US Files Charges In Decades-Old Double Homicide, Wants Man Extradited From India Photo: FBI Newark officers at a press conference on Nazeer Hameed who is wanted for murder in NJ. The Burlington County Prosecutor’s office announced on November 18 that Nazeer Hameed has been charged with the double homicide of 38-year-old Sasikala Narra and her six-year-old son, Anish Narra. The victims were found dead by Sasikala’s husband, Hanu Narra, over eight years ago. Hameed, who was in the US on a work visa, was a colleague of Hanu Narra at a New Jersey-based company and resided in the same apartment complex as the family. The suspect reportedly left for India six months after the murders and was believed to be residing there ever since. He was initially identified as a person of interest after being accused of stalking the husband. The charges followed a critical development in the investigation involving DNA evidence. Although Hameed denied an earlier request for a DNA sample, investigators were determined to proceed. In 2024, they obtained a court order compelling his employer, Cognizant, to provide his company-issued laptop. After the laptop was transported to a New Jersey State Police DNA Laboratory in September and October 2024, a DNA contributor was successfully obtained from the device. This sample matched unknown blood found at the crime scene. Hameed was subsequently fired by the company. Following the formal charges, the Burlington County Prosecutor requested that the Trump Administration and the Government of India take swift and decisive action to extradite Hameed to face justice in the US. Authorities stated they still have not identified a clear motive for the killings.
https://indiawest.com/us-files-charges-in-decades-old-double-homicide-wants-man-extradited-from-india/
Tag Archives: administration
Who Is Lawrence Reed? Chicago Man Accused of Setting Woman on Fire
Lawrence Reed is the man who has been charged with a federal terrorism offense after allegedly dousing a young woman with gasoline and setting her on fire on a Blue Line train in downtown Chicago. The attack, described in a press release by the U. S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois Andrew S. Boutros as “barbaric” and an “act of terrorism,” left the 26-year-old victim hospitalized in critical condition. Reed, 50, faces a maximum sentence of life in prison if convicted. Why It Matters The attack has drawn intense local and national attention to issues of public safety and criminal justice reform. It comes after Trump in September called Chicago “the most dangerous city in the world” and sent 200 National Guard troops to the city the next month. The administration said the deployment was needed to support domestic immigration enforcement personnel, restore order in the face of protests and reduce crime. But deployment faced legal challenges and opposition from city and Illinois Democratic leadership, and the troops have not partaken in law enforcement operations in the city. What To Know The U. S. Attorney’s Office in Chicago’s federal complaint alleges that Reed boarded a Blue Line train near Chicago’s Clark/Lake station just before 9 p. m. on Monday. The complaint describes train car surveillance footage showing Reed approaching the victim from behind, removing the cap from a plastic bottle filled with gasoline and pouring it over her head and body. When the woman tried to fight Reed off and escape him, he chased her and ignited the bottle of gasoline in his hand that contained the remaining liquid and dropped it on the floor by this point, the woman was at the rear end of the car. Reed picked up the bottle and approached the victim again, setting her on fire with the bottle. He then “ran to the front of the train car and stood watching Victim A as her body was engulfed in flames.” The woman tried to extinguish the flames by rolling on the ground, before she was able to exit the train when it stopped at Clark and Lake Street. She collapsed on the platform, where people rushed to help her, while Reed exited the train and walked away from the scene, the complaint says. Reed was arrested on Tuesday and appeared in court on Wednesday local newspapers reported that he was disruptive, shouting over the judge, insisting he wanted to represent himself and claiming he was a Chinese citizen. At one point, Reed repeatedly yelled, “I plead guilty!” as the judge attempted to advise him of his rights. Lawrence Reed’s Criminal Record Reed has a criminal history dating back to at least 2017, according to the Chicago Police Department’s arrest data reviewed by Newsweek. “Lawrence Reed has no business being on the streets given his violent criminal history and his pending criminal cases,” Christopher Amon, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago Field Division told reporters at a press conference on Wednesday. “Reed has plenty of second chances by the criminal justice system and, as a result, you have an innocent victim in the hospital fighting for her life.” “There will be no other chances for Mr. Reed,” he added. When a reporter asked whether Boutros was “concerned” that Reed’s “evident mental state could make it hard to have a terrorism charge stick,” he answered: “We have a court system that deals with mental health and mental health competence, so we know that this will go through that normal channel and he’ll be able to avail himself of that entire sort of process.” “I’m not aware of him ever being declared mentally incompetent in connection with any of the other extensive criminal history,” he added. A Timeline of Lawrence Reed’s Criminal Record • May 2017: Driving while revoked/suspended (2nd offense). • April 2018: Soliciting unlawful business. • June 2018: Criminal trespass to real property. • July 2018: Battery make physical contact. • April 2019: Driving on a revoked license. • December 2019: Criminal damage to property under $500. • February 2020: Battery -make physical contact; aggravated battery in a public place. • April 2020: Aggravated arson / arson knowing a person was present. • December 2021: Assault simple; battery cause bodily harm. • June 2022: Battery make physical contact. • January 2024: Criminal damage to property under $500. This is based on records from the Chicago Police Department Newsweek corroborated the name “Lawrence Reed” with the ages filed at the time, in line with Reed being 50 years old in 2025, as well as consistent mugshots. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump’s Transportation Secretary, Sean Duffy wrote in a post on X: “This horrific attack is EXACTLY why we need communities to take safety seriously. Blue cities cannot allow another Iryna Zarutska to happen.” What Happens Next Lawrence Reed is currently in federal custody. He faces a charge of terrorism against a mass transportation system, which carries a potential maximum sentence of life in prison. A detention hearing is set for Friday, where further details about Reed’s criminal record and mental health evaluations are expected. The attack has prompted federal and local officials to review transit security and policies around pretrial release and mental health interventions. It is important to note that criminal complaints are not evidence of guilt and that defendants are presumed innocent until proven otherwise in a court of law. The investigation is ongoing, and additional charges may follow based on the victim’s medical condition and further developments.
