Bihar Assembly Elections 2025 Might Prove To Be A Litmus Test For Many

The Bihar assembly elections have been announced, and now all eyes are glued to the final result on November 14, when votes will be counted. The Bihar election is important for various reasons, not least because the credibility of the Election Commission (EC) is at stake. Regardless of the outcome, a serious debate is expected after the results are declared, questioning whether votes were polled and counted fairly, or if the result was manipulated to suit the interests of a particular party.

### The Crucial Role of the Election Commission

The role of the Election Commission has rarely been discussed as much as it is now, since the days when T.N. Seshan was the Chief Election Commissioner. Seshan is credited with transforming the EC into a powerful institution that refused to toe the government line. He gave the EC ferocious teeth to challenge big political parties, powerful prime ministers, and chief ministers, cleansing the electoral system during a time when elections often meant violence and destruction at polling booths.

Before the Bihar elections were announced, the Special Summary Revision (SSR) of the voters’ list had become a hot topic. The Opposition alleged that the entire exercise was designed to help the ruling NDA by deleting and adding names on the voters’ list to ensure a BJP/JDU victory. The SSR was challenged in the Supreme Court, which ordered the EC to announce reasons for the deletion of each of the 6.5 million names removed from the draft list.

The EC remained adamant about not using Aadhaar cards for voter verification but relented only after a stern Supreme Court order. Meanwhile, claims surfaced that foreigners’ names were included to favor the Opposition, yet, as of now, no evidence or arrests have confirmed these allegations. This turned out to be a hoax, further proving that the BJP’s purported use of Bangladeshi and Rohingya names was a tactic to polarize the elections.

### Upholding Election Integrity

In this election, the EC must prove that elections in India cannot be manipulated. Elections should not only be conducted fairly but must also be **seen** to be done fairly. Hence, more than the political parties, it is up to the EC to demonstrate impartiality and ensure its conduct is above suspicion. The SSR exercise was not intended to favor any party but to ensure a clean and accurate voters’ list.

This election is also very important for Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP, as the Rahul Gandhi-led Opposition has accused them of manipulating the election through the EC. The BJP must prove that these accusations are baseless and that they win the election purely by voters’ choice. Even if the BJP loses, it should not be seen as an impediment to free and fair elections, thereby putting an end to the “vote chori” (vote theft) debate in future elections.

### Rahul Gandhi’s Rising Opposition Leadership

Rahul Gandhi has emerged as a formidable leader of the opposition since the 2024 parliamentary elections. He is shaping the political agenda, compelling the BJP to respond to campaigns like Save Constitution, the demand for a caste census, and now the Vote Chori allegations. Rahul is increasingly viewed as a serious challenger to Prime Minister Modi. According to the C-Voter survey, he is closing the popularity gap vis-à-vis Modi for the prime minister’s post.

However, since becoming the top leader of Congress, Rahul has lost more elections than he has won. He needs to prove that he can win elections too, and that the Congress’s improved seat tally in 2024 was no fluke. His Voter Adhikar Yatra has been a huge success, attracting massive crowds and energizing Congress cadres at the grassroots. Yet, whether this momentum will translate into votes remains to be seen.

### Tejashwi Yadav: The Mahagathbandhan’s Hope

Tejashwi Yadav narrowly missed victory in the 2020 Assembly elections. Despite being a greenhorn then, he courageously made unemployment the central theme of that election, forcing Modi and Nitish Kumar to work hard to retain power. Since then, Tejashwi has matured as a leader and is now the sole leader of the Mahagathbandhan alliance. Most surveys place him ahead of Nitish Kumar as the first choice for Chief Minister.

But can he actually win? This remains the million-dollar question.

### Nitish Kumar’s Final Battle

Twenty years is a long time in politics, and anti-incumbency has surely mounted against Nitish Kumar. He is trying to neutralize public anger by distributing money directly to women’s bank accounts—a strategy that worked in Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, and Maharashtra. Will this formula work again in Bihar?

This is likely Nitish’s last election. He appears frailer and seems to have lost some control over the administration due to his failing health. Speculations abound that he is only a front, with others running the government and the JDU. However, Nitish should not be underestimated. A maverick in Indian politics, he has survived and remained Chief Minister for two decades. Even now, he has the capacity to surprise his rivals and pull off extraordinary political maneuvers.

### Bihar at a Crossroad

Bihar has a rich history as the land of great empires but remains the poorest state in India today, with the lowest per capita income. Nearly 34% of households earn less than Rs 6,000 per month, and over 95% of the population does not own a vehicle.

