4 big ways ‘The X-Files’ distorts government operations

**4 Big Ways ‘The X-Files’ Distorts Government Operations**
*By Vinita Jain | Oct 07, 2025, 10:54 AM*

*What’s the story?*
*The X-Files* is a cult classic, famous for its take on government conspiracies and the paranormal. While the series makes for an entertaining watch, it often takes creative liberties with how real-world government operations work. Here are some of the most notable ways the show misrepresents government conspiracies—and how those portrayals differ from reality.

**1. Overemphasis on Secrecy**
*The X-Files* frequently depicts government operations as being shrouded in extreme secrecy, with very little oversight. While it’s true that some operations are classified, in reality, there are numerous checks and balances designed to ensure accountability. Government actions are typically subject to scrutiny by various oversight bodies—something the show seldom reflects.

**2. Simplified Narratives**
The series tends to reduce complex issues into simple, clear-cut narratives of good versus evil. However, real-world government decisions and actions are influenced by a multitude of factors and involve many stakeholders. This oversimplification can lead viewers to misunderstand the complexities involved in governance and policy-making.

**3. Dramatic Portrayals of Technology**
Technology in *The X-Files* is often portrayed as far more advanced than it actually is or available to the public. While this adds to the suspense and intrigue of the show, it does not accurately represent the current state of technological development or its realistic limitations within government operations.

**4. Focus on Individual Agents**
The series spotlights individual agents who seem to have significant control over major government decisions. In reality, most government actions result from teamwork and collaboration across various departments and officials. This focus on individuals can give the false impression that one person wields more power than is typical within the larger system.

While *The X-Files* remains a beloved show for its storytelling and mysterious themes, it’s important to recognize these creative liberties to better understand how government operations actually function.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/how-the-x-files-misrepresents-government-conspiracies/story

4 big ways ‘The X-Files’ distorts government operations

**4 Big Ways ‘The X-Files’ Distorts Government Operations**
*By Vinita Jain | Oct 07, 2025, 10:54 AM*

*What’s the story?*
_The X-Files_ is a cult classic renowned for its intriguing take on government conspiracies and the paranormal. While the series offers great entertainment, it often takes creative liberties in portraying how real-world government operations actually work. Here are four notable ways the show misrepresents government activities and how these differ from reality.

### 1. Overemphasis on Secrecy
_The X-Files_ frequently depicts government operations as being enveloped in extreme secrecy with little to no oversight. In reality, although some operations are classified, there are numerous checks and balances designed to ensure accountability. Government actions are typically subject to scrutiny by various oversight bodies — a safeguard that the show largely overlooks or underrepresents.

### 2. Simplified Narratives
The series tends to present complex issues as straightforward battles between good and evil. However, government decisions and actions in the real world are rarely so black-and-white. They are influenced by a multitude of factors and involve many stakeholders, making policymaking and governance far more nuanced. This simplification can mislead viewers about the intricacies involved in governmental processes.

### 3. Dramatic Portrayals of Technology
In _The X-Files_, technology is often depicted as far more advanced—or accessible—than it truly is. While such portrayals heighten suspense and intrigue, they do not accurately reflect the current state of technological development or its real-world limitations within government operations.

### 4. Focus on Individual Agents
The show spotlights individual agents who appear to wield significant control over major government decisions. In contrast, actual government actions typically emerge from collaboration and teamwork among numerous departments and officials. This individual-centric focus can give viewers an exaggerated impression of a single person’s power within the complex government system.

While _The X-Files_ remains an iconic and entertaining journey into the mysterious, it’s important to remember that its portrayal of government operations is shaped by storytelling rather than strict realism. Understanding these distinctions helps viewers appreciate the show’s creativity without conflating fiction with fact.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/how-the-x-files-misrepresents-government-conspiracies/story

4 big ways ‘The X-Files’ distorts government operations

**4 Big Ways ‘The X-Files’ Distorts Government Operations**
*By Vinita Jain | Oct 07, 2025, 10:54 AM*

*What’s the story?*

*The X-Files* is a cult classic, famous for its take on government conspiracies and the paranormal. While the series is undeniably entertaining, it often takes creative liberties with how real-world government operations actually work. Here are four notable ways the show misrepresents government conspiracies and how these differ from reality.

**1. Overemphasis on Secrecy**
*The X-Files* frequently depicts government operations as wrapped in extreme secrecy with minimal oversight. In truth, although some operations are classified, government activities are subject to numerous checks and balances to ensure accountability. Oversight bodies regularly scrutinize government actions—an element largely missing from the show’s portrayal.

**2. Simplified Narratives**
The series tends to reduce complex issues into clear-cut stories of good versus evil. However, real-world government decisions are influenced by a complex mix of factors and involve many stakeholders. This oversimplification can mislead viewers, obscuring the intricate processes involved in governance and policy-making.

