BOULDER, Colo. Firefighters extinguished a small fire near Realization Point in Boulder on Tuesday evening, and they have determined it was not sparked by natural causes or electrical infrastructure. Around 8: 40 p. m. Tuesday, residents began calling 911 to report flames on the Flatirons. Boulder Fire-Rescue and its partner agencies began to search the area for the flames, which took about one hour. When they found it near Realization Point, they discovered it had burned roughly one acre. The fire was not threatening any structures. “Wildland firefighters, practiced in navigating steep, rugged terrain, immediately began extinguishment efforts and constructing a fire line to secure the area,” Boulder Fire-Rescue said. “Working in the dark on rocky slopes, crews carried more than 50 pounds of gear while hiking terrain that is considered moderately challenging even during the day. Their skill and endurance allowed them to overcome difficult conditions and contain the fire.” The fire was fully contained at 1 a. m. Within the following two hours, most crews had been released from the area, but a small number of them stayed there to patrol for hotspots and continue mop-up work. The cause of the fire remains under investigation. However, authorities have ruled out natural causes and electrical infrastructure. Artist Point off of Realization Point and the Boy Scout Trail are closed Wednesday. In addition to Boulder Fire-Rescue, several other agencies responded to this small fire, including Sugarloaf Fire, Boulder Emergency Squad and drone team, Fourmile Fire, Sunshine Canyon Fire, Boulder County Sheriff’s Office, and Open Space and Mountain Parks rangers.
https://www.denver7.com/news/front-range/boulder/cause-of-small-fire-near-boulders-realization-point-on-tuesday-evening-under-investigation
Tag Archives: investigation
The Morning News: ICE in Raleigh, Trice on CHCCS Funding, Restaurant Closing, UNC-Navy Preview
In today’s news: federal immigration officials arrive in Raleigh, and Chapel Hill-Carrboro schools face a funding cut over declining enrollment. Also: the Carrboro Town Council considers a Downtown Area Plan; the Casual Pint restaurant in Chapel Hill announces it’s closing next month; three UNC students get named Rhodes Scholars; a WRAL investigation finds a high number of driving citations among UNC football players; the Daily Tar Heel uncovers more information about alleged public-records law violations by members of the UNC Board of Trustees; local pollsters say Democrats have a chance to retake the State House in 2026; and local Muslims react to Zohran Mamdani’s mayoral win in New York City. In sports: UNC men’s basketball gears up for Navy; Tar Heel women’s basketball lands a five-star recruit for 2026; Carolina men’s soccer gets an at-large bid (and a first-round home game) in this year’s NCAA tourney; and a Tar Heel football star earns national recognition. 97. 9 The Hill WCHL and Chapelboro in Chapel Hill-Carrboro. Every weekday morning, 97. 9 The Hill’s Aaron Keck recaps the day’s news, from local government to business developments to UNC sports. Click here to listen back to all of Aaron’s daily news reports, which you can hear live during “This Morning with Aaron Keck” every weekday from 6: 00 to 9: 00 a. m. Listen: Related Stories None.
