9 years after the first movie made $1 billion, Zootopia 2 debuts to near-perfect Rotten Tomatoes score

Zootopia 2 (or Zootropolis 2, depending on where you are in the world) is a hit with the critics. Disney’s new animated sequel, which comes nine years after the first movie, has debuted to a near-perfect score of 92% on Rotten Tomatoes, based on 77 reviews (although it has yet to beat the original film’s impressive 98%). Jason Bateman and Ginnifer Goodwin return to voice Nick Wilde and Judy Hopps, a fox and rabbit cop duo. This time around, they’re going undercover to investigate Zootopia’s new president, Gary De’Snake (Ke Huy Quan). It’s got big shoes to fill: 2016’s Zootopia was a runaway hit, winning Best Animated Feature at the Oscars and making over $1 billion at the box office against a budget of $150 million. For the most part, though, critics seem to think it’s matched, if not surpassed, the quality of the first film. The Independent writes that Zootopia 2 is “a sequel that not only justifies itself, but arguably improves on its predecessor. Really, it’s the same film but better, while The Hollywood Reporter thinks it’s “more than worth the lengthy wait, knocking it out of the park with its dazzling visuals, sophisticated humor and doses of genuine emotion. It’s got the kind of heart that has too long seemed to be missing from other Disney animated offerings,” reads IndieWire’s review. “There’s a weight to the messaging of the film. There’s real care behind the bond between Nick and Judy.” Meanwhile, Slant writes that “Zootopia 2 provides plenty of food for thought for its young audience, making a more expansive statement on the dangers of intolerance than the first film, and without sacrificing any of its charm, humor, or visual ingenuity along the way.” It’s not all positivity, though. According to the Guardian, “it’s the kind of movie you put on an iPad to keep the children quiet on a long plane or train journey; nothing wrong with that of course, but the heart and soul are lacking.”.
https://www.gamesradar.com/entertainment/animation-movies/9-years-after-the-first-movie-made-usd1-billion-zootopia-2-debuts-to-near-perfect-rotten-tomatoes-score/

I Wore a Full Face of Dior Holiday Makeup—These Are the Products I Recommend Buying Before They’re Gone

I may be a little biased considering my job title, but I firmly believe that holiday makeup collections are the best treasures. There’s just something about a limited-edition formula or shade housed in frosty, festive packaging that makes my heart sing-so much so that I often find myself saving these exclusive palettes, bullets, and tubes long after the pigment has depleted. And then there’s Dior. The brand is already responsible for some of my favorite glam staples of all time (namely the Rouge Dior in 999, the Diorshow Mascara, and, of course, the cult-favorite Lip Glow Oil), but its holiday collections are always nothing short of magical. This year’s collection doesn’t disappoint. Drawing inspiration from circus arts, the assortment hones in on enchanting shimmer-from embossed lipsticks to silky eye shadow palettes to pearlescent nail lacquers-in a way that, despite its theme, doesn’t lean too far into stage-makeup territory. This is Dior we’re talking about, so you can expect only the most elevated offerings. Imagine the light-reflecting sheen from a luxurious velvet chaise or twinkling champagne flutes huddled on a silver tray, whispers of shimmer that feel chic, sophisticated, and so very Dior. I’ve been wearing the collection for weeks (you know, testing the waters ahead of the holiday-party circuit), and it’s just as divine as it looks on-screen. That said, I keep gravitating toward a few standouts that deserve a spot in your makeup bag, and I highly recommend shopping them while you still can. A couple heroes have already sold out! Scroll ahead and godspeed. 1. Diorshow 5 Couleurs Eyeshadow Palette in Fiery Circus 2. Limited Edition Dior Backstage Rosy Glow Powder Blush in 830 Fiery Red 3. Limited Edition Dior Backstage Rosy Glow Powder Blush in 810 Starry Pink 4. Rouge Dior Velvet Lipstick in 629 Parade 5. Rouge Dior Sequin Liquid Duo Lipstick in Spectacular Icone Shop More Dior Holiday Essentials.
https://www.whowhatwear.com/beauty/makeup/dior-holiday-makeup-collection-2025-review

