Solana Price Drops to $140, Is a Fall to $134 the Next Move?

Posted on by
Reply

Solana Finds Itself in the Spotlight Amid Crypto Turmoil

Solana (SOL) has come under intense pressure as another wave of volatility shakes the cryptocurrency market. The SOL price experienced a sharp decline, plunging below key support levels amid a climate of widespread fear across the sector. Today, SOL price predictions are increasingly grounded in technical analysis rather than optimism.

### What’s Driving the Drop?

Several factors are weighing heavily on Solana’s performance:

– A broad market risk-off sentiment has gripped investors.
– Significant ETF outflows from Bitcoin and Ethereum are impacting overall crypto confidence.
– Solana’s own ETF inflows remain weak, totaling just around $46 million, failing to counterbalance the selling pressure.

After price fell below the crucial $144.50-$140.80 demand zone, algorithmic traders stepped in with increased selling, further pushing the price down. Volatility has surged, prompting traders to focus on potential lower support levels as the market adjusts expectations.

### ETF Flows: Solana’s Ongoing Tug-of-War

ETF inflows into Solana have so far failed to spark a lasting rally. Data from Sosovalue reveals that daily net inflows into SOL ETFs have reached approximately $12.04 million, with total net assets standing at $541.31 million. However, these figures remain small compared to the $1.8 billion in ETF outflows from Bitcoin and Ethereum that have been dominating market sentiment.

While inflows of up to $70 million on October 28 and November 3 temporarily slowed Solana’s decline, the momentum was short-lived. This pattern suggests that ETF inflows alone cannot offset the broader macro-driven selling pressures, especially as fear continues to pervade risk assets.

### Is $134 the Next Major Target?

Examining the SOL price charts reveals a challenging environment for bulls. Key observations include:

– Price has fallen below its 7-day Simple Moving Average (SMA) of $147.97.
– The SOL price broke beneath Fibonacci support at $149.96, currently trading around $140.71.
– Over the past week, SOL has dropped nearly 16%.
– The daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) stands at 29.9, indicating an oversold condition.
– The MACD exhibits a strong negative histogram value of -1.99, signaling increasing bearish momentum.

Attempts to reclaim the $144.50-$140.80 support zone have failed repeatedly, increasing the likelihood of further decline. The next significant support lies near $134.97, a level last tested in June.

On the upside, resistance points are identified at $149.96 and $161.73. Should selling pressure persist and $134 support break, the technical structure suggests a potential slide toward $129.

### What Lies Ahead?

Recovery for Solana depends on a successful close above $144.90. Achieving this could catalyze a swift move back toward $149.96 within 3 to 4 trading sessions. If bulls manage to regain control, a bounce toward the $150–$161 range is possible.

For now, however, bearish sentiment dominates the narrative, with downward pressure likely to persist until key resistance levels are convincingly reclaimed.

—

Stay tuned for further updates as the situation develops. Traders are advised to watch these critical technical levels closely when planning their next move in Solana.
https://coinpedia.org/price-analysis/solana-price-drops-to-140-is-a-fall-to-134-the-next-move/

Drive Shack GAAP EPS of -$0.02, revenue of $90.15M

Posted on by
Reply

To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable JavaScript and cookies in your browser.

Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.

If you have an ad-blocker enabled, you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh the page.
https://seekingalpha.com/news/4522731-drive-shack-gaap-eps-of–002-revenue-of-9015m?feed_item_type=news

Institutions don’t care about Bitcoin Core vs Knots clash: Galaxy exec

Posted on by
Reply

The majority of institutional Bitcoin investors don’t seem to know or care about the ongoing Bitcoin Core vs Knots debate, which has been intensifying over the past few months. This insight comes from Galaxy Digital’s head of research, Alex Thorn.

### The Core of the Debate

At the heart of the discussion are differing views on what Bitcoin (BTC) should be used for, particularly whether non-financial transactions should be excluded from the blockchain. The recent Bitcoin Core v30 update has sparked this debate, with some arguing that it opens the “floodgates” to spam transactions.