Bihar desperately needs new thinking and fresh ideas to break free from the cycle of backwardness and poverty. Can this election demonstrate that Bihar votes on real issues rather than caste? Only time will tell.

*The writer is Co-Founder of SatyaHindi.com and author of* Hindu Rashtra. *He tweets at* [@ashutosh83B](https://twitter.com/ashutosh83B).
https://www.freepressjournal.in/analysis/bihar-assembly-elections-2025-might-prove-to-be-a-litmus-test-for-many

Bihar election to be held on November 6 and 11

**Bihar Assembly Elections Scheduled for November 6 and 11**

*By Chanshimla Varah | October 6, 2025, 4:36 PM*

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has announced that the Bihar Assembly elections will be conducted in two phases on November 6 and November 11, 2025. The results are expected to be declared on November 14.

The current 243-member Bihar Assembly’s term concludes on November 22, making it mandatory to hold elections before that date. The election schedule aligns with political parties’ requests to hold polls after the Chhath Puja festival to boost voter turnout.

### Bypolls to be Held Alongside Second Phase

On November 11, alongside the second phase of the Bihar Assembly elections, eight Assembly bypolls will take place. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar confirmed that results for both the general elections and bypolls will be announced on November 14.

The bypolls will be held for the following seats:

– Budgam and Nagrota (Jammu and Kashmir)
– Anta (Rajasthan)
– Ghatsila (ST) (Jharkhand)
– Jubilee Hills (Telangana)
– Tarn Taran (Punjab)
– Dampa (ST) (Mizoram)
– Nuapada (Odisha)

### Political Dynamics: Major Contestants

The Bihar elections will largely be a contest between two major alliances:

– **National Democratic Alliance (NDA):** Led by incumbent Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, currently holding 131 seats.
– **Mahagathbandhan:** Led by Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), with the opposition bloc, including the Congress, holding 111 seats.

New entrant Prashant Kishor’s Jan Suraaj party is also set to contest all 243 seats, marking its debut in Bihar’s political landscape.

### Election Commission’s Preparations and Voter Details

Ahead of the announcements, an ECI delegation led by Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, along with Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, visited Bihar to review poll preparations. They met representatives from 12 political parties, including prominent national parties like the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

On September 30, the ECI published the final electoral roll for Bihar, which lists 7.42 crore registered voters. This reflects a decrease of over 47 lakh voters since the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) started in June.

Out of the total electorate, 3.92 crore are male and 3.5 crore are female voters. Additionally, there are approximately 14 lakh first-time voters participating in these elections. Remarkably, around 14,000 voters are over the age of 100.

In a significant update, CEC Kumar announced that the new voter ID cards will feature color photographs of electors, replacing the earlier black and white images.

### Polling Arrangements

A total of 90,712 polling stations have been arranged across Bihar to facilitate smooth and accessible voting for all electors.

Stay tuned for further updates as Bihar gears up for this crucial electoral exercise.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/politics/bihar-election-dates-announced/story

Bihar polls: CEC defends voter list revision ahead of elections

Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar has recently defended the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists in Bihar.

Addressing concerns and criticisms surrounding the exercise, CEC Kumar emphasized the importance of maintaining accurate and updated electoral rolls. The SIR aims to ensure that every eligible voter is correctly registered, thereby strengthening the democratic process in the state.

By conducting this comprehensive revision, the Election Commission seeks to eliminate duplicates, include new voters, and uphold the integrity of upcoming elections in Bihar.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/politics/bihar-voter-list-revision-in-accordance-with-law-eci-chief/story

McDowell says he didn’t nominate Steen because ‘her election would be step backwards’

Senator Michael McDowell has stated that he did not nominate Maria Steen for the presidency because, “as a liberal, I felt her election would have been a step backwards for the Ireland I believe in.”

Maria Steen is a conservative campaigner who advocated for a ‘no’ vote in both the abortion and same-sex marriage referendums. She received 18 of the 20 required Oireachtas nominations but criticized Mr. McDowell following her failed bid.

Ms. Steen claimed she had been waiting to see if Mr. McDowell would run for president herself. She also said she had expected his support, as they campaigned on the same side during the family and care referenda — proposals that were overwhelmingly rejected by the public.

In a written statement, Mr. McDowell explained his position in detail:

“In early 2025, I considered suggestions that I should seek nomination for the presidential election and decided against doing so. My decision was made public on May 23rd in this newspaper.

