After Heated Debate, U.S. State of New Hampshire Delays Vote on Controversial Mining Bill

A legislative effort to make New Hampshire one of the most crypto-friendly states in the U.S. has stalled after lawmakers decided the proposal needed more scrutiny. The measure, known as House Bill 639, sought to loosen restrictions on cryptocurrency mining. However, mounting concerns from residents and divided opinions in the state senate forced lawmakers to postpone any decision until further review is completed.

### Push for a Pro-Crypto Framework Meets Resistance

The bill’s architects aimed to establish New Hampshire as a hub for blockchain innovation by shielding miners from strict local regulations. It would have prevented municipalities from imposing special taxes, energy caps, or noise restrictions on mining operations—effectively removing most local oversight.

Supporters argued that such protections were necessary to attract investment and give entrepreneurs the freedom to participate in a growing global industry. But that approach quickly became contentious.

Members of the Senate Commerce Committee struggled to reach consensus, splitting twice before voting 4-2 to refer the proposal for additional study. Lawmakers said the issue raised complex questions about energy management, zoning, and residents’ rights to protect their communities from industrial-scale data operations.

### Public Opposition Centers on Energy, Noise, and Oversight

Public engagement on the bill was unusually high. Senator Tara Reardon, who represents Concord, said her office received more messages about crypto mining than on any other legislative topic in her career.

Many residents objected to the idea of stripping towns and cities of the ability to regulate the size and energy usage of mining facilities. Environmental groups warned that granting broad exemptions could overwhelm local power grids and undermine the state’s carbon-reduction goals.

Crypto mining, particularly for Bitcoin, depends on vast networks of energy-intensive machines competing to validate transactions. Although the sector has made measurable progress toward cleaner energy—research from the MiCA Crypto Alliance and Nodiens suggests coal’s share in Bitcoin mining has fallen from 63% in 2011 to 20% in 2024—the industry still faces heavy criticism over its environmental footprint.

### A Global Tightrope Between Innovation and Regulation

New Hampshire’s hesitation reflects a worldwide dilemma. In Canada, the province of Manitoba has extended its moratorium on new mining projects to safeguard electricity supplies, while Russia has moved to formalize crypto mining through new regulations that stop short of full legalization.

Around the globe, governments are wrestling with how to harness blockchain’s economic benefits without destabilizing power systems or violating environmental commitments.

### What Comes Next

The New Hampshire Senate has opted to revisit the issue in 2026, giving regulators and industry experts time to conduct a deeper analysis of mining’s economic and environmental impact.

While the delay frustrates advocates of digital-asset innovation, it also signals the state’s intent to find a middle ground—one that supports technological growth without sacrificing local governance or sustainability.

For now, the Granite State remains on the sidelines of America’s crypto-mining race, choosing deliberation over deregulation.

*The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice.*
https://coindoo.com/after-heated-debate-u-s-state-of-new-hampshire-delays-vote-on-controversial-mining-bill/

North Korea’s AI Hackers Redefine Crypto Crime in 2025

North Korea’s Hackers Have Found a New Weapon—and It’s Not Quantum Computing

In 2025 alone, state-sponsored groups like the Lazarus Group have stolen more than $2 billion in cryptocurrency, using artificial intelligence (AI) to supercharge every stage of their operations. AI now scans thousands of smart contracts within minutes, identifies exploitable code, and automates multi-chain attacks that were once limited to elite cyber teams.

AI at the Core of Modern Crypto Heists

The record-breaking $1.5 billion Bybit hack in February 2025 marked a turning point. Investigators from Elliptic and TRM Labs revealed that North Korean hackers employed AI-driven reconnaissance tools and deepfake recruiter profiles to infiltrate internal systems.

Once inside, AI algorithms detected weaknesses, executed exploits, and routed stolen funds through Tron-based mixers and over-the-counter brokers—masking their trail with near-machine precision.

Cybersecurity experts note that AI now handles the entire attack lifecycle, from writing malicious code to generating phishing lures and managing laundering paths. As one analyst from Mysten Labs put it, “Large language models have made cybercrime scalable; even small teams can now operate like industrial-scale hackers.”

Quantum Computing Isn’t the Immediate Threat

While quantum computing remains a long-term risk, no existing system can yet break Bitcoin’s ECDSA encryption. Experts estimate it will take a decade or more before quantum decryption becomes realistic.

The immediate challenge, they say, is defending against adaptive AI models that evolve faster than traditional security protocols.

Industry Adapts to AI-Driven Threats

Exchanges and DeFi projects are now urged to run continuous, AI-aware security audits that scan for vulnerabilities as quickly as attackers do. Firms like Elliptic, Chainalysis, and Mandiant are integrating AI-based monitoring tools to track suspicious fund flows and detect AI-generated phishing campaigns.

Some blockchain projects, including Mysten Labs and Algorand, are already preparing for quantum threats by developing quantum-resistant cryptography—ensuring long-term resilience while addressing today’s AI risks.

The Bottom Line

As North Korea’s hackers weaponize AI, the global crypto industry faces a new reality: machine-driven crime that learns, adapts, and scales at lightning speed. Defending against it will require the same technology that made it possible—AI fighting AI.

FAQs

  • How have North Korean hackers used AI in cryptocurrency thefts?
    They use AI to scan smart contracts for vulnerabilities, automate attacks, create phishing lures, and manage laundering processes.
  • Is quantum computing currently a threat to Bitcoin’s encryption?
    No, quantum decryption is estimated to be at least a decade away from being practical.
  • What measures are being taken to combat AI-driven cyber threats?
    Continuous AI-aware security audits, AI-based monitoring of transaction flows, and development of quantum-resistant cryptography.
  • Why is AI making cybercrime more scalable?
    Because AI automates many complex tasks, allowing even small hacker teams to carry out large-scale operations.
  • What role do blockchain projects play in future-proofing crypto security?
    They are developing quantum-resistant algorithms and incorporating advanced AI tools to detect and prevent attacks.

https://coinpedia.org/news/north-koreas-ai-hackers-redefine-crypto-crime-in-2025/