Supporters of Knots nodes believe this type of “spam” should be filtered out to prevent potential misuse. They warn that allowing unchecked transactions could enable bad actors to embed illegal or immoral content into the blockchain. On the other hand, Bitcoin Core advocates argue that imposing such restrictions could fragment the network, confuse users, and undermine one of the fundamental principles of Bitcoin’s technology: permissionless and decentralized operation.

### More Than Half Are Unaware or Unconcerned

In a recent post on X (formerly Twitter), Alex Thorn shared findings from a poll conducted among 25 institutional Bitcoin investors that Galaxy Digital works with. The results reveal that:

– 46% of respondents were unaware of the Bitcoin Core vs Knots debate.
– 36% said they either didn’t know much about it or felt ambivalent.
– The remaining 18% indicated a clear preference for Bitcoin Core’s position.

Thorn commented on these results, saying, “Real capital, real investors, service providers, even government officials see no problem at all or are unaware there’s even a debate. At best, it’s a hypothetical problem, and their proposed solution does nothing to solve the (fake) problem they claim is real.”

He further added, “Even if it [the proposed solution] is adopted, all their legal theories are mumbo jumbo, and the fears about them are ones that everyone got comfortable with years ago during early debates over the legality of permissionless decentralized systems.”

### Addressing Concerns About the Poll Size

Some questioned the validity of the poll due to its small sample size. Thorn acknowledged this concern but assured that the poll’s results align closely with his broader interactions in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

He stated, “I won’t reveal their identities but I will say yes, and the results from that poll line up exactly with my conversations with other whales, investors, leaders at miners and service providers, and government officials over the last several months.”

Thorn also noted that while he did not poll miners directly, he is familiar with most of the major mining players and confirmed that “nobody cares or is following [the debate] at all.”

### Possible Outcomes

Last month, a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) proposing a soft fork stirred controversy on X. A particular section appeared to threaten legal consequences for those rejecting the fork, which many Bitcoiners criticized as “legal threats.”

Despite this, Thorn believes the debate will likely conclude in one of three ways:

1. **No one cares, and the debate fades into obscurity.**

2. **The proponents of the fork inadvertently create the very problem they fear by scaring everyone away from Bitcoin; however, their fork ideas ultimately fail.**

3. **Although highly unlikely, their proposed changes get adopted. Even then, Thorn argues that their solutions would fall short, and their actions would have already instilled fear around permissionless systems, causing irreparable harm to Bitcoin adoption.**

### Conclusion

The ongoing Bitcoin Core vs Knots debate highlights important philosophical differences in the Bitcoin community regarding network governance and usage. However, for most institutional investors and key players in the ecosystem, this debate remains largely theoretical or irrelevant to their focus on Bitcoin as a financial asset.

As the discussion unfolds, its ultimate impact on Bitcoin’s future adoption and network integrity remains to be seen. For now, many continue to prioritize Bitcoin’s core principles of permissionless access and decentralization.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-core-vs-knots-debate-institutional-investors-response

Afghanistan vs Myanmar Prediction and Betting Tips | 18th November 2025

Posted on by
Reply

Afghanistan and Myanmar will clash in a neutral venue in Bangladesh on Tuesday during the 2027 AFC Asian Cup qualifiers. However, the match is a dead rubber as both teams have already been eliminated from the competition.

Ranked 162nd in the world, Afghanistan, also known as the Lions of Khorasan, have struggled throughout the qualifiers. They have failed to win any of their four Group E fixtures, collecting just two points from two draws against Pakistan last month. Earlier in the campaign, Afghanistan lost 2-1 to Myanmar in their opening game, followed by a 1-0 defeat to Syria. Afghanistan have never qualified for the Asian Cup before, and their dream of reaching the tournament remains elusive after another disappointing qualifying campaign.

On the other hand, Myanmar started the qualifiers strongly. The Chinthe won their first two games, gathering six points from a possible six, and looked like serious contenders alongside Syria. However, the Qasioun Eagles dashed Myanmar’s hopes by handing them back-to-back defeats last month. Syria dominated with a 5-1 home win and a 3-0 victory away. Myanmar’s defense struggled against a lethal Syrian attack led by Omar Khribin, who scored a hat-trick in their first meeting.

