement. Disabling the Yelabuga drone assembly plant might just be the motivation needed to bring Russia to the negotiating table.

Consequently, Zelensky’s conversation with President Trump takes on much greater significance.

*The views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect those of any other affiliate.*
https://www.libertynation.com/ukraines-president-zelensky-comes-to-washington-once-again/

City Council amends bill to allow expansion of bike lanes in Philly

Efforts to expand bike lane access in Center City took a major step forward Thursday as the City Council unanimously passed an amendment to a bill changing parking rules and loading zones for a significant portion of Philadelphia streets between the rivers.

The bill proposes allowing all loading zones from Spring Garden to Bainbridge streets east of Broad Street, and from Bainbridge to the northern border of the 2nd Councilmanic District west of Broad. The amendment introduced Thursday expands the targeted areas beyond just Spruce and Pine streets between the Delaware and Schuylkill rivers.

If passed, the bill would open specialized lanes for bikes and other non-car traffic, benefiting thousands of residents in and around Center City. Cyclists testified about the dangers they face and injuries they have suffered while biking alongside cars in the city. Some spoke in honor of Dr. Barbara Friedes, a child oncology resident at CHOP who was tragically killed by a drunken driver in July 2024 at the corner of 18th and Spruce streets.

“I looked at the map of the area and just made sure as we move forward, we’re not just protecting bicyclists but also keeping the lines of communication open in partnership with the residents when they have issues and concerns,” Council President Kenyatta Johnson said after the session. The bill was introduced on his behalf, as per Council rules.

“This is making sure that we deal with the issue comprehensively, and that’s why I decided, working in partnership with my colleague Mark Squilla, to expand the scope of it,” Johnson added.

West of Broad Street, the loading zones would expand to Market Street between the Schuylkill River and 22nd Street; Chestnut Street between 22nd and 20th streets and between 17th and Broad streets; and Locust Street between 20th and 17th streets around Rittenhouse Square.

Meanwhile, efforts to expand bike lanes in the southernmost region of the 5th District have stalled in the Streets Committee. Biking advocates blame committee chair Jeffery Young Jr., who represents the 5th District including the streets around City Hall.

“There’s nothing more left to learn about it,” said Jon Geeting, policy and advocacy director for Build Philly Now, in a post on X on Oct. 5, one day after the committee hearing failed to advance the legislation. “(Young) just thinks he’s smarter than OTIS (the Office of Transportation and Infrastructure Systems) and PennDOT and doesn’t believe them that it won’t cause problems.”

In other Council business, Young also introduced a bill to end late fees charged to residential Philadelphia Water Department customers starting July 1, 2026. Council members have been introducing legislation to combat rising utility costs.

“In order to allow our residents to just be able to live a little more free in this city, this bill will enable residential customers to avoid paying late fees and penalties on your water,” Young said in a floor speech.

“We have to make sure this city is affordable for the people who live in the city. That doesn’t mean you don’t have to pay your water bill, all right. But we want to make sure that we are providing a level of service so that city residents can really appreciate it, and we want to again keep their costs down as much as possible, as other costs continue to rise up in the city,” he added.

Stay informed and connected — subscribe to The Philadelphia Tribune NOW! [Click Here]

**Community Guidelines**

– Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist, or sexually oriented language.
– PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
– Don’t Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
– Be Truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
– Be Nice. No racism, sexism, or any form of -ism that is degrading to others.
– Be Proactive. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to alert us to abusive posts.
– Share with Us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts and the history behind an article.
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/local_news/city-council-amends-bill-to-allow-expansion-of-bike-lanes-in-philly/article_72b1530f-83fb-446e-936b-a758d1f11163.html

A war on drugs or a war on terror? Trump’s military pressure on Venezuela blurs the lines

**U.S. Drug War Under Trump Echoes Post-9/11 War on Terror Legal Framework**

**WASHINGTON (AP)** — Under President Donald Trump, the U.S. drug war is increasingly mirroring the war on terror. To support military strikes against Latin American gangs and drug cartels, the Trump administration is relying on a legal argument that gained prominence after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. This framework allowed U.S. authorities to use lethal force against al-Qaida combatants responsible for the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks.

However, the criminal groups currently targeted by U.S. strikes represent a very different adversary. These groups, such as Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua gang, were spawned in prisons and are fueled not by anti-Western ideology but by drug trafficking and other illicit enterprises. Legal scholars warn that Trump’s use of overwhelming military force and authorization of covert action inside Venezuela—possibly aimed at ousting President Nicolás Maduro—push the limits of international law.

This shift comes as Trump expands the military’s domestic role by deploying the National Guard to U.S. cities and expressing openness to invoking the nearly 150-year-old Insurrection Act, which permits military deployment in only exceptional civil unrest cases.

### Lethal Strikes Without Formal War Declaration

So far, U.S. military strikes have killed at least 27 people in five separate incidents targeting vessels alleged to be carrying drugs. The most recent strike occurred on Tuesday, killing six people. These actions have taken place without any legal investigation or a formal war declaration from Congress.

Such circumstances raise questions about the legal justification for these strikes and their potential impact on diplomatic relations, especially with Latin American countries that recall the U.S.’s contentious Cold War-era military interventions.

Meanwhile, the U.S. intelligence community disputes Trump’s central claim that Maduro’s government collaborates with the Tren de Aragua gang to orchestrate drug trafficking and illegal immigration into the United States.