https://www.newsweek.com/lawrence-reed-chicago-man-accused-setting-woman-on-fire-11079202
Trump’s New Peace Deal for Russia-Ukraine War: Everything We Know
Adding to his roster of international peace negotiations, President Donald Trump has reportedly proposed putting together a plan to end the over three-and-a-half-year war between Russia and Ukraine, according to several reports citing anonymous sources close to the matter. Why It Matters The plan reportedly would grant Russia expanded control over two eastern Ukrainian territories in exchange for security guarantees for Ukraine and Europe. Territorial sovereignty has been at the crux of the war since Russian President Vladimir Putin led a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, which was launched years after Moscow annexed Crimea in 2014. The prospect of Russian land guarantees is viewed as a major concession and a concern for Ukraine and its supporters. The reported plan comes nearly a month after the Trump administration announced sweeping new sanctions targeting Russia’s oil industry and after the president said he was not, for now, considering a deal that would allow Ukraine to obtain long-range Tomahawk missiles from the United States for use against Russia. On the campaign trail in 2024, Trump repeatedly said he would end the Russia-Ukraine war on his first day in office. It comes after the president made headway on a peace plan between Hamas and Israel in Gaza. What To Know The plan, outlined in 28 points, would reportedly grant Russia parts of eastern Ukraine, in exchange for a security guarantee, Axios reported, citing a U. S. official familiar with the situation. Specifically, it outlines Russia as gaining de facto control of Luhansk and Donetsk, which are referred to as the Donbas, but Ukraine would not be asked to publicly acknowledge it. The U. S. and international community would recognize Crimea and the Donbas as Russian territory. Currently, the U. S. State Department considers Crimea Ukrainian, writing on its website, “The U. S. government recognizes Crimea is part of Ukraine; it does not and will not recognize the purported annexation of Crimea. Occupation authorities continue to impose the laws of the Russian Federation in the territory of Crimea.” The Axios report noted that in two other frontline regions, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, the “current lines of control would mostly be frozen in place, with Russia returning some land.” A Ukrainian official reportedly noted that the plan limits the size of the Ukrainian military and its long-range weapons in return for U. S. security guarantees. The report did not detail what the U. S. security guarantee entails. Two other countries are reportedly involved in the talks-Qatar and Turkey, Axios reported. Both parties played a key role in establishing Trump’s 20-point Israel-Hamas peace plan. On Wednesday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan met with Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky in Ankara. “We count on the strength of Turkish diplomacy, on [how] it’s understood in Moscow,” Zelensky said following their meeting, according to the Associated Press. A U. S. Army official confirmed to the Associated Press that Army Secretary Dan Driscoll was in Ukraine on Wednesday for negotiations. Axios reported earlier that Zelensky’s national security adviser, Rustem Umerov, met with Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff last weekend. Financial Times reported that one of the lead architects of the deal is Kirill Dmitriev, the head of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund and a close ally of Putin. What People Are Saying Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Wednesday: “Moscow is open to continuation; Moscow is open to negotiations. The pause that has arisen is, in fact, due to the Kyiv regime’s reluctance to continue this dialogue.” Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Wednesday, per Russia state media outlet Tass: “We count on the continuation of the Istanbul negotiations based on a pragmatic and result-oriented approach. We see them as an important basis for a peaceful resolution [of the conflict].” Representative Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican, said in an X post on Wednesday: “I totally disagree with the Administration negotiating w/ the Russians & not the Ukrainians, and their plan to demand the Ukrainians accept the agreement as a “fait accompli.” Not involving the Europeans is foolish. The U. S. did this too with South Vietnam & the Afghan Government. This sounds like 1938 Munich.” Maria Avdeeva, a non-resident senior fellow in the Eurasia Program at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, said in an X post on Wednesday: “Seriously? Witkoff and Dmitriev in Miami drafting Russia’s demands for Ukraine calling it a ‘peace plan’? It’s beyond pathetic.” Michael McFaul, Stanford University professor and former U. S. Ambassador to Russia, said in an X post Frankly, I’m shocked.” What Happens Next It is unclear when the plan will be publicly revealed and if and when the parties will agree to the proposal.
