Upbit Emergency Inspection Halts All Crypto Transactions Immediately

Attention all crypto traders: South Korea’s leading exchange Upbit has just announced an unexpected emergency inspection that temporarily suspends all deposit and withdrawal services. This sudden maintenance action, which began at 11: 55 p. m. UTC on November 26, affects millions of users worldwide. The Upbit emergency inspection represents a crucial security measure, but it also raises important questions about what prompted this urgent action and when normal operations will resume. What Triggered This Upbit Emergency Inspection? The cryptocurrency community was taken by surprise when Upbit announced its emergency maintenance. While the exchange hasn’t revealed specific details about what prompted this urgent Upbit emergency inspection, such measures typically occur for several reasons. Exchange platforms often conduct emergency inspections to address potential security vulnerabilities, update system protocols, or investigate suspicious activities. This proactive approach demonstrates Upbit’s commitment to user asset protection, though it does cause temporary inconvenience. Regular maintenance helps prevent larger issues down the line. However, emergency inspections like this Upbit emergency inspection usually indicate the platform has identified something requiring immediate attention. The timing suggests the exchange prioritizes security over convenience, even if it means disrupting trading activities during peak hours. How Does This Upbit Emergency Inspection Affect Your Trading? During this Upbit emergency inspection period, users face specific limitations that impact their trading strategies. Understanding these restrictions helps you plan accordingly and avoid frustration. All digital asset deposits are temporarily suspended Withdrawal requests cannot be processed Existing balances remain secure and unaffected Trading between cryptocurrencies may continue normally Fiat currency transactions are also paused This comprehensive Upbit emergency inspection means you cannot move funds onto or off the exchange until maintenance completes. However, your stored assets remain safe, and the inspection doesn’t affect your ability to trade between different cryptocurrencies already in your Upbit wallet. When Will Normal Services Resume After This Upbit Emergency Inspection? Upbit has not provided a specific timeline for when the Upbit emergency inspection will conclude. Historically, similar emergency maintenance periods on major exchanges have lasted anywhere from a few hours to several days. The duration typically depends on the complexity of the issues being addressed and the thoroughness required to ensure complete system security. Users should monitor Upbit’s official communication channels for updates. The exchange will likely provide progress reports through their website, social media accounts, and email notifications. Patience is crucial during these security measures, as rushing the process could compromise the effectiveness of the Upbit emergency inspection. Why Should You Support This Upbit Emergency Inspection? While temporary service suspensions are inconvenient, this Upbit emergency inspection ultimately benefits all users. Security measures protect your investments from potential threats that could cause far greater damage than temporary access restrictions. The cryptocurrency space has seen numerous exchange hacks resulting in massive losses, making proactive security essential. This Upbit emergency inspection demonstrates the exchange’s commitment to maintaining robust security standards. By addressing potential vulnerabilities before they can be exploited, Upbit protects both individual users and the broader ecosystem. Such responsible practices help build trust in cryptocurrency platforms and contribute to mainstream adoption. What Can You Do During the Upbit Emergency Inspection? While waiting for the Upbit emergency inspection to conclude, savvy traders can use this time productively. You can research new investment opportunities, analyze market trends, or educate yourself about security best practices. This unexpected pause provides an opportunity to review your trading strategy and ensure you’re prepared when services resume. Remember that other exchanges continue operating normally, though transferring assets between platforms isn’t possible during the Upbit emergency inspection. Use this time to diversify your knowledge rather than worrying about temporary access limitations. Final Thoughts on the Upbit Emergency Inspection The Upbit emergency inspection, while inconvenient, represents the exchange’s strong commitment to security and user protection. In the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency landscape, such proactive measures are essential for maintaining trust and preventing catastrophic security breaches. While the temporary suspension of deposits and withdrawals disrupts trading activities, the long-term benefits of enhanced security far outweigh the short-term inconveniences. As we await further updates from Upbit regarding their emergency inspection, remember that security should always take priority over convenience in the digital asset space. This incident serves as a reminder that even major exchanges must remain vigilant against emerging threats in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Frequently Asked Questions What exactly is happening with Upbit? Upbit is conducting an emergency inspection of its digital asset deposit and withdrawal systems, temporarily suspending these services to ensure platform security. Can I still trade cryptocurrencies on Upbit during the inspection? Yes, trading between different cryptocurrencies already in your Upbit wallet should continue normally. Only deposits and withdrawals are affected. How long will this emergency inspection last? Upbit hasn’t provided a specific timeline. Emergency maintenance typically lasts from several hours to a few days, depending on the issues being addressed. Is my money safe during this inspection? Yes, your existing balances remain secure and unaffected. The inspection is a preventive measure to enhance security, not a response to lost funds. Will I be notified when services resume? Upbit will likely announce when services resume through their official website, social media channels, and email notifications to registered users. Can I cancel pending withdrawal requests during the inspection? Withdrawal processing is completely suspended during the inspection, so pending requests will remain queued until services resume. Share This Important Update Help other crypto traders stay informed about this critical development. on your social media channels to ensure the community understands the Upbit emergency inspection and its implications for their trading activities. Knowledge sharing strengthens our collective security in the cryptocurrency space. To learn more about the latest cryptocurrency exchange security trends, explore our article on key developments shaping digital asset protection and institutional adoption.
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/crypto/upbit-emergency-inspection-halts-all-crypto-transactions-immediately/

