Delhi Red Fort blast kills 13: What happened as police invoke ‘terror’ law?

At least 13 people were killed and more than 20 others wounded after a car exploded in New Delhi, India’s capital, on Monday night. Security forces have been placed on high alert across major states and cities as authorities launched an investigation into the cause of the blast.

### What happened in New Delhi?

At approximately 18:52 local time (13:52 GMT), a powerful, high-intensity blast tore through a crowded neighborhood in New Delhi during the evening rush hour. According to Delhi Police, the explosion originated in a moving Hyundai i20 car.

“A slow-moving vehicle stopped at a red light. An explosion happened in that vehicle, and due to the explosion, nearby vehicles were also damaged,” Delhi Police Commissioner Satish Golcha told reporters.

Images from the scene show shattered windows, mangled vehicle parts, and plumes of fire and smoke rising from burning cars.

Police later detained the original owner of the car, identified as Mohammad Salman, in Gurugram, Haryana. Salman had bought the vehicle in 2013. Investigators said he had subsequently sold the vehicle to another man in New Delhi, who in turn sold the car recently. The person Salman sold the car to has also been arrested.

However, the car was still registered in Salman’s name and carried a Haryana number plate, according to local media reports.

Delhi Police have invoked India’s primary counter-terrorism law, registering a case under Sections 16 and 18 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), along with relevant provisions of the Explosives Act. This means that even though officials have yet to formally confirm the cause of the blast or name suspects, they appear to be treating the explosion as a potential act of terrorism, not just a regular criminal or accidental blast.

### Where did the blast happen?

The explosion occurred in a densely populated part of Old Delhi, near the Red Fort Metro Station. The blast took place at a traffic signal close to the entrance of the metro station serving the iconic Red Fort (locally known as Lal Qila), one of the city’s most renowned Mughal-era monuments.

The site lies at a busy intersection linking the Red Fort with the bustling Chandni Chowk market, where the impact of the explosion was felt.

The Red Fort itself, constructed by Emperor Shah Jahan in 1546 AD, is an architectural masterpiece blending Islamic, Persian, Timurid, and Hindu design traditions. It holds deep national importance because it was from its ramparts that India’s first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, delivered the country’s Independence Day speech on August 15, 1947, marking the end of British colonial rule.

Since then, every year on Independence Day, the Indian prime minister hoists the national flag and addresses the nation from the same spot. This tradition makes the fort a living symbol of India’s sovereignty and freedom.

### What’s the backdrop to the explosion?

The explosion occurred hours after police revealed they had arrested a Kashmiri doctor from Faridabad, Haryana, on charges of plotting a “terrorist” attack.

Haryana police said they found 2,900 kg of explosives, 20 timers, two dozen remote controls, a rifle, and dozens of live rounds from the premises of the doctor’s house. Seven other people accused of helping the doctor were also arrested.

However, Indian authorities have so far not confirmed any link between the arrested doctor and Monday’s explosion.

### What is the latest on the ground?

Police have intensified security checks across the city, with particular focus on railway stations, where incoming vehicles are being thoroughly inspected.

According to local media reports, major train stations across India including those in Mumbai, the country’s financial capital, and in Uttar Pradesh, which borders Delhi, have also been placed on high alert as a precautionary measure.

Videos shared online show the wreckage of several cars scattered along a crowded street in Delhi’s old quarter, as police secured the scene and dispersed onlookers.

According to New Delhi’s deputy fire chief, the explosion ignited six vehicles and three autorickshaws.

Meanwhile, as authorities respond to the explosion, voters in the eastern state of Bihar are heading to the polls in the second and final phase of state elections, marking a significant political event unfolding alongside heightened national security concerns.

### What have witnesses said?

As panic and confusion swept through Old Delhi following the explosion, eyewitnesses described scenes of horror and chaos.

“Suddenly there was a sound of a blast,” Irfan, a witness in Delhi, told Al Jazeera. “We came running, and we didn’t get too close because we were scared. We saw someone’s hand on the ground, they were completely blown up.”

“I saw someone’s lungs, and I also saw a car’s steering wheel completely damaged. I just cannot express, can’t imagine how their families will deal with this. I cannot describe how big the blast was,” he added.

Separately, relatives of people injured or missing were trying to track down their loved ones.

Speaking to Al Jazeera, Nazish Malik said his brother-in-law, Mohsin, an e-rickshaw driver, was missing after the blast.