https://www.newsweek.com/trumps-new-peace-deal-russia-ukraine-war-everything-we-know-11077463
Trump nominates new CFPB director, but White House says agency is still closing
By KEN SWEET, AP Business Writer NEW YORK (AP) President Trump nominated Stuart Levenbach as the next director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, using a legal maneuver to keep his budget director Russell Vought as acting director of the bureau while the Trump administration continues on its plan to shut down the consumer financial protection agency. Levenbach is currently an associate director inside the Office of Management and Budget, handling issues related to natural resources, energy, science and water issues. Levenbach’s resume shows significant experience dealing with science and natural resources issues, acting as chief of staff of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration during Trump’s first term. Levenbach’s nomination is not meant to go through to confirmation, an administration official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss personnel matters. Under the Vacancies Act, Vought can only act as acting director for 210 days, but now that Trump has nominated someone to the position, that clock has been suspended until the Senate approves or denies Levenbach’s confirmation as director. Vought is Levenbach’s boss. The CFPB has been nonfunctional much of the year. Many of its employees have been ordered not to work, and the only major work the bureau is doing is unwinding the regulations and rules it put into place during Trump’s first term and during the Biden administration. While in the acting director role, Vought has signaled that he wishes to dismantle, or vastly diminish, the bureau. The latest blow to the bureau came earlier this month, when the White House said it does not plan to withdraw any funds from the Federal Reserve, which is where the bureau gets its funding, to fund the bureau past Dec. 31. The White House and the Justice Department used a legal interpretation of the law that created the bureau, the Dodd-Frank Act, that the Fed must be profitable in order to fund the CFPB’s operations. Several judges have rejected this argument when it was brought up by companies, but it’s never been the position of the government until this year that the CFPB requires the Fed to be profitable to have operating funds. “Donald Trump’s sending the Senate a new nominee to lead the CFPB looks like nothing more than a front for Russ Vought to stay on as Acting Director indefinitely as he tries to illegally close down the agency,” said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, in a statement. The bureau was created after the 2008 financial crisis as part of the Dodd-Frank Act, a law passed to overhaul the financial system and require banks to hold more capital to avoid another financial crisis. The CFPB was created to be a independent advocate for consumers to help them avoid bad actors in the financial system.
https://www.pasadenastarnews.com/2025/11/19/trump-cfpb-nomination/
Entire Texas congressional delegation votes to release Epstein files
The U. S. House of Representatives voted nearly unanimously Tuesday to require the Justice Department to publish all of its files related to Jeffrey Epstein, including one Texas Republican who opposed the measure until a few days ago. For months, President Donald Trump resisted calls to release the files as he tried to distance himself from the deceased sex offender, including pressing Republicans against signing a discharge petition a tool through which a majority can circumvent House leadership and force a vote on a bill to compel the Justice Department to release material on Epstein. Last week, the petition garnered the support of all House Democrats and four House Republicans none from Texas to successfully require a vote. The vote comes after the House Oversight Committee released documents last week that draw ties between Trump and Epstein, including emails from Epstein that mention Trump. As it became clear that many Republicans would vote with Democrats to release the files, the president changed his mind. Trump posted on Truth Social Sunday evening that House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files because they have “nothing to hide.” Trump also said Monday that he would sign the bill to release the files if it reached his desk. Later on Tuesday, the Senate agreed to pass the bill unanimously, sending it straight to Trump’s desk. On his podcast Monday, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said he supports the release of the files and added he suspected more Democrats would be harmed than Republicans. “The bulk of the evidence, from everything we know, is going to be evidence that is a real, real problem for, I suspect, a significant number of Democrats,” Cruz said. “I’m glad the President did this. I’m hopeful the House can vote. We can put this behind it, and then we can have some real accountability to people who committed criminal acts and hurt underage girls.” Though no Texas Republican joined the effort to compel a vote through the discharge petition, all of them voted in favor of releasing the files on Tuesday. Rep. Clay Higgins, R-Louisiana, was the only member who voted against the release. As recently as Friday, Rep. Troy Nehls, R-Richmond, spoke out against the measure. “I’ll be voting NO on the Epstein Hoax,” Nehls wrote on social media. “The Democrats are using the Epstein Hoax to distract us from the winning of President Trump and his administration.” But by Monday, Nehls was parroting Trump and telling reporters he would vote to release the files. The documents will exonerate Trump and prove that the president is not a pedophile, Nehls said. Nehls has previously said Republicans should be doing everything possible to help Trump achieve his goals. “If Donald Trump says ‘Jump three feet high and scratch your heads,’ we all jump three feet high and scratch our heads,” Nehls told reporters last November. Others, like Rep. Keith Self, R-McKinney, had consistently supported the bill, but refused to sign the discharge petition, saying a House panel probing the matter, with the blessing of leadership, was making good progress. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Austin, spoke on the House floor ahead of the vote, emphasizing the importance of transparency. “Today, a united Republican Party and a bipartisan super majority is going to pass a bill to increase transparency regarding the egregious abuses by Jeffrey Epstein,” he said. Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Farmers Branch, said the vote is symbolic because it shows that Congress is standing up for justice. For too long, Republicans have failed to hold people in positions of power accountable, she said. “It is political gamesmanship at its worst,” she said. “They’ve traded that accountability for complicitness to a president out of fear that they’re going to harm their great leader.”.
