Trump’s CZ pardon draws fury from Maxine Waters over ‘pay-to-play’ crypto ties

United States Representative Maxine Waters has strongly criticized former US President Donald Trump for his decision to pardon Binance founder and former CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao.

Trump pardoned Zhao on Thursday, stating that people told him “what he did is not even a crime.” Waters, the top Democrat on the House Committee on Financial Services, responded later that day with a sharp rebuke. In a statement, she claimed, “Trump is doing massive favors for crypto criminals who have helped line his pockets.”

Waters continued, “Trump’s pardon of Binance founder Changpeng Zhao—who pleaded guilty to enabling money laundering and facilitating suspicious transactions with child abusers, drug dealers, and terrorists—is an appalling but unsurprising reflection of his presidency.”

According to Trump, his decision to pardon Zhao followed advice from “a lot of people” who told him CZ was not guilty. “It wasn’t a crime; he was persecuted by the Biden Administration,” Trump asserted.

### Waters Disagrees

Maxine Waters further accused CZ of lobbying Trump and his family for months while funneling billions into Trump’s personal crypto company, World Liberty Financial. She insisted that the pardon was a direct result of these efforts and called it “a blatant example of the kind of pay-to-play corruption that Trump and his Administration continue to engage in.”

These statements come amid recent reports highlighting an extraordinary rise in Trump’s personal wealth during what would have been his second term in office. This wealth increase has been driven, in part, by a sprawling cryptocurrency empire linked to the president and his family.

### Trump Family’s Crypto Ventures

The Trump family’s crypto ventures are reported to have generated more than $1 billion in pre-tax profit over the past year. The family does not shy away from this fact; Trump’s son, Eric Trump, even claimed that their actual profits were “probably more.”

### World Liberty Financial’s Success

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), named by Waters, is at the center of this new wealth. The decentralized finance (DeFi) company was founded by Trump’s sons and close associates. It has sold billions of dollars in tokens and stablecoins, bolstering the family’s crypto fortune.

Back in June, Trump disclosed $57.4 million in income derived from his involvement with World Liberty Financial. In the following month, the family’s stake in WLFI surged to $5 billion after a token unlock. More recent estimates suggest that the family’s earnings from WLFI this year alone have reached approximately $550 million.

*Related: Polymarket bets that Sam Bankman-Fried gets pardon surge to 12%*
*Related: Crypto execs fork over cash at Trump’s ballroom fundraiser*
https://cointelegraph.com/news/trump-accused-of-rewarding-crypto-criminals-after-pardoning-binance-s-cz?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

An open, transparent, accessible government protects everyone.

Though we needed no reminders, the latest outrages out of Washington have proven that would-be dictators and their empowered henchmen will seek to shut down free speech and hide their misdeeds whenever they can.

Fortunately, in Connecticut, government by and for the people has remained much healthier. This is thanks to heroes ensuring that our state and municipal meetings, records, and officials remain open and accessible, and that the freedom to speak—to critique and criticize—remains robust.

I am on the board of the Connecticut Foundation for Open Government, which for more than three decades has sought to educate the public about the vital need for freedom of information. As part of that effort, we honor its champions. We are journalists, lawyers, professors, state and local officials, and others dedicated to the notion, as Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis famously asserted, that “If the broad light of day could be let in upon men’s actions, it would purify them as the sun disinfects.”

We know—and we want the public to know—that open government benefits liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, and everyone in between. All parties and people should be able to see what their public officials are doing and both take part in decisions or comment on them. If they could, they would understand government better and stop believing the wild conspiracy theories, myths, and misinformation that bad actors peddle.

Open, transparent, accessible government is bipartisan—call it what you will. It is for everyone. It protects everyone.

Sadly and dangerously, President Trump doesn’t agree.

In just the last month, he’s had his FCC chairman threaten TV networks unless they stifle Jimmy Kimmel and other critics. His Attorney General has threatened to prosecute people for “hate” speech. His Vice President has encouraged people to report critiques of Charlie Kirk and other matters to their employers, hoping those uttering criticism will be fired.