“After more than a hundred calls on his phone, finally someone answered and said that the phone is at the police post at the Red Fort and your relative has been taken to Lok Nayak Hospital,” Malik said.

“When we heard that, we rushed here and got here around 8:30 pm. My brother was already here. I got here late, but found that the security was so tight, they are not permitting us to go inside,” he added.

“At least announce who is critical and who is dead. You can at least inform that bit,” he said.

### What have been the reactions?

Prime Minister Narendra Modi said he had been briefed about the attack by Home Minister Amit Shah and expressed condolences for the lives lost.

Shah stated that all possibilities were being investigated, with top agencies involved.

Israel’s envoy also expressed his condolences. The Embassy of Egypt likewise extended its sympathies to the victims and their families.

The United Kingdom issued a travel advisory following the explosion, while the US Embassy in India released a security alert and extended its condolences.

“Our sincere condolences to the families who lost their loved ones. We pray for the swift recovery of those injured,” the US government said.

### Has Delhi faced attacks in the past?

Yes, Delhi has been the target of multiple bomb explosions and armed attacks over the years but not in over a decade.

– **September 2011:** Fifteen people were killed after a briefcase bomb exploded outside Delhi High Court. Pakistan-based armed group Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami claimed responsibility.

– **September 2008:** Two separate bomb attacks rocked the capital. On September 13, five bombs ripped through crowded markets, killing 33 people. The Indian Mujahideen claimed responsibility. Two weeks later, two more bombs exploded, killing three more.

– **October 2005:** Three devastating blasts across different parts of the city killed 70 people. Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba claimed responsibility.

– **December 2001:** Fighters from Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed attacked the Indian parliament in an audacious strike that brought the nuclear-armed neighbors to the brink of war. Thirteen people were killed.

– **December 2000:** Three people were killed in an attack at Red Fort by Lashkar-e-Taiba fighters.

### Have other places in India faced major attacks?

Yes, Indian cities have been targets of major attacks by armed groups, often associated with Kashmir’s secessionist struggle.

India has in most cases blamed Pakistan-based armed groups and Pakistan’s intelligence services for orchestrating these attacks. Some of these groups have claimed responsibility themselves, and some accused individuals have been captured by Indian authorities.

Here are some of the deadliest attacks in India outside Delhi:

– **November 2008, Mumbai:** More than 170 people died and over 300 were injured in attacks carried out by Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba. Indian authorities captured one of the perpetrators alive.

– **July 2008, Ahmedabad:** Seventeen bombs exploded in different parts of the western Indian city, killing 56 people. Police blamed two different armed groups.

– **May 2008, Jaipur:** More than 70 people died in nine explosions in the capital of India’s western state of Rajasthan. Authorities blamed the Indian Mujahideen, a home-grown armed group.

– **February 2007, Haryana:** Seventy people, mostly Pakistani civilians, died after bombs exploded on the Samjhauta Express, which connected India and Pakistan. Authorities accused a far-right Hindu group, Abhinav Bharat, of carrying out the attack. However, in 2019, under Prime Minister Modi’s Hindu majoritarian Bharatiya Janata Party’s rule, all accused were acquitted.

– **September 2006, Malegaon:** Explosions near a mosque in Malegaon, Maharashtra, killed at least 45 people. Authorities blamed Abhinav Bharat, but all accused were later acquitted.

– **July 2006, Mumbai:** More than 200 people were killed when a series of bombs exploded on multiple trains of the suburban rail network used daily by millions in India’s financial capital. Authorities blamed Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, but all Indian nationals arrested have now been acquitted.

– **March 1993, Mumbai:** The single deadliest attack in independent India’s history, multiple bombs exploded across the city, killing more than 250 people. Police blamed Indian fugitive gangster Dawood Ibrahim and his aides.

The ongoing investigation into Monday night’s blast in New Delhi continues, with authorities remaining vigilant amid heightened security measures across the country.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/11/delhi-red-fort-blast-kills-13-what-happened-as-police-invoke-terror-law?traffic_source=rss

‘CCTV…shows bike wasn’t deliberately rammed’: BMW crash accused gets bail

By Chanshimla Varah | Sep 30, 2025, 03:45 PM

**Delhi Court Grants Bail to BMW Accident Case Accused Gaganpreet Kaur**

A Delhi court has granted bail to Gaganpreet Kaur, the accused in a recent BMW accident case that resulted in the death of Navjot Singh. The decision followed the court’s observation that CCTV footage weakened the prosecution’s claims of “culpable homicide anchored in delayed care.”

