Artemis II crew clears Earth orbit, heads for the moon

The Orion capsule and its three-man, one-woman crew successfully broke out of Earth orbit and headed for the moon Thursday evening, hours after NASA’s mission management team cleared the Artemis II crew for a critical rocket firing. The shuttle-era Orbital Maneuvering System engine at the base of the Orion capsule’s service module began firing for five minutes and 50 seconds starting at about 7: 50 p. m. EDT as the spacecraft raced through the low point of its elliptical orbit. The engine firing provided a slingshot-like boost to the Orion, speeding it up to some 25, 000 mph, the velocity needed to break free of Earth’s gravitational clasp for a four-day trek to the moon. NASA’s Mission Management Team had met earlier in the day, and after reviewing the Orion’s near-flawless performance, cleared the spacecraft and its crew for the critical trans-lunar injection, or TLI burn, a make-or-break milestone for the lunar fly around. “Hey just to make it clear in the open here, we are go for TLI after the MMT concluded their deliberations a few minutes ago, and we’re going to proceed down that path and get ready for the burn here,” lead Flight Director Jeff Radigan radioed the crew. Replied Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen: “We love those words. And we’re loving the view. We’re falling back to Earth real fast and looking forward to accelerating back to the moon.” Launched from the Kennedy Space Center Wednesday, Artemis II commander Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch and Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen spent their first “day” in space testing their Orion capsule’s myriad systems. They also tested the capsule’s maneuverability and adjusted its highly elliptical orbit to line them up for a trajectory to the moon, one that will carry them around the lunar far side Monday and then back to Earth late next week. Wiseman and his crewmates are the first astronauts to fly aboard a Lockheed Martin-built Orion spacecraft and the first to head for the moon since the final Apollo mission in December 1972. In the process, they’re expected to travel farther from Earth than anyone before them, reaching a distance of some 252, 455 miles as they fly behind the moon, beating a record set by the crew of Apollo 13 in 1970. But the major goal of the flight, along with putting the Orion through its paces, is to test the planning, procedures and flight control techniques needed for managing upcoming moon landing missions after a half-century gap between the Artemis and Apollo programs. The Artemis II flight is seen by NASA as a trailblazer, demonstrating the Orion crew ferry ship can safely carry astronauts to the moon and back on a regular basis while setting the stage for one, and possibly two, landings near the moon’s south pole in 2028. Amid planning for those flights, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman says the agency will send up another Orion crew next year to rehearse rendezvous and docking procedures with moon landers being built by SpaceX and Blue Origin. That flight, Artemis III, will be carried out in low-Earth orbit. Isaacman says NASA will spend $20 billion over the next seven years to speed up the launch rate to a moon landing every six months while building a base near the moon’s south pole.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/artemis-ii-crew-clears-earth-orbit-heads-for-moon/

Formation of oceans within icy moons could cause the waters to boil

Our explanation of the outer Solar System has revealed a host of icy moons, many with surface features that suggest a complex geology. In some cases, these features-most notably the geysers of Enceladus-hint at the presence of oceans beneath the icy surfaces. These oceans have been ascribed to gravitational interactions that cause flexing and friction within the moon, creating enough heat to melt the body’s interior. Something that has received a bit less attention is that some of these orbital interactions are temporary or cyclical. The orbits of any body are not always regular and often have long-term cycles. That’s also true for the other moons that provide the gravitational stress. As a result, the internal oceans may actually come and go, as the interiors of the moons melt and refreeze. A new study, released today by Nature Astronomy, looks at one of the consequences of the difference in density between liquid water and ice (about 10 percent): the potential for the moon’s interior to shrink as it melts, leaving an area of low pressure immediately below its icy shell. If the moon is small enough, this study suggests, that could cause the surface of the ocean to boil. Shifting ice It can be tempting to think of the Solar System’s current configuration as being relatively static. But that’s definitely not the case; there are plenty of hints that the outer planets moved around a bit early in their history. And, even in its present state, the Earth experiences long-term orbital cycles that drive its entry to and exit from ice ages. The moon systems of the outer planets have the potential for even more complex interactions, with many individual bodies of varying sizes sharing space with a giant planet. So, it’s easy to think that any oceans are the product of constant forces, and so they were always present. Or that the moons started out hot due to their formation and have been gradually cooling since. But the reality is that the tidal heating that drives the formation of these oceans can come and go over time, and that the moons may experience periodic meltings and re-freezings. That can have significant consequences on the stresses experienced by the icy shells of these moons. Water is significantly less dense than ice. So, as a moon’s ocean freezes up, its interior will expand, creating outward forces that press against the gravity holding the moon together. The potential of this transition to shape the surface geology of a number of moons, including Europa and Enceladus, has already been explored. So, the researchers behind the new work decided to look at the opposite issue: what happens when the interior starts to melt? Rather than focus on a specific moon, the team did a general model of an ice-covered ocean. This model treated the ice shell as an elastic surface, meaning it wouldn’t just snap, and placed viscous ice below that. Further down, there was a liquid ocean and eventually a rocky core. As the ice melted and the ocean expanded, the researchers tracked the stresses on the ice shell and the changes in pressure that occurred at the ice-ocean interface. They also tracked the spread of thermal energy through the ice shell. Pressure drop Obviously, there are limits to how much the outer shell can flex to accommodate the shrinking of the inner portions of the moon that are melting. This creates a low-pressure area under the shell. The consequences of this depend on the moon’s size. For larger moons-and this includes most of the moons the team looked at, including Europa-there were two options. For some, gravity is sufficiently strong to keep the pressure at a point where the water at the interface remains liquid. In others, the gravity was enough to cause even an elastic surface to fail, leading to surface collapse. For smaller moons, however, this doesn’t work out; the pressure gets low enough that water will boil even at the ambient temperatures (just above the freezing point of water). In addition, the low pressure will likely cause any gasses dissolved in the water to be released. The result is that gas bubbles should form at the ice-water interface. “Boiling is possible on these bodies-and not others-because they are small and have a relatively low gravitational acceleration,” the researchers conclude. “Consequently, less ocean underpressure is needed to counterbalance the [crustal] pressure.” How small does a moon have to be? Only three of the moons they examined are likely to have boiling oceans. One of them is Enceladus, famed for the geysers it produces in its southern hemisphere. Two others are Mimas, a small moon of Saturn, and Miranda, which orbits Uranus. Mimas is especially intriguing, given that evidence suggests that it might have recently developed its ocean (at least recently in astronomical terms). None of this requires an especially deep ocean. The researchers estimate that Enceladus would only need to melt an ocean about 14 km deep in order to create the conditions where boiling is possible; for Mimas, it’s only five kilometers. The researchers are careful to acknowledge that we don’t really know the implications of this, writing, “The fate of vapor generated in a subsurface ocean is uncertain.” They suggest it could act a bit like the liquid magma does in our crust, forcing its way into fractures and imperfections in the icy crust. The water should be cool enough to condense there, while others gasses released from the water should remain in the gaseous phase, potentially extending any fractures. The real question is what any of this means from the perspective of the surface. It’s possible that the failure of the crust due to the lack of pressure will create different surface features from the sort of thing caused by gas-driven fracturing. Unfortunately, the three moons where that sort of event might be happening don’t look a whole lot like each other. So, it’s possible that we’ll need to have more examples than our Solar System can provide to get a clear picture of what’s going on. Nature Astronomy, 2025. DOI: 10. 1038/s41550-025-02713-5 (About DOIs).
https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/11/formation-of-oceans-within-icy-moons-could-cause-the-waters-to-boil/