What happened after Cardano was ‘taken down by a kid?’ Mapping investor confidence

Key Takeaways What triggered Cardano’s recent sell-off? A rare partition event exposed vulnerabilities in Cardano’s network, disrupting DeFi activity, stake pool operators, and damaging stakeholder confidence. How weak is ADA, fundamentally? ADA has already shed 50% in Q4 and is technically fragile. Analysts suggest another 5× drop could align fundamentals with network strength. Cardano has been among the worst Q4 performers among large-cap cryptocurrencies so far, shedding 50% of its value. However, looking back, ADA has been bearish since peaking in mid-August above $1. This means that Cardano [ADA] was already in a technically weak spot before the October crash, with bulls failing to defend key support zones. That crash further eroded stakeholder confidence, pushing ADA back to pre-election levels. In such a fragile environment, even a small trigger could spark a major sell-off. Recently, Cardano experienced a rare partition event. The incident was later addressed by founder Charles Hoskinson. In his post, Hoskinson emphasized the seriousness of the issue, noting that “it will take weeks to clean up this mess.” For context, the partition event was caused by a glitch, creating a split in Cardano’s blockchain history. Hoskinson highlighted the impact of the incident, explaining how the “accidental” action by a user disrupted the network, affecting DeFi activity, stake pool operators (SPOs), and damaging Cardano’s overall reputation. However, the market reaction largely contradicted this perspective. Many viewed the event as a “much-needed” catalyst that exposed vulnerabilities in the network and sparked debates about Cardano’s resilience. Community questions Cardano’s technical strength This partition event has once again put Cardano’s resilience under scrutiny. Price-wise, ADA has already shaken stakeholder confidence, emerging as one of the weakest top-cap assets. The recent network issue has worsened the situation, further dampening market sentiment. On-chain data reflects this weakness as well. According to Token Terminal, Cardano’s key metrics are deep in the red. For instance, 30-day trading volume is down 25%, while network fees have fallen by 22%. In simple terms, the network was already weak before the incident. Adding to this, an X page noted that ADA is overvalued, suggesting that another 5× drop may be needed to bring Cardano’s fundamentals in line with its technical positioning. If that happens, ADA could fall to $0. 08. Technically, that would represent a full-fledged price collapse. In this context, Cardano’s recent partition event was more than just a glitch. Instead, it acted as a catalyst that exposed ADA’s perceived overvaluation.
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/tech/what-happened-after-cardano-was-taken-down-by-a-kid-mapping-investor-confidence/