https://chapelboro.com/the-aaron-keck-show/6-o-clock-news/ice-in-raleigh-trice-on-chccs-funding-restaurant-closing-unc-navy-preview
House expected to vote on bill forcing release of Jeffrey Epstein files
WASHINGTON (AP) The House is expected to vote Tuesday on legislation to force the Justice Department to publicly release its files on the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, the culmination of a monthslong effort that has overcome opposition from President Donald Trump and Republican leadership. When a small bipartisan group of House lawmakers introduced a petition in July to maneuver around House Speaker Mike Johnson’s control of which bills see the House floor, it appeared a longshot effort, especially as Trump urged his supporters to dismiss the matter as a “hoax.” But both Trump and Johnson failed in their efforts to prevent the vote. Now the president has bowed to the growing momentum behind the bill and even said Republicans should vote for it. His blessing all but ensures that the House will pass the bill with an overwhelming margin, putting further pressure on the Senate to take it up. Trump on Monday said he would sign the bill if it passes both chambers of Congress, adding, “Let the Senate look at it.” Tuesday’s vote also provides a further boost to the demands that the Justice Department release its case files on Epstein, a well-connected financier who killed himself in a Manhattan jail while awaiting trial in 2019 on charges he sexually abused and trafficked underage girls. A separate investigation conducted by the House Oversight Committee has released thousands of pages of emails and other documents from Epstein’s estate, showing his connections to global leaders, Wall Street powerbrokers, influential political figures and Trump himself. Trump’s reversal on the Epstein files Trump has said he cut ties with Epstein years ago, but tried for months to move past the demands for disclosure. On Monday, he told reporters that Epstein was connected to more Democrats and that he didn’t want the Epstein files to “detract from the great success of the Republican Party.” Still, many in the Republican base have continued to demand the release of the files. Adding to that pressure, several survivors of Epstein’s abuse will appear on Capitol Hill Tuesday morning to push for release of the files. They also met with Johnson and rallied outside the Capitol in September, but have had to wait two months for the vote. That’s because Johnson kept the House closed for legislative business for nearly two months and also refused to swear-in Democratic Rep. Adelita Grijalva of Arizona during the government shutdown. After winning a special election on Sept. 23, Grijalva had pledged to provide the crucial 218th vote to the petition for the Epstein files bill. But only after she was sworn into office last week could she sign her name to the discharge petition to give it majority support in the 435-member House. It quickly became apparent the bill would pass, and both Johnson and Trump began to fold. Trump on Sunday said Republicans should vote for the bill. Rep. Thomas Massie, the Kentucky Republican who sponsored the bill alongside Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna, said Trump “got tired of me winning. He wanted to join.” How Johnson is handling the bill Rather than waiting until next week for the discharge position to officially take effect, Johnson is moving to hold the vote this week. He indicated the legislation will be brought to the House floor under a procedure that requires a two-thirds majority. “I think it’s going to be an important vote to continue to show the transparency that we’ve delivered,” House Republican leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said Monday night. House Democrats celebrated the vote as a rare win for the minority. “It’s a complete and total surrender, because as Democrats we made clear from the very beginning, the survivors and the American people deserve full and complete transparency as it relates to the lives that were ruined by Jeffrey Epstein,” said House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries. What will the Senate do? Still, it’s not clear how the Senate will handle the bill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S. D., has previously been circumspect when asked about the legislation and instead said he trusted the Justice Department to release information on the Epstein investigation. But what the Justice Department has released so far under Trump was mostly already public. The bill would go further, forcing the release within 30 days of all files and communications related to Epstein, as well as any information about the investigation into his death in federal prison. Information about Epstein’s victims or continuing federal investigations would be allowed to be redacted, but not information due to “embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.” Johnson also suggested that he would like to see the Senate amend the bill to protect the information of “victims and whistleblowers.” But Massie said the Senate should take into account the public clamor that forced both Trump and Johnson to back down. “If it’s anything but a genuine effort to make it better and stronger, it’ll backfire on the senators if they muck it up,” Massie said. ___ Associated Press writers Kevin Freking and Matt Brown contributed to this report.
https://ktar.com/national-news/house-expected-to-vote-on-bill-forcing-release-of-jeffrey-epstein-files/5778254/
Newbury fire crews extinguish blaze at Bob Lobster restaurant
**Fire Crews Quickly Contain Blaze at Bob Lobster in Newbury**
NEWBURY, MASS. (WHDH) – Firefighters swiftly contained a blaze that broke out Saturday afternoon at Bob Lobster on 49 Plum Island Turnpike, officials said.
Crews responded to the popular restaurant around 4 p.m. after reports of a fire. According to the Newbury Fire Department, three employees had already evacuated upon noticing smoke rising from the building’s roof.
Firefighters quickly knocked down a small fire in the roof but spent an extensive amount of time searching for and extinguishing hidden hot spots in the roof area and inside the walls of the one-story building.