### Afghanistan vs Myanmar: Head-To-Head and Key Numbers

Afghanistan and Myanmar have faced each other just once before, with Myanmar claiming a 2-1 victory in March 2025. Currently, Afghanistan is one of eight teams without a win in the Asian Cup qualifiers. Myanmar has six points from four games, while Afghanistan has earned only two. Interestingly, Myanmar has conceded nine goals, whereas Afghanistan’s defense has allowed just four.

Form-wise, Myanmar is winless in their last three matches, while Afghanistan has failed to win any of their eight games in 2025, suffering five losses. According to the latest FIFA World Rankings, Afghanistan sits at 162nd place, with Myanmar just behind in 163rd.

### Match Prediction: Afghanistan vs Myanmar

Though Myanmar defeated Afghanistan in their previous qualifier, the stakes are lower this time as both sides are already out of contention. While Myanmar may still pose a challenge, Afghanistan should be able to hold them to a draw and share the spoils.

**Prediction:** Afghanistan 1-1 Myanmar

### Afghanistan vs Myanmar: Betting Tips

– **Tip 1:** Result – Draw
– **Tip 2:** Goals Over/Under 2.5 – Under 2.5
– **Tip 3:** Both Teams to Score – Yes
https://www.sportskeeda.com/football/afghanistan-vs-myanmar-prediction-betting-tips-18th-november-2025

El único touchdown de Jalen Hurts lleva a Eagles a victoria 16-9 sobre Lions

Posted on by
Reply

Por DAN GELSTON
FILADELFIA (AP)

Jalen Hurts anotó el único touchdown en un esfuerzo por lo demás débil de la ofensiva de los Eagles de Filadelfia, y fue suficiente para llevarlos a una victoria de 16-9 sobre los Lions de Detroit, quienes fallaron en todos sus intentos en cuarta oportunidad el domingo por la noche.

Los Eagles (8-2) son el único equipo en la División Este de la NFC con más de tres victorias y el segundo en la conferencia en alcanzar ocho triunfos, lo que los pone en contienda para obtener el primer puesto y ganar la ventaja de jugar en casa mientras los campeones del Super Bowl buscan repetir el título de la liga.

Hurts lanzó para solo 135 yardas, el actual Jugador Ofensivo del Año Saquon Barkley corrió para 83, y los ex receptores de 1,000 yardas A. J. Brown y DeVonta Smith se combinaron para nueve recepciones para 57 yardas. Sin embargo, esas dificultades no importaron mucho contra un equipo de Detroit que parecía feliz de intentar regalar el juego.

Los Lions, que entraron promediando 31.4 puntos por juego, no lograron convertir en cinco intentos de cuarta oportunidad y se fueron tres de 13 en tercer down.

El coach de los Lions, Dan Campbell, reemplazó al coordinador ofensivo John Morton como el encargado de las jugadas la semana pasada. Campbell no estaba listo para decir que era un cambio permanente, aunque volvió a llamar las jugadas contra los Eagles. Campbell no fue una gran mejora.

El notable fracaso de los Lions llegó al final del tercer cuarto mientras perdían 13-6, después de que Jared Goff conectara con Jahmyr Gibbs para una ganancia de 42 yardas que llevó el balón a la yarda 22 de los Eagles.

Los Lions lograron un primer intento y gol en la yarda ocho, pero perdieron el balón en downs.

Los Eagles al menos aprovecharon su mejor oportunidad de anotar dentro de la yarda diez. Jake Elliott pateó goles de campo de 27 y 34 yardas en la primera mitad. Hizo uno de 49 yardas en el cuarto para una ventaja de 16-6.

Goff —quien completó 14 de 37 para 255 yardas— conectó con Jameson Williams para una anotación de 40 yardas que empató el juego a seis al final del segundo cuarto.

Williams celebró saltando sobre el acolchado del poste de gol y abrazando el poste, lo que le valió una penalización de 15 yardas por conducta antideportiva.

En una noche ventosa en Filadelfia, esas yardas perdidas le costaron a los Lions cuando Jake Bates falló a la derecha en el punto extra de 48 yardas.