Hey, Google — is Santa real? How AI is ruining Christmas for kids

AI is the new Grinch that’s stealing Christmas. Nervous laughter was Kelly Bowron’s visceral, hysterical response to her son learning the truth about Santa Claus on Tuesday courtesy of a Google search. Her little Leo, age 11 whose belief in the jolly old elf had remained firmly intact from childhood to preadolescence until this week simply wanted to know St. Nick’s spending budget, per child, worldwide. Unfortunately, however, Google’s AI overview instantly turned his merry curiosity into holiday dismay with its answer, reading, “There is no set amount Santa spends per child, as he is a fictional character.” “He screamed, ‘A fictional character?’” Bowron, a UK mother of two, told The Post. “And I was shocked, laughing in disbelief, telling him, ‘No, no. Google doesn’t always tell the truth. I still believe in Santa. Don’t listen to Google.’” A Google spokesperson told The Post that, despite its AI overview which derives responses from top-trending web content the company “believes in Santa,” noting that the site even features a dedicated Santa tracker, counting down the days until his big night. Still, peeved parents like Bowron aren’t pleased that their tiny tots, who would likely prefer to remain all aglow, can easily open up the internet and be gifted a lump of coal. After several hours of damage control, Leo so crushed by Google AI’s revelation that he gave it the middle finger seemed to buy his mom‘s insistence that Santa is real. But Bowron, wanting to preserve her youngest child’s innocence for as long as possible, spent the rest of the evening “annoyed” at the search engine and artificial intelligence for nearly spoiling the spirit of the season. With sophisticated technology at our fingertips and now, thanks to built-in speech features on most digital devices, at our beck and call large language models like ChatGPT, Grok and Google’s Gemini are everywhere and accessible to everybody. It’s a frustration most parents of Gen Alpha and Gen Beta kids, those under age 14, may face this year and beyond. Jeanice Perez, 37, a single mom of one from Las Vegas, didn’t even have time to adapt or even brace herself before her third-grader, Jordyn, stormed through the front door after school one day and yelled, “We need to talk!” Google had given the little girl a rude, Yuletide awakening, telling her Santa Claus isn’t real. It felt like a “betrayal” to Perez. “I was offended,” said the lifestyle influencer, whose daughter is now a teen. “I’d spent years committing to the bit perfecting my ‘Santa’ handwriting, making sure the reindeer had their carrots, nibbling the cookies just right, making sure not to let her find the wrapping paper ‘Santa’ used for her presents in the closet.” “Then, one day, I was just betrayed by Google.” The “betrayal” may be less of a surprise to some. Recent research found that 51% of children aged 8 and younger already have their own mobile devices. The data also determined that roughly 33% of parents allow their broods to access AI chatbots through those gadgets for answers to everyday quandaries including questions like: “Is Santa real?” Jeremy Gutsche, an AI expert and married father of two, told The Post that in the war between artificial intelligence vs. concerned parents, the bots will likely come out on top. “Is advanced technology the end of childhood wonder? Not exactly,” Gutsche, author and founder of Trend Hunter, an AI trends-spotting imprint, explained to The Post. “But it is an unstoppable force, which may push us to rethink how we teach our children about Christmas and whether or not Santa is a real character.” The pro warned that many major tech companies might soon implement kid-friendly guardrails to censor certain information but they are virtually ho-ho-hopeless. “There are dozens of competing models, and it would be nearly impossible for each platform to have one universal response to questions about Santa,” Gutsche noted. “The difficulty with embedding any rule into AI is that it can cause truth-seeking consequences in the future.” He said moms and dads will just have to learn to go with the high-tech flow. “We need to retrain our thinking in order to quickly adapt to changes in this new AI world,” said Gutsche, “versus hoping there will be regulations, which probably won’t happen.” Natalie, an NYC mom of two who preferred to use pseudonyms for her and her children, felt a similar sting when her 7-year-old daughter, Tara, announced that Google had recently burst her Santa-belief bubble. “I was walking my daughter to school the other morning and she turned to me and said, ‘I don’t believe in Santa anymore,’” Natalie recalled. “I asked why, and she replied, ‘Well, I asked Google whether Santa was real, and Google said ‘no.’ Google said that Santa was invented by Coca-Cola. “‘So I don’t believe in him anymore.’” The second grader’s sudden disillusion was hard for the mom to stomach. “Honestly, I felt quite sad about it,” she confessed. “You think, as a parent, that it’s much more in your control about how your kids find out about these things.” Her elder daughter, now 12, discovered the real deal about Kris Kringle two years ago, in what she called “a more normal, organic way” that kept the magic of Christmas alive. But that whimsical cheer might die with the tykes of today. Natalie revealed that debates about Santa’s existence are “now all flying around all her classmates,“ owing to overly chatty chatbots. One of the Gothamite’s mom friends plans to unplug her family’s Google Home smart speaker until the new year, hoping to avoid any anti-Santa leaks. Another pal, an elementary school teacher, told her that she lets her students the ones that skip AI altogether, and ask her if Santa is real what they think about his lore. She then follows up with a mini lesson on “beliefs” versus “knowledge.” But by that point, the child’s lost interest and often runs off, screaming “6 7!” It’s the silly, sad reality of kids and Christmas culture today. “I can just see that we’re raising a generation of slightly more cynical kids thanks to AI,” said Natalie. This may not be the answer you wanted . The Post asked Google, ChatGPT, Grok, Siri and Google Gemini the controversial, age-old question: “Is Santa real?” Check out what each chat said, in part.
https://nypost.com/2025/11/20/lifestyle/hey-google-is-santa-real-ai-is-ruining-christmas-for-kids/