In July, my office was informed of plans by pro-life members of the Oireachtas, including Aontú, to establish a process in which members of the Oireachtas would interview aspiring candidates chosen by them. These aspirants included Declan Ganley and Maria Steen, both known pro-life activists. I indicated then that I was not interested in becoming involved with such a caucus.”

Mr. McDowell also revealed that he was approached by Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín on a second occasion but again declined to participate in the process.

He further discussed correspondence he received from Ms. Steen regarding her nomination:

“A number of people sounded me out as to whether I would support their candidacies. On September 1st, Steen contacted me by text saying: ‘you may have seen I am looking for a nomination would you have time to take a quick call today.’

I replied as follows: ‘Maria, thanks for your message. My position is that as I have already informed two hopefuls, I will make no decision or commitments on nominations until the likely set of nominees becomes clearer including the possibility of Local Authority nominations and whether Sinn Féin are running an SF candidate.'”

Mr. McDowell concluded:

“I did not consider that a face-to-face meeting with Steen would serve any useful purpose, as her Seanad supporters well knew my position.

Suggestions that I was motivated by envy, jealousy, misogyny or other base reasons are simply untrue. For the reasons stated above, I was opposed to her election, which might very well have happened, in my view. It would have been divisive and a step backwards for the kind of Ireland I believe in.”
https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/mcdowell-says-he-didnt-nominate-steen-because-her-election-would-be-step-backwards-1813744.html

Three presidential candidates face off in first TV debate in race for Áras

The first televised debate of the presidential campaign was shown on Virgin Media One on Monday night. Hosted by Kieran Cuddihy, the debate featured the three candidates: Independent Catherine Connolly, Fine Gael’s Heather Humphreys, and Fianna Fáil’s Jim Gavin.

The 60-minute programme began with opening statements from the candidates. This was followed by questions on neutrality before moving on to the issue of Irish flags being erected in certain communities, which led to a broader debate about immigration.

The topic raised the first real clash concerning direct provision and asylum seekers. Gavin welcomed immigration but emphasized the need for a robust yet fair immigration system. Connolly was strongly critical of the direct provision process and, when asked about those who are not asylum seekers or whose claims have been rejected, she stated: “We are talking about human beings and about a conflation of issues.”

The debate then moved on to safety on the streets of Dublin and other towns. Humphreys asserted that there are more gardaí on the streets, while Connolly countered that there is a lack of Garda presence on the ground, particularly community gardaí.

There were also strong exchanges on the situation in Gaza between Connolly and Gavin before the discussion turned to the challenging topic of housing. Connolly was adamant that the Government has failed miserably in this area. Humphreys defended the Government’s performance to date, acknowledging that ambitious goals were not achieved but noting that the solution is very complex.

A potential United Ireland was also discussed, with all three candidates outlining their experiences with communities in the North. Humphreys spoke of her experience as a “proud Ulsterwoman and Republican.”

### Opening Statements

In the initial addresses, Catherine Connolly opened proceedings, saying:

> “As President and working together, we can shape a new United Republic, where everyone is valued, where diversity is cherished, where sustainable solutions are urgently implemented and where a home is a fundamental human right.

> A country where we raise our voice for the peaceful resolution to conflicts and war, drawing on our history of colonization, of famine and our lived experience of the successful peace process in the North.”

Heather Humphreys said:

> “I want to bring my life experience to the role of President. I worked for many years as a Credit Union manager; where I got to know people; and the challenges they faced. It was a great apprenticeship for public life.

> I was honoured to serve in Cabinet for over a decade. I led the 1916 Commemorations. I supported businesses through the pandemic; and I worked hard to ensure children across our country receive a Hot School meal.

> I’m a daughter, a mother and a grandmother. All my life I have seen the quiet strength of women.

> In my own family, in my community and right across this country, women have been the ones holding things together. I can’t promise perfection, but I will promise honesty, compassion and service.”

Jim Gavin said:

> “Over the last four decades I’ve served my country and its values in many different roles. From working in our most disadvantaged communities to leading peacekeepers in Africa, I’ve always worked to serve others.

> I’ve built teams which show how much we can achieve when we listen and when we respect each other. There’s no problem we cannot overcome when we work together.

> At a time of growing division, my commitment to you is that I will be a President for every section of society. A voice for all.”

### Campaign Activity and Upcoming Debates

Earlier today, Humphreys and Gavin were canvassing in Dublin, while it is understood that Connolly was focusing on her debate preparation.