Bates pateó un gol de campo de 54 yardas con 1:58 restantes, pero no fue suficiente para cambiar el resultado del partido.
https://www.mcall.com/2025/11/17/el-nico-touchdown-de-jalen-hurts-lleva-a-eagles-a-victoria-16-9-sobre-lions/

Analyst’s warning – Bitcoin’s early-2026 rebound could precede a major crash!

Posted on by
Reply

**Has Bitcoin Entered a Bear Market?**

The question on every investor’s mind is: has Bitcoin entered a bear market? The answer is not conclusive—at least, not yet. There is still another week for Bitcoin (BTC) to respond following the recent formation of a death cross.

—

**Signs of Recovery to Watch**

One of the key signals that could indicate a recovery would be Bitcoin moving beyond the $110,000 mark, corresponding with the 50-day moving average (50DMA), within November. Such a move would draw parallels to Bitcoin’s price action seen back in April.

—

**Repeating Patterns: March vs. Today**

Bitcoin’s price movements in recent weeks bear striking similarities to those observed earlier this year in March. On both occasions, Bitcoin broke down beneath a 3-month range formation that followed new all-time highs. This pattern has caught the attention of market analysts.

In a recent post on X, analyst EndGame Macro shared insights suggesting Bitcoin is likely to find support and bounce back in early 2026, based on detailed financial analysis. However, it comes with a cautionary note—the bounce is unlikely to mark the start of the next major rally like the one seen in April and May.

—

**Why Caution is Warranted for 2026**

Several factors contribute to the expectation of a potential slump in Q2 2026. The analyst highlighted the drying up of liquidity during tax season and the U.S. Treasury’s plan to build up the Treasury General Account (TGA), which tightens liquidity conditions. These elements could reduce risk appetite considerably, resulting in Bitcoin struggling and possibly sinking further into a bear market.

—

**What Lies Ahead?**

The critical question remains: will Bitcoin repeat the March-April 2025 scenario, where a rally led to new all-time highs? Or will we experience a brief bounce in Q1 2026 that misleads investors into a false sense of security before the price dips deeper?

—

**Analyzing the Macro Environment**

Understanding the broader economic indicators is essential for making sense of the situation and for Bitcoin bulls to strategize accordingly.

One such indicator is the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY), which measures the value of the U.S. dollar against a basket of six foreign currencies. A rising DXY trend signals dollar strength, often leading to weaker Bitcoin performance due to reduced risk appetite. Conversely, a falling DXY indicates a weakening dollar, generally associated with stronger Bitcoin performance and a more risk-on sentiment.

Since 2021, when the Bitcoin bear market began, the DXY had been on a strong uptrend. Currently, the DXY is maintaining a bearish structure—a positive sign for Bitcoin. However, this could change.

Interestingly, the probability of a Federal Reserve rate cut in December has dropped sharply from 88% a month ago to 44% now. This uncertainty around rate cuts could halt the current DXY downtrend, which would be unfavorable for Bitcoin bulls.

—

**Investor Sentiment and Market Flows**

Further reflecting the prevailing market mood, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have experienced significant outflows since the market crash on October 10th. This trend highlights weak investor sentiment and underscores the strength of bearish market forces, although it does not guarantee sustained losses.

—

**The Significance of the Death Cross**

Benjamin Cowen, CEO and founder of Into The Cryptoverse, pointed out the formation of a Bitcoin death cross in a recent post on X. Historically, death crosses have marked market bottoms. However, if Bitcoin fails to respond bullishly within a week by challenging the 50DMA at $110,000, the death cross could instead signal a “macro lower high.”

Such a lack of a positive response would suggest that Bitcoin may attempt another rally towards the $110,000 region but only to form a macro lower high—a bounce that is part of a larger downtrend. This outlook aligns with the expectations for Q2 2026 discussed earlier.

—

**Conclusion**

While Bitcoin has yet to definitively enter a bear market, key indicators point to cautious optimism mixed with underlying bearish risks. Investors and bulls should watch the $110,000 level closely and remain vigilant about macroeconomic factors driving market sentiment. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining the direction of Bitcoin’s next major move.
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/bitcoin/analysts-warning-bitcoins-early-2026-rebound-could-precede-a-major-crash/

The Fair ICA Method Points Directly to the Best Crypto for the Future

Posted on by
Reply

**Bitcoin: Discover How Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) Becomes the Best Crypto for the Future with a Provably Fair Auction Model Unlike Pi and BCH**

While familiar networks continue to draw attention, Pi Network (PI) feature updates and shifting Bitcoin Cash (BCH) patterns reveal that these projects still rely on traditional systems. But what if the core method used to launch tokens is flawed from the start?

