Bitcoin Price Today: BTC Price Reclaims Strength at $87K, but Bulls Must Overcome the $100K Block

After briefly dipping earlier in the week, Bitcoin has stabilized above crucial demand zones, attracting fresh trader interest. Market sentiment is shifting as buyers eye a potential surge toward the highly anticipated $90K-$100K range. Weekend Momentum Accelerates, but Analysts Urge Caution Market commentator Ted (@TedPillows)-known for tracking Bitcoin liquidity flows and weekend volatility patterns-highlighted the recurring nature of weekend-driven rallies, noting that they often fade once institutional trading volume returns. “TC weekend pump is here. And we know what will happen next,” he wrote, suggesting that Bitcoin frequently loses momentum without strong weekday follow-through from institutional desks. Bitcoin’s weekend pump returns, but traders warn real momentum must show up on weekdays. Technical charts referenced by traders show consistent selling pressure around this region, which continues to serve as a major barrier to any attempt at a new Bitcoin all-time high. Some analysts attribute this behavior to thinner weekend order books. According to multiple order-flow tools used by traders, weekend depth can be 10-30% lower than weekday levels, magnifying both upward surges and sudden corrections. Critics refer to these conditions as “low-liquidity weekend traps”, though not all analysts agree on the reliability of this pattern. Large Sell Orders Emerge as Market Approaches Resistance In a separate update, Ted noted that significant sell-side liquidity has been forming between $88,000 and $91,000. “Some big sell orders are emerging. Bitcoin is trading $2,000 above the CME gap, which isn’t a good sign,” he remarked, referencing common futures-market dynamics tracked by many traders. Bitcoin faces heavy sell walls near $88K-$91K as traders brace for a possible Monday top and a CME gap-filling drop. Red candles appeared as large sell walls developed across Binance. Coinbase and other major venues have visible liquidity clusters totaling nearly $800 million across multiple exchanges. While some traders interpret heavy liquidity as a sign of potential rejection, others argue that CME gaps do not always fill quickly, and their timing remains widely debated. Some previous gaps have taken weeks or months to close, while others remain unfilled entirely. This ongoing debate highlights the uncertainty surrounding Bitcoin’s next decisive move. Short-Term Technicals Support Upside-If Key Levels Hold A technical breakdown from TradingView analyst SMC-Trading-Point-who specializes in Smart Money Concepts (SMC) and institutional order-flow analysis-offered a more constructive outlook, pointing to strong structural signals on the 1-hour BTC/USDT chart. BTC holds above the 85. 3K-86K demand zone, signaling bullish continuation toward the 90K liquidity target. Price action remains above the EMA 50, while approaching the EMA 200, a level many traders associate with potential trend reversals when broken convincingly. Higher lows and the break of minor structure highs suggest that bullish momentum is gradually building. The analyst highlighted the next upside target at $90, 000-$90, 100, which aligns with a liquidity pool and resistance cluster monitored by short-term traders. Looking Ahead: Can Bitcoin Break the $100K Barrier? Bitcoin’s weekend rally shows that buyers remain active, but the next major test will come when weekday trading volume returns. The $88,000-$91,000 region has emerged as a critical battleground, with order-book data showing heavy liquidity in this range. Breaking above it could open the path toward another challenge of $100, 000, while failure may lead to a broader retracement toward the lower CME gap area. Bitcoin was trading at around 86, 990, up 2. 93% in the last 24 hours at press time. With Bitcoin’s market cap recovering alongside resilient ETF inflows, the broader uptrend remains intact-but volatility is likely as BTC approaches one of its most important resistance zones of the year.
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/bitcoin/bitcoin-price-today-btc-price-reclaims-strength-at-87k-but-bulls-must-overcome-the-100k-block/

Why Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere Flopped At The Box Office

With the musician biopic omnipresent in modern Hollywood, it was inevitable that Bruce Springsteen would eventually get his equivalent to “Bohemian Rhapsody” or “Elvis.” Such a project finally materialized with *Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere*, which saw *The Bear* veteran Jeremy Allen White lending his soulful pupils and psychologically frazzled aura to Springsteen as he works to create his 1982 album *Nebraska*.

But any hopes that *Deliver Me From Nowhere* would score an opening weekend anywhere close to the biggest musician biopics in box office history quickly flamed out, thanks to the movie only grossing $8.88 million on opening weekend. That’s the 18th-worst debut in history for a movie playing in 3,400+ theaters domestically. On a $55 million budget, the film has a long way to go before it becomes profitable.

Given Springsteen’s iconic stature and the success of other films like *Elvis*, it’s worth asking why exactly *Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere* crashed so spectacularly at the box office. The reasons include the lack of famous, marketable names in its cast and crew, its downbeat atmosphere, and even the lack of novelty surrounding a movie concerning Bruce Springsteen, among other problems.

Though on paper this project looked like a financial slam-dunk to Disney/20th Century Studios executives, *Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere* suffered from some severe obstacles in execution that led to it hitting a box office sour note.

In 2009, director Scott Cooper’s *Crazy Heart*, in addition to securing Jeff Bridges an Oscar win, became a solid box office performer for Fox Searchlight Pictures with a $39.47 million domestic haul. Since then, save for *Black Mass*, Cooper’s filmography has solely consisted of features that ended up beneath $30 million domestically.

Since 2017, his only theatrical release before *Deliver Me From Nowhere* was *Antlers*, a 2021 horror title that topped out at $10.61 million domestically. The man’s films have their fair share of devotees, but he’s nowhere near a household name in his box office track record.

The trouble is that *Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere* could have certainly used a well-known filmmaking name to put it on the radar of general audiences. An auteur known for delivering crowdpleasers, like Baz Luhrmann, might have immediately catapulted *Springsteen* into the spotlight.