https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/politics/2025/11/19/536552/texas-congress-vote-release-epstein-files/
Trump Promises Lower Prices While Taking Aim at Inflation at McDonald’s Event [WATCH]
President Trump told McDonald’s owners, operators, and suppliers on Monday that prices will decline, delivering remarks at the fast-food chain’s Impact Summit in Washington, D. C. The event came amid ongoing national discussions about inflation, the cost of living, and economic pressures affecting consumers. “Prices are coming down,” President Trump said during his address. “I will tell you that nobody has done what we’ve done in terms of pricing,” Trump said. “We took over a mess. We had the highest inflation in the history of our country . and now we have normal inflation.” Inflation measured 3 percent in September over the previous 12 months, the highest rate recorded so far this year. Food prices remain a significant point of concern for consumers. This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year According to the Economist’s “Big Mac” index, the average price of the McDonald’s burger was $6. 01 in July, an increase from $5. 69 one year earlier. Data from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis showed that ground beef averaged $6. 32 in September, compared to $5. 67 at the same time last year. Last week, the administration adjusted tariff rates on imports of beef, coffee, tropical fruits, and other food products as part of an effort to address affordability issues. “We have it down to a low level,” Trump said of inflation. “But we’re going to get it a little bit lower. We want perfection.” Before a room of McDonald’s franchise leaders, Trump described himself as “one of your all-time, most loyal customers.” He said McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski told him that “prices at McDonald’s are coming down,” referencing ongoing cost adjustments within the company. Trump also highlighted the administration’s economic policies, including investment and trade decisions. He said the country would have faced significant financial challenges had he not won the 2024 election. “You are so damn lucky that I won that election,” Trump said. During the 2024 campaign, Trump visited a McDonald’s in Pennsylvania, where he served french fries. He referenced that moment in his speech, saying he was “the very first former McDonald’s frycook to ever become president of the United States,” adding, “It was not that easy!” in reference to working the drive-thru. Trump told the audience that McDonald’s employees have a unique view of everyday American life. “Before the sun rises, you’re serving hot coffee to construction workers, nurses and police officers on the way to the job,” he said. “In the evening, you stand ready with the fast dinner and the smile for busy moms and their children as they race from school to soccer practice. And late at night your lights are on, and the only one still glowing when the long haul trucker pulls up for a good meal and the best Coca-Cola in America.” Trump also mentioned his preferred menu item, saying, “I like the fish,” in reference to McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish sandwich. He added, “You could do a little bit more tartar sauce.” WATCH:.