The Challenge of Parenting Young Adults

The kids are grown. In theory, the parents’ job is done. But for many parents, the anxiety regarding their children’s well-being continues. Though there are shelves full of books on parenting young children and teens, there is a relative dearth of advice for this stage, which occurs between finishing traditional school and having a career or their own family life. Despite having much less power to influence adult children, parents still hope their children will land that ideal job, find a healthy partner, avoid major disappointments, and live a better life than the parents themselves did. Parents hope to protect their grown children from the vagaries of unfairness in the world. Parents may blame themselves for whatever vulnerabilities their children have. The limited parenting role may be frustrating when parents wish, under the best of circumstances, for more opportunities to help their children. Despite this wish, increasing parent participation undermines the most important task of this age-to experience life, directly learning lessons for oneself. This lack of control for parents can lead to significant distress and a sense of loss during the young adult stage of parenting. Even with best best-case scenarios, there is still parental uncertainty and young adult missteps. How much should a reasonable parent do? 7 Strategies for Parental Coping as Children Reach Adulthood Manage parental anxiety Having less control may lead to more anxiety. Parents are no longer privy to information about how their children are doing. The days of obsessively checking the school website to get minute-by-minute accountings of their children’s assignments and grades are over. There are no calls from other parents to give the inside scoop about what is going on in the child’s friend network. There are few, if any, opportunities to view a child’s interactions directly. On the bright side, this lack of information can provide enormous freedom. A burden has been lifted, even if it leaves a void. The best advice may be to practice living with less information and remember that having the information would not necessarily be useful at this age. After all, when young adults are living on their own, does knowing their bedtime actually make the parents sleep better at night? Trust development By this age, the young adult has learned, to the best of their abilities, the lessons taught to them. Sure, they will make mistakes, but most of these errors will have some remedy. And mistakes provide learning opportunities. It is much harder to trust development when launching children who are truly not ready yet. There is a population of young adults who may never be due to medical or cognitive disabilities. In those cases, it is essential to put other external supports in place that help bridge the gap between complete reliance on parents and complete independence. Shift parental thinking Part of the difficulty in this stage is the feeling of losing parental control and still being in the role of parent. How the parent thinks about it can make an enormous differenceçmoving from a concept of loss to the idea of creating opportunities for new challenges outside the life as a parent or reimagining what being a parent means. Shifting from “holding on tightly” to “this is the way it is supposed to go, and I have done my job well if they are almost ready” can make a big difference. Let them and let me In the Mel Robbins book The Let Them Theory (2024), Robbins advises focusing on what can be controlled and shifting away from what can’t. “Let them” in this context might mean: “Let your child choose their own path. Let them have their own feelings. Let them make their own choices without inspiring guilt. Let them take the risks, within reason, about what to study and where to live.” There’s also a separate side, the “let me” side. “Let me enjoy what I can with my child. Let me make new choices and choose new paths. Finally, let me appreciate the ways my children are different from me, let me appreciate who they are, and let me learn from them.” Model what you would want them to do Most children learn Recognize that there is no way to shield children from disappointment Young adults are going to make a boatload of mistakes, meet a ton of adversity, and manage lots of disappointment. No matter how carefully crafted the parenting plan is, no one can shield kids from those challenges. Radical acceptance, the practice of accepting reality as it is, an important concept from dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) (Linehan and Wilks, 2015), will help parents tolerate their children’s difficulties. Skip “I told you so” When do young adult children need parents the most? Is it when they are performing to the accolades of those around them? Sure, you will be there for the joys and celebrations, and your children will appreciate it. But is this when they need their parents the most? No. They need their parents when they are alone; when they have messed up, and they know it, and it might affect their chances for a job or school; when they have lost an important relationship, regardless of who broke it off or whose fault it is; and when their world hasn’t been kind. They need to know parents will be there for the rainy moments. There are so many uncertainties in parenting, and they do not disappear when children hit age 18. Parenting through this transitional age has its challenges and rewards. Launching and allowing for experiential learning are so important. If the young adult keeps coming back, and their parents meet the moment, those uncertain times will be OK.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/aligning-for-growth/202511/the-challenge-of-parenting-young-adults