Instead, Cooper is someone with an erratic box office track record and a mixed history in terms of critical reception. This was a filmmaker who couldn’t be put on the poster or help draw in the Letterboxd crowd.

Granted, in this day and age where even Leonardo DiCaprio can’t instantly score a $35 million+ debut, the failure of *Deliver Me From Nowhere* can’t entirely fall on Cooper’s shoulders. Still, the lack of a more notable director just gave this troubled music biopic one less must-see element to lean on. Residual *Crazy Heart* love wasn’t enough to get people invested in *Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere*.

Most people, when they go see a concert, want a big experience. They yearn for elaborate choreography from the backup dancers, striking set design, and a sense of bigger-than-life showmanship from the central singer. It’s one thing to sing familiar tunes. It’s another to give people a spectacle they’ll never forget.

Many of the biggest music biopics at the box office deliver that kind of visual razzle-dazzle. *Bohemian Rhapsody* gave audiences plenty of sequences where Freddie Mercury and Queen belted out familiar tunes with lots of energy. *Rocketman* and *Elvis*, meanwhile, deployed stylized maximalism that gave viewers a lot of bang for their buck.

*Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere*, meanwhile, was a more grounded, grim odyssey exploring Bruce Springsteen’s psychological turmoil as he puts together a beloved but musically minimalist album. This more intimate scope helped differentiate *Nowhere* from other music biopics, but also deprived audiences of the sort of grandeur informing *Elvis* and *Rocketman*.

Ads for the biggest music biopics emphasize sweeping scope and the ways iconic singers change history. *Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere*’s trailers, meanwhile, had Jeremy Allen White’s Springsteen wandering through monochromatic, traumatic childhood memories.

In hammering home its downbeat atmosphere, *Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere* ensured it would never be as lucrative as the biggest musician biopics, which prioritize pageantry above all else. Just ask any concertgoer — folks want something to marvel at in addition to hearing well-known hits.

Bob Dylan is a famously reclusive human being. His music has forever changed American culture, but he’s not on every talk show at least once a year, and he’s not easily accessible through social media activity. Thus, when director James Mangold and leading man Timothée Chalamet delivered *A Complete Unknown* in December 2024, it filled a hole in the marketplace.

In contrast, Bruce Springsteen is everywhere in the modern pop culture landscape. Since 2019 alone, Springsteen’s cinematic exploits have included his music providing the entire plot of *Blinded By The Light*, starring and co-directing in the concert film *Western Stars*, and being the centerpiece of the 2024 Hulu documentary *Road Diary: Bruce Springsteen and The E Street Band*.

If you want to see movies either involving or starring The Boss, you could get your fill pretty easily. *Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere*, then, was a bit of a “hat on a hat” situation. Its straightforward marketing and title suggested to audiences that it was yet another Bruce Springsteen movie without anything unique to make it stand out in a crowded marketplace.

Why should people leave their homes to see this movie when they can access so many other Springsteen-focused films at home? *Deliver Me From Nowhere* never found a good answer to that question and paid the price for it at the box office.

*Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere* premiered at the Telluride Film Festival on August 29, 2025. Debuting nearly two months before its general release, the hope was for *Nowhere* to pick up steam and acclaim-driven momentum over that time period which could benefit its box office haul.

Instead, mixed reviews greeted the project. While Jeremy Allen White was universally praised for his work, most felt the movie lacked much of a personality or any sense of verve. The sluggish pace of its 119-minute runtime also garnered criticism.

These are not the responses a studio wants for its awards season project, especially one that costs $55 million to make. It’s one thing for a mainstream-skewing effort with a crowdpleasing marketing campaign like *Bob Marley: One Love* to get mixed marks. It’s another for a more somber-looking film like *Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere* to not wow critics, especially in an autumn moviegoing season with plenty of competition for adult moviegoers.

Without a bunch of rave reviews giving it a boost, *Nowhere* just looked even more inessential to the general public. The B+ CinemaScore grade from audiences wasn’t terrible, but it also wasn’t nearly good enough to suggest that a tidal wave of moviegoer enthusiasm might save it in the weeks ahead.

Instead of immediately catapulting it into the Oscar race, that early *Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere* debut just solidified the film’s shrug-worthy (and eventually financially fatal) reception weeks in advance.

Before *Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere*, Jeremy Strong’s biggest creative endeavor was *Succession*. The series had a sizable cultural impact in terms of inspiring memes and award season wins (including for Strong’s acclaimed performance), but it didn’t have viewership on par with *M*A*S*H* or even *This Is Us*.

Strong, who plays Springsteen’s manager Jon Landau, is still, for most of the general public, not a massive name or a tremendous box office draw. Neither is leading man Jeremy Allen White, despite the success of *The Bear*.

This encapsulated a problem that *Deliver Me From Nowhere* could never quite get over: it didn’t have a big enough cast to get the attention of people who might not otherwise be interested in a Bruce Springsteen movie.

Compare this music biopic to other entries in its genre, like *Walk the Line*, which was headlined by Joaquin Phoenix and Reese Witherspoon at the peak of her fame. *Elvis* featured Tom Hanks playing against type as a portly, smarmy manager. *8 Mile*, meanwhile, had beloved rapper Eminem playing a fictionalized version of himself.

*Nowhere*, in contrast, had a supporting cast rounded out by respected actors like Strong, Paul Walter Hauser, Odessa Young, Stephen Graham, and Harrison Gilbertson. None of them are household names, and were certainly not enough to convince skeptical audience members to give the film a chance.

Leaning on folks like White and Strong deprived *Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere* of the eye-catching casting that has driven the biggest musician biopics.
https://www.looper.com/2011642/why-springsteen-deliver-me-from-nowhere-flopped-box-office/