Further presidential debates are planned to be broadcast on Prime Time and The Week in Politics.

The election takes place on Friday, October 24th, with counting beginning the following day.
https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/three-presidential-candidates-face-off-in-first-tv-debate-in-race-for-aras-1812756.html

Is New Jersey Now a Swing State?

Mikie Sherrill is not prone to hyperbole. The Democratic nominee for governor of New Jersey is measured and mainstream—even milquetoast, in the words of one progressive activist. But when I asked Sherrill what message a victory for her this November would send nationally, she made a rather bold declaration.

“As New Jersey goes, so goes the nation,” she told me.

This is a stretch. But maybe not by all that much.

New Jersey is no one’s idea of a swing state; it hasn’t voted Republican for president in nearly four decades, and it last elected a GOP senator during the Nixon administration. But the Garden State has been moving rightward these past few years—Donald Trump came within six points of winning its electoral votes last year—and the governor’s office has historically toggled between the parties.

This fall’s election holds outsize importance for Democrats, who want both to keep a Trump ally out of a key state office and to give their base some hope heading into the 2026 midterm elections. A win, Sherrill said, would represent the party’s shot across the bow against Trump’s second term.

The off-year governor’s races in New Jersey and Virginia are closely scrutinized for signs of voter backlash to whichever party controls Washington. Usually Virginia, until recently a presidential battleground, provides the best clues about the national mood. This year, however, operatives in both parties believe that New Jersey might be the closer race and the more accurate barometer of how voters are reacting to Trump’s return tour in the White House.

In a shift from previous elections, national Democrats have spent far more money trying to hold the governorship of New Jersey than they have in the Virginia governor’s race. They’ve placed their hopes in Sherrill, a 53-year-old former Navy helicopter pilot and federal prosecutor, who in 2018 captured a House seat long held by Republicans. In June, she won a crowded party primary by defeating candidates to her left and to her right.

Sherrill is now facing the former Republican state legislator Jack Ciattarelli, a self-proclaimed Jersey guy running a loose and energetic campaign built around lowering property taxes, combatting crime, and making a crowd-pleasing appeal to bring plastic bags back to grocery stores. He has run for governor twice before and came within three points of upsetting the heavily favored Democratic incumbent Phil Murphy’s reelection bid in 2021.

Although Sherrill has leaned on her military service, Ciattarelli has mocked her as a predictable and occasionally ham-fisted Democrat; one of his most frequently aired ads shows her fumbling the answer to a seemingly straightforward question about what her first piece of legislation would be.

Sherrill and I spoke shortly after she addressed some 200 mostly nonwhite supporters at a restaurant in Newark, in an area where she wants to run up Democratic margins that have shrunk in recent elections as some Black and Hispanic voters either stayed home or voted Republican. The crowd was filled with local party officials and volunteers who were about to spend the afternoon knocking on doors for Sherrill and the rest of the Democratic ticket.

Nearly everyone I spoke with, however, said they had friends or neighbors who cast their ballot for Trump last year. “Some minorities believe they were taken for granted by Democrats,” Carlos Gonzalez, an at-large member of Newark’s city council, told me. “Trump won their votes by promising to lower their cost of living,” he said, “but the president hasn’t delivered. I am certain that they are going to come back to the Democratic Party because they feel that they were cheated.”

Sherrill was one of the only speakers who did not switch between English and Spanish, but in either language, the themes were the same: affordability and Trump.

“We have an out-of-control president who’s attacking the people we care about, and he’s attacking the economy of our state,” Sherrill said, presenting herself as a bulwark against threats to New Jersey from the Trump administration. She painted Ciattarelli, who secured the president’s endorsement in the GOP primary, as a Trump lackey. Her local surrogates made the same connection in more colorful terms.

“He is going to support the agenda of the orange man, and we don’t want the orange man to control the politics of New Jersey,” Gonzalez told them, and the audience cheered.

Ciattarelli’s actual history with Trump is more complicated than Democrats like to let on. A decade ago, while supporting then-Governor Chris Christie’s presidential bid, Ciattarelli called Trump a charlatan who was not fit to be president of the United States. He did not seek Trump’s endorsement during either of his first two runs for governor—a snub the president remembered when Ciattarelli finally sought Trump’s support earlier this year to fend off a more MAGA-friendly GOP competitor.