### The Incident

Navjot Singh, who was serving as Deputy Secretary in the Finance Ministry, tragically died after his bike was hit by a BMW near south Delhi’s Dhaula Kuan earlier this month. His wife was also grievously injured in the accident.

### Evidence Analysis: CCTV Footage Shows Loss of Control

In its 19-page judgment, the court noted that the CCTV footage did not support allegations of a deliberate, high-speed ramming of the motorbike from behind. Instead, it shows a loss of control that culminated in the BMW flipping and making contact with both the motorbike and a DTC bus.

Delhi Police initially claimed that the BMW hit the deceased from behind while ramming into him. However, Gaganpreet Kaur argued that her vehicle flipped and unintentionally struck the victim.

### Court Observations: Bail Granted Amid Weakened Prosecution Case

Judicial Magistrate First Class Ankit Garg of Patiala House Courts stated, “This clarification weakens the foundation for imputing ‘knowledge’ of likely death at the stage of initial impact and, on the present material, brings the occurrence closer to rash/negligent driving than to culpable homicide premised on the mode of collision.”

He further added, “Whether a higher mental element can ultimately be proved is a matter for trial; at the bail stage, the reduced strength of that allegation must be duly weighed.”

### Emergency Response: Court Slams Ambulance Staff for Negligence

The court strongly criticized the ambulance staff who arrived at the accident site within seconds but failed to provide any first aid or check the victim’s pulse.

“Accident happened in front of their eyes and they chose not to act and flee. Lives could have been saved, aid could have been provided—only if they would have shown some humanity and just did their duty,” the court remarked. It labelled the conduct of the ambulance driver and paramedic as “highly unprofessional and unethical.”

### Bail Rationale: Lack of Evidence on Car Speed

Highlighting gaps in the prosecution’s case, the court observed that no concrete evidence was provided regarding the car’s speed at the time of the accident.

The judge emphasized, “The function of bail is not punitive but to secure the accused’s presence and ensure a fair investigation and trial.” Given the contradictions and the reduced strength of the prosecution’s evidence, the court deemed it disproportionate to keep Gaganpreet Kaur in jail at this stage.

*This judgment underscores the importance of careful evidence examination and ensures that the principles of justice and fair trial are upheld.*
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/india/cctv-doesn-t-show-deliberate-ramming-court-in-bmw-crash-case/story

Court hears arguments on behalf of Samir Modi, police oppose bail plea

At the outset, Senior Advocate Tanveer Ahmed Mir requested the court to hear arguments on camera. Subsequently, the hearing was conducted in camera (closed room hearing). The court has listed the bail plea for hearing on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) extended the judicial custody of Samir Modi till October 6. He was produced before the court after the expiry of one day’s judicial custody.

On Saturday, the Delhi Police filed a reply opposing the bail plea of businessman Samir Modi. Senior Advocates Ramesh Gupta, along with Advocates Punit Mittal, Shailendra Singh, Ishaan Jain, and Surya Pratap Singh, appeared for Samir Modi. On the other hand, Senior Advocate Tanveer Ahmed Mir, accompanied by Shubham Mahajan and Ravish Thakur, appeared for the complainant.

During the proceedings on Saturday, Senior Advocate Ramesh Gupta contended that a Lookout Circular (LOC) can be issued within five days of an FIR being registered. It was submitted that the FIR in this case was registered on September 10, and the LOC was issued within four days. He stated that Samir Modi had traveled to London on a return ticket, returned from London, and was detained at the airport before being handed over to the police on September 18.

The counsel requested that the court inquire with the police about how an LOC could be opened within four days. He also submitted that the police be asked to investigate a complaint filed by the accused alleging extortion by the complainant. Additional Sessions Judge Vipin Kharb remarked that he, too, wanted to know how an LOC could be opened in four days.

On September 19, the Saket court granted two more days’ remand of Samir Modi to the Delhi Police. He was subsequently sent to judicial custody on Sunday. The court had also directed the police to inquire into the complaint filed by Samir Modi.

The Friday hearing was conducted in camera, with the court asking the media and others to leave. Senior Advocate Ramesh Gupta pointed out that bail plea hearings are typically never conducted in camera.

*This story has been sourced from a third-party syndicated feed and agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for the dependability, trustworthiness, reliability, or accuracy of the information presented. Mid-day management reserves the sole right to alter, delete, or remove (without notice) any content at its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.*
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/police-opposes-bail-plea-of-samir-modi-court-lists-matter-to-hear-arguments-23595275