Trump expected to sign crypto regulation bill

The U. S. Senate Banking Committee will vote in December 2025 on comprehensive cryptocurrency market structure legislation, according to committee Chair Tim Scott on a recent television interview The Bill seeks to establish a unified regulatory framework for digital assets and would formally designate Bitcoin and Ether as digital commodities under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, according to draft text of the legislation. The designation would resolve a jurisdictional dispute between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the CFTC over oversight of digital assets. The proposed legislation includes requirements for cryptocurrency exchanges to segregate customer funds, implement conflict-of-interest controls, and provide enhanced disclosures. The provisions address vulnerabilities exposed during the collapse of exchanges including FTX, according to the bill’s framework. Scott stated he plans to advance the legislation to the full Senate in early 2026 if the committee vote succeeds. President Donald Trump is expected to sign the bill into law, according to legislative projections. Bipartisan negotiations continue Bipartisan negotiations remain ongoing, with regulation of decentralized finance platforms emerging as a primary point of contention. Democratic lawmakers have expressed concerns regarding money laundering risks and systemic vulnerabilities associated with DeFi protocols, according to sources familiar with the discussions.
https://crypto.news/trump-expected-to-sign-crypto-regulation-bill/

UK Hacker Who Breached Obama’s Twitter Account Ordered to Repay $5.4 Million in Bitcoin

UK prosecutors secured a civil recovery order forcing Joseph James O’Connor to repay $5. 4 million in Bitcoin linked to the 2020 Twitter hack. Authorities seized 42 BTC and other crypto assets, ensuring O’Connor cannot profit from the high-profile account breaches. British national Joseph James O’Connor has been ordered to repay £4. 1 million ($5. 4 million) in Bitcoin linked to the scam. James O’Connor is one of the key figures behind the notorious 2020 Twitter hack involving high-profile figures such as former U. S. President Barack Obama. The announcement was made by the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) on Monday. This is just one of the many scam cases involving crypto. O’Connor, now 26, was previously sentenced to five years in prison in the United States after pleading guilty to charges that included computer intrusion, wire fraud, and extortion. His crimes stem from the July 2020 cyberattack that compromised some of the world’s most influential Twitter accounts, including those of Joe Biden, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and Kim Kardashian. The attackers used the hijacked accounts to solicit cryptocurrency and threaten public figures. O’Connor was arrested in Spain in 2021 after the country’s High Court determined that the United States was the appropriate jurisdiction for prosecution due to the location of most evidence and victims. After his extradition, he pleaded guilty and was sentenced in 2023. Ordered to Surrender 42 Bitcoin and Other Crypto Assets The CPS said it had secured a civil recovery order allowing authorities to seize 42 Bitcoin and additional crypto assets tied to O’Connor’s criminal activity. The assets were frozen during extradition proceedings, and now they will be liquidated by a court-appointed trustee. Prosecutor Adrian Foster emphasized that UK authorities will act even when convictions occur abroad, stating: “We were able to use the full force of the powers available to ensure that even when someone is not convicted in the UK, we are still able to ensure they do not benefit from their criminality.” One of the Most High-Profile Hacks in Twitter’s (X’s) History The 2020 attack became one of the most high-profile security incidents to hit the platform. The breach forced the company to temporarily restrict verified accounts, highlighting major vulnerabilities in its internal tools. With the recovery order now in place, authorities have taken another step toward preventing O’Connor from profiting from one of the most widely publicized cybercrimes of the past decade. Recommended for you:.
https://www.crypto-news-flash.com/uk-hacker-who-breached-obamas-twitter-account-ordered-to-repay-5-4-million-in-bitcoin/

Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) Stock: Tesla Shifts Away From China-Made Parts Amid Tariff Pressure

Tesla Mandates Suppliers to Ditch China-Made Components for U.S. Vehicles Amid Tariff Volatility

Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) is implementing a significant shift in its supply chain strategy by requiring suppliers to eliminate China-made parts from vehicles manufactured in the United States. According to a recent Wall Street Journal report, this decision reflects growing concerns over fluctuating U.S.-China trade policies and the reliability of rare-earth elements and semiconductor supplies.