On the stump, Ciattarelli is neither obsequious nor critical toward the president. Instead, he plays Sherrill’s frequent criticism of Trump for laughs. He tells audiences that if they took a drink every time the Democrat blamed something on the president, they’d be “drunk off their ass.”

At a packed bar in Fair Lawn, a Democratic-leaning suburb about 20 miles northwest of New York City, Ciattarelli joked: “On your way home tonight, if you get a flat tire, she’s going to blame President Trump.” The line went over well with a crowd that, judging by its large number of MAGA hats and Trump shirts, would have been fine with more effusive praise of the president.

Several people cited Ciattarelli’s better-than-expected showing in 2021 and Trump’s relatively narrow loss in the state last year as reasons for optimism, as they did with the strong turnout for a Monday-evening campaign rally. Well over 100 people stood shoulder to shoulder to hear Ciattarelli deliver a brief speech.

“This is the best chance we’re going to have to turn New Jersey red,” Mike Messina, a 60-year-old retired police officer, told me.

Ciattarelli is a 63-year-old accountant with a deep tan that makes him look like he’s just come from the golf course or the beach. He’s had more freedom to barnstorm the state than Sherrill, whose day job as a House Democrat in the closely divided Congress has occasionally kept her off the campaign trail.

Some of Ciattarelli’s biggest applause lines—keeping wind farms off our Jersey Shore and bringing plastic bags back to the grocery stores—sit at the very edge of the culture wars.

“I could say I’m going to lower taxes, and I get a nice round of applause,” he observed in Fair Lawn. “I say I’m bringing back the plastic bags, and it brings down the house.”

On the topic of Trump, he’s a bit more careful and conventional. When I asked him after the event whether he’d like the president to campaign for him, Ciattarelli replied:

“I appreciate the president’s willingness to do whatever we think he can do to help us win this election, but at the end of the day, the candidate has to win the election.”

He predicted that the Democrats would bring in the party’s biggest stars, including former President Barack Obama, to help Sherrill in the campaign’s closing weeks.

“I’m going to bring in Jack Ciattarelli.”

Trump, himself a New Jersey property owner with a golf club in Bedminster, is keeping a close watch. A Quinnipiac University poll in mid-September showed Sherrill leading Ciattarelli by nine points. But when an Emerson College survey had the race tied last week, Trump seized on the finding to tout Ciattarelli and attack Sherrill.

Later that same day, the Sherrill campaign accused Trump’s administration of aiding Ciattarelli in a far more nefarious way: by releasing Sherrill’s full military records to an ally of the Republican in order to plant a negative story about her.

CBS News discovered the breach while investigating claims pushed by Republicans that Sherrill was barred from walking in her 1994 Naval Academy commencement because she had been implicated in a cheating scandal that involved more than 130 students. (Sherrill has said that she was punished for not reporting on her classmates.)

A branch of the National Archives acknowledged that a technician released too many of her records, including documents that contained her Social Security number and other sensitive information. Sherrill’s campaign claimed that the disclosure violated federal law.

“This is an illegal and dangerous weaponization of the federal government,” Sherrill wrote on X.

Republicans and Democrats can each draw hope from history. The New Jersey governor’s race typically swings away from whichever party won the presidency in the year before—a trend that would favor Sherrill. (Christie won the governorship during Obama’s first year in the White House, and Murphy grabbed it back for Democrats after Trump’s victory in 2016.)

Ciattarelli is banking on voters’ tendency to get tired of the Democrats holding power in Trenton, the state capital: “For more than half a century, neither party has won three governor’s races in a row.”

Sherrill and Ciattarelli both see an electorate that’s frustrated with the status quo and rising prices—particularly a spike in electricity bills. Sherrill has vowed to declare a state of emergency to freeze utility rates on her first day in office if she wins.

Ciattarelli is trying to localize the race, calling Sherrill “Murphy 2.0” and, though she has never served in state government, accusing her of backing policies that have contributed to high energy costs and property taxes.

“It’s a smart strategy,” Mike DuHaime, a New Jersey-based former top aide to Christie, told me. The challenge for Ciattarelli, and a reason both parties believe that Sherrill retains a small edge, is that Republicans have struggled over the past decade to win elections when Trump isn’t on the ballot. (The dynamic was the same for Democrats when Obama was in the White House.)

Democrats cleaned up in lower-turnout elections during Trump’s first term, and they have done the same so far this year.

“Can somebody who’s not Donald Trump turn out Donald Trump’s voters?” DuHaime asked. “It didn’t happen in 2017 or 2018. Is there something different in 2025? That’s what this election is a test of.”