Meanwhile, Congressional Republicans and the Justice Department refuse to release the Epstein files. The FBI refuses to release the tape of immigration czar Tom Homan allegedly accepting cash in a paper bag from those seeking border security contracts. The administration refuses to produce documents, tapes, or other evidence that the Venezuelan boats it has blown out of the water were actually smuggling drugs.

Information is not free in this administration. Government is not transparent.

But here in Connecticut, the Freedom of Information Act is celebrating its 50th anniversary.

There are those, to be sure, who want to limit access to public records and keep government meetings closed to the public. But the overwhelming majority of state and local officials—led by the Freedom of Information Commission, leadership in the General Assembly, and hundreds of sterling mayors, first selectmen, town clerks, and town councilors—are keeping records available and meetings open.

Last week, more than 100 guardians of those rights gathered at the Mark Twain House & Museum to honor some of those heroes. Among them were the Republican and Democratic leaders of the state House of Representatives, Vincent Candelora and Jason Rojas, who have distinguished themselves in recent years—and particularly this year—by defending government transparency in the face of determined efforts to shield government actions from the public.

As leaders admired by their respective caucuses, they are both uncommonly influential when they take a stand on issues, and have proven their philosophical opposition to government secrecy when reviewing proposed legislation.

This year, in contrast to Washington—where compromise and bipartisan agreement are almost nonexistent—they were instrumental in promoting sincere caucus-to-caucus discussions that ultimately defeated bills that would have:

– Kept hidden higher education records pertaining to teaching or research

– Restricted access to voter records

– Permitted public review of complaints against police and corrections officers only after they had been “investigated and adjudicated by the proper legal authority”

– Allowed school superintendents to attend closed executive sessions of boards of education without limitation, creating a slippery slope that might have unleashed unlimited closed sessions by councils, boards of selectmen, and other public bodies in future years

Other honorees included The Housing Collective, which works to create affordable homes across Connecticut. Each week, it publishes a comprehensive listing of land-use commission meetings’ times, locations, and agendas—where housing creation decisions are made—so residents can attend and voice concerns. It also provides a list of vacancies on land-use boards so residents can seek appointment or election, along with explanations of what land-use boards are empowered to decide and information on how to understand their actions and offer input.

If every policy organization in Connecticut—environmental, public health, education—did the same, government would be more visible and less mysterious. Connecticut residents would be less inclined to believe the misinformation and conspiracy theories fed to them by those trying to mislead them.

Journalist Katherine Revello, of CT Inside Investigator, was also honored for writing more than 150 pieces in the last year explaining the Freedom of Information Act and open meetings law.

Colleen M. Murphy, the current executive director and general counsel of the Connecticut Freedom of Information Commission, received a special award for her steadfast advocacy of open government. With 35 years as an FOI attorney and 20 years as the commission’s leader, she is widely respected as a fair, objective, and brilliant attorney, and is a sought-after speaker nationally on government transparency, privacy, and FOI issues.

The honor they all received—the Mitchell W. Pearlman Freedom of Information Award—is named after the first executive director of the state FOI Commission and the father of the state’s FOI Act. He attended the ceremony, standing to the side, smiling.

We will all have a reason to keep smiling if government records, officials, and meetings remain open and accessible.

But “government of the people, by the people, for the people,” as Abraham Lincoln understood, will perish from the earth if the abuses out of Washington continue and spread. Democracy will only remain alive if we ensure that “We the People”—all the people—can see, petition, and shape their government.

The heroes honored last week were richly deserving. But they can’t do it alone. We have to be heroes, too.

*David Fink is a Board Member of the Connecticut Foundation for Open Government.*
https://ctmirror.org/2025/10/24/an-open-transparent-accessible-government-protects-everyone/

Soybean farmer says aid announced by Trump falls short as losses mount from trade war

Last month, President Trump announced that he would use revenue generated by tariffs to bail out American soybean farmers affected by the ongoing trade war with China.