Supply Chain Realignment for U.S. Production

Tesla and its supplier network have already replaced several China-sourced components. The company aims to transition all remaining parts to non-China sources within the next one to two years. This move is intended to shield U.S. production lines from tariff-related cost risks and supply chain disruptions, providing greater stability amidst uncertain geopolitical tensions.

The push to diversify away from China-based components has intensified due to unpredictable cost structures created by tariff policy swings in recent years. Tesla’s focus aligns with a broader industry trend seeking to mitigate exposure to trade conflicts and supply bottlenecks.

Industry-Wide Response to Tariff Exposure

Automotive executives across the sector are actively revising supply chain strategies due to ongoing tariff volatility. Recent concerns over rare-earth material shortages and semiconductor supply constraints have prompted companies to reduce their dependence on China.

General Motors, for example, has instructed thousands of its suppliers to eliminate China-made parts, underscoring a wider industry movement towards alternative sourcing.

Challenges in Tesla’s China Market Performance

Tesla’s operations in China are confronting new headwinds as well. Data from the China Passenger Car Association shows a 9.9% year-over-year decline in China-made electric vehicle (EV) sales for October, with deliveries falling to 61,497 units. This represents a reversal from a 2.8% sales increase recorded in the previous month.

Production at Tesla’s Shanghai facility also dropped significantly, with Model 3 and Model Y output declining by 32.3% compared to September. The reduction includes vehicles destined for both domestic and export markets, highlighting challenges in maintaining momentum within this key region.

Increasing North American Sourcing Efforts

For the past two years, Tesla has intensified efforts to increase North American sourcing in order to minimize tariff risk. This strategy echoes the broader shift within the automotive industry to reduce reliance on China amid growing geopolitical risks and supply chain vulnerabilities.

TSLA Stock Performance Snapshot

As of November 14, 2025, Tesla’s stock performance reflects this transitional period. The company reported a modest year-to-date (YTD) return of 0.13%, lagging behind the S&P 500’s 14.49% gain. However, Tesla’s 1-year return of 29.94% outperformed the benchmark, while longer-term returns remain robust with 3-year and 5-year gains of 111.76% and 196.95%, respectively.

At market close, TSLA traded at $404.35, with after-hours prices around $405.42, showing modest intraday gains.

Outlook

Tesla’s restructuring of its supplier ecosystem marks a strategic, long-term defensive move aimed at navigating the evolving geopolitical landscape and regulatory challenges. As the auto industry continues to adapt to shifting trade policies and supply constraints, Tesla’s proactive supply chain realignment positions it to mitigate risks and secure its manufacturing footprint in North America.


Stay informed on Tesla and other market movers with KnockoutStocks.com — a data-driven platform offering live prices, charts, and KO Scores to help you identify top breakout stocks.
https://coincentral.com/tesla-inc-tsla-stock-tesla-shifts-away-from-china-made-parts-amid-tariff-pressure/

Peter Schiff Warns of MicroStrategy Bitcoin Model Risks, Challenges Saylor to UAE Debate

**Schiff’s Criticism: MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin Bet Under Fire**

Gold advocate Peter Schiff has raised serious concerns about MicroStrategy’s aggressive Bitcoin strategy, calling it unsustainable and predicting a potential halt in debt issuance and a sharp drop in the company’s stock. This criticism comes as Bitcoin (BTC) has dropped over 20% from its $125,000 peak, reflecting broader challenges for the crypto market. In contrast, gold has demonstrated notable strength, holding above $4,000 per ounce and achieving a $30 trillion market capitalization high in October, according to TradingView data.

Recently, Peter Schiff accused MicroStrategy of being a “Bitcoin fraud” and publicly challenged CEO Michael Saylor to a debate in the UAE. In this article, we explore the ongoing rivalry between BTC and gold amid rising treasury risks.

## What is Peter Schiff’s Challenge to Michael Saylor Regarding MicroStrategy?

Peter Schiff’s challenge stems from his ongoing criticism of both Bitcoin and MicroStrategy’s strategy of aggressively accumulating BTC. On Sunday, Schiff charged MicroStrategy with operating a fraudulent business model, claiming it relies on issuing high-yield preferred shares to income-oriented funds—shares he asserts will never deliver the promised returns.