The outcome in November could also help determine whether Democrats desperate for a path back to federal power gravitate toward candidates such as Sherrill and her House colleague Abigail Spanberger, the party’s nominee in Virginia.

Both women have a background in national security—Spanberger was a CIA agent—and moderate voting records. They’re both waging campaigns devoted to kitchen-table economic issues such as affordability.

(Another amusing biographical twist: Sherrill grew up in Virginia, and Spanberger was born in New Jersey.)

Victories this fall could put one or both women in the conversation for a spot on the Democrats’ national ticket in 2028.

Polls have given Spanberger a wider edge in Virginia than Sherrill in New Jersey, a dynamic that political strategists attribute to a weaker GOP opponent, Lieutenant Governor Winsome Earle-Sears, and the disproportionate impact that the Trump administration’s cuts to the federal workforce have had on the state.

Democratic leaders in New Jersey, however, are confident about Sherrill’s chances. Senator Cory Booker, who is up for reelection next year, told me that the Trump administration’s cuts to health-care programs and its aggressive deportation raids have turned the Latino community against him—a shift that polling has also captured.

The president’s low approval, Booker argued, would drag Ciattarelli down.

“It is stunning to me that he’s not trying to distance himself from somebody who’s wildly unpopular in New Jersey,” Booker said.

Sherrill made clear that she was aware that, as much as voters might disapprove of Trump right now, they’re not falling back in love with Democrats, either.

“What I’m largely hearing from people is that they’re disappointed with both parties. They’re sort of in a nonpartisan place,” Sherrill told me. “They felt unheard by the Democratic Party, and now they feel swindled by the Republican Party.”

Sherrill had not served in elected office before winning her House seat in the Democrats’ 2018 wave. Her military and law-enforcement background helps her appeal to voters who pay little attention to politics, Senator Andy Kim told me.

“She’s not somebody that looks and sounds like somebody who came up through politics their entire life,” he said.

Kim, who served alongside Sherrill in the House before winning a Senate seat last year, told me that the two bonded over their shared experiences as parents of young children—Sherrill has four kids—in Congress. After Sherrill won the primary for governor in June, they talked at length about the state and pored over data gleaned from his 2024 campaign.

“She’s a general-election juggernaut,” Kim said.

Not all Democrats find Sherrill that impressive or exciting.

Adam Green, the co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee and a former spokesperson for New Jersey’s Democratic Party, is the one who called Sherrill milquetoast, and he endorsed two of her opponents during the primary.

He’s warning Democrats not to see her as a model for 2026 and beyond, urging the party instead to embrace candidates willing to campaign more boldly and aggressively against corporate greed.

“Mikie Sherrill will likely win because of the blue color of her team jersey,” Green told me, “but it will not be because of anything new or inspiring [she offered], or because she tapped into an outsider economic-populist zeitgeist that this moment calls for nationally.”

What Sherrill does have that some Democrats do not, however, is a record of electoral success: She has prevailed in every campaign she’s entered so far.

When I asked her about Green’s critique, she pointed to that winning record.

“I’m presenting a vision of New Jersey that the people of New Jersey want to see, for their kids, for their costs,” Sherrill said. “That’s been pretty compelling so far, and I think it will be in November as well.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/09/the-democrats-first-must-win-test-of-trumps-second-term/684360/

Prashant Kishor predicts poll results for NDA, Mahagathbandhan, his party

**Prashant Kishor Predicts Poll Results for NDA, Mahagathbandhan, and His Party**

*By Snehil Singh | September 29, 2025, 05:18 pm*

Prashant Kishor, founder of the Jan Suraaj Party, has announced that his party will contest all 243 seats in the upcoming Bihar Assembly elections. He boldly predicted that the party would either finish first or last in the race.

“Jan Suraaj Party will either be first or last, but there is no middle ground in this election,” Kishor stated.

**Election Forecast**

Kishor also offered his predictions for other major political players in Bihar. He forecasted that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) would face notable setbacks in the elections.

Regarding the Janata Dal (United) [JD(U)], led by Nitish Kumar, Kishor predicted a significant decline, expecting the party to secure less than 25 seats compared to its 43 seats in 2020.

The Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), which emerged as the single-largest party in 2020 with 75 seats, is anticipated to finish third, according to Kishor’s analysis.

