Category Archives: justice

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ lawyers plan to appeal as convicted hip-hop star faces more years behind bars

Posted on by
Reply

**Sean “Diddy” Combs Sentenced to Over Four Years in Prison for Transporting People Across State Lines for Sexual Encounters**

Attorneys for Sean “Diddy” Combs are planning to appeal following the Grammy-winning artist and music executive’s sentencing on Friday to more than four years in prison. Combs was convicted of transporting people across state lines for sexual encounters, a case that has shattered his carefully cultivated reputation as an affable celebrity entrepreneur, A-list party host, and reality TV star.

The sentencing culminated a public reckoning for the 55-year-old hip-hop icon, who made a plea for leniency and wept as his lawyers played a video highlighting his family life, career, and philanthropy. U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian also imposed a $500,000 fine, the maximum allowed under the law.

—

### Conviction and Sentencing Details

Combs was convicted in July of flying girlfriends and male sex workers around the country to engage in drug-fueled sexual encounters over many years and multiple locations. The nearly two-month federal trial in Manhattan featured harrowing testimony from women who accused Combs of beating, threatening, sexually assaulting, and blackmailing them. However, Combs was acquitted of sex trafficking and racketeering charges, which could have resulted in a life sentence.

He was sentenced to four years and two months in prison. Having already served one year in jail, he could be released in about three years. Prosecutors had sought a sentence exceeding 11 years, while Combs’ lawyers argued for immediate release, stating that the time served has already led to his remorse and commitment to sobriety.

On the eve of his sentencing, Combs wrote the judge, describing himself as a “new man” after realizing he was “broken to my core.” His legal team has announced plans to appeal the sentence.

There is no possibility of parole in the federal system.

—

### Prosecutors and Key Witnesses Oppose Leniency

Prosecutor Christy Slavik emphasized that sparing Combs serious prison time would effectively excuse years of violence. Key witnesses also urged the judge to reject leniency, expressing fears for their safety should Combs be freed.

—

### Where Is Combs Serving His Sentence?

Since his arrest a year ago, Combs has been held in a federal lockup in Brooklyn. His lawyers’ requests to keep him under house arrest at his Miami Beach mansion were denied. The Brooklyn facility, primarily used for post-arrest detention and short sentences, has faced criticism for poor conditions.

It remains unclear where Combs will serve the remainder of his sentence, but there is a low-security federal correctional institution near his Miami home, including an adjacent minimum security satellite camp. According to its website, the facility houses about 1,000 inmates.

—

### Key Trial Testimonies

During the trial, former girlfriend and R&B singer Casandra “Cassie” Ventura testified that Combs compelled her to have “disgusting” sex with strangers hundreds of times during their decade-long relationship. Jurors viewed video footage of Combs dragging and beating her in a Los Angeles hotel hallway after one such multi-day encounter.

Another woman, identified as “Jane,” testified that Combs pressured her into sex with male workers during drug-fueled “hotel nights,” which he sometimes filmed. The Associated Press does not typically name sexual abuse victims unless they come forward publicly.

Combs’ lawyers argued that the government was attempting to criminalize consensual—but unconventional—sexual preferences.

—

### The Federal Law Involved: The Mann Act

Combs was sentenced for violating the federal Mann Act, an anti-prostitution law with a century-old history. The Mann Act prohibits the transportation of individuals across state lines for prostitution or other illegal sexual acts. While amended in the 1980s, it is primarily used to prosecute interstate prostitution crimes or cases involving the transportation of minors for sexual purposes.

Defense attorney Jason Driscoll contended that the law was misapplied in Combs’ case.

—

### Diddy’s Reputational Downfall

Combs’ public downfall began in 2023 when Ventura, a key trial witness, sued him, alleging years of sexual and physical abuse. The two settled within hours for $20 million—a sum Ventura revealed publicly for the first time during the trial. Since then, dozens of others have come forward with similar allegations.

The federal sex trafficking investigation was publicly revealed during a coordinated raid on Combs’ homes across the country, escalating the case to intense public scrutiny.

