UNH Poll: Majority of Vermonters support a Gov. Phil Scott reelection campaign

The latest University of New Hampshire Green Mountain State Poll results, released on Friday, indicate that the majority of Vermonters approve of Governor Phil Scott’s performance in office and want him to run for reelection next year.

The October poll outlined political positioning leading up to next year’s statewide elections, according to Professor Andrew Smith, an author of the poll and director of UNH’s Survey Center. It draws on 880 survey responses collected last week, which are weighted according to demographic information from U.S. Census data and recent election results, Smith said.

The governor has remained relatively popular with Democrats and “mitigated some of the anger” from those farther to his right since the presidential election, Smith noted. “He’s in a pretty good spot for reelection.”

Over 60% of Vermonters approved of Scott’s work as governor, with 57% to some extent in favor of him running for reelection. Slightly less than half believed he actually deserved to be reelected, the survey said.

Scott’s consistently high standing in polling is particularly noteworthy given the state’s strong blue leanings in other areas of politics, Smith added.

The survey found that 80% of Democrats and over half of all Vermonters describe Scott as far or slightly to the right of their own views. Yet, in a question that allowed poll-takers to say they wanted multiple potential candidates to run, Scott registered only slightly lower support—47% among Democrats—compared to the 50% garnered by liberal State Treasurer and rumored gubernatorial hopeful Mike Pieciak. An even lower 38% of Democrats said they wanted State Attorney General Charity Clark, another possible challenger for governor, to run.

However, Scott’s potential Democratic opponents also registered high rates of “don’t know/no opinion” responses to this query. “The major reason for Vermonters’ ambivalence about Pieciak and Clark is they are largely unknown,” the survey authors observed.

For more than 70% of Republicans, Scott sat far or slightly to their left. Just 20% of all Vermonters thought that Scott’s politics are “close to (their) own views,” the survey estimated.

U.S. Representative Becca Balint (D-Vt.) continued to demonstrate strong appeal among the state’s Democrats, with just over half the state saying she deserves reelection, according to the survey. Mark Coester, a Republican who ran against Balint in 2024, has filed to challenge her again next year. Just 6% of Vermonters had a favorable opinion of Coester, and more than three-quarters didn’t know enough about him to say, the survey found.

The survey also included several questions about current state policy decisions, “taking a look at what issues are in the news, what people are paying attention to,” Smith said.

One such question focused on the Scott administration’s much-discussed return-to-office plan for state employees, which has drawn pushback from the Vermont State Employees Association, among others. Overall, 51% of Vermonters supported the policy to some extent, with 13% remaining neutral.

However, public opinion on the governor’s policy ran heavily along party lines: 80% of Republicans and 64% of Independents strongly or somewhat supported the measure, compared with just a third of Democrats.

The governor’s refusal to send Vermont National Guard troops to Washington, D.C. at the request of President Donald Trump was met with relative popularity across the state, Friday’s poll said. The move was opposed to some degree by 70% of Republicans, but affirmed by 98% of Democrats. Combining all responses, 72% of Vermonters approved of the decision.

Theo Wells-Spackman is a Report for America corps member who reports for VTDigger.org. This story was republished with permission from VTDigger, which offers its reporting at no cost to local news organizations through its Community News Sharing Project. To learn more, visit vtdigger.org/community-news-sharing-project.
https://vnews.com/2025/10/29/vermonters-approve-scott-reelection/

U.S. Entities Hold 73% of Global Crypto Treasuries: Details

Sentora, the on-chain research shop, grabbed attention today when it tweeted that “US entities hold 73% of global crypto treasury value, showing the country’s dominance in the institutional crypto space.” That huge figure, shared as part of the firm’s ongoing crypto treasury coverage, spotlights how concentrated institutional crypto reserves have become around American organizations.

The claim rests on Sentora’s broader Crypto Treasury Tracker, a dashboard the firm maintains that aggregates reserves across public companies, private firms, DAOs, nonprofits, and sovereign wallets. Rather than counting only balance-sheet Bitcoin, the tracker aims to map “all crypto reserves” held by entities, merging asset-level detail with entity-level views so users can see who holds what and in which token.

That methodology helps explain how a single national cohort—US entities—can account for such a large share: it folds together corporate treasuries, exchange reserves, protocol and fund holdings that are legally domiciled or managed within the United States.

### From Corporations to Exchanges

How big are those treasuries overall? Recent estimates peg global institutional crypto reserves in the low hundreds of billions. As of today, Sentora’s Crypto Treasury Tracker puts the total near $241 billion, a figure that has roughly tripled year-over-year as more organizations add digital assets to their balance sheets or keep larger liquid coffers on exchanges and in custodial accounts.

That scale helps put Sentora’s 73% claim into context: if global treasuries number in the mid-hundreds of billions, US entities controlling roughly three-quarters of that pool represent meaningful market power.

Public companies alone already account for very large slices of corporate crypto holdings. CoinGecko’s Bitcoin treasury tracker, which focuses on corporate and government Bitcoin allocations among other assets, lists well over a million BTC held across tracked institutions—a position worth tens or hundreds of billions depending on BTC’s price—and shows how a relatively small set of firms have concentrated exposures.

These corporate balance-sheet allocations are a big part of the institutional narrative. Some companies treat crypto as a strategic hedge or an alternative reserve asset, and that choice drives meaningful flows into the market.

At the front of that corporate wave sits Strategy, the poster child for a corporate Bitcoin treasury strategy. Public filings and reporting show the firm has repeatedly purchased hundreds of thousands of BTC, making it by far the largest corporate holder and a bellwether for the “digital asset treasury company” model that other firms have imitated.

### Implications of US Dominance

The dominance of US entities has several practical implications. Concentration amplifies the influence of a handful of actors on liquidity and market sentiment; regulatory moves or corporate decisions in the United States can ripple through price formation when so much value is parked in domestic hands.

It also raises questions about counterparty, custodial, and jurisdictional risk: when reserves are legally, operationally, or institutionally tied to one regulatory regime, that can simplify compliance on one hand and create single-jurisdiction vulnerabilities on the other.

Sentora’s observation, therefore, matters not only as a statistic but as a prompt to consider how the market will evolve as more corporates, funds, and DAOs professionalize their treasury management.

Not every major treasury is American, of course: sovereign seizures, miners, and foreign corporates hold material amounts, and many protocol treasuries are geographically distributed or multisig-governed. But the trend Sentora highlights—that US entities are disproportionately large holders of institutional crypto value—is a useful lens for understanding where power sits today in digital-asset markets.

It is also useful for anticipating how policy, liquidity, and corporate finance choices made in the United States might continue to shape crypto’s next phase.

For readers interested in digging deeper, Sentora’s tracker lets you break holdings down by entity type and asset class, while other public trackers provide complementary views on corporate Bitcoin treasuries and exchange reserves.

As the numbers continue to shift with new purchases, that map will be essential for anyone trying to read where institutional demand really sits.
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/crypto/u-s-entities-hold-73-of-global-crypto-treasuries-details/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=u-s-entities-hold-73-of-global-crypto-treasuries-details