A fully built project named Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) challenges this notion and flips the entire approach on its head. With its whitelist now open ahead of the main presale auctions, ZKP questions the usual launch process—not through promises, but through clear, mathematical proof.

ZKP’s Initial Coin Auction introduces a system of cryptographic fairness. It enforces a daily limit of $50,000 to prevent whales from dominating the sale, ensuring every participant receives their exact proportional share of the 90 billion coins. This focus on a verified process—rather than insider access—sets a strong example of what the best crypto for the future should look like.

—

### Inside the Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) Initial Coin Auction

Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) is pushing back against the standard token launch format. Instead of the common presales that frequently benefit private groups or whales, this fully built project utilizes a daily Initial Coin Auction designed to remove unfair advantages through code.

ZKP’s system eliminates special rates, secret allocations, and early bonuses for connected groups. The whitelist to participate in the upcoming auctions is open now, providing a transparent process controlled entirely by smart contracts.

Each day during the presale, exactly 200 million ZKP coins are distributed among all contributors from that 24-hour period. Your share is directly proportional to your contribution. For example, if the total daily pool is 1,000 USDC and you contribute 100 USDC, you will receive precisely 10% of that day’s 200 million coins.

This method is a prime example of the fairness the cryptocurrency space should strive for.

To further reduce whale influence, daily contributions are capped at $50,000, while a $50 minimum lets virtually anyone join. This is more than just a simple sale—it is an on-chain release of 90 billion coins with no venture capital unlocks and no founder sell-offs.

When the presale auctions begin, the testnet and Proof Pod hardware will also launch, forming a provably fair model that many believe exemplifies what the best crypto projects of the future should offer.

—

### Fresh Progress Inside the Pi Network (PI) Journey

The Pi Network is rapidly advancing toward its Open Mainnet, with recent changes catching community attention.

A major milestone was achieved with a successful stress test of the upcoming Mainnet v23. Built on Stellar’s framework, this version aims to provide strong scalability and smooth on-chain trading. The tests delivered an almost zero failure rate, indicating solid readiness for the final rollout.

Simultaneously, the team is aligning the network with ISO 20022, the global messaging standard used by banks—an important step toward making Pi compatible with traditional financial systems.

On the technical front, on November 11, the Core Team introduced a new Pi Node version (v0.5.4). This update improves the method for checking open ports on user nodes, which is vital for accurately calculating node bonuses and preparing for upcoming reward migrations.

As the mainnet development continues, the Pi DEX is actively running on the testnet. This robust milestone update highlights significant progress as Pi closes in on its Open Mainnet goal.

—

### A Closer Look at Recent Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Activity

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) has shown notable movement, especially after Bitcoin (BTC) surpassed the $100,000 mark.

Following a drop on November 11, BCH experienced a sharp intraday rebound on November 12, reflecting strong buyer interest. This price action adds nuance to an otherwise mixed but hopeful BCH trend outlook.

Many market watchers are observing whether BCH, one of the most recognized Bitcoin forks, can follow Bitcoin’s strong upward momentum. The close relationship between BTC and BCH continues to be a major factor influencing BCH’s short-term price movements.

Beyond price action, the Bitcoin Cash project maintains strong real-world use. Its fast transactions, low fees, and merchant-friendly design have driven steady adoption. BCH’s 4th place ranking on Crypwerk’s global adoption list demonstrates this ongoing growth.

Analysts remain optimistic, with forecasts for 2025 projecting highs near $710, contingent on sustained market attention. These solid fundamentals are central to Bitcoin Cash’s long-term trend outlook.

—

### How These Developments Compare in the Bigger Picture

While Pi Network’s recent milestone update shows steady progress toward its Open Mainnet and Bitcoin Cash’s trend outlook reflects broader positive market momentum, both projects operate within established frameworks.

They represent the continued evolution of well-known cryptocurrencies.