—

### Cultural Impact of the Case

The raid’s seizure of 1,000 bottles of baby oil and other lubricants quickly became a cultural talking point, turning Combs into both a villain and a punchline. Talk shows, “Saturday Night Live,” and social media widely joked about the “freak-offs” and the vast quantities of baby oil allegedly used during the sex marathons.

While fellow celebrities associated with Combs faced public scrutiny, no others have been implicated in the criminal allegations.

—

**Stay Informed and Connected**

Subscribe to The Philadelphia Tribune for the latest updates.
[Click Here to Subscribe]

—

*Please note: We encourage respectful and truthful discussion. Avoid obscene, vulgar, or discriminatory language. Threats or harassment will not be tolerated. Use the ‘Report’ link to notify us of any abusive posts. We welcome eyewitness accounts and information related to our articles.*
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/sean-diddy-combs-lawyers-plan-to-appeal-as-convicted-hip-hop-star-faces-more-years/article_4c992b72-bce3-4aa1-941e-691650e9324a.html

Federal judge temporarily blocks the Trump administration from deploying troops in Portland

Posted on by
Reply

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — A federal judge in Oregon has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s administration from deploying the National Guard in Portland.

U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut issued the order Saturday in a lawsuit brought by the state and city.

The Defense Department had announced it was placing 200 members of Oregon’s National Guard under federal control for 60 days to protect federal property at locations where protests are occurring or likely to occur, following President Trump’s description of the city as “war-ravaged.”

Oregon officials called that description ludicrous.

The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) building in Portland has recently been the site of nightly protests, which typically drew a couple dozen people in recent weeks before the deployment was announced.
https://wsvn.com/uncategorized/federal-judge-temporarily-blocks-the-trump-administration-from-deploying-troops-in-portland/

‘CCTV…shows bike wasn’t deliberately rammed’: BMW crash accused gets bail

Posted on by
Reply

By Chanshimla Varah | Sep 30, 2025, 03:45 PM

**Delhi Court Grants Bail to BMW Accident Case Accused Gaganpreet Kaur**

A Delhi court has granted bail to Gaganpreet Kaur, the accused in a recent BMW accident case that resulted in the death of Navjot Singh. The decision followed the court’s observation that CCTV footage weakened the prosecution’s claims of “culpable homicide anchored in delayed care.”

### The Incident

Navjot Singh, who was serving as Deputy Secretary in the Finance Ministry, tragically died after his bike was hit by a BMW near south Delhi’s Dhaula Kuan earlier this month. His wife was also grievously injured in the accident.

### Evidence Analysis: CCTV Footage Shows Loss of Control

In its 19-page judgment, the court noted that the CCTV footage did not support allegations of a deliberate, high-speed ramming of the motorbike from behind. Instead, it shows a loss of control that culminated in the BMW flipping and making contact with both the motorbike and a DTC bus.

Delhi Police initially claimed that the BMW hit the deceased from behind while ramming into him. However, Gaganpreet Kaur argued that her vehicle flipped and unintentionally struck the victim.

### Court Observations: Bail Granted Amid Weakened Prosecution Case

Judicial Magistrate First Class Ankit Garg of Patiala House Courts stated, “This clarification weakens the foundation for imputing ‘knowledge’ of likely death at the stage of initial impact and, on the present material, brings the occurrence closer to rash/negligent driving than to culpable homicide premised on the mode of collision.”

He further added, “Whether a higher mental element can ultimately be proved is a matter for trial; at the bail stage, the reduced strength of that allegation must be duly weighed.”

### Emergency Response: Court Slams Ambulance Staff for Negligence

The court strongly criticized the ambulance staff who arrived at the accident site within seconds but failed to provide any first aid or check the victim’s pulse.

“Accident happened in front of their eyes and they chose not to act and flee. Lives could have been saved, aid could have been provided—only if they would have shown some humanity and just did their duty,” the court remarked. It labelled the conduct of the ambulance driver and paramedic as “highly unprofessional and unethical.”