Wikipedia Traffic Drops as AI Answers Eat the Free Encyclopedia

The Wikimedia Foundation announced this week that human traffic to Wikipedia fell roughly 8% between May and August compared to the same period last year. The decline came into focus after the foundation discovered that sophisticated bots, primarily from Brazil, had been disguising themselves as human visitors.

After updating its detection systems in May, the foundation reclassified traffic data and found that much of the unusually high traffic in May and June came from bots built to evade detection. The revised numbers revealed what many in publishing already knew: fewer people visit Wikipedia directly because search engines now provide answers on their own pages.

“After making this revision, we are seeing declines in human pageviews on Wikipedia over the past few months, amounting to a decrease of roughly 8% as compared to the same months in 2024,” Marshall Miller wrote. “We believe that these declines reflect the impact of generative AI and social media on how people seek information, especially with search engines providing answers directly to searchers, often based on Wikipedia content.”

AI is not just affecting Wikipedia. Data from Pew Research showed that median year-over-year referral traffic from Google Search to premium publishers has decreased almost every week during May and June 2025, with losses outpacing gains two-to-one. Nearly 60% of all Google searches now end in an AI-generated summary instead of directing users to read the actual source.

Publishers across industries are sounding alarms and resorting to lawsuits in an attempt to gain some protection. Danielle Coffey, who leads the News/Media Alliance representing more than 2,000 outlets, said Google is using publisher content without compensation while offering no meaningful way to opt out without disappearing from search entirely.

“It’s parasitic, it’s unsustainable, and it poses a real existential threat to many in our industry,” she said.

The volume of AI content online is rising fast. Research from SEO firm Graphite found that as of November 2024, almost half of new web articles were generated using AI in some form, up from just 5% before ChatGPT’s launch. A post by Ask Perplexity on X claimed AI content went from around 5% in 2020 to 48% by May 2025, with projections saying 90% or more by next year.

The Wikimedia Foundation said fewer visits to Wikipedia could mean that fewer volunteers contribute to growing and enriching the content, and fewer individual donors support the work. In response, the foundation is enforcing policies for third-party access, developing a framework for attribution, and experimenting with ways to bring free knowledge to younger audiences on platforms like YouTube and TikTok.

The foundation emphasized that Wikipedia’s human knowledge is more valuable to the world than ever before, 25 years since its creation. The question remains whether the platforms using that knowledge will support the ecosystem that creates it.
https://decrypt.co/344845/wikipedia-traffic-drops-ai-answers-eat-free-encyclopedia