Category Archives: criminal justice

London Court To Hear Nirav Modi’s Petition To Reopen Extradition Trial Over Possible Agency Interrogation In India

Posted on by
Reply

New Delhi: A London court is set to hear fugitive diamantaire Nirav Modi’s petition on November 23 to reopen his extradition trial. Modi’s plea is based on the claim that he may face interrogation by agencies if repatriated to India. Authorities, however, are expected to counter this claim by assuring the court that Modi will not be subjected to any such questioning.

Modi, who has exhausted all his legal appeals up to the Supreme Court, approached the Westminster Court seeking to reopen his extradition trial. The petition reportedly contends that if extradited, Modi could be interrogated by various agencies, potentially leading to torture.

Officials familiar with the developments stated that the investigative agencies handling the case may reiterate their previous assurances to the court. They will likely emphasize that Modi will be tried strictly according to Indian laws and will not face interrogation upon extradition.

“We have already filed chargesheets in the case. His questioning is not needed at this stage as the investigation is almost complete. He is required to face trial. If the UK court seeks clarification, we may reiterate that he will not be subjected to interrogation if extradited. We have provided such assurance before as well,” said an official.

All investigative agencies probing the allegations against Modi—who is accused of siphoning off over Rs 6,498 crore through hundreds of fraudulent Letters of Undertaking issued from Punjab National Bank (PNB)—are reportedly aligned in their stance that interrogation is unnecessary.

India has also informed the UK authorities that Modi will be held at barrack 12 of Arthur Road Prison in Mumbai upon extradition. This facility reportedly offers protection from violence, is not overcrowded, and provides adequate medical care. The agencies have assured the UK that Modi will face trial in accordance with Indian law and no new charges will be filed against him.

Once a shining star of the Indian jewellery industry, whose brand ‘Nirav’ attracted global celebrities, the 54-year-old diamantaire was arrested on an extradition warrant on March 19, 2019. The then UK Home Secretary, Priti Patel, ordered his extradition in April 2021. Modi has been in prison in London for nearly six years.

Despite multiple bail applications, all have been rejected due to his deemed real and substantial flight risk. Modi faces three sets of criminal proceedings: a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) fraud case involving Punjab National Bank, an Enforcement Directorate (ED) case concerning alleged money laundering linked to the fraud, and a third case relating to interference with evidence and witnesses in the CBI case.

—
*(Except for the headline, this article has not been edited by FPJ’s editorial team and is auto-generated from an agency feed.)*
https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/london-court-to-hear-nirav-modis-petition-to-reopen-extradition-trial-over-possible-agency-interrogation-in-india

PNB Fraud Case: CBI Court Grants Pardon To Nirav Modi’s Brother-In-Law, Maiank Mehta

Posted on by
Reply

**Mumbai:**

The special CBI court has granted pardon to Maiank Mehta, the brother-in-law of fugitive businessman Nirav Modi, allowing his plea to be an approver in connection with the Punjab National Bank (PNB) fraud case lodged by the CBI against Modi.

Special judge AV Gujarathi, earlier this week, allowed Mehta’s application to turn approver after his confession statement was recorded by the CBI. Mehta was cited as an accused in the case registered by the agency for cheating PNB by fraudulently obtaining letters of undertaking (LOUs) worth Rs 23,780 crore.

The court stated that the pardon can be granted only after Mehta gives a statement and makes a full and true disclosure of the facts as an approver.

The CBI’s case against Modi is a predicate offence. Following this, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) launched a probe, in which Mehta was declared an approver by the special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court back in 2021.

The CBI, however, made Mehta an accused in the case earlier this month, later agreeing to accept him as an approver.

As per the CBI case, the funds obtained through LOUs were transferred to Pacific Diamond FZE, Modi’s shell company in the UAE, and subsequently routed to Mehta through a complex web of transactions.

The probe revealed that around $30 million were transferred to Mehta’s account from Pacific Diamond FZE. Between November 13 and 26, 2013, Mehta transferred these funds in 10 instalments to Modi’s sister, Purvi Mehta’s account. Purvi reportedly showed these as gifts from her husband.

The CBI further claimed that on November 15, 2013, Purvi created four deposits with Syndicate Bank for three years, appointing Mehta as the nominee. Later, she allegedly availed a term loan of $19 million from Syndicate Bank, London, by mortgaging all the FCNR deposits.

On November 22, 2013, she is said to have transferred the loan amount to her account maintained with Ratnakar Bank. For the remaining $10 million, she allegedly opened a fixed deposit account with Ratnakar Bank.

Against this, she allegedly obtained a packing credit foreign currency facility of $28.50 million through her firm, Radhashree Jewellers Company.

The CBI alleges that out of the funds transferred via the LOUs, $30 million were used by both Nirav Modi and Purvi Mehta through a credit facility obtained by Radhashree Jewellers, with the assistance of Mehta.