Farmers were expecting around $13 billion in assistance to help offset their losses. However, the administration is only offering a quarter of that amount, leaving many growers concerned about their financial future.

As Lana Zak reports, these farmers are now facing growing financial strain amid the unresolved trade tensions.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/soybean-farmer-says-aid-announced-by-trump-falls-short-as-losses-mount-from-trade-war/

Here’s who’s paying for Trump’s $300 million White House ballroom

The Trump administration has demolished the White House East Wing.

Work began earlier this week as the crew started preparations to make room for a new 90,000 square foot ballroom.

This expansion marks a significant change to the historic White House structure, aiming to enhance its event-hosting capabilities.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/whos-paying-trumps-300-million-white-house-ballroom/

What Is Controversial Author Michael Wolff’s Net Worth?

Who Is Michael Wolff?

Michael Wolff is a journalist and author known for his in-depth coverage of American politics. He has written for prominent publications including Vanity Fair, The Hollywood Reporter, British GQ, USA Today, and The Guardian. Wolff gained widespread recognition for his 2018 book Fire and Fury, which offers a riveting and explosive account of the inner workings of Donald Trump’s White House.

Fire and Fury quickly became a #1 New York Times bestseller and broke sales records for its publisher, Henry Holt, selling over 1.7 million copies in just three weeks, including more than a million hardcover copies in the United States alone. The book’s success placed Wolff among the world’s highest-earning authors in 2018.

Michael Wolff’s Net Worth

Estimates of Michael Wolff’s net worth vary, but according to The Economic Times, it likely falls between $13 million and $20 million. The phenomenal sales of Fire and Fury contributed significantly to his earnings. Forbes reported that the book generated approximately $13 billion in revenue between June 2017 and June 2018 before taxes and fees.

Additionally, Endeavor Content is developing a series based on Fire and Fury, which is expected to further boost Wolff’s profile and income. Reflecting on his unexpected rise to literary fame, Wolff once remarked, “Once a day, I cast my eyes heavenward and say, ‘Thank you for Donald Trump.’”

Lawsuit Against Melania Trump

In October 2025, Michael Wolff filed a lawsuit against Melania Trump after she threatened him with legal action over statements he made regarding her alleged relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Melania’s legal team demanded over $1 billion in damages and required Wolff to apologize and retract statements connecting her to Epstein. According to The Independent, her lawyers described Wolff’s comments as “defamatory, disparaging, misleading, and inflammatory.” He was given until October 21, 2025, to comply but instead chose to respond with a countersuit.

Details of the Legal Dispute

Wolff’s attorneys argued that Melania’s threats were “designed to create a climate of fear” that stifles free speech. The lawsuit accuses Mrs. Trump, her husband Donald Trump, and their supporters of using costly SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) tactics to silence critics, intimidate opponents, and extract unjustified payments or forced apologies.

Wolff stated that the comments Melania objected to were taken out of context, particularly those he made in an interview with The Daily Beast. Furthermore, he defended his right to question Melania’s alleged connection to Epstein’s inner circle, where she purportedly met Donald Trump. Wolff also made claims about Trump’s personal behavior involving relationships with his friends’ wives, asserting these were fair subjects for inquiry.

The ongoing legal battle highlights the contentious nature of Wolff’s commentary on the Trump family and the broader issues of free speech versus defamation in the public arena.

https://marketrealist.com/net-worth/michael-wolff-net-worth/

PeeWee Goebbels Unhappy Robert De Niro Called Him A Nazi

Stephen Miller Rants on Sean Hannity’s Show After Robert De Niro Calls Him a “Nazi”

Stephen Miller, known as President Donald Trump’s top aide, went on an unhinged rant during an appearance on Sean Hannity’s show this Wednesday. The outburst came in response to actor Robert De Niro labeling Miller a “Nazi” during a heated exchange on MSNBC over the weekend.