In contrast, Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) approaches the crypto space from a fresh starting point—beginning with a revolutionary launch method.

ZKP’s Initial Coin Auction system, governed by mathematical rules that prevent whales and insiders from gaining an unfair advantage, reshapes expectations around launch fairness.

This focus on verifiable fairness driven by code, rather than mere claims, offers a compelling argument for what the best crypto projects of the future should deliver.

The whitelist for this upcoming presale is open now.

—

### Find Out More about Zero Knowledge Proof

Website: [Insert Website Link]

—

*This publication is sponsored. Coindoo does not endorse or assume responsibility for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or any other materials on this page. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research before engaging in any cryptocurrency-related activities. Coindoo will not be liable, directly or indirectly, for any damages or losses resulting from the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned. Always do your own research.*

—

**About the Author**

Kosta joined the team in 2021 and quickly established himself through his thirst for knowledge, dedication, and analytical thinking. He covers a wide range of current topics and produces excellent reviews, PR articles, and educational materials. His work is frequently quoted by other news agencies.

—

**Related Stories**
[Insert links to related articles here]
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/crypto/the-fair-ica-method-points-directly-to-the-best-crypto-for-the-future/

“He does everything right”: When Chase Elliott named NASCAR champion as perfect role model for his kids

Posted on by
Reply

Former NASCAR Cup Series champion Chase Elliott was featured in an interview with stock car analyst Jeff Gluck in 2014.

The conversation provided unique insights into Elliott’s early career and his journey within the world of stock car racing. Fans and enthusiasts gained a deeper understanding of the young driver’s aspirations and the challenges he faced on his path to becoming a champion.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/nascar/news-he-everything-right-when-chase-elliott-named-nascar-champion-perfect-role-model-kids

No. 21 James Madison plays Washington State

Posted on by
Reply

Washington State (5-5) at No. 21 James Madison (9-1)

Date & Time: Nov. 22 at 1 p.m. EST
Location: James Madison University

Betting Odds

Opening Line: James Madison by 13.5
Against the Spread Records: James Madison 7-3, Washington State 6-4

How to Watch

ESPN+

Key Stats

James Madison Offense

  • Overall: 457.3 yards per game (19th in FBS)
  • Passing: 215.7 yards per game (83rd)
  • Rushing: 241.6 yards per game (7th)
  • Scoring: 37.1 points per game (14th)

James Madison Defense

  • Overall: 257.1 yards per game (5th in FBS)
  • Passing: 168 yards per game (13th)
  • Rushing: 89.1 yards per game (7th)
  • Scoring: 16.2 points per game (11th)

Washington State Offense

  • Overall: 309.9 yards per game (119th in FBS)
  • Passing: 199.4 yards per game (96th)
  • Rushing: 110.5 yards per game (119th)
  • Scoring: 20.7 points per game (115th)

Washington State Defense

  • Overall: 304.1 yards per game (18th in FBS)
  • Passing: 168.9 yards per game (14th)
  • Rushing: 135.2 yards per game (49th)
  • Scoring: 21 points per game (34th)

Additional Team Stats

  • Washington State ranks 102nd in third down conversion percentage, converting 35.9% of the time.
  • James Madison’s defense ranks 10th, allowing opponents to convert only 30.2% on third downs.
  • Turnover margin: Washington State is 123rd in FBS with a -9 turnover margin, while James Madison ranks 67th with an even turnover margin.
  • Penalties: James Madison averages 69.8 penalty yards per game (132nd in FBS), compared to Washington State’s 53.5 yards per game (64th).
  • Time of possession: James Madison is 2nd in FBS averaging 35:09 per game; Washington State ranks 18th with 32:11.