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/11/trump-promises-lower-prices-while-taking-aim-at-inflation-at-mcdonalds-event-watch/
Iowa’s mental health revamp shows little change
Laura Semprini of Iowa City knows what it is like to call behavioral health providers in a desperate attempt to get an appointment during a time of need, just to be told, “Come in three months.” This experience is not uncommon, with the average wait time for behavioral health services in the U. S. being 48 days, according to a November 2024 study by the Health Resources and Services Administration National Center for Health Workforce Analysis. The same study said six in 10 psychiatrists do not accept new patients, making wait times a more significant barrier to accessing care. Semprini now works as a remote peer support coordinator for the Johnson County chapter of the National Alliance of Mental Illness, or NAMI. Although she has been fortunate enough to access behavioral health services when she needed it, Semprini said she understands, as a patient and a provider, there are notable barriers in access to care. In an attempt to streamline services and improve access to behavioral health care across Iowa, a new statewide system was implemented on July 1. After being signed into law by Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds and passing the Iowa Legislature with bipartisan support in March 2024, the new Behavioral Health Service System reorganized resources across the state. State officials and some mental health advocates said the system will be a more effective way of providing care, while Johnson County officials say the system will be too far removed from the needs of local communities. Semprini worked on the advisory council and governing board for the East Central Region, one of 14 former behavioral health regions across the state. She said much of the old system was working, but there were areas that needed improvement, such as the difficulty in providing substance abuse and behavioral health care together, considering the high rates of the co-occurring diseases. According to a study published by the World Psychiatry Journal and archived in the National Library of Medicine, around 50 percent of individuals with severe mental illness also deal with substance abuse. Marissa Eyanson, director of the division of behavioral health for Iowa Health and Human Services, or Iowa HHS, said the old system was outdated in terms of laws and services designed to provide care to Iowans. She said Iowa HHS conducted a statewide assessment to identify problems with the old system. Eyanson said the previous system was inconsistent in providing care and often led to individuals not receiving help until they were in crisis. She said the new system was developed from a “community-driven, statewide effort,” and has been modernized to fit the current needs of the state to prioritize early intervention. Early intervention initiatives include increased services in locations such as schools or jails places where individuals are likely to gain access to care for the first time, Eyanson said. Johnson County Supervisor Rod Sullivan said funding previously came directly from the county until the funds were combined into regions in 2014, when Johnson County became part of the East Central Region, one of 14 former regions in the state. The old regions each had different entities administering services. Now, the regions combine to form seven districts, and funding is funneled through the Iowa Primary Care Association, or PCA, a singular Administrative Service Organization in an attempt to limit complexities in funding distribution. Iowa PCA said it does not deliver direct clinical care but rather “builds and supports a network,” which reaches across the state to do so. Iowa PCA said it contracts with 124 behavioral health providers across Iowa to deliver care as efficiently and consistently as possible. “Our goal is to ensure Iowans can get connected to care regardless of where they live or what coverage they have,” Abby Ferenzi, senior director of behavioral health services at the Iowa PCA, said in a statement. Semprini said while some providers’ contracts changed as a part of the realignment, NAMI’s contract remained largely the same, though funding for staff training is no longer included. Navigating the behavioral health system Eyanson said a major issue Iowa HHS found was difficulty navigating the old system, leading to hardship in accessing services. “[People] often found there were too many doors but not enough of the right doors,” Eyanson said. She said the addition of system navigators, a “boots on the ground” mechanism to help Iowans maneuver the behavioral health system, has been an immediately impactful change with the new system. Navigators are located throughout the districts and make care more accessible through a less cumbersome process. “We don’t replace local providers we connect and support them, and we strive to make sure rural residents have the same clear pathways to care as urban Iowans,” Ferenzi said in the statement to The Daily Iowan. Iowa PCA has already participated in more than 4, 000 calls to connect Iowans to behavioral health resources across the state from July 1 to late October, the organization said. Eyanson said the previous system had other system navigation tools that were not as accessible, as some had eligibility requirements. Both the “Your Life Iowa” line and the 988 lifeline existed before the transition, but Eyanson said the lines are being emphasized in the new system as another tool for providing immediate assistance to those in need. “What we are trying to do is get people connected sooner,” Eyanson said. “The most common reason folks get sicker with behavioral health-related issues is because they waited to get care, [or] they didn’t know where to go,” Eyanson said. Semprini said Iowa has a shortage of health care providers, and while there are increasing options through telehealth, peer support can also help bridge the gap. She thinks NAMI has been supported by Iowa PCA in prioritizing peer support services. Eyanson said the streamlining of services in the new system should help retain providers across Iowa, fighting the provider shortage nationwide. According to the HRSA, more than 122 million Americans live in an area facing a shortage of mental health professionals. The Association of American Medical Colleges reported Iowa was 44th in the nation in