Here’s what set Miller off: While appearing on MSNBC’s “The Weekend” on Sunday, the Oscar-winning actor Robert De Niro, 82, launched into a sweeping critique of the Trump administration. At one point, De Niro singled out Miller, comparing him to Joseph Goebbels—the chief propagandist for the Nazi Party.

De Niro stated, “We see it, we see it, we see it… all the time he will not want to leave. He set it up with… I guess he’s the Goebbels of the cabinet, Stephen Miller. He’s a Nazi.”

The “Goodfellas” star didn’t stop there. He added, “Yes, he is and [Miller’s] Jewish, and he should be ashamed of himself.”

When Sean Hannity invited Miller to respond to De Niro’s comments, Miller eagerly launched into a fierce attack. Notably, Miller completely ignored the Goebbels comparison and instead directed his ire at those he described as tracking what he called “their ICE Gestapo.”

The exchange highlights the ongoing tensions and heated rhetoric surrounding key figures in the Trump administration, with Miller defending his role amid increasingly personal attacks from public figures like De Niro.
https://crooksandliars.com/2025/10/peewee-goebbels-very-unhappy-robert-de

Trump Admin Reportedly Close To Gobbling Up Stakes In Key Growing Industry

Several quantum computing firms have reportedly been in discussions with the Commerce Department to offer equity stakes in return for federal funding.

Companies such as IonQ, Rigetti Computing, and D-Wave Quantum are considering allowing the government to take equity stakes as part of deals to secure funding designated for promising technology firms, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported on Wednesday, citing anonymous sources familiar with the matter. Other technology firms, including Quantum Computing and Atom Computing, are also exploring similar arrangements, according to the outlet.

The Commerce Department, Quantum Computing, Atom Computing, D-Wave Quantum, Rigetti Computing, and IonQ did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

Deputy Commerce Secretary Paul Dabbar, who was confirmed by the Senate in June, is reportedly spearheading the funding discussions with these technology companies, the anonymous sources told the WSJ. However, any potential deals with the quantum computing firms have yet to be finalized and remain subject to change, the report noted.

This news follows the White House announcement in August that the U.S. government will take a 10% ownership stake in Intel under a deal with the U.S.-based chipmaker. Additionally, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick stated on August 26 that the Trump administration was considering taking equity stakes in defense companies.

Quantum computers have the ability to solve highly complex statistical problems far beyond the capabilities of today’s conventional computers, according to a March report from McKinsey & Company. These machines can be applied across a variety of key industries, including finance, transportation, pharmaceuticals, and “green” technology.

An April 2023 report from McKinsey & Company estimated that quantum computing could account for nearly $1.3 trillion in value by 2035.

Following the release of the WSJ’s report, shares in U.S. quantum computing firms jumped in premarket trading on Thursday, according to Reuters.

*All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline, and their DCNF affiliation. For questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.*
https://dailycaller.com/2025/10/23/trump-admin-commerce-department-quantum-computing/

Will Trump’s sanctions against Russian oil giants hurt Putin?

Washington has announced new sanctions against Russia’s two largest oil companies, Rosneft and Lukoil, in an effort to pressure Moscow to agree to a peace deal in Ukraine. This marks the first time the current Trump administration has imposed direct sanctions on Russia.

Speaking alongside Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office on Wednesday, US President Donald Trump said he hoped the sanctions would not need to be in place for long, but expressed growing frustration with stalled truce negotiations.

“Every time I speak to Vladimir [Putin], I have good conversations and then they don’t go anywhere. They just don’t go anywhere,” Trump said, shortly after a planned in-person meeting with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in Budapest was cancelled.

Trump’s move is designed to cut off vital oil revenues that help fund Russia’s ongoing war efforts. Earlier on Wednesday, Russia unleashed a new bombardment on Ukraine’s capital, Kyiv, killing at least seven people, including children.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the new sanctions were necessary because of “Putin’s refusal to end this senseless war.” He added that Rosneft and Lukoil fund the Kremlin’s “war machine.”