### Bail Rationale: Lack of Evidence on Car Speed

Highlighting gaps in the prosecution’s case, the court observed that no concrete evidence was provided regarding the car’s speed at the time of the accident.

The judge emphasized, “The function of bail is not punitive but to secure the accused’s presence and ensure a fair investigation and trial.” Given the contradictions and the reduced strength of the prosecution’s evidence, the court deemed it disproportionate to keep Gaganpreet Kaur in jail at this stage.

—

*This judgment underscores the importance of careful evidence examination and ensures that the principles of justice and fair trial are upheld.*
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/india/cctv-doesn-t-show-deliberate-ramming-court-in-bmw-crash-case/story

A hard-hitting thriller

Posted on by
Reply

Written by GEO News anchor Shahzeb Khanzada and directed by Syed Wajahat Hussain, the new play *Case No. 9* has already caused quite a stir despite only two episodes having aired to date. Boasting a stellar supporting cast and a gripping plot, the series promises to raise the bar for future productions.

Featuring accomplished actors like Faysal Qureshi and Saba Qamar, and with Syed Wajahat Hussain at the helm, it is hard for the production to go wrong. Saba Qamar plays Sehar Moazzam, the head of sales and marketing at KKR—a company owned by Kamran Haider, portrayed by Faysal Qureshi.

Sehar, a star employee, is invited to dinner by Kamran. However, upon arrival, she is surprised to find that she is alone. Suspecting something terribly wrong, she tries to escape but is sexually assaulted by her boss, who is frustrated by her repeated rejection of his advances. Kamran’s wife, Kiran, is away at her parents’ house and is soon due to have a baby.

Junaid Khan plays Rohit, Kamran’s friend. After receiving a text from Sehar inquiring about Kamran’s whereabouts, Rohit grows concerned. Following a conversation with Kamran, he rushes to the location, only to find Sehar lying in a distressed state on the powder room floor. It appears she has been sexually assaulted. Sehar is traumatized and leaves, while Rohit, enraged at Kamran’s actions, later agrees to hush things up under pressure.

After nearly a week, Sehar finds the courage to file an FIR against her boss. Mirza Gohar Rasheed appears as Shafique, the police inspector assigned to the case. Under the supervision of the SP, he investigates Sehar’s complaint. Sehar undergoes invasive questioning at the police station and is sent for a medical examination.

Kamran, with the help of his company lawyer, obtains bail before arrest and hires a powerful lawyer to defend him. The unfolding of the play brings forth several pressing questions: Will Sehar get justice? Will Kamran be convicted?

*Case No. 9* highlights numerous social issues. For example, Saba’s character, Sehar, is a divorcee—an aspect exploited by misogynists around her who view it as justification for Kamran’s advances. When she rejects him, Kamran’s attempt to retaliate leads to the assault. Rohit, as a witness, is torn between loyalty to his friend and the truth.

The supporting cast delivers excellent performances, effectively propelling the narrative. Faysal Qureshi excels as the arrogant and supercilious boss. Junaid Khan is an on-screen revelation, having developed into a fine actor. However, it is Saba Qamar who steals the show. She portrays a survivor with incredible conviction and maturity, continuing to raise the bar with every performance. Her previous roles in productions like *Cheekh* and *Baaghi* cemented her reputation as one of television’s finest actresses, and she has only improved since.

The play boasts a big-budget production with a slick look, complemented by great acting and excellent dialogues. With a masterful director leading the charge, the audience is in for a treat.

Far removed from the usual fare, *Case No. 9* aims to raise awareness about a crime that occurs every day worldwide—sexual assault—wherein the conviction rate remains abysmally low in Pakistan, at a mere 3 percent. This low rate is partly due to delayed reporting and societal pressure on survivors to remain silent.

As the story progresses, viewers will be eager to find out whether Sehar obtains justice, if Kamran will be held accountable, and whether Rohit will protect Kamran or reveal what he witnessed.