**3. Dramatic Portrayals of Technology**
*The X-Files* often showcases technology that seems far more advanced than what is actually available to the public or government agencies. While these futuristic gadgets enhance suspense, they do not accurately reflect the current state of technological development or the real limitations faced within government operations.

**4. Focus on Individual Agents**
The series centers on individual agents who appear to wield significant control over major government decisions. In reality, government actions are typically the result of teamwork and collaboration among multiple departments and officials. This focus on lone agents can give the mistaken impression that a single person holds more power than is true within the larger system.

While *The X-Files* remains an iconic and gripping show, it’s important to remember that its thrilling narrative often comes at the expense of accurately depicting how government really functions.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/how-the-x-files-misrepresents-government-conspiracies/story

Clemson Professor Sues University After Being Fired for ‘Play Certain Games, Win Certain Prizes’ Post About Charlie Kirk’s Assassination

A former Clemson University professor is suing the school, claiming his firing over a Facebook post about the assassination of conservative icon Charlie Kirk violated his First Amendment rights.

Joshua Bregy, an assistant professor in environmental engineering, was one of several Clemson employees dismissed last month after their social media comments sparked outrage from conservatives. The group demanded accountability for professionals who appeared to be gloating over Kirk’s tragic murder.

The lawsuit, filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in federal court, seeks Bregy’s reinstatement, back pay, and damages. It argues that the university bowed to pressure from bullying legislators and an online mob, rather than addressing any internal disruption.

“External pressure, not internal disruption, caused Clemson to fire Bregy,” the lawsuit, obtained by the South Carolina Daily Gazette, states. It continues, “But however challenging it must have been for Clemson to confront bullying legislators or the online mob and its 280-character pitchforks, the First Amendment does not credit Clemson’s impulse to capitulate as a legitimate interest. The Constitution requires a stronger spine than that.”

This is especially ironic given that the “woke left” has spent years pushing for conservatives to be fired and censored online for speech they disagreed with.

Bregy’s post, shared shortly after the shooting, reposted someone else’s comment criticizing Kirk’s past statements on gun rights. Kirk had argued that some gun deaths were a necessary cost for Second Amendment freedoms. The former professor added his own commentary:

“I’ll never advocate for violence in any form, but it sounds to me like karma is sometimes swift and ironic. As Kirk said, play certain games, win certain prizes.”

He further questioned why conservatives weren’t equally outraged over the June 2025 assassination of Democratic Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman. While expressing superficial sympathy for Kirk’s family, Bregy refused to allow Kirk to be portrayed as a martyr, calling him “a flawed human being whose rhetoric caused notable damage.”

According to the South Carolina Daily Gazette, Bregy’s Facebook settings usually allowed only friends to see his posts. However, because the original post he shared was public, his repost was also publicly viewable, per the lawsuit. After a few hours, Bregy made the post private and then deleted it entirely the next morning at the request of university officials.

Allen Chaney, Legal Director for the American Civil Liberties Union of South Carolina, said in a statement: “The First Amendment protects the rights of public employees to speak in their personal capacity on important public topics. When it comes to free speech, Clemson isn’t allowed to cave to the whims of a political mob. Fortunately for us all, the Constitution is made of sterner stuff than that.”

Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old founder of Turning Point USA and a leading voice in conservative activism, was fatally shot on September 10 while speaking at Utah Valley University. The brazen act of political violence shocked the world.

In the immediate aftermath, conservatives mobilized and secured the firing or disciplining of dozens of educators across the country for posts that mocked or downplayed the assassination.

The South Carolina Daily Gazette reports that Clemson released a statement on September 12 expressing disagreement with the statements made by the professors but recognized their First Amendment rights to free speech.

However, the next day, GOP leaders in both state legislature chambers—including the lead budget writers in each—sent a letter to Clemson’s Board of Trustees calling for immediate and appropriate action.

While the letter did not specify what action should be taken, the lawsuit alleges the message was clear. The choice of signatories, combined with their authority over Clemson’s budget, conveyed this warning: fire Joshua Bregy and fellow professor Melvin Villaver, or face potential funding cuts.

An hour before an emergency board meeting on September 15, Clemson announced it had suspended Bregy and another professor from teaching duties and fired a third employee.

In his termination letter, Bregy was informed that he had engaged in “blatantly unprofessional conduct” and conduct “seriously prejudicial to the University.” The letter stated, “You did not show due restraint or respect, and you made no effort when you reposted to state that your views did not represent the views of Clemson University.”

To date, Clemson University has not publicly commented on the lawsuit.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/10/clemson-professor-sues-university-after-being-fired-play/