### How Have Rosneft and Lukoil Been Sanctioned?

The new measures will freeze assets owned by Rosneft and Lukoil in the US and bar US entities from engaging in business with them. Additionally, thirty subsidiaries owned by Rosneft and Lukoil have also been sanctioned.

Rosneft, which is controlled by the Kremlin, is Russia’s second-largest company in terms of revenue, behind natural gas giant Gazprom. Lukoil is Russia’s third-largest company and its biggest non-state enterprise.

Together, the two companies export 3.1 million barrels of oil per day, accounting for 70 percent of Russia’s overseas crude oil sales. Rosneft alone is responsible for nearly half of Russia’s oil production, which makes up 6 percent of global output.

In recent years, both companies have been hit by ongoing European sanctions and reduced oil prices. In September, Rosneft reported a 68 percent year-on-year drop in net income for the first half of 2025. Lukoil posted an almost 27 percent fall in profits for 2024.

Meanwhile, last week the United Kingdom unveiled sanctions on the two oil majors. Elsewhere, the European Union is set to announce its 19th package of penalties on Moscow later today, including a ban on imports of Russian liquefied natural gas.

### How Much Impact Will These Sanctions Have?

In 2022, Russian oil groups, including Rosneft and Lukoil, were able to offset some of the effects of earlier sanctions by pivoting exports from Europe to Asia, and by using a “shadow fleet” of hard-to-detect tankers with no ties to Western financial or insurance groups.

China and India quickly replaced the EU as Russia’s biggest oil consumers. Last year, China imported a record 109 million tonnes of Russian crude, representing almost 20 percent of its total energy imports. India imported 88 million tonnes of Russian oil in 2024.

These figures represent a significant increase compared to pre-2022 levels, when Western countries started tightening sanctions on Russia. At the end of 2021, China imported roughly 79.6 million tonnes of Russian crude, while India imported just 0.42 million tonnes.

Trump has repeatedly urged Beijing and New Delhi to halt Russian energy purchases. In August, he levied an additional 25 percent trade tariff on India because of its continued purchase of discounted Russian oil. He has so far refrained from a similar move against China.

However, Trump’s new sanctions are likely to place pressure on foreign financial groups that do business with Rosneft and Lukoil, including banking intermediaries facilitating sales of Russian oil in China and India.

“Engaging in certain transactions involving the persons designated today may risk the imposition of secondary sanctions on participating foreign financial institutions,” the US Treasury Department’s press release on Wednesday’s sanctions states.

As a result, the new restrictions may force buyers to shift to alternative suppliers or pay higher prices. Though India and China may not be the direct targets of these latest restrictions, their oil supply chains and trading costs are likely to come under increased pressure.

“The big thing here is the secondary sanctions,” Felipe Pohlmann Gonzaga, a Switzerland-based commodity trader, told Al Jazeera. “Any bank that facilitates Russian oil sales and with exposure to the US financial system could be subject.”

However, he added, “I don’t think this will be the driver in ending the war, as Russia will continue selling oil. There are always people out there willing to take the risk to beat sanctions. These latest restrictions will make Chinese and Indian players more reluctant to buy Russian oil; many won’t want to lose access to the American financial system. But it won’t stop it completely.”

According to Bloomberg, several senior refinery executives in India, who asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the issue, said the restrictions would make it impossible for oil purchases to continue.

On Wednesday, Trump said he would raise concerns about China’s continued purchases of Russian oil during his talk with President Xi Jinping at the 2025 Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea next week.

### Have Oil Prices Been Affected?

Oil prices rallied after Trump announced the US sanctions. Brent, the international crude oil benchmark, rose nearly 4 percent to $65 a barrel on Thursday.