Newbury firefighters were assisted at the scene by crews from Newburyport, Rowley, and Georgetown. Additional support was provided by teams from West Newbury, Salisbury, Groveland, and Amesbury, who covered Newbury’s fire stations during the incident.
No injuries were reported.
The Newbury Building Inspector, Health Inspector, and Electrical Inspector were also on site to provide support. To facilitate fire apparatus access, Newbury Police briefly closed the Plum Island Turnpike.
The cause of the fire remains under investigation by the Newbury Fire Department and the Massachusetts State Police Fire and Explosion Investigation Unit, which is part of the State Fire Marshal’s Office.
“Companies did a great job opening things up and chasing this fire to ensure that all hot spots were out. There was great teamwork between Newbury firefighters and the mutual aid companies on scene,” said Chief Evans. “Newbury Police also did a great job of keeping us safe here in front of the building.”
https://whdh.com/news/newbury-fire-crews-extinguish-blaze-at-bob-lobster-restaurant/
EU Prepares Antitrust Probe into Google’s News Ranking Practices Under DMA
**EU Launches New Antitrust Investigation into Google’s News Rankings Under the Digital Markets Act**
EU regulators have opened a new antitrust probe into Google, alleging that the tech giant demotes news outlets featuring sponsored content in its search rankings. This practice, according to the European Commission, adversely impacts the visibility and revenue of European news publishers who rely heavily on paid editorial pieces for financial sustainability.
The investigation stems from complaints by multiple European publishers concerned about how their sponsored content is treated in Google’s search results. If found in violation, Google could face fines of up to 10% of its global annual turnover—a sum that could potentially reach billions of euros, based on enforcement precedents under the Digital Markets Act (DMA).
—
### What Is the European Commission’s New Antitrust Investigation into Google?
The European Commission’s latest investigation focuses on Google’s role as a gatekeeper in digital markets, emphasizing that unfair treatment of news publishers stifles innovation and diversity in the media ecosystem. Under the DMA, gatekeepers like Google are required to ensure fair competition and transparency in their platforms. The Commission’s probe aims to determine whether Google’s algorithms unfairly lower the ranking of news publishers’ sponsored content.
—
### Frequently Asked Questions
**What penalties could Google face in this DMA antitrust investigation?**
If found to be violating the DMA, Google could be fined up to 10% of its annual global revenue. Considering Google’s revenues exceed 300 billion euros annually, this could translate to potential penalties in the tens of billions. Beyond fines, the Commission may also require Google to adjust its algorithms to ensure fair treatment for all news publishers. This follows the significant 2.95 billion euro fine imposed on Google in 2024 related to its search advertising practices.
**Is Google currently facing other regulatory challenges in the EU?**
Yes. Google is subject to multiple ongoing DMA investigations within the EU. These include scrutiny over whether Google prioritizes its own services in search results and whether it unfairly restricts app developers from linking to external offers. These investigations, alongside the new probe into news rankings, illustrate the EU’s robust approach to regulating Big Tech’s influence over digital markets. EU competition chief Margrethe Vestager has publicly highlighted the importance of these efforts to foster competition and innovation.
—
### Google’s Response to Allegations and Broader Privacy Concerns
Google has consistently defended its search ranking system, stating it aims to deliver the most relevant results to users based on quality and user intent. The company insists its algorithms operate with neutrality and comply with DMA requirements by not arbitrarily favoring any publisher.
However, regulators remain skeptical amid repeated fines totaling over 8 billion euros against Google for various antitrust violations since 2017.
Adding to the scrutiny, a class-action lawsuit was filed in October 2024 in federal court in San Jose, California, alleging Google’s AI technology Gemini was activated across Gmail, Chat, and Meet applications without explicit user consent. The complaint claims this enables the AI to access users’ entire communication histories—including emails and attachments—in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act.