—

To explore exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai and surrounding regions, visit: [https://budgetproperties.in/](https://budgetproperties.in/)
https://www.freepressjournal.in/business/pnb-fraud-case-cbi-court-grants-pardon-to-nirav-modis-brother-in-law-maiank-mehta

The true story behind Donna Scrivo’s crime ahead of Snapped

Posted on by
Reply

**Snapped Returns with a Deep Dive into the Donna Scrivo Case**

The true crime series *Snapped* revisits a chilling case that captured widespread attention in Michigan. Donna Scrivo was convicted of first-degree murder in the 2014 killing of her son, Ramsay Scrivo, receiving a life sentence without the possibility of parole.

—

### The Case That Gripped Michigan

Ramsay Scrivo was reported missing in late January 2014. Within days, county crews and deputies discovered multiple bags containing human remains along rural roads in St. Clair County. Among the grim evidence was an electric saw found inside one of the bags. Authorities quickly identified the remains as those of Ramsay Scrivo, according to reports by Reuters.

—

### Contradictory Defense Claims

During the trial, Donna Scrivo presented a competing narrative. She claimed that a masked, armed intruder had killed Ramsay, then held her hostage for several days, forcing her to move the bags containing the remains. Despite this testimony, the jury did not accept her version of events, as reported by CBS News.

—

### Trial, Verdict, and Sentence

In May 2015, after brief deliberations, a Macomb County jury found Donna Scrivo guilty of first-degree premeditated murder and mutilation of a body. The prosecution’s case included evidence related to the electric saw, the scene at the condo, her movements in the days following Ramsay’s death, and phone records aligning with the timeline of events, according to the *Detroit Free Press*.

Currently, Donna Scrivo is serving her life sentence at the Huron Valley Complex for Women, as listed by the Michigan Department of Corrections.

—

### Watch *Snapped*’s Coverage of the Case

The episode recounting the Donna Scrivo case is set to re-air on Oxygen on Friday, September 26, at 10 PM ET. This broadcast offers an in-depth look at the timeline, the evidence, and the courtroom outcome.

*Snapped* is available to stream on multiple platforms, including Peacock Premium, Peacock Premium Plus, fuboTV, NBC, Oxygen, YouTube TV, and Hulu. Fans can also purchase episodes on Apple TV, Amazon Video, and FandangoNow.

—

For those interested in more true crime stories, check out detailed case overviews such as the Sarah McLinn case, also featured on *Snapped*.

—

Stay tuned for compelling insights and gripping storytelling with *Snapped*’s thorough examination of the Donna Scrivo case.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/us/shows/the-true-story-behind-donna-scrivo-s-crime-ahead-snapped

A drunken chase, a disputed identity: Man challenges breath test charge

Posted on by
Reply

A man accused of drunkenly fleeing his car after being pulled over by police has challenged his charge of refusing to submit to a breath test.

Shaun Richard Rowell has disputed the charge of refusing breath analysis at a hearing at the Magistrates Court.

The charge relates to an incident that occurred in Claremont at about 10pm on April 25, 2024, when Senior Constable Matthew Bowden detained Mr Rowell as he was attempting to open the garage of his house.

The officer had moments earlier pulled over a red Mitsubishi ASX that he suspected was being driven by an intoxicated person. The suspect fled the vehicle into a nearby street after being stopped.

The court heard that Constable Bowden began the pursuit but was forced to turn back after realizing he had left the keys in his unlocked car. When he resumed the chase, he had lost sight of the suspect he had seen fleeing the Mitsubishi.

As he rounded the corner, video footage from his body-worn camera showed him focusing on a figure bending over to lift a garage door of a private residence.

During his testimony before Magistrate Reg Marron at the Hobart Magistrates Court, Constable Bowden said he had “no doubt” that the man he intercepted at the garage door was the same man who had fled from the Mitsubishi.

The police prosecutor asked how many seconds had elapsed between losing sight of the suspect and then seeing Mr Rowell at the garage door.

“It would have been close to 20 seconds,” Constable Bowden told the court.

“Why did you focus on this person?”

“I believed they were the driver of the vehicle and that they were required to submit to the breath test.”

The witness told the court that the defendant smelled strongly of alcohol.

“He wasn’t very steady on his feet when I pulled him away. I felt like I was holding him up to make sure he didn’t fall,” Constable Bowden said.

Defence counsel Fabiano Cangelosi suggested Constable Bowden was trespassing when he entered the driveway to detain the defendant.

“If nobody gave you permission to go onto that property and grab hold of the defendant, how were you able to do it?” the lawyer asked.

“I saw only one person get out of the car,” Constable Bowden said.

Magistrate Marron ordered the lawyers to make final written submissions by the end of October and reserved his decision until November 14.
https://www.theadvocate.com.au/story/9069430/man-challenges-breath-test-refusal-charge-in-court-hearing/?src=rss