**Corruption Allegations**

Kishor took a sharp dig at JD(U) leader Ashok Choudhary, accusing him of corruption amounting to ₹200 crore. He questioned why Choudhary purchased land in his personal assistant’s name, implying wrongdoing.

“But Nitish Kumar is no longer able to control the state’s administration. Nitish Kumar may not be a bad person, but the leaders and officers around him are looting,” Kishor added.

**Election Strategy and Criticism of Government Schemes**

Kishor dismissed the Bihar government’s recently launched scheme that transfers ₹10,000 to women, calling it a “simple bribe” rather than a meaningful game-changer.

He accused Nitish Kumar of compromising with corruption and crime, citing that leaders like Samrat Chaudhary and Dilip Jaiswal face murder charges.

Earlier on Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched the *Mukhyamantri Mahila Rojgar Yojana* in Bihar, which aims to transfer ₹10,000 directly into the bank accounts of 75 lakh women across the state.

Prashant Kishor’s predictions and accusations have set the stage for a highly charged election season in Bihar, with his party positioning itself as a major contender in the political landscape.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/politics/prashant-kishor-predicts-jan-suraaj-first-or-last-in-bihar/story

Vulnerable Dem Senator Admits They Lied About Biden’s Mental Decline to Keep Power [WATCH]

The 2026 Senate race in Georgia is already drawing national attention, with control of the U.S. Senate at stake and both parties preparing for what is expected to be one of the most competitive and expensive contests in the country.

Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff, who won his seat in the 2021 runoff elections, is seeking reelection. Republicans are eager to reclaim the seat, though the party has not yet determined who its nominee will be. Among the declared GOP candidates is Rep. Mike Collins, who has begun to sharpen his attacks on Ossoff following remarks the senator made in a recent interview.

Ossoff’s comments came during an appearance on *Pod Save America*, where he was questioned about the Democratic Party’s handling of concerns over Joe Biden’s age and ability to serve another term. The discussion was prompted by claims made in Kamala Harris’s new book, which revisits internal party debates over whether Biden should have sought reelection in 2024.

During the exchange, Tommy Vietor, a former Obama administration spokesman and one of the podcast’s hosts, asked Ossoff why Democrats had not been more forthcoming about Biden’s vulnerabilities before the election.

> “Do you think that there was something preventing, I don’t know, a more honest conversation about his prospects within [the] Democratic Party?” Vietor asked. “Because, like the data was there, voters were telling us he was too old. Focus groups were telling us he was too old. We just didn’t listen to the mounds and mounds of data that was out there.”

In response, Ossoff acknowledged that Democrats were aware of Biden’s weaknesses but chose not to address them publicly because of concerns it might hurt their chances against Donald Trump.

> “I think that, like, the most brutally honest answer to that question is, you know, when you’re facing the specter of Donald Trump potentially being reelected to the presidency and you have in the sitting president the presumptive nominee, it’s understandable that you’re not going to be inclined to do or say things that might weaken that presumptive nominee against Trump, given the threat that he posed and poses,” Ossoff said.

Ossoff’s remarks are among the clearest acknowledgments from a Democratic senator that party leaders were aware of Biden’s challenges but chose to remain quiet. The admission is likely to feature prominently in the 2026 campaign, particularly as Republicans argue that Democrats prioritized electoral strategy over transparency with voters.

Collins, a Republican congressman from Georgia, has already seized on the comments, calling them proof that Ossoff and his colleagues misled the public. He has argued that the remarks raise broader questions about judgment, accountability, and who was effectively making decisions in the White House while Biden was in office.

The Georgia race is expected to draw substantial national investment from both parties, much like the North Carolina contest where former Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat, is likely to face former Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley. Both states will play a central role in determining which party controls the Senate after 2026.

For Ossoff, the challenge will be to defend his record while addressing growing scrutiny over his remarks and the broader implications of what they reveal about Democratic strategy in 2024. For Republicans, the focus will remain on capitalizing on the senator’s admission and framing the election as a referendum not only on his tenure but on the decisions made under Democratic leadership in recent years.

As the campaign season intensifies, Ossoff’s interview is expected to remain a flashpoint, raising new questions about how much Democratic officials knew about Biden’s decline and why they withheld those concerns from voters ahead of the 2024 election.
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/09/vulnerable-dem-senator-admits-they-lied-about-bidens-mental-decline-to-keep-power-watch/

‘The picture is grim’: Conservative outlet flags ‘warning signs’ that GOP is losing ground

The GOP was riding high, but is now being anchored down by a “political dud,” according to a conservative outlet.