The US benchmark, West Texas Intermediate (WTI), jumped more than 5 percent to nearly $60 per barrel.

*Recommended Stories*

– Trump hits Russia’s oil giants with sanctions, EU bans Russian LNG
– EU poised to agree on using frozen Russian assets to help Ukraine in war
– Why planned Trump-Putin talks collapsed, and what it means for Ukraine
– EU moves to ban Russian energy imports by 2028
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/23/will-trumps-sanctions-against-russian-oil-giants-hurt-putin?traffic_source=rss

Gov. JB Pritzker and GOP House leader bickered in texts after conservative influencer filmed Pritzker’s home

When a right-wing provocateur last month posted a video outside Gov. JB Pritzker’s Chicago home encouraging viewers to “take action” after conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination, the governor reached out to both Republican leaders of the Illinois legislature.

“I’m dealing with vastly increased threats on my family and myself in the wake of this week and this Republican Trumper went to my house, suggested that I’m taking God out of public life and encouraged people to ‘take action,’” the governor texted separately to Illinois Senate Leader John Curran and House Leader Tony McCombie. “I’d like to see condemnation of this from GOP leaders today.”

What followed was not exactly what Pritzker sought. Instead, he and McCombie, who are typically cordial in texts to each other, exchanged heated messages as McCombie rebuffed the governor’s request and called out Pritzker for some of his previous comments about Republicans. The governor shot back, sometimes in all capital letters, that her response was “absurd” and that she was playing politics.

“So you won’t condemn this guy coming to MY HOME (where my wife and children live) and calling me evil while encouraging people to ‘take action?’ GOT IT,” Pritzker wrote to McCombie.

While Senate GOP Leader Curran later issued a joint statement with Democratic Senate President Don Harmon condemning political violence more broadly, the testy back-and-forth between Pritzker and McCombie occurred just two days after Kirk’s death. Republicans and Democrats across the nation debated, discussed, and denounced political violence, while at the same time accusing the other side of perpetuating it.

President Donald Trump himself escalated the situation in the hours and days after Kirk’s death, saying publicly that rhetoric from “the radical left” was “directly responsible for the terrorism that we’re seeing in our country today.”

It also came at an especially tense time in Chicago between Pritzker and the Trump administration, as the president was just days into his sometimes-violent crackdown on illegal immigration in and around the city.

In Illinois, the debate about political violence among top leaders was more behind the scenes, according to text messages the Tribune received through the Freedom of Information Act. While the governor and state Republican leaders, such as McCombie, often engage in public sparring, their one-on-one texts—which the Tribune regularly obtains—are typically breezy and brief. But the tone was different on Sept. 12 when Pritzker texted both Curran, of Downers Grove, and McCombie, of Savanna.

The governor sent each a link to a social media video from right-wing influencer Ben Bergquam, in which Bergquam criticized Pritzker for blaming Trump for fomenting political violence. As Bergquam spoke, the influencer pointed behind him at the governor’s home in Chicago’s Gold Coast neighborhood, including the house address number.

“If you love America and the assassination of Charlie Kirk doesn’t inspire you to take action, I don’t know what will!” the video caption said.

After decrying legal protections for transgender people, abortion rights, and immigrants in the U.S. without legal permission, Bergquam, who hosts the show “Law & Border” and had been accompanying U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents around Chicago, said, “Godless leftist policies are the problem, evil is the problem and it’s politicians like Gov. Pritzker.”

When Pritzker sent the link of Bergquam’s post and requested that Illinois GOP leaders condemn it, McCombie sent a three-paragraph response. She said she prayed for the safety of Pritzker and his family daily and has condemned political violence against Democrats before, including the shootings of Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota.

But she then turned the issue back on the governor, asking him to apologize for his own past statements. These included likening the actions of Trump’s administration in the early days of his second term to the rise of Nazism in Germany in the 1930s and saying Republicans should never “know a moment of peace.” Pritzker has repeatedly said he was talking about the public expressing their opposition to the GOP through protests, not violence.