**Verdict:**
A hard-hitting and powerful production, *Case No. 9* is definitely one to watch out for. Tune in to GEO every Wednesday and Thursday to see how the plot unfolds.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/tns/detail/1346824-a-hard-hitting-thriller

Crime that unsettles

Posted on by
Reply

Netflix has released the second chapter of its *Monsters* anthology, **The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story**, a dramatization that revisits a case embedded in American popular culture for more than three decades. The series focuses on the 1989 murders of Jose and Kitty Menendez by their two sons, Lyle and Erik, and the subsequent trials that became a national spectacle.

The production raises uncomfortable questions about privilege, secrecy, and abuse, concentrating both on the violence itself and the social environment that shaped the brothers. Across nine episodes, the story unfolds in a strictly chronological order but employs alternating perspectives, shifting between the courtroom, the family home, and the media frenzy that surrounded the brothers.

This narrative approach keeps the tension alive while reflecting how the public encountered the case in fragments during the early 1990s. Viewers are constantly reminded that the truth is layered and contested, heightening the unease that defines the series from start to finish.

At the heart of the production are the performances of Nicholas Alexander Chavez as Lyle Menendez and Cooper Koch as Erik Menendez. Chavez captures the intensity and defiance of the elder brother, while Koch conveys the fragility and self-doubt of the younger sibling. Together, they paint a portrait of two young men deeply connected yet burdened with conflicting emotions about their parents and themselves. The bond between the brothers, carrying both tenderness and despair, feels authentic, adding a profoundly human dimension to the story.

What sets this production apart from other true crime dramatizations is its refusal to offer clear answers. The series does not suggest whether the brothers should be viewed as cold-blooded killers or victims of long-term abuse. It presents evidence, perspectives, and memories, leaving viewers to wrestle with the contradictions on their own.

Javier Bardem delivers a commanding performance as Jose Menendez, portraying a man driven by ambition and a will to control. His presence dominates the household scenes, embodying both the promise of success and the fear it instilled in his children. Chloe Sevigny plays Kitty Menendez with a mixture of vulnerability and volatility, suggesting a woman caught between dependence and resentment. Their portrayals ensure the parents are seen not merely as victims but as complex individuals with their own flaws and contradictions. This choice prevents the narrative from descending into moral simplicity.

The dialogue throughout the series is precise. Courtroom exchanges are brisk yet intense, while domestic scenes often rely on silences and hesitations that carry as much weight as spoken words. This balance allows viewers to experience both the noise of public spectacle and the quiet pain of private life. Rather than leaning heavily on drama, the series builds tension through subtlety, making the story even more unsettling.

One of the most challenging aspects of the show is its depiction of abuse. The production does not sensationalize these elements, nor does it obscure them. By presenting detail candidly, the series forces viewers to confront the disturbing claims that shaped the brothers’ defense. Whether or not particular accounts are accurate becomes less important than their emotional impact on the audience. The series powerfully conveys how trauma can remain hidden within families that outwardly appear secure and successful. This thematic choice makes the series difficult to watch but leaves a lasting impression.

The supporting cast enriches the production further. Ari Graynor as defense attorney Leslie Abramson demonstrates both empathy and strategic determination, while Nathan Lane as journalist Dominick Dunne highlights the media’s role in shaping public perception of the case. Their performances add essential layers, reminding viewers that the Menendez story extends beyond the family to engage broader conversations about wealth, justice, and the spectacle of televised trials.

As a viewing experience, *The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story* is demanding. It is not casual entertainment; it requires attention, patience, and a willingness to endure disturbing material. Those who invest this effort are rewarded with a portrayal that is both emotionally powerful and intellectually engaging.

Combining strong performances with thoughtful storytelling, the series unsettles rather than comforts and questions rather than simplifies. It succeeds precisely because it avoids sensational shortcuts, presenting a disturbing family tragedy with honesty and care. This approach creates a portrayal marked by complexity rather than caricature.