The Washington Examiner, widely considered to be right-wing, published a report on Saturday titled, “Chucks in luck? Warning signs ahead for Republicans in next year’s Senate races.”

Just a few months ago, Republicans were riding high, giddy after having passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law. But as the saying goes, a few weeks can be an eternity in politics. And as autumn kicks in, it’s clear that cheer is turning into fear.

The weekend article states, “What gives? And what does it mean for the 2026 Senate races? As is usually the case with midterm elections in the Trump era, the answer is: ‘It’s complicated.'”

According to the report, there is one major concern for the Republicans.

“A big problem facing the GOP as 2026 draws near is that while the tax cuts in the GOP megabill should be popular, the legislation is overall proving to be a political dud with a 64% disapproval rating,” the article notes. This has prompted reports that President Donald Trump is looking to rebrand it as the “Working Families Tax Cut Bill.”

Some voters fret about Medicaid cuts hurting the poor. Others worry about the possibly adverse impact on hospitals. Additionally, many fear the debt and deficit implications.

The article adds, “Add to this that inflation sits higher than it was at the same point last year and about a percentage point above the Federal Reserve’s target rate, and it’s likely Republican Senate candidates will have to run with some semblance of an inflation anchor next year, just as former Vice President Kamala Harris did last year.”

Polling data supports this challenge, with 61% of those surveyed by The Economist and YouGov disapproving of Trump’s handling of inflation.

The situation appears grim, and this outlook does not even account for the historical trend that the party controlling the White House generally tends to do worse in the first midterm election of each presidency.

“Crazy though it may seem, the GOP could indeed be staring down a situation in which Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) ends up back in charge and gridlock once again becomes the name of the game in Washington, D.C.,” the Washington Examiner concludes.
https://www.rawstory.com/gop-picture-is-grim-2026/

Rahul Gandhi announces 10-point plan for Bihar’s backward classes

**Rahul Gandhi Announces 10-Point Plan for Bihar’s Backward Classes**

*By Snehil Singh | September 24, 2025, 06:24 PM*

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has unveiled a comprehensive 10-point resolution aimed at the Extremely Backward Classes (EBC) in Bihar. The announcement was made at the “Ati Pichra Nyay Sankalp” conference held in Patna, marking a significant part of the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) bloc’s strategy for the upcoming Bihar Assembly elections.

### Key Promises for EBCs

The proposed program includes several critical measures to uplift the EBC community. Among these is the introduction of reservations for EBCs in private institutions and government contracts worth up to ₹25 crore. Additionally, the plan seeks to increase reservations for EBCs in panchayats and urban local bodies from the current 20% to 30%.

A notable legislative move in the proposal is the introduction of a new “Extremely Backward Classes Atrocities Prevention Act” dedicated to protecting the rights and dignity of the EBCs.

### Additional Commitments

The 10-point plan also emphasizes the need to conduct a caste census to accurately assess the population of Dalits, EBCs, and other backward classes. To ensure fairness, a committee will be established to review the current EBC list for any under- or over-inclusion.

Further, the program promises to eliminate the “Not Found Suitable” clause often misused in recruitment processes against backward classes.

Addressing land rights, the initiative proposes providing land to landless families—three decimals in urban areas and five decimals in rural regions—empowering these communities with much-needed ownership and security.

### Vision for Social Justice

Rahul Gandhi articulated a clear vision transcending partisan politics, focusing on the welfare of the ‘Ati Pichhda Samaj’ (extremely backward society). He underscored the urgency of conducting a caste census and removing existing caps on reservations to reinforce constitutional rights, which he warned are under threat nationwide.

### Election Strategy and Political Context

This 10-point resolution aligns with the INDIA bloc’s broader social justice agenda ahead of the Bihar Assembly elections set for October-November 2025. By championing the rights of the EBCs and other marginalized groups, the alliance aims to challenge and potentially unseat the incumbent Nitish Kumar-led Janata Dal (United) and Bharatiya Janata Party coalition.

Currently, the INDIA bloc’s leading parties are engaged in seat-sharing negotiations to present a united front in the upcoming polls.

This ambitious plan by Rahul Gandhi and the INDIA bloc represents a significant push towards inclusive development and social justice for Bihar’s backward communities, setting the stage for a high-stakes electoral battle in the state.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/politics/bihar-polls-rahul-unveils-10-point-plan-bigger-quotas-for-ebcs/story