“I would like for you to publicly apologize for your rhetoric,” she said after citing the examples.

That’s when Pritzker responded with “GOT IT” before adding: “I think you know how absurd your response is. But I suppose you have a primary to run.”

Pritzker brought up the texts publicly weeks later, at an Oct. 7 appearance in Minneapolis.

“Neither one of them—I asked them to simply post something publicly or put a statement out, anything. It seems like just common decency to just say, ‘This is wrong,’ and they wouldn’t do it,” Pritzker said onstage at a summit hosted by the Minnesota Star Tribune.

In a statement after those remarks, McCombie said she condemned violence and added of Pritzker: “If he is serious about lowering the temperature, he should stop pointing fingers and take responsibility for his own words.”

Curran did issue a statement on Sept. 12 condemning political violence, a joint release with Harmon, of Oak Park. The statement did not mention the video at Pritzker’s house or any other specific incident. When Curran responded to Pritzker’s request with a text mentioning the joint statement, the governor didn’t respond, records show.

Neither Curran’s office nor Pritzker’s office provided a comment Wednesday on the text message exchanges.

After the June shooting of the Minnesota lawmakers, Robert Pape, a University of Chicago expert on political violence, wrote in an op-ed for The New York Times that joint statements—such as the one from Harmon and Curran—are an effective tool for tamping down political violence.

“My research suggests that to de-escalate the political environment and reduce the risk of violence, America’s political leaders need to cross their political divides and make joint statements (and ideally joint appearances) that denounce all political violence, welcome all peaceful protest and call for respecting the rules, process and results of free and fair elections in the country,” Pape wrote.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/23/jb-pritzker-texts-gop-house-leader-influencer/

South Park Nails Depiction Of Peter Thiel’s Antichrist Obsession

“South Park” mocked conservative billionaire Peter Thiel over his obsession with the Antichrist in the show’s latest episode aired on October 15.

Thiel recently gave a lecture series in which he warned about the return of the Antichrist, the destruction of capitalism, and the collapse of the United States—breezy topics, to say the least. He even bizarrely called AI skeptics “legionnaires of the Antichrist.”

The satirical series, which has been poking fun at the Trump administration throughout season 27, tackled Thiel’s Antichrist fixation, his relationship with Vice President JD Vance, and a supposedly demonic TikTok trend spreading among Generation Alpha.

Thiel’s character in the episode is obsessed with the “6-7” TikTok trend and delivers a TED Talk to South Park Elementary School students about the Antichrist and demonology.

“Hello, kids, I’m Peter Thiel, and I’m here to talk to you about the Antichrist,” he says. “OK, so first, what is the Antichrist? The Antichrist is a newer, more human form of Satan that will soon walk the Earth. We don’t know how soon it will walk the Earth, but it could be within the next six to seven weeks.”

The show also pokes fun at Palantir, the data analytics company Thiel co-founded, which has faced criticism for its intrusive AI surveillance tools. At one point, Thiel’s character, dead set on uncovering the truth behind the demonic TikTok trend, uses the school’s data center to spy on students.

“I’ve downloaded all the students’ information and loaded them into an AI face detection program so the school’s security cameras can watch their every move,” Thiel’s character explains. “Now look. Two students passing each other in the hallway. They give each other the sign: six, seven. Exactly 67 seconds later, this odd parka-wearing child makes the same gesture. And then inside the girls’ bathroom, two girls doing the same thing!”

Later in the episode, referencing the classic horror movie *The Exorcist*, Thiel’s character performs an exorcism on Eric Cartman, believing him to be a spawn of Satan.

Through its trademark satire, “South Park” continues to lampoon contemporary political figures and cultural phenomena, this time highlighting Peter Thiel’s eccentric conspiracy theories and tech surveillance controversies.
https://dailycaller.com/2025/10/21/south-park-peter-thiel-antichrist-trump-jd-vance-satan/