While Google notes users can disable Gemini through privacy settings, the lawsuit argues that this option is not prominently disclosed, leading to unauthorized data harvesting. Privacy experts, including those from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, consider these practices a serious threat to user autonomy amid growing AI integration.
Google maintains that Gemini improves user experience and offers opt-out capabilities, but the outcome of this litigation may set important precedents for AI transparency and privacy in communication tools.
—
### What Are the Implications of the Gemini AI Lawsuit for User Privacy?
This lawsuit highlights the growing tension between rapid AI development and users’ privacy rights. Alleging violations of a 1967 law that prohibits the unconsented recording of confidential communications, the case could result in monetary damages for affected users and compel Google to enhance transparency around AI deployment.
Privacy advocates point to Federal Trade Commission guidelines emphasizing the need for clear and explicit consent mechanisms to protect personal data in AI-powered services.
—
### Key Takeaways
– **Regulatory Pressure on Gatekeepers:** The EU’s DMA investigations into Google underline the Commission’s commitment to preventing unfair advantages in search and advertising, fostering a more equitable digital marketplace for news publishers.
– **Revenue Challenges for News Outlets:** Demotion of sponsored content threatens vital income streams, with industry data from PwC indicating that 20-40% of news publishers’ revenue often depends on such models.
– **Privacy in the AI Era:** The Gemini lawsuit signals increased scrutiny of AI technologies accessing private data. Users are advised to regularly review privacy settings and stay informed about evolving regulations.
—
### Conclusion
The European Commission’s latest antitrust investigation into Google illustrates ongoing efforts to regulate the dominance of Big Tech in digital markets while ensuring fair competition and protecting user privacy. As the DMA continues to reshape the digital landscape, both publishers and users must stay informed about these regulatory developments and their implications.
Stay tuned for further updates on this evolving story and how it impacts digital competition and privacy in the era of AI.
—
*For more on Big Tech regulations and digital market fairness, follow our ongoing coverage.*
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/tech/eu-prepares-antitrust-probe-into-googles-news-ranking-practices-under-dma/
Justin Tucker is eligible to be signed by any team
Tuesday’s transaction report featured a line that was expected, yet still somewhat jarring: kicker Justin Tucker had his suspension lifted. Tucker had agreed to a 10-week ban after a Personal Conduct Policy investigation into numerous allegations of misconduct during massage-therapy sessions.
A free agent since his release by the Ravens, Tucker was able to serve his suspension without being on a team. A five-time first-team All-Pro, Tucker spent 13 seasons in Baltimore. Last year marked the worst season of his career, with a field-goal success rate of just 73.3 percent—his previous low had been 82.5 percent back in 2015.
There are plenty of teams in the NFL currently struggling with kicker issues. On the surface, the question is whether any of them will give Tucker a tryout. However, several challenges complicate that possibility.
For some teams, it’s a matter of principle—they may simply not want to do business with Tucker. Others may be concerned about the public relations backlash that could come with even a minimal association, such as inviting him to a practice to see if his performance has rebounded since his release.
Adding to the difficulty, Tucker is no longer automatic from any distance, making it harder for decision-makers to justify granting him a second chance. In every sport, at all levels, it’s common for stars to receive leniency while lesser-known players become examples.
Time will tell whether an opportunity arises. While thirty-one teams can readily say, “No,” it only takes one to whisper, “Yes.” Necessity, especially with a dire kicker situation, can push a team to consider, “He was never accused of a crime. He was never sued. He served his suspension. He should be allowed to return to the NFL.”
For Tucker—who has aggressively maintained his innocence—exploring public relations strategies might ease the path for a potential return. Making it easier for a team to face any potential backlash could improve his chances of being invited to try out for a roster spot.
Ultimately, the decision rests with teams in need of a kicker. If and when they begin considering potential tryouts, Tucker’s name is likely to come up—and they’ll have to weigh the risks and rewards of giving him another shot in the NFL.
https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/justin-tucker-is-eligible-to-be-signed-by-any-team
Bipartisan funding bill would allow senators to sue over government searches of their phone records
**Senate Passes Funding Package Including Provision Allowing Senators to Sue Over Data Privacy Breach**
*WASHINGTON —* A provision included in the funding package that the Senate passed Monday night as part of a bipartisan deal to reopen the government would allow senators to sue the federal government for potentially millions of dollars if their data is obtained without proper notification.