patient-to-physician ratio in 2024. The data represent all physicians, not just behavioral health professionals. “We find that within services and systems that are complex, sometimes people will leave the profession just because they’re done having to deal with the noisiness of that level of administrative effort,” Eyanson said. Existing barriers to behavioral health care Sullivan, the Johnson County supervisor who has 35 years of experience in the behavioral health field, said while access to services is a nationwide problem, it only gets more difficult in rural areas. However, the issue has more to do with proper funding, compared to the system used to deliver services. He said the new system will turn out worse for Iowans, and previous barriers to care will continue within the new system because state funding for services is not increasing. “Iowa does not adequately fund Medicaid,” Sullivan said. “No matter how you provide the service, if they are not funding it adequately, you can’t do what is necessary.” According to a 2025 report from the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit providing research on health policy, Iowa has the highest rate of mental illness among non-elderly Medicaid recipients, at 51 percent. Medicaid funding is split between the state and federal government. In budget year 2025, $2. 2 billion in state funds and $6. 8 billion in federal funds were appropriated in Iowa for Medicaid. Sullivan no longer sits on a state behavioral health advisory board, as district boards do not have direct interaction with county supervisors. “They are taking the county’s output out of the process and moving it to a state-driven system,” Sullivan said. “Everything state-driven ends up being, in my opinion, worse, because [it is] more removed from the people.” Johnson County Supervisor Lisa Green-Douglass said county-level influence in the system had been decreasing since the realignment was developed and passed into law in March 2024, noting the new governing board, the District 7 Advisory Council, does not include any elected officials. Green-Douglass said having elected officials on the board allows it to be held accountable, “because if they are unhappy with what you are doing, you don’t get reelected.” Semprini works on the new advisory council as both a provider and advisor as a person who has lived experience with mental illness and said even though there are no elected officials on the board, Iowa PCA and Iowa HHS have worked to get input from a wide variety of sources. These sources include patients, law enforcement, and elected officials, on the transition. Sullivan said the new system intends to fix barriers to care throughout Iowa, but he doesn’t think it will be possible without funding increases. “We are going to see less availability [of services],” Sullivan said. “We might see some improvements on some of the very acute stuff, but I would expect things are going to get worse and not better.” Sullivan said he still attends a monthly system of care meeting in Johnson County to discuss access to services, and while he feels like he still has adequate knowledge about the system and services, he no longer has direct input. Redistributing funds Eyanson said while the distribution and organization of state-appropriated funds for the behavioral health system have changed, the dollar amount has not. For fiscal 2026, $236 million has been allocated for the system, a number that has not changed from fiscal 2025. Iowa Rep. Timi Brown-Powers, D-Waterloo, said not only is the behavioral health system not funded enough, but she foresees cuts considering the recent projections that the Iowa revenue is projected to fall $800 million in fiscal 2026, leading to potential complications with the state budget. Eyanson said she does not anticipate any changes in the amount of funding appropriated to Iowa’s behavioral health system, even in light of potential budget difficulties and revenue falls. Brown-Powers said the new behavioral health system looks good “on paper” but will be ineffective without proper funding. Eyanson said the “streamlined administrative effort” prioritized in the new system, particularly through the use of Iowa PCA as an Administrative Service Organization, has saved the state money, which is being reinvested to expand services, such as school-based behavioral health care and system navigation. Eyanson said while the installation of the statewide system was only a few months ago, she has already received feedback in spaces that are improving, including reduced administrative effort from providers. “That means providers get to spend more time being providers,” she said. Eyanson emphasized the goals of Iowa HHS in providing services to all Iowans more efficiently and effectively than before. “It really doesn’t matter where you are, where you sit, who you are you should be able to get connected to the services, the resources that you need, and be able to feel confident about how to do it,” Eyanson said.
https://dailyiowan.com/2025/11/18/iowas-mental-health-revamp-shows-little-change/
What One Attorney General Learned From Suing Trump 46 Times
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. In Trump 1. 0, a loose coalition of democratic attorneys general worked to resist the administration’s forays into lawless power grabs. In Trump 2. 0, the chief law-enforcement officers of 23 blue states have become an organized, surgical, and vital bulwark against the White House’s assaults on the Constitution. California Attorney General Rob Bonta has been one of the busiest. On this week’s Amicus podcast, Bonta explained his state’s developing litigation strategy to Dahlia Lithwick. Their conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity. Dahlia Lithwick: If my math is correct, as California’s attorney general, you are now signed off on 46 lawsuits against the Trump administration. That is a lot. How does your office decide what’s worthy of a suit and what goes on the back burner? How do you decide what’s a priority? Rob Bonta: We don’t have the luxury of choosing. We have one simple position: If Trump breaks the law and it hurts the state of California, we sue him. If he doesn’t break the law, we don’t. So if he decides that he’s going to issue an executive order on Inauguration Day, after he just raised his right hand and swore to defend the Constitution, then goes into another room to issue an executive order that violates the