Schiff invited Michael Saylor to debate these issues at Binance Blockchain Week in Dubai, scheduled for December. In a detailed social media post, Schiff explained that once fund managers realize the yields are unsustainable, a mass sell-off could occur. According to Schiff, this would prevent MicroStrategy from raising additional debt, potentially sparking a downward spiral for the company’s stock and its Bitcoin holdings.

Furthermore, Schiff has challenged Binance co-founder Changpeng Zhao to debate tokenized gold assets, highlighting his steadfast preference for traditional safe-haven investments over cryptocurrencies.

## Why Does Peter Schiff View MicroStrategy’s Business Model as a Fraud?

Peter Schiff bases his fraud accusations on MicroStrategy’s continued dependence on debt and equity issuances to fund its Bitcoin purchases, resulting in the world’s largest corporate BTC treasury. According to Schiff, the “high-yield” preferred shares entice investors with the promise of steady income, but these payouts are ultimately dependent on ongoing capital inflows—not actual profitability.

He warns that if investors become disillusioned, it could trigger a wave of selling, crippling MicroStrategy’s ability to sustain its strategy. Supporting this skepticism, MicroStrategy’s multiple on net asset value (mNAV)—a key metric comparing its stock price to its underlying Bitcoin holdings—dipped below 1.0 in November before recovering to 1.21, as noted by the company. Typically, analysts view an mNAV of 2 or higher as healthy for treasury operations.

MicroStrategy’s stock price has fallen over 50% since July, now trading around $199, highlighting the vulnerabilities that Schiff points out. Financial analysts echo these concerns, noting that MicroStrategy’s fortunes are tightly linked to Bitcoin’s volatility, increasing risks in bearish markets.

All of this unfolds as the broader crypto sector faces significant headwinds. Bitcoin has retreated more than 20% from its October all-time high above $125,000, including a flash crash on October 10 that erased tens of billions in market value. By contrast, gold has maintained its $4,000 per ounce support—trading recently at approximately $4,085—after peaking at $4,380 in October and briefly pushing its total market capitalization above $30 trillion.

## Frequently Asked Questions

### What Impact Could Peter Schiff’s Predicted ‘Death Spiral’ Have on MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin Holdings?

If Peter Schiff’s “death spiral” scenario comes to pass, MicroStrategy’s vast Bitcoin treasury (worth billions) could come under immense pressure. A halt in debt issuance would restrict new BTC acquisitions and might even force the company to liquidate some holdings during price lows to meet obligations. This could further depress MicroStrategy’s stock and shake investor confidence in corporate crypto strategies.

### How Are Current Market Trends Favoring Gold Over Bitcoin in 2025?

As of late 2025, gold’s stability above $4,000 per ounce is providing investors with a much-needed hedge against economic uncertainty. In contrast, Bitcoin’s volatility—currently trading below $99,000—reflects wider sector corrections. Many investors now favor the reliability of gold, which recently reached a $30 trillion market cap, as a safer alternative to BTC’s more volatile profile.

## Key Takeaways

**Schiff’s Bold Challenge:** Peter Schiff’s debate invitation to Michael Saylor at Binance Blockchain Week highlights the deep divide between gold traditionalists and Bitcoin proponents.

**MicroStrategy’s Vulnerabilities:** With an mNAV at 1.21 and stock down 50% since July, MicroStrategy’s reliance on unproven yield strategies signals caution.

**Asset Class Contrast:** Gold’s price stability above $4,000 per ounce sharply contrasts with Bitcoin’s 20% drop from its highs, reflecting shifting investor preferences in unstable markets.

**Conclusion**

Peter Schiff’s outspoken criticism and debate challenge underscore a pivotal moment in the ongoing battle between gold and Bitcoin as alternative stores of value. With MicroStrategy’s business model under scrutiny and market trends favoring safe-haven assets, the debate over crypto versus gold is as heated as ever. Investors and observers alike should watch these developments closely as we head further into 2025.
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/bitcoin/peter-schiff-warns-of-microstrategy-bitcoin-model-risks-challenges-saylor-to-uae-debate/