The legislative language is designed to uniquely benefit eight Republican senators who were recently found to have had their phone records—though not the contents of their calls or messages—accessed as part of the investigation that led to former special counsel Jack Smith’s probe of the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.
While the bill does not explicitly mention Smith’s investigation, the language would retroactively apply to data requests made on or after January 1, 2022. This means the request for these Republican senators’ data, which was made on September 27, 2023, would fall under the scope of this new provision, making it susceptible to a lawsuit.
—
**Read more at NBC News**
—
*Topics:* Extended News, Government, News/Current Events, Politics/Elections
—
*Disclaimer:* Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by applicable copyright laws.
—
*Support Free Republic*
You can donate by:
– Credit Card
– PayPal
Or by mail to:
Free Republic, LLC
PO Box 9771
Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4352229/posts
Red Fort Blast: Celebrities flood social media with heartfelt condolences
A day after the shocking blast near the Red Fort in New Delhi, the country continues to grapple with the tragedy that claimed multiple lives and left several injured. According to initial reports, the explosion occurred near a crowded tourist stretch close to the Lahori Gate entrance, triggering panic across the area.
Emergency responders and security teams swiftly evacuated the vicinity, with authorities launching a full-scale investigation into the attack. The incident has drawn widespread grief and condemnation, with citizens and public figures expressing solidarity with the victims and their families.
### Red Fort Blast: Celebrities Flood Social Media with Heartfelt Condolences
Members of the Indian film industry have taken to social media to voice their sorrow and support. Celebrities like Priyanka Chopra Jonas, Raveena Tandon, Ayushmann Khurrana, Sidharth Malhotra, Ishaan Khatter, Sonu Sood, Thalapathy Vijay, Nimrat Kaur, Karan Tacker, Neha Sharma, and others shared their condolences, extending help to the victims and their families during such difficult times.
Social media quickly turned into a space of collective grief and support, reflecting the nation’s unity in the face of tragedy.
—
**Bollywood News Live Updates**
https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/red-fort-blast-celebrities-flood-social-media-heartfelt-condolences/
Delhi Red Fort blast kills 13: What happened as police invoke ‘terror’ law?
At least 13 people were killed and more than 20 others wounded after a car exploded in New Delhi, India’s capital, on Monday night. Security forces have been placed on high alert across major states and cities as authorities launched an investigation into the cause of the blast.
—
### What happened in New Delhi?
At approximately 18:52 local time (13:52 GMT), a powerful, high-intensity blast tore through a crowded neighborhood in New Delhi during the evening rush hour. According to Delhi Police, the explosion originated in a moving Hyundai i20 car.
“A slow-moving vehicle stopped at a red light. An explosion happened in that vehicle, and due to the explosion, nearby vehicles were also damaged,” Delhi Police Commissioner Satish Golcha told reporters.
Images from the scene show shattered windows, mangled vehicle parts, and plumes of fire and smoke rising from burning cars.
Police later detained the original owner of the car, identified as Mohammad Salman, in Gurugram, Haryana. Salman had bought the vehicle in 2013. Investigators said he had subsequently sold the vehicle to another man in New Delhi, who in turn sold the car recently. The person Salman sold the car to has also been arrested.
However, the car was still registered in Salman’s name and carried a Haryana number plate, according to local media reports.
Delhi Police have invoked India’s primary counter-terrorism law, registering a case under Sections 16 and 18 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), along with relevant provisions of the Explosives Act. This means that even though officials have yet to formally confirm the cause of the blast or name suspects, they appear to be treating the explosion as a potential act of terrorism, not just a regular criminal or accidental blast.