For viewers prepared to sit with discomfort, the series offers an absorbing examination of one of the most notorious cases in American criminal history—a poignant reminder that beneath public spectacle often lies private pain.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/tns/detail/1346827-crime-that-unsettles-in-1989-two-brothers

The true story behind Donna Scrivo’s crime ahead of Snapped

Posted on by
Reply

**Snapped Returns with a Deep Dive into the Donna Scrivo Case**

The true crime series *Snapped* revisits a chilling case that captured widespread attention in Michigan. Donna Scrivo was convicted of first-degree murder in the 2014 killing of her son, Ramsay Scrivo, receiving a life sentence without the possibility of parole.

—

### The Case That Gripped Michigan

Ramsay Scrivo was reported missing in late January 2014. Within days, county crews and deputies discovered multiple bags containing human remains along rural roads in St. Clair County. Among the grim evidence was an electric saw found inside one of the bags. Authorities quickly identified the remains as those of Ramsay Scrivo, according to reports by Reuters.

—

### Contradictory Defense Claims

During the trial, Donna Scrivo presented a competing narrative. She claimed that a masked, armed intruder had killed Ramsay, then held her hostage for several days, forcing her to move the bags containing the remains. Despite this testimony, the jury did not accept her version of events, as reported by CBS News.

—

### Trial, Verdict, and Sentence

In May 2015, after brief deliberations, a Macomb County jury found Donna Scrivo guilty of first-degree premeditated murder and mutilation of a body. The prosecution’s case included evidence related to the electric saw, the scene at the condo, her movements in the days following Ramsay’s death, and phone records aligning with the timeline of events, according to the *Detroit Free Press*.

Currently, Donna Scrivo is serving her life sentence at the Huron Valley Complex for Women, as listed by the Michigan Department of Corrections.

—

### Watch *Snapped*’s Coverage of the Case

The episode recounting the Donna Scrivo case is set to re-air on Oxygen on Friday, September 26, at 10 PM ET. This broadcast offers an in-depth look at the timeline, the evidence, and the courtroom outcome.

*Snapped* is available to stream on multiple platforms, including Peacock Premium, Peacock Premium Plus, fuboTV, NBC, Oxygen, YouTube TV, and Hulu. Fans can also purchase episodes on Apple TV, Amazon Video, and FandangoNow.

—

For those interested in more true crime stories, check out detailed case overviews such as the Sarah McLinn case, also featured on *Snapped*.

—

Stay tuned for compelling insights and gripping storytelling with *Snapped*’s thorough examination of the Donna Scrivo case.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/us/shows/the-true-story-behind-donna-scrivo-s-crime-ahead-snapped

CBI Brings Back Fugitive Parminder Singh From UAE Via INTERPOL Channels

Posted on by
Reply

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has successfully coordinated the return of wanted fugitive Parminder Singh, also known as Nirmal Singh or Pindi, from the UAE through INTERPOL channels.

Parminder Singh was wanted by the Punjab Police in connection with multiple serious offences, including extortion, violations under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for raising funds for terrorist activities, attempt to murder, and criminal intimidation. He had fled India and was absconding until his recent capture.

The International Police Cooperation Unit (IPCU) of the CBI, in collaboration with the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) in Abu Dhabi, and Punjab Police, coordinated efforts to bring Parminder Singh back to India on 26 September 2025. Upon his return, he was escorted by a team from Punjab Police.

Earlier, on 13 June 2025, the CBI facilitated the publication of a Red Notice against Parminder Singh through INTERPOL, acting on a request from the Punjab Police. Following his arrest by UAE authorities, a decision was made to extradite him to India.

Red Notices issued by INTERPOL are circulated globally among law enforcement agencies to aid in the tracking and apprehension of wanted criminals. As India’s National Central Bureau for INTERPOL, the CBI coordinates closely with law enforcement agencies across the country through BHARATPOL, ensuring effective assistance via INTERPOL channels.