Constitution, we sue. He decides he’s going to issue an Office of Management and Budget memo that tries to withhold $3 trillion worth of critical funding to the states that Congress has already appropriated, we sue. He decides he’s going to impose unlawful tariffs, or invade the privacy of Americans through DOGE’s access to bank accounts and Social Security information, we sue. He decides that he’s going to deploy the National Guard unlawfully to states, then we respond. We stand at the outer boundary of his authority, and we say, You cannot cross this line. We are here to push you back and to cabin you, and we hold you accountable to the actual authority that you have, but you can’t cross this line. You can’t take Congress’ authority, you can’t take this state’s authority, and you can’t violate the Constitution. And we meet him in court every time. We don’t want to sue him 46 times. I’d rather have sued him zero times, because that would mean he’s following the law. I think I have to ask you about the Netflix movie that plays in my head, in which all of the state attorneys general are sitting around on Zoom calls and war-gaming what’s coming next and what the states can do. This is not really a model that we thought about in law school, right? This is a new way of thinking about states and federalism and state power. This surging into the legal void by state elected officials and state law and state supreme courts to act as a bulwark against creeping authoritarianism-this is so not the way we learned to think about justice. What have you learned from the work you’re doing with other states and the work you’re doing inside your state about whether these litigation strategies might be a way out of this mess? When I was in law school, I dreamed about having a job in the law that was meaningful, that made a difference, that advanced our society and protected people’s rights. I wanted to use the law as a force for good. I never could have imagined I would be the attorney general of California, working with my incredible colleagues, a total of 23 Democratic attorneys general, fighting to defend the bedrock principles of our nation, our Constitution, the separation of powers, checks and balances, congressional authority, state sovereignty, rights, and freedoms, or that I’d be fighting to protect those things against the federal government, a federal government that would be weaponizing the government to try to undermine all those things. That wasn’t on my bingo card. But sometimes you don’t pick the moment, you don’t pick the scenario, it picks you. So we are all attorneys general in this moment. I couldn’t be more proud of my fellow AGs and of what we’ve created as a team, as a coalition of states. This model emerged in Trump 1. 0, when AGs started banding together, but it was a little more loose. There were far fewer cases. The pace was different, the stakes were different. I was a legislator at the time in California, watching it up close and personal and seeing the cases filed, and I’ve always called that “the rise of the AGs.” We have continued to be on that trajectory. The fact that it would be state AGs exercising state sovereignty, reminding the federal administration of separation of powers, checks and balances, acting as the constitutional authority holding the federal administration in check, wasn’t necessarily what I planned on, but it’s the brilliance of the design of our American democracy that there are checks and balances all over the Constitution and they can be ignited and used at the appropriate time. Here, it’s states led by state AGs pushing back against the unlawful conduct of the federal administration. Thus far, I’m grateful to say, we’ve been overwhelmingly effective, with 80 percent of the orders in our cases being in our favor and blocking and stopping unlawful conduct quite often. I’m not sure that you intended to say this, but I’d absolutely love it if you did. You said, “We are all attorneys general,” and I love that as a model of thinking about all of our roles going forward. Every single one of us has a responsibility, very similar to the one you just described, of seeing unlawful action and calling it out and fighting against it. Yes, we in the states have our own formal role as attorneys general. We’re in courts, and courts are a place where the law is applied to the facts and justice is delivered. But three things are really important right now. I call them the three C’s: courts, crowds, and courage. We state AGs are in courts, and others are in courts, including private plaintiffs, holding this administration accountable-but it’s important that everyone know that they have a role to call out unlawfulness and to call out injustice. Crowds are important, whether it be on “No Kings” Day or Hands Off marches, when the people come out en masse to remind this administration who their boss is. Trump’s bosses aren’t his billionaire buddies or greedy corporations. His boss is the people, you and me, us and we. We will have the final say. We’ll write the next chapter in the story of America. And, finally, courage is important. There’s a lot of intimidation, targeting, attempts to silence. Everyone in this country has an opportunity, and I would even say a duty and an obligation, to exercise the most potent power that there is, which is people power-to speak up against injustice and to call out unlawfulness and to demand more and better of our administration. AGs will play our role, but everyone has a role, and I encourage everyone to lean into that role in this moment.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/11/california-attorney-general-rob-bonta-trump-lawsuits.html?via=rss
Eric Adams Warns Israelis That Jews Might Not Be Safe in NYC After Mamdani Win: ‘I Would Be Concerned Right Now’