—
### Where did the blast happen?
The explosion occurred in a densely populated part of Old Delhi, near the Red Fort Metro Station. The blast took place at a traffic signal close to the entrance of the metro station serving the iconic Red Fort (locally known as Lal Qila), one of the city’s most renowned Mughal-era monuments.
The site lies at a busy intersection linking the Red Fort with the bustling Chandni Chowk market, where the impact of the explosion was felt.
The Red Fort itself, constructed by Emperor Shah Jahan in 1546 AD, is an architectural masterpiece blending Islamic, Persian, Timurid, and Hindu design traditions. It holds deep national importance because it was from its ramparts that India’s first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, delivered the country’s Independence Day speech on August 15, 1947, marking the end of British colonial rule.
Since then, every year on Independence Day, the Indian prime minister hoists the national flag and addresses the nation from the same spot. This tradition makes the fort a living symbol of India’s sovereignty and freedom.
—
### What’s the backdrop to the explosion?
The explosion occurred hours after police revealed they had arrested a Kashmiri doctor from Faridabad, Haryana, on charges of plotting a “terrorist” attack.
Haryana police said they found 2,900 kg of explosives, 20 timers, two dozen remote controls, a rifle, and dozens of live rounds from the premises of the doctor’s house. Seven other people accused of helping the doctor were also arrested.
However, Indian authorities have so far not confirmed any link between the arrested doctor and Monday’s explosion.
—
### What is the latest on the ground?
Police have intensified security checks across the city, with particular focus on railway stations, where incoming vehicles are being thoroughly inspected.
According to local media reports, major train stations across India including those in Mumbai, the country’s financial capital, and in Uttar Pradesh, which borders Delhi, have also been placed on high alert as a precautionary measure.
Videos shared online show the wreckage of several cars scattered along a crowded street in Delhi’s old quarter, as police secured the scene and dispersed onlookers.
According to New Delhi’s deputy fire chief, the explosion ignited six vehicles and three autorickshaws.
Meanwhile, as authorities respond to the explosion, voters in the eastern state of Bihar are heading to the polls in the second and final phase of state elections, marking a significant political event unfolding alongside heightened national security concerns.
—
### What have witnesses said?
As panic and confusion swept through Old Delhi following the explosion, eyewitnesses described scenes of horror and chaos.
“Suddenly there was a sound of a blast,” Irfan, a witness in Delhi, told Al Jazeera. “We came running, and we didn’t get too close because we were scared. We saw someone’s hand on the ground, they were completely blown up.”
“I saw someone’s lungs, and I also saw a car’s steering wheel completely damaged. I just cannot express, can’t imagine how their families will deal with this. I cannot describe how big the blast was,” he added.
Separately, relatives of people injured or missing were trying to track down their loved ones.
Speaking to Al Jazeera, Nazish Malik said his brother-in-law, Mohsin, an e-rickshaw driver, was missing after the blast.
“After more than a hundred calls on his phone, finally someone answered and said that the phone is at the police post at the Red Fort and your relative has been taken to Lok Nayak Hospital,” Malik said.
“When we heard that, we rushed here and got here around 8:30 pm. My brother was already here. I got here late, but found that the security was so tight, they are not permitting us to go inside,” he added.
“At least announce who is critical and who is dead. You can at least inform that bit,” he said.
—
### What have been the reactions?
Prime Minister Narendra Modi said he had been briefed about the attack by Home Minister Amit Shah and expressed condolences for the lives lost.
Shah stated that all possibilities were being investigated, with top agencies involved.
Israel’s envoy also expressed his condolences. The Embassy of Egypt likewise extended its sympathies to the victims and their families.
The United Kingdom issued a travel advisory following the explosion, while the US Embassy in India released a security alert and extended its condolences.
“Our sincere condolences to the families who lost their loved ones. We pray for the swift recovery of those injured,” the US government said.
—
### Has Delhi faced attacks in the past?
Yes, Delhi has been the target of multiple bomb explosions and armed attacks over the years but not in over a decade.