In recent years, more than 130 wanted criminals have been repatriated to India through successful coordination using these international cooperation mechanisms.
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/cbi-brings-back-fugitive-parminder-singh-from-uae-via-interpol-channels

Tim Allen says Erika Kirk’s memorial speech inspired him to forgive his father’s killer

Posted on by
Reply

**Tim Allen Moved by Erika Kirk’s Forgiveness in Memorial Speech**

Tim Allen has opened up about how Erika Kirk’s memorial speech “deeply affected” him. On Thursday, Allen took to X to share that he was personally moved by Kirk’s act of forgiving the man who allegedly killed her husband, Charlie Kirk—a forgiveness that has not come as easily for Allen himself.

“When Erika Kirk spoke the words on the man who killed her husband: That man. That young man. I forgive him. That moment deeply affected me,” Allen wrote.

Allen revealed that he has struggled with forgiveness for decades. “I have struggled for over 60 years to forgive the man who killed my Dad. I will say those words now as I type: I forgive the man who killed my father. Peace be with you all,” he added.

Allen’s father died in 1978 after being hit by a drunk driver. Allen was just 11 years old at the time.

### Erika Kirk’s Message of Forgiveness

At Charlie Kirk’s memorial service on Sunday, Erika publicly forgave Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old accused of killing the Turning Point USA founder.

“Charlie wanted to save young men, just like the one who took his life,” Erika said. Quoting scripture, she continued, “Our Savior said, ‘Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.’ That young man… I forgive him.”

Erika further explained, “I forgive him because it was what Christ did, and it’s what Charlie would do.”

### The Incident

Charlie Kirk was tragically assassinated at a Turning Point USA event held at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, on September 10. Tyler Robinson was arrested and now faces several charges, including aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child.

—

Tim Allen’s heartfelt response highlights the powerful impact of Erika Kirk’s message of forgiveness — a reminder of grace amid tragedy.
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/tim-allen-says-erika-kirks-memorial-speech-inspired-him-forgive-his-fathers-killer

Court hears arguments on behalf of Samir Modi, police oppose bail plea

Posted on by
Reply

At the outset, Senior Advocate Tanveer Ahmed Mir requested the court to hear arguments on camera. Subsequently, the hearing was conducted in camera (closed room hearing). The court has listed the bail plea for hearing on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) extended the judicial custody of Samir Modi till October 6. He was produced before the court after the expiry of one day’s judicial custody.

On Saturday, the Delhi Police filed a reply opposing the bail plea of businessman Samir Modi. Senior Advocates Ramesh Gupta, along with Advocates Punit Mittal, Shailendra Singh, Ishaan Jain, and Surya Pratap Singh, appeared for Samir Modi. On the other hand, Senior Advocate Tanveer Ahmed Mir, accompanied by Shubham Mahajan and Ravish Thakur, appeared for the complainant.

During the proceedings on Saturday, Senior Advocate Ramesh Gupta contended that a Lookout Circular (LOC) can be issued within five days of an FIR being registered. It was submitted that the FIR in this case was registered on September 10, and the LOC was issued within four days. He stated that Samir Modi had traveled to London on a return ticket, returned from London, and was detained at the airport before being handed over to the police on September 18.

The counsel requested that the court inquire with the police about how an LOC could be opened within four days. He also submitted that the police be asked to investigate a complaint filed by the accused alleging extortion by the complainant. Additional Sessions Judge Vipin Kharb remarked that he, too, wanted to know how an LOC could be opened in four days.

On September 19, the Saket court granted two more days’ remand of Samir Modi to the Delhi Police. He was subsequently sent to judicial custody on Sunday. The court had also directed the police to inquire into the complaint filed by Samir Modi.

The Friday hearing was conducted in camera, with the court asking the media and others to leave. Senior Advocate Ramesh Gupta pointed out that bail plea hearings are typically never conducted in camera.

—

*This story has been sourced from a third-party syndicated feed and agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for the dependability, trustworthiness, reliability, or accuracy of the information presented. Mid-day management reserves the sole right to alter, delete, or remove (without notice) any content at its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.*
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/police-opposes-bail-plea-of-samir-modi-court-lists-matter-to-hear-arguments-23595275