### “You Can’t Just Call Something War”

Trump’s assertion that the United States is engaged in an “armed conflict” with drug cartels hinges on the same legal authority the Bush administration used to declare a war on terror after 9/11. This authority permits the capture and detention of combatants and the use of lethal force against their leaders.

However, the United Nations Charter expressly forbids the use of force except in self-defense. Claire Finkelstein, a professor of national security law at the University of Pennsylvania, commented, “You just can’t call something war to give yourself war powers. … It makes a mockery of international law to suggest we are in a noninternational armed conflict with cartels.”

Unlike al-Qaida, which was actively plotting attacks designed to kill civilians after 9/11, the cartels’ primary goal is drug trafficking. Geoffrey Corn, a Texas Tech law professor and former senior Army adviser on law-of-war issues, described the government’s position as politically motivated: “Even if we assume there’s an armed conflict with Tren de Aragua, how do we know everyone in that boat was an enemy fighter? I think Congress needs to know that.”

### Trump Defends Military Strikes and Signals Possible Escalation

When asked at the White House why the U.S. does not use the Coast Guard to intercept Venezuelan vessels and seize drugs, Trump responded, “We have been doing that for 30 years and it has been totally ineffective.”

He also suggested that the U.S. might strike targets inside Venezuela, a move that would markedly escalate tensions and legal concerns. So far, the strikes have occurred in international waters outside any single country’s jurisdiction.

Trump said, “We’ve almost totally stopped it by sea. Now we’ll stop it by land.”

Regarding a New York Times report that he authorized a covert CIA operation in Venezuela, Trump declined to confirm whether he had given the CIA authority to take out Maduro, calling it “ridiculous” to answer.

### Legal and Historical Context of Covert Operations

Numerous U.S. laws and executive orders since the 1970s prohibit the assassination of foreign officials. Yet, by declaring Venezuelan criminals “unlawful combatants,” Trump may be attempting to circumvent these restrictions, possibly reviving a historical pattern of covert regime-change operations akin to those in Guatemala, Chile, and Iran.

Finkelstein noted, “If you pose a threat, and are making war on the U.S., you’re not a protected person.”

During Trump’s first term, Maduro was indicted on federal drug-related charges, including narcoterrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine. This year, the Justice Department doubled the reward for information leading to Maduro’s arrest to $50 million, labeling him “one of the largest narco-traffickers in the world.”

### Drug Trade Realities and Geographic Focus

Despite the intense focus on Venezuela, the bulk of American overdose deaths stem from fentanyl, primarily transported by land from Mexico. While Venezuela is a significant drug transit zone, about 75% of the cocaine produced in Colombia—the world’s largest producer—is smuggled through the eastern Pacific Ocean, not the Caribbean.

### Congressional and International Oversight Lacking

Under the U.S. Constitution, only Congress can declare war. Yet no indications suggest congressional pushback against Trump’s broad interpretation of presidential authority to target drug cartels blamed for tens of thousands of American overdose deaths annually.

The GOP-controlled Senate recently voted down a war powers resolution sponsored by Democrats, which would have required the president to seek congressional authorization for further military strikes.

Even amid calls from some Republicans for more transparency, the Trump administration has yet to provide compelling evidence to lawmakers that the targeted vessels were carrying narcotics, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

Senator Angus King (I-Maine) revealed that members of the Senate Armed Services Committee were denied access in a classified briefing to the Pentagon’s legal opinion on whether the strikes complied with U.S. law.

### Legal Challenges and International Court Prospects

Legal opposition is unlikely to deter the White House. A 1973 Supreme Court ruling, stemming from a lawsuit aimed at halting the Vietnam War’s spread to Laos and Cambodia, set a high legal threshold for challenging military orders.

Families of those killed in the boat strikes also confront legal hurdles after several high court decisions have limited the ability of foreign citizens to sue in U.S. courts.

The strikes occurred in international waters, which could open the door for the International Criminal Court (ICC) to investigate, similar to its probes into alleged war crimes in Russia and Israel—both countries, like the U.S., do not recognize the ICC’s authority.

However, the ICC’s work is currently hampered by a sexual misconduct investigation that led to its chief prosecutor stepping aside. Additionally, U.S. sanctions related to the ICC’s indictment of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have complicated the court’s operations.

### Conclusion

President Trump’s approach to the drug war, invoking a war-on-terror legal framework to justify lethal strikes on Latin American criminal groups, challenges established international and constitutional norms. As this policy unfolds, it raises critical questions about legality, transparency, and long-term geopolitical impacts in the region.
https://ktar.com/national-news/a-war-on-drugs-or-a-war-on-terror-trumps-military-pressure-on-venezuela-blurs-the-lines/5762491/

Mayoral Candidates Spar Over Trump, Qualifications and the Q Train

The first New York City mayoral debate among Andrew Cuomo, Zohran Mamdani, and Curtis Sliwa covered a wide range of political issues.

The discussion traversed a complex minefield of topics, addressing concerns that are both global in scope and hyperlocal to the city’s unique challenges.

Candidates offered their perspectives on policies impacting New Yorkers at every level, engaging in a robust dialogue that highlighted their differing visions for the future of the city.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/17/nyregion/mayoral-debate-mamdani-cuomo-sliwa.html