– **September 2011:** Fifteen people were killed after a briefcase bomb exploded outside Delhi High Court. Pakistan-based armed group Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami claimed responsibility.
– **September 2008:** Two separate bomb attacks rocked the capital. On September 13, five bombs ripped through crowded markets, killing 33 people. The Indian Mujahideen claimed responsibility. Two weeks later, two more bombs exploded, killing three more.
– **October 2005:** Three devastating blasts across different parts of the city killed 70 people. Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba claimed responsibility.
– **December 2001:** Fighters from Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed attacked the Indian parliament in an audacious strike that brought the nuclear-armed neighbors to the brink of war. Thirteen people were killed.
– **December 2000:** Three people were killed in an attack at Red Fort by Lashkar-e-Taiba fighters.
—
### Have other places in India faced major attacks?
Yes, Indian cities have been targets of major attacks by armed groups, often associated with Kashmir’s secessionist struggle.
India has in most cases blamed Pakistan-based armed groups and Pakistan’s intelligence services for orchestrating these attacks. Some of these groups have claimed responsibility themselves, and some accused individuals have been captured by Indian authorities.
Here are some of the deadliest attacks in India outside Delhi:
– **November 2008, Mumbai:** More than 170 people died and over 300 were injured in attacks carried out by Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba. Indian authorities captured one of the perpetrators alive.
– **July 2008, Ahmedabad:** Seventeen bombs exploded in different parts of the western Indian city, killing 56 people. Police blamed two different armed groups.
– **May 2008, Jaipur:** More than 70 people died in nine explosions in the capital of India’s western state of Rajasthan. Authorities blamed the Indian Mujahideen, a home-grown armed group.
– **February 2007, Haryana:** Seventy people, mostly Pakistani civilians, died after bombs exploded on the Samjhauta Express, which connected India and Pakistan. Authorities accused a far-right Hindu group, Abhinav Bharat, of carrying out the attack. However, in 2019, under Prime Minister Modi’s Hindu majoritarian Bharatiya Janata Party’s rule, all accused were acquitted.
– **September 2006, Malegaon:** Explosions near a mosque in Malegaon, Maharashtra, killed at least 45 people. Authorities blamed Abhinav Bharat, but all accused were later acquitted.
– **July 2006, Mumbai:** More than 200 people were killed when a series of bombs exploded on multiple trains of the suburban rail network used daily by millions in India’s financial capital. Authorities blamed Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, but all Indian nationals arrested have now been acquitted.
– **March 1993, Mumbai:** The single deadliest attack in independent India’s history, multiple bombs exploded across the city, killing more than 250 people. Police blamed Indian fugitive gangster Dawood Ibrahim and his aides.
—
The ongoing investigation into Monday night’s blast in New Delhi continues, with authorities remaining vigilant amid heightened security measures across the country.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/11/11/delhi-red-fort-blast-kills-13-what-happened-as-police-invoke-terror-law?traffic_source=rss
Investigation underway after deadly shooting in west Phoenix parking lot
**PHOENIX — Investigation Underway After Fatal Shooting in West Phoenix Parking Lot**
An investigation is underway following a shooting in a west Phoenix parking lot that left one man dead and two others injured on Sunday morning, authorities reported.
The incident occurred around 5 a.m. near the intersection of 27th Avenue and McDowell Road, according to the Phoenix Police Department.
When officers arrived at the scene, they found two men who had been shot. One of the men died at the scene, while the other was transported to a hospital with serious injuries.
A third man was also injured during the incident. He was hospitalized with non-life-threatening injuries but has since been released.
After his release, the third man was interviewed by homicide detectives and subsequently released from custody pending further investigation, police said.
No additional details about the shooting have been released at this time.
Anyone with information is urged to contact Silent Witness at 480-WITNESS (948-6377) or 480-TESTIGO (837-8446) for Spanish.
https://ktar.com/arizona-news/deadly-parking-lot-shooting-phoenix/5774012/