Team Leaders

James Madison

  • Passing: Alonza Barnett III – 2,089 yards, 16 TDs, 5 INTs, 61.6% completion
  • Rushing: Wayne Knight – 840 yards on 136 carries, 7 TDs
  • Receiving: Landon Ellis – 532 yards on 32 catches, 5 TDs

Washington State

  • Passing: Zevi Eckhaus – 1,390 yards, 10 TDs, 8 INTs, 64.0% completion
  • Rushing: Kirby Vorhees – 473 yards on 105 carries, 4 TDs
  • Receiving: Josh Meredith – 588 yards on 44 catches, 3 TDs

Last Game Recap

James Madison: James Madison dominated Appalachian State with a 58-10 victory on Saturday, Nov. 15. Alonza Barnett III led the offense, completing 22-of-35 passes for 303 yards with no passing touchdowns and one interception. He also rushed 11 times for no yards but scored two rushing touchdowns. Jobadiah Malary carried the ball eight times for 105 yards and scored three touchdowns. Jaylan Sanchez contributed with 69 yards on two receptions.

Washington State: Washington State earned a 28-3 victory over Louisiana Tech on Saturday, Nov. 15. Quarterback Zevi Eckhaus completed 17-of-25 passes for 146 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. He also ran 11 times for 56 yards and scored two rushing touchdowns. Kirby Vorhees had 76 rushing yards on 16 carries and added one rushing touchdown plus two receptions for 12 yards. Josh Meredith recorded 70 yards on five catches with one touchdown.

Next Game

  • James Madison: Travels to Coastal Carolina on Nov. 29.
  • Washington State: Hosts Oregon State on Nov. 29.

By The Associated Press

https://mymotherlode.com/sports/college-sports-general-news/10195329/no-21-james-madison-plays-washington-state.html

Jannik Sinner’s coach Darren Cahill reveals the ‘rare’ gesture Carlos Alcaraz made towards Italian’s box during ATP Finals clash

Posted on by
Reply

Jannik Sinner’s coach, Darren Cahill, heaped praise on Carlos Alcaraz for his sportsmanship and the positive energy he displayed on the court. Cahill expressed that Sinner’s team holds nothing but admiration for the talented Spaniard.

Sinner and Alcaraz faced off in a thrilling final at the ATP Finals, where the Italian star spectacularly defeated his rival to claim his second consecutive title. Coming into the tournament fresh off his Paris Masters triumph, Sinner had reclaimed the No. 1 ranking. Meanwhile, Alcaraz was just shy of regaining the top spot but secured it by defeating Lorenzo Musetti during the ATP Finals group stage.

Despite falling to Sinner in the finals, Alcaraz earned praise from Darren Cahill for spreading smiles and exhibiting exceptional sportsmanship throughout the match. Cahill revealed that he had sent a congratulatory message to Alcaraz after he achieved the World No. 1 ranking.

“Carlos has been incredible in 2025 and certainly the years before. I sent him a congratulations note a couple nights ago when he secured No. 1. He’s an incredible young man. He actually gave us a couple of smiles during the match. Jannik hit a backhand down the line at one point, and he looked over to us with a big smile. It is a pretty rare athlete and competitor that does that. We have nothing but admiration for Carlos,” Cahill shared.

Throughout the year, Alcaraz and Sinner have met multiple times on the court, always battling it out in finals. Both have won two Grand Slams apiece this year: Alcaraz claimed titles at the French Open and the US Open, while Sinner triumphed at the Australian Open and Wimbledon.

The rivalry between the two is marked not only by their dominance on the court but also by the mutual respect and camaraderie they share off it. They consistently acknowledge each other’s strengths, highlighting their integrity as competitors.

After reclaiming the No. 1 ranking, Alcaraz admitted that Sinner was the favorite heading into the ATP Finals, especially given his strong form on indoor courts and the support of his home crowd in Turin.

“Who is the favorite? I mean, the No. 1 means that I’ve been playing really good during the whole season, on all surfaces. He’s playing the best on indoor court. We’re playing in front of his home crowd. I would say he’s the favorite. Don’t want to believe it, but I would say he’s the favorite for tomorrow, I guess,” Alcaraz said during a post-match press conference.

With multiple Grand Slam titles between them, Alcaraz holds a slight edge in total majors, having won two Roland Garros, two Wimbledon, and two US Open titles, compared to Sinner’s two Grand Slam victories.

This ongoing rivalry promises to deliver more exciting tennis and memorable moments as both players continue to push each other to new heights.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/tennis/news-jannik-sinner-s-coach-darren-cahill-reveals-rare-gesture-carlos-alcaraz-made-towards-italian-s-box-atp-finals-clash