Pyrite President Targets Programs In Dem States

The Trump administration plans to freeze $10 billion in funding for child care subsidies, social services, and cash support for low-income families in five states controlled by Democrats. This move comes amid claims of widespread fraud throughout those states, though no evidence has been cited to support these claims beyond a major welfare fraud scheme uncovered in one of them.

The affected states—Minnesota, New York, California, Illinois, and Colorado—will lose access to approximately $7 billion in funding for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. TANF provides cash assistance to households with children, according to two people familiar with the matter.

In addition to the TANF cuts, the five states will also forfeit nearly $2.4 billion allocated for the Child Care Development Fund, which supports child care for working parents. They will also lose around $870 million in social services grants, which mostly benefit children at risk, the sources said.

This funding pause could jeopardize programs serving hundreds of thousands of low-income households in the affected states.

The planned freeze appears to build on the administration’s recent suspension of $185 million in annual aid to Minnesota day care centers. This action followed investigators’ findings that more than a dozen welfare fraud schemes in Minnesota had resulted in billions of dollars in taxpayer losses.

While no evidence has emerged to suggest that the other four Democratic states experienced similar widespread welfare fraud, Andrew Nixon, a spokesman for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)—the agency responsible for disbursing the funds—implied that the Minnesota fraud cases triggered the broader freeze.

“Democrat-led states and governors have been complicit in allowing massive amounts of fraud to occur under their watch,” Nixon said in a statement. “Under the Trump administration, we are ensuring that federal taxpayer dollars are being used for legitimate purposes.”

The funding freeze, initially reported by The New York Post, continues the Trump administration’s pattern of interrupting federal dollars to Democratic-run cities and states. This approach appears to leverage the disbursement of congressionally approved funding to punish perceived enemies and political opponents.
https://crooksandliars.com/2026/01/pyrite-president-targets-programs-five

After missing deadline, DOJ says it may need a ‘few more weeks’ to finish releasing Epstein files

WASHINGTON — The administration’s historic hostility to releasing the files, politicization of the Epstein case more broadly, and failure to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act have raised serious concerns.

In a statement, senators emphasized that a neutral assessment of the administration’s compliance with the statutory disclosure requirements is essential.

They stressed that full transparency “is essential in identifying members of our society who enabled and participated in Epstein’s crimes.”

___

Sisak reported from Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
https://whdh.com/news/after-missing-deadline-doj-says-it-may-need-a-few-more-weeks-to-finish-releasing-epstein-files/

Justices rule against Trump, for now

**Supreme Court Blocks Trump Administration’s Deployment of National Guard Troops in Chicago**

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to allow the Trump administration to deploy National Guard troops in the Chicago area to support its immigration crackdown, marking a significant setback for President Donald Trump’s efforts to send troops to U.S. cities.

The justices declined the Republican administration’s emergency request to overturn a ruling by U.S. District Judge April Perry, who had blocked the deployment of troops. An appeals court had also refused to intervene. Notably, the Supreme Court took more than two months to make its decision.

Three justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch—publicly dissented from the majority opinion. While the high court’s order is not a final ruling, it could influence other lawsuits challenging President Trump’s attempts to deploy the military in Democratic-led cities.

“At this preliminary stage, the Government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois,” the majority wrote.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed with the decision to keep the Chicago deployment blocked but expressed that the president should have more latitude to deploy troops in potential future scenarios.

This outcome represents a rare Supreme Court setback for President Trump, who had won repeated victories in emergency appeals since resuming office in January. The conservative-dominated court has allowed Trump to ban transgender individuals from the military, claw back billions in congressionally approved federal spending, take aggressive actions against immigrants, and remove Senate-confirmed leaders of independent federal agencies.

Democratic Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker praised Tuesday’s decision as a victory for both the state and the nation.

“American cities, suburbs, and communities should not have to face masked federal agents asking for their papers, judging them for how they look or sound, and living in fear that the President can deploy the military to their streets,” he said.

In contrast, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson stated that the president had activated the National Guard to protect federal personnel and property from “violent rioters.”

“Nothing in today’s ruling detracts from that core agenda. The Administration will continue working day in and day out to safeguard the American public,” she added.

Justices Alito and Thomas, in their dissenting opinion, argued that the court had no basis to reject the administration’s claim that troops were necessary to enforce immigration laws. Justice Gorsuch also dissented, stating he would have narrowly sided with the government based on declarations from federal law enforcement officials.
https://www.bostonherald.com/2025/12/23/justices-rule-against-trump-for-now/

Judge orders Trump administration to pay full SNAP benefits for November by Friday

A federal judge on Thursday ordered the Trump administration to pay full SNAP benefits for November by Friday, rejecting the administration’s plan to partially fund the food stamp program for 42 million Americans.

“People have gone without for too long,” Judge Jack McConnell said during a hearing in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island as he issued the order.

The decision came after plaintiffs in the case urged Judge McConnell to reject the administration’s proposed plan for partial benefits. The Trump administration had announced last week that it would not use a congressionally authorized contingency fund containing $4.65 billion to fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Like other federal programs, SNAP had no current appropriation because Congress has not approved a stopgap funding bill to reopen the U.S. government. As a result, the payment of full benefits was in question until the judge’s order.

The ruling ensures that millions of Americans who rely on SNAP will receive their full benefits for November.
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/06/snap-trump-food-stamps-shutdown.html