Outgoing New York City Mayor Eric Adams said Jewish residents of the city should be nervous as far-left Democrat Zohran Mamdani succeeds him. “If I was a Jewish New Yorker with children, I would be concerned right now,” he said in an interview with the Forward. “I think this is a period where they [Jews in New York City] need to be very conscious that there’s a level of global hostility towards the Jewish community,” Adams said Sunday. In 2024, anti-Semitic incidents were 54 percent New York City’s so-called hate crimes. “I’m not going to lie. I’m not going to pretend as though everything is fine,” Adams said. Mayor Adams, speaking about rising antisemitism, at first open-to-press event in Israel: “If I was a Jewish New Yorker with children, I would be concerned right now.. “I’m not just the mayor that’s leaving office, I’m your brother, and we will continue to stand side by side.” pic. twitter. com/7wtrg0ory8 Jacob N. Kornbluh (@jacobkornbluh) November 16, 2025 “There is something to be worried about,” Adams said in the interview, according to The New York Times, adding that “the community must prepare itself.” During the mayoral campaign, Adams said New York City would face “Islamic extremism” under Mamdani’s leadership. Mamdani representative Dora Pekec pushed back in a statement. “Zohran Mamdani was proud to earn the support of hundreds of thousands of Jewish New Yorkers and looks forward to both protecting and celebrating all Jewish New Yorkers as the next mayor of this city,” she said. During a visit to Israel, Adams said New Yorkers do not believe the same things as their mayor. “We want to clearly send the right message that 49 percent of New Yorkers made it clear that they don’t embrace the philosophy of anti-Israel. We still consider Israel as an ally and as a friend,” he said, according to the Times of Israel. During the visit, Israeli President Isaac Herzog said, “we are worried about how things will look post the mayoral elections in New York.” After Mamdani was elected, the Combat Anti-Semitism Movement said it had its work cut out for it. “Jewish New Yorkers are right to be alarmed,” the group’s Chief Government Affairs Officer Lisa Katz said, noting that Mamdani’s “radical outlook and history of antisemitic rhetoric should concern all New Yorkers.” “The Jewish community continues to face unprecedented antisemitic threat levels. Yet barring an improbable 180-degree ideological about-face from Mamdani, Jews in New York City will lack an ally in City Hall come January. If past is prologue, a Mamdani administration will refuse to recognize as antisemitism hate that vilifies and demonizes Jews on the basis of the Jewish people’s connection to Israel,” Katz said.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/eric-adams-warns-israelis-jews-might-not-safe/
MTG Slams Trump as Lawmakers Appear With Epstein Survivors Ahead of Vote
In a joint press conference with survivors of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, House lawmakers bashed President Donald Trump and Republican leadership ahead of the lower chamber’s vote to compel the release of the so-called “Epstein files.” Standing before survivors, longtime Trump sycophant and MAGA standardbearer Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) told reporters that the debacle over the Epstein files has been “one of the most destructive things to MAGA.” “I wasn’t ‘Johnny come lately’ to the MAGA train,” Greene said. “Watching the man that we supported early on [.] Watching this actually turn into a fight has ripped MAGA apart.” Greene has long supported transparency in the Epstein case, while Trump has pressured the nation to move on from the scandal. The president whose was once close friends with Epstein and whose name reportedly appears in the files recently revoked his endorsement of Greene, and repeatedly bash her as a “traitor” to his movement. The congresswoman addressed the president’s attacks on Tuesday. “I gave him my loyalty for free,” she said. “I’ve never owed him anything. But I fought for him for the policies and for America first. And he called me a traitor for standing with [survivors] and refusing to take my name off the discharge petition.” A bipartisan coalition of House members, led by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), bucked House leadership and Trump’s efforts to silence calls for the administration to follow through on its campaign promise for transparency regarding the cases against Epstein. The members spent months shoring up support for a discharge petition that would allow them to bring “The Epstein Files Transparency Act” to a floor vote without the approval of House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who has been allied with the president on the issue. Johnson for seven weeks stalled the swearing-in ceremony of Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.), who ultimately cast the vote to bring the resolution to the floor When it became clear the petition would be coming to a vote, Trump flipped his position, encouraging House Republicans to vote yes. Editor’s picks Survivors were not buying it. Halye Robinson, who worked closely with members of Congress to secure a vote to release the files, spoke directly to Trump: “To the president of the United States of America who is not here today. I want to send a clear message to you: while I do understand that your position has changed on the Epstein files and I’m grateful that you have pledged to sign this bill I can’t help to be skeptical of what the agenda is.” “I am traumatized. I am not stupid, I am traumatized,” she added. “You have put us through so much stress: the lockdowns, the halting of these procedures that were supposed to have happened 50 days ago. Adelita Grijalva, who waited to get sworn in. And then [you] get upset when your own party goes against you because what is being done is wrong. It’s not right.” Survivors and lawmakers who spoke called on the Senate to also pass the resolution, and criticized lawmakers including Johnson who only decided to lend their support after it became clear the vote had enough momentum to pass. “I think the speaker wants to save face,” Massie said. “He’s going to vote for a piece of legislation today that he’s disparaged for four months.” In a subsequent press conference, Johnson said “if and when” the legislation makes it to the Senate Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-Mont.) would take the time to carefully amend the act in order to assuage “concerns” about its scope. Trending Stories Johnson expressed worry that releasing the files “could ruin the reputations of completely innocent people, such as those who may just have known Epstein but knew nothing of his crimes or whose names he exploited and used to try to get close to his intended victims.” The American justice system exists precisely as the mechanism to try those accused of crimes, and fear of reputational damage is no reason to continue denying Epstein’s survivors the justice they deserve.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/mtg-epstein-survivors-files